Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm thinking of buying a good sauté pan. I've considered a few brands, but
I also ran across copper pans. That got me thinking, copper is expensive, but is it truly the best? I don't mind spending a few bucks more for a once in a lifetime buy. Brands I've looked at on the web so far are Ruffoni, Mauviel, Bourgeat. Any thoughts? Suggestions? Tinned versus stainless? -- Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome/ |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:52:32 -0400, "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:
>I'm thinking of buying a good sauté pan. I've considered a few brands, but >I also ran across copper pans. That got me thinking, copper is expensive, >but is it truly the best? I don't mind spending a few bucks more for a once >in a lifetime buy. > >Brands I've looked at on the web so far are Ruffoni, Mauviel, Bourgeat. > >Any thoughts? Suggestions? Tinned versus stainless? For me, copper is worth the price. One major reason is quicker response to heat changes. Tinned pans are much cheaper, and they respond even quicker than ss-lined copper, but you probably don't want to mess with tinned pans because they require extra care to avoid overheating and melting the tin, they can be damaged by steel utensils, there may be health concerns, and tinning can be both expensive and a hard service to find. I have a place that does tinning a mile away (La Cuisine), and I still wouldn't have a tinned pan. The minor negatives I see to copper are maintenance (not a problem for me, but then I don't insist on shiny copper bottoms, either), weight, and the fact that all the copper saute pans I know of have riveted handles, and those rivet heads are a small pain-in-the-butt when making things like risotto. Oh, and they're not of any use should you switch to induction in the future. IMO, it pays to buy the heaviest gauge copper you can find for a saute pan. Dehillerin, in Paris, stocks copper saute pans from 2.0 mm to 3.5mm. I bought the 3.5 mm 12-inch, 4-inches deep, and lugged that mama home in my suitcase -- well worth the effort, as it's my favorite pan. I also have two 3 mm 8-inch copper sautes, and they're probably the most frequently used pans in our kitchen. Another point I find interesting: the stainless interior of my French ss-lined copper pans cleans up much, much easier than any of my All Clad or Tramontina pans. Maybe the ss is of higher quality, or better polished -- never have figured out why. -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pltrgyst" > wrote in message > > Tinned pans are much cheaper, and they respond even quicker than ss-lined > copper, but you probably don't want to mess with tinned pans because they > require extra care to avoid overheating and melting the tin, they can be > damaged > by steel utensils, there may be health concerns, and tinning can be both > expensive and a hard service to find. I have a place that does tinning a > mile > away (La Cuisine), and I still wouldn't have a tinned pan. Getting a saute pan tinned is about $50 plus freight from what I've seen. I'm leaning to the SS though as I think it may be less likely to have a problem from heating. I like the traditional hammered pan such as the Opera series from Ruffoni, but the SS just seems more practical. Ruffoni has the Modern line but I've not seen anyone selling it yet. > > The minor negatives I see to copper are maintenance (not a problem for me, > but > then I don't insist on shiny copper bottoms, either), weight, and the fact > that > all the copper saute pans I know of have riveted handles, and those rivet > heads > are a small pain-in-the-butt when making things like risotto. Oh, and > they're > not of any use should you switch to induction in the future. Just bought a new Bertazoni gas range so no chance of changing to induction unless propane is no longer available. Ir the price hits $20 a gallon. > > IMO, it pays to buy the heaviest gauge copper you can find for a saute > pan. > Dehillerin, in Paris, stocks copper saute pans from 2.0 mm to 3.5mm. I > bought > the 3.5 mm 12-inch, 4-inches deep, and lugged that mama home in my > suitcase -- > well worth the effort, as it's my favorite pan. I also have two 3 mm > 8-inch > copper sautes, and they're probably the most frequently used pans in our > kitchen. Does the 3.5 mm come with a block and tackle to lift it? Probably too heavy for my wife. Most of what I've seen is 2.5. Thanks for the reply |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> I'm thinking of buying a good sauté pan. I've considered a few brands, but > I also ran across copper pans. That got me thinking, copper is expensive, > but is it truly the best? I don't mind spending a few bucks more for a once > in a lifetime buy. > > Brands I've looked at on the web so far are Ruffoni, Mauviel, Bourgeat. > > Any thoughts? Suggestions? Tinned