Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We presently have a glasstop ceramic cooktop. We have now had a second
burner burn out and are thinking of replacing it with an Induction Cooktop. We are using All Clad Stainless cookware. I would like to hear all the pros and cons about making this change. Thanks for any and all help. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:04:12 GMT, hahabogus > wrote:
>trvlnmny > wrote in news:f2e4d419-7250-4897-97a5- : > >> We presently have a glasstop ceramic cooktop. We have now had a second >> burner burn out and are thinking of replacing it with an Induction >> Cooktop. We are using All Clad Stainless cookware. > >Again the only cons are the price and that you need special pans. Pans >that magnites can stick to, so no aluminum or stainless steel, only iron >and steel based pans. Not true. Some manufacturers, including All Clad, have recently reformulated all their stainless steel pots and pans to be induction-compatible. Check your stainless steel pot/pan base with a magnet to be sure. And some aluminum pot and pan manufacturers, including Circulon, have recently added new aluminum lines including thick steel-encapsulated bases which are induction-compatible. I recently bought an "Infinite Circulon" 7-qt. stock pot (with the locking strainer lid: http://tinyurl.com/5kt2uh) which works beautifully with my induction hob. I've never cared for Circulon, but this pot has very wide, comfortable handles, and is very stable to handle when full of liquid. Now we'll see what the interior bottom looks like after its first batch of my high-powered chili... 8 ![]() -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
pltrgyst wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:04:12 GMT, hahabogus > wrote: > >> trvlnmny > wrote in news:f2e4d419-7250-4897-97a5- >> : >> >>> We presently have a glasstop ceramic cooktop. We have now had a second >>> burner burn out and are thinking of replacing it with an Induction >>> Cooktop. We are using All Clad Stainless cookware. >> Again the only cons are the price and that you need special pans. Pans >> that magnites can stick to, so no aluminum or stainless steel, only iron >> and steel based pans. > > Not true. Some manufacturers, including All Clad, have recently reformulated all > their stainless steel pots and pans to be induction-compatible. Check your > stainless steel pot/pan base with a magnet to be sure. > > And some aluminum pot and pan manufacturers, including Circulon, have recently > added new aluminum lines including thick steel-encapsulated bases which are > induction-compatible. I recently bought an "Infinite Circulon" 7-qt. stock pot > (with the locking strainer lid: http://tinyurl.com/5kt2uh) which works > beautifully with my induction hob. I would have to be convinced that induction was a near miracle before I would replace my Magnalite pans. Some of mine are over 50 years old and still perform as designed. Matthew -- "All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people". Alexander Bullock ("My Man Godfrey" 1936): |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:07:18 -0500, "Matthew L. Martin" >
wrote: >I would have to be convinced that induction was a near miracle before I >would replace my Magnalite pans. Some of mine are over 50 years old and >still perform as designed. I feel the same way about the dozen or so 2.5 mm+ copper pans I've lugged back from Dehillerin in Paris. I'd hate to give them up. But temperature-sensing control is the killer application that makes induction worth it. Once you try it, I can't imagine giving it up. No more weeks of learning every new cooktop. When we make our next move, we know we'll never find a kitchen that satisfies us, so a kitchen rebuild will be priced in in advance. And we now know that kitchen will include two cooktops, side by side: one smoothtop electric, and one induction. And an indoor grill. And extra storage, so I can keep the copper pans and add additional induction-capable ones. -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
trvlnmny > wrote:
> We presently have a glasstop ceramic cooktop. We have now had a second > burner burn out and are thinking of replacing it with an Induction > Cooktop. We are using All Clad Stainless cookware. > I would like to hear all the pros and cons about making this change. > Thanks for any and all help. See <http://groups.google.com/group/rec.food.cooking/msg/fa594f3c58a0ad4c>. Victor |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "trvlnmny" > wrote in message ... > We presently have a glasstop ceramic cooktop. We have now had a second > burner burn out and are thinking of replacing it with an Induction > Cooktop. We are using All Clad Stainless cookware. > I would like to hear all the pros and cons about making this change. > Thanks for any and all help. If I were installing it into my countertop (I'm sure this the only way to buy an induction cooktop with more than one burner? or am I mistaken?) I would read many reviews of the different brands available to you if you live in the U.S. I recall reading at one time a year or so ago, one particular countertop brand (four burners) here in the U.S., (and there weren't many brands available), that had some not-so-good reviews. That's pretty frightening for something that costs so much. I do have a couple of induction hobs that I like. I started to use one a while ago outside, but got rained out, and finished up inside. Beef barley soup/stew. I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our fore'bears.' Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:45 -0500, "Dee Randall" > wrote:
> I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our fore'bears.' Ummm, Dee, if you're going to cook four bears outdoors, it must be going to be one heck of a party. I hope to be invited. We can make it there in a little over an hour... -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon 01 Dec 2008 03:40:54p, pltrgyst told us...
