Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Cooking Equipment (rec.food.equipment) Discussion of food-related equipment. Includes items used in food preparation and storage, including major and minor appliances, gadgets and utensils, infrastructure, and food- and recipe-related software. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:01:04 -0400, Aileen > wrote:
>I have had my Thermador for almost five years. I find that the spills >burn onto the porcelain part and I can not find >a product where I live that is abrasive enough to remove the greasey gunk. >I am wondering if the nonsealed just require cleaning of the tray part >on rollers..... no porcelain bits. >I also was wondering if I recall correctly that non sealed burners >result in higher BTUs. > I have an older (30+ years) open burner range. With spills you will get a portion of the spill going down between the burner and the stovetop. If you have a drip pan then cleanup of the spill in the lower part is pretty easy. HOWEVER, not all of that spill goes conveniently down into the drip pan. You will still have parts of the spill on the surface of the cooktop and that can get burned in if you don't clean it up quick enough. There is also the problem that at high flame settings the flame will deposit a black, carbon film on the cooktop if the flame is close enough to the surface of the cooktop. This is extremely difficult to remove. This can happen with open or sealed burners. I would try a degreaser as has been suggested for the gunk. You have to be careful with abrasives with a porcelain coating as you will rub the porcelain coating off and have bare metal. You can also roughen up the surface of the porcelain and make it harder and harder to clean in the future. Sealed burners are not inherently less powerful than open burners as far as BTUs/HR go. Some of the multi-ring sealed power burners from Fisher & Paykel, Miele, Gaggenau, Windcrest, Elan etc. will produce just as powerful flames as the "pro-line" consumer open burner stoves. There are design differences that make a difference for specific applications. Single ring sealed burners with high BTUs/HR tend to throw the flame out more than the open burner multi-ring port models such as Blue Star. The Blue Star might perform better for concentrating the heat for wok cooking. Both designs would work fine for boiling large pots of water (pasta or seafood boils) or high temperature sauteing in large pans. The multi-ring sealed burners would concentrate the heat near the center like the Blue Star and should work well for wok cooking. I'm leaning towards a cooktop with a multi-ring sealed power burner and other single ring less powerful burners myself for my upgrade. Greg Muncill |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks to all... I now can "chew" on this info. I think I need a cup of
tea ![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aileen" > wrote in message ... > Hi all: > I presently own a Thermador 36" with griddle which I have had no > problems with to date. > I will be setting up a new kitchen and want to go to a 48" with grill. > One friend loves his Viking ....another person swears by wolf. > I want an all gas stove but I would like to know what advantages there > are between Wolf vs Viking and sealed vs non sealed burners. I would > like the opinions of as many folk as possible. > I presently have sealed burners and I do think they are a pain in the > @$$ to clean. What opinions do you guys have? > I am not interested in other brands...I only have access to Wolf and Viking. > Thanks for the help!!! Aileen in the Freezing North > This may sound strange, but I have found that a razor blade scraper helps in removing the most difficult burned-on deposits from a porcelain surface. Porcelain is basically glass, which is harder than the steel of the blade, so you don't scratch the porcelain. It's roughly analagous to scraping paint off a window pane after painting. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:55:50 -0500, "Dsorgnzd" > wrote:
> >This may sound strange, but I have found that a razor blade scraper helps in >removing the most difficult burned-on deposits from a porcelain surface. >Porcelain is basically glass, which is harder than the steel of the blade, >so you don't scratch the porcelain. It's roughly analagous to scraping paint >off a window pane after painting. > I'm not going to state that you are not able to clean your surface with a razor blade but most porcelain can be at the most as hard as glass or steel (your razor blade), but can also be softer. Most porcelains falls into a Mohs scale of hardness between 4 and 5.5. <http://www.porcelainenamel.com/pei502.htm> Glass is near the upper end of porcelain at 5.5 and steel can be 5.5 to 6.5 in hardness. <http://waldaninternational.com/hardnessDef.shtml> The porcelain and steel can vary according to composition. So, not scratching your porcelain does not mean not scratching someone else's porcelain. Also, if the porcelain has been roughened or abraded by using abrasives before using the razor blade, the ability to scrape the deposit will be degraded. Greg Muncill |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:12:51 -0400, Aileen > wrote:
>Thanks to all... I now can "chew" on this info. I think I need a cup of >tea ![]() Hi Aileen, One other thought... I too was an "all gas" fan, but eventually bought a dual fuel DCS (which, by the way, we are happy with. The virtue of the dual fuel is that we get better broiling and also have the self cleaning feature. Of course, the range top is "all gas." 'Just one more thing to consider... HTH, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aileen wrote:
> Hi all: > I presently own a Thermador 36" with griddle which I have had no > problems with to date. > I will be setting up a new kitchen and want to go to a 48" with grill. > One friend loves his Viking ....another person swears by wolf. > I want an all gas stove but I would like to know what advantages there > are between Wolf vs Viking and sealed vs non sealed burners. I would > like the opinions of as many folk as possible. > I presently have sealed burners and I do think they are a pain in the > @$$ to clean. What opinions do you guys have? > I am not interested in other brands...I only have access to Wolf and > Viking. > Thanks for the help!!! Aileen in the Freezing North > There was a recent thread on pro stoves in this group, check back about a week for it. There is also a substantial discussion on gardenweb.com, and if you're into paying $4.95 for a month's worth of access, the Consumer Reports site also has a discussion (but not formal reviews). From what I've been able to find on the web, Viking seems to have the worst rap when it comes to build quality and service, Wolf and Thermador seem to have some of the best feedback. Out of curiosity, how long have you had the Thermador? We currently have sealed burners on a 30" range, and I'm having trouble imagining why they would be more difficult to clean than non-sealed. Cheers - Gregg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
gas range advice needed | General Cooking | |||
Frigidaire gas range -- opinions needed | Cooking Equipment | |||
advice on gas range | General Cooking | |||
slide-in gas range advice | Cooking Equipment | |||
Timer Needed for GE Range | Cooking Equipment |