versus stainless? If looks are more important to you than cooking performance *and* you are lazy, avoid Cu like poison. I, myself, have *never* polished my Cu pans and they look like it. I have three Cu saute pans, two 10" round and very heavy. The other is light, oblong and only used for dishes going into the oven destined for presentation. The round pans' handles are riveted though, the oblong is blind riveted. All are nickel lined. Unless you are allergic to nickel (which is very rare) I think that is the way to go. The SS/Cu pans I have seen look like they have a flash of Cu on a SS pan. That is just annoying because you have the look and care of Cu and none (or nearly none) of the advantages. The pans I have are primarily Cu with Ni plating (95Cu/5Ni, I would guess), so they really act like copper pans. My everyday pans are Magnalite, so the advantages to me of the high conductivity of Cu are relatively minor, but for anything I want to cook that demands high heat for searing followed by low heat for finishing, Cu is marginally better. I use Cu for scallops, squid and shrimp, primarily. I also have a 2L, thin Cu pot. A complete waste of the $5 I paid for it. I only use it if it is the right size, or it is the only clean pot left:-) YMMV Matthew -- Thermodynamics and/or Golf for dummies: There is a game You can't win You can't break even You can't get out of the game |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matthew L. Martin" > wrote in message > The round pans' handles are riveted though, the oblong is blind riveted. > All are nickel lined. Unless you are allergic to nickel (which is very > rare) I think that is the way to go. The SS/Cu pans I have seen look like > they have a flash of Cu on a SS pan. That is just annoying because you > have the look and care of Cu and none (or nearly none) of the advantages. > The pans I have are primarily Cu with Ni plating (95Cu/5Ni, I would > guess), so they really act like copper pans. > I'm not considering the All Clad copper because you get all the work and just an exterior coating. I can find plenty of work without polishing copper every day. Mine will probably look like yours over time. Thanks for the reply -- Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome/ |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat 09 Aug 2008 10:52:32p, Edwin Pawlowski told us...
> I'm thinking of buying a good sauté pan. I've considered a few brands, > but I also ran across copper pans. That got me thinking, copper is > expensive, but is it truly the best? I don't mind spending a few bucks > more for a once in a lifetime buy. > > Brands I've looked at on the web so far are Ruffoni, Mauviel, Bourgeat. > > Any thoughts? Suggestions? Tinned versus stainless? I can't offer you comparisons of the brands, Ed, but I have a very old Mauviel omelette pan with a tinned interior that I really love. I think current production is lined in stainless steel. This is the only pan I own that I hand wash. -- Date: August(VIII) 10th(X),2008(MMVIII) ******************************************* Countdown till Labor Day 3wks 3hrs 49mins ******************************************* Heute die Welt, Morgens das Sonnensystem! ******************************************* |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 10, 12:52 am, "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote:
> I'm thinking of buying a good sauté pan. I've considered a few brands.... You might like these: http://www.falkculinair.com/ |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message ... > I'm thinking of buying a good sauté pan. I've considered a few brands, > but I also ran across copper pans. That got me thinking, copper is > expensive, but is it truly the best? I don't mind spending a few bucks > more for a once in a lifetime buy. > > Brands I've looked at on the web so far are Ruffoni, Mauviel, Bourgeat. > > Any thoughts? Suggestions? Tinned versus stainless? > -- > Ed Ed, curious about your post and future purchase, I decided to read a little about copper pans. Fantes (www.fantes.com) says this about tinned lined copper pans. "Our tin lined pans are lined by hand, and will display some brush strokes as a result. Lining by hand insures thicker coats of tin, that will last much, much, much longer than pans that are electroplated." Fantes must be referring to "Mauviel" copper pans, as that is the only brand I see they cover. So, if you decide on tinned vs. ss, Mauviel might be the answer for you. However, since I am unknowledgeable regarding this, maybe most good copper pans are all 'lined by hand." ?? Dee Dee |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Copper Chef Cookware Alternatives? | General Cooking | |||
Gaillard Copper Cookware | Cooking Equipment | |||
Copper cookware | Cooking Equipment | |||
Why is copper cookware so expensive? | Cooking Equipment | |||
Copper cookware thickness | Cooking Equipment |