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:45 -0500, "Dee Randall" > > wrote: > >> I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our fore'bears.' > > Ummm, Dee, if you're going to cook four bears outdoors, it must be going > to be one heck of a party. I hope to be invited. We can make it there in > a little over an hour... > > -- Larry > It will take a lot longer than an hour to cook four bears. No need to rush. ![]() -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Monday, 12(XII)/01(I)/08(MMVIII) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Christmas Day 3wks 2dys 8hrs 7mins ************************************************** ********************** Vote Democrat--Washington needs more blood and Gore. ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message 5.250... > On Mon 01 Dec 2008 03:40:54p, pltrgyst told us... > >> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:45 -0500, "Dee Randall" > >> wrote: >> >>> I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our fore'bears.' >> >> Ummm, Dee, if you're going to cook four bears outdoors, it must be going >> to be one heck of a party. I hope to be invited. We can make it there in >> a little over an hour... >> >> -- Larry >> > > It will take a lot longer than an hour to cook four bears. No need to > rush. ![]() > > -- > Wayne Boatwright Darn, you guys, you got me smiling again. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon 01 Dec 2008 06:09:49p, Dee Randall told us...
> > "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message > 5.250... >> On Mon 01 Dec 2008 03:40:54p, pltrgyst told us... >> >>> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 15:59:45 -0500, "Dee Randall" > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our fore'bears.' >>> >>> Ummm, Dee, if you're going to cook four bears outdoors, it must be going >>> to be one heck of a party. I hope to be invited. We can make it there in >>> a little over an hour... >>> >>> -- Larry >>> >> >> It will take a lot longer than an hour to cook four bears. No need to >> rush. ![]() >> >> -- >> Wayne Boatwright > > > > Darn, you guys, you got me smiling again. > Dee Dee Well, just grin and *bear* it, Dee! ![]() -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Monday, 12(XII)/01(I)/08(MMVIII) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Christmas Day 3wks 2dys 5hrs 38mins ************************************************** ********************** Don't you just hate it when your boogers freeze? --Calvin ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:54:18 GMT, Wayne Boatwright >
wrote: >>> I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our fore'bears.' >> >> Ummm, Dee, if you're going to cook four bears outdoors, it must be going >> to be one heck of a party. I hope to be invited. We can make it there in >> a little over an hour... > >It will take a lot longer than an hour to cook four bears. No need to >rush. ![]() Well, the little baby bear should be ready long before the momma bear or the poppa bear. Just wait for the Thermopen to say "Just right!" -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon 01 Dec 2008 09:44:13p, pltrgyst told us...
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:54:18 GMT, Wayne Boatwright > > wrote: > >>>> I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our fore'bears.' >>> >>> Ummm, Dee, if you're going to cook four bears outdoors, it must be >>> going to be one heck of a party. I hope to be invited. We can make it >>> there in a little over an hour... >> >>It will take a lot longer than an hour to cook four bears. No need to >>rush. ![]() > > Well, the little baby bear should be ready long before the momma bear or > the poppa bear. Just wait for the Thermopen to say "Just right!" > > -- Larry > LOL! -- Wayne Boatwright (correct the spelling of "geemail" to reply) ************************************************** ********************** Date: Monday, 12(XII)/01(I)/08(MMVIII) ************************************************** ********************** Countdown till Christmas Day 3wks 2dys 1hrs 52mins ************************************************** ********************** Define the universe and give three examples. ************************************************** ********************** |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee Randall wrote:
> > If I were installing it into my countertop (I'm sure this the only > way to buy an induction cooktop with more than one burner? or am I > mistaken?) I would read many reviews of the different brands > available to you if you live in the U.S. > > I recall reading at one time a year or so ago, one particular > countertop brand (four burners) here in the U.S., (and there weren't > many brands available), that had some not-so-good reviews. That's > pretty frightening for something that costs so much. > > I do have a couple of induction hobs that I like. I started to use > one a while ago outside, but got rained out, and finished up inside. Beef > barley soup/stew. I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our > fore'bears.' Dee Dee! How lovely to see you posting ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > Dee Randall wrote: >> >> If I were installing it into my countertop (I'm sure this the only >> way to buy an induction cooktop with more than one burner? or am I >> mistaken?) I would read many reviews of the different brands >> available to you if you live in the U.S. >> >> I recall reading at one time a year or so ago, one particular >> countertop brand (four burners) here in the U.S., (and there weren't >> many brands available), that had some not-so-good reviews. That's >> pretty frightening for something that costs so much. >> >> I do have a couple of induction hobs that I like. I started to use >> one a while ago outside, but got rained out, and finished up inside. Beef >> barley soup/stew. I prefer cooking meat outdoors - like our >> fore'bears.' > > Dee Dee! How lovely to see you posting ![]() I guess you see me on the cross-posting; I don't post to rfc; just bread, wine, coffee & equipment. I don't see you often enough even when I do occasionally read the rfc at google. Ta Ta, dear. Dee dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.equipment
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:55:21 -0500, Dee Randall wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message > ... >> Dee Randall wrote: >>> >> >> Dee Dee! How lovely to see you posting ![]() > > > I guess you see me on the cross-posting; I don't post to rfc; just bread, > wine, coffee & equipment. > I don't see you often enough even when I do occasionally read the rfc at > google. > Ta Ta, dear. > Dee dee come back, dee! we can change! yourpal, blake |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Induction cooktop | General Cooking | |||
Anyone have Induction cooktop? | General Cooking | |||
Induction Cooktop | General Cooking | |||
Induction Cooktop | General Cooking | |||
Induction cooktop | Cooking Equipment |