Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi all
got a couple of the smaller globals and am pleased with them, I want to get a global workhorse and am tempted by the santoku Although i have never handled them, I like the idea of the extra blade width and feel more confident with that, I use light cleavers a lot and am used to that shape I got a global 24cm (9.5inch) chefs and returned it I found it too long and too thin in the width at the top few inches and a bit scary to use at speed, what does a chefs do that a santoku cant and vice versa? I also like their oriental chef - any thoughts on that Regards niall |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:36:45 +0100, "fourmations"
> wrote: >I got a global 24cm (9.5inch) chefs and returned it >I found it too long and too thin in the width at the top few inches >and a bit scary to use at speed, Was the knife you tried one of the heavier, forged models (GF) or one of the lighter line (G)? -- Larry |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hi larry and all
It was the G series stamped When i say I thought it was too thin: I mean the depth of the blade, where your knuckles would be I have another brand 8" chefs knife and it seems like global have kept the heel of their chefs the same height regardless of the lenght so the long ones are a more slim triangle (if you know what i mean) I am just a little concerned that the global santoku may be a little too short, I am happy enough with the weight of the G series as I have three chinese cleavers for heavy work regards -- niall "pltrgyst" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:36:45 +0100, "fourmations" > > wrote: > > >I got a global 24cm (9.5inch) chefs and returned it > >I found it too long and too thin in the width at the top few inches > >and a bit scary to use at speed, > > Was the knife you tried one of the heavier, forged models (GF) or one of the > lighter line (G)? > > -- Larry > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"fourmations" > wrote in message
news ![]() > hi all > > got a couple of the smaller globals and am pleased with them, > > I want to get a global workhorse and am tempted by the santoku > Although i have never handled them, > I like the idea of the extra blade width and feel more confident with > that, > I use light cleavers a lot and am used to that shape > > I got a global 24cm (9.5inch) chefs and returned it > I found it too long and too thin in the width at the top few inches > and a bit scary to use at speed, > > what does a chefs do that a santoku cant and vice versa? > > I also like their oriental chef - any thoughts on that > I think the main difference is related to your cutting style. If you are a rocker, keeping the tip on the board and rocking the knife up and down, then you will like a traditional chef's knife with a somewhat curved edge, such as Henckles. If you are more of a slicer, lifting the entire knife for each stroke, then something with a straighter edge will work great. -- Peter Aitken Visit my recipe and kitchen myths page at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Henckels Santoku knife | General Cooking | |||
TV Chefs and Real Chefs | General Cooking | |||
Santoku knife question | General Cooking | |||
santoku knife | General Cooking |