Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm debating between a Viking range and a Wolf range. I've heard that
Wolf has better quality than Viking. What's your opinion on these manifactures. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd get a Wolf if I had to choose between the two. Check them out in
real life, if possible. Blue Star (the former Garland) is said to be making excellent ranges. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com>,
> wrote: > I'm debating between a Viking range and a Wolf range. I've heard that > Wolf has better quality than Viking. What's your opinion on these > manifactures. I've had horrible experiences with Viking repair--still trying to get it rewired (a rodent chewed through the cabling); I'm probably going to have to do it myself. Unfortunately, the black paint (as opposed to the ceramic top) peels off instantly when touched with oven cleaner. Expect the oven igniters to be replaced every 2-3 years. I have an 8-burner, 2-oven range. The burner quality is much better than the oven. If I were to look at Viking again, it would only be for a cooktop. No Wolf experience. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Wiss > wrote:
> On 11 Oct 2005 06:31:57 -0700, wrote: > >I'm debating between a Viking range and a Wolf range. I've heard that > >Wolf has better quality than Viking. What's your opinion on these > >manifactures. > The issue of Consumer Reports that just came out reviews ranges. They > reviewed 18 gas models. The pro-style ranges: 3-Thermador, 14-Viking, and > 16-DCS. Under dual fuel they have eight: 1-Kitchenaid, 5-Wolf, 7-Dacor, and > 8-Viking. While I don't want to start a pro/con debate on Consumer Reports, I do wonder why they didn't include Blue Star, or does Blue Star not make a dual fuel model? Bill Ranck Blacksburg, Va. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've just completed a major kitchen remodel, and did a lot of research
on Wolf vs.Viking ranges. I was concerned about the quality and service issues I've read about with Viking, and ultimately chose the Wolf dual fuel. Reasons: I preferred the look of Wolf Wolf felt more solid, and offered more configuration options Viking does not offer a 60" dual fuel model I've only had my range installed for a few months, and I absolutely love it. I want to pass along the (only) experience I've had with Wolf service... After cleaning one of the ovens for the first time, I noticed small particles of porcelain had begun to flake around the corners of the oven. I called for service, and the distributor (Goldman Associates) promptly dispatched a technician to check it out. Two days later I got a call informing me that they would *replace* my range! This was done almost immediately, and there are no problems with the replacement. I could have gotten a much better price on Viking (a friend is a dealer), but I'm glad I decided on Wolf. I'd be happy to answer any other questions you have.... |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the feed back. I whish I could get a look at a Blue Star but
there is not a dealer near buy. Looks like Wof is my answer. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Viking vs Wolf vs DCS | Cooking Equipment | |||
Viking vs Wolf vs DCS | General Cooking | |||
Wolf V.S Viking | Cooking Equipment | |||
Wolf V.S Viking | Cooking Equipment | |||
Wolf V.S Viking | Cooking Equipment |