Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The english roasts where I shop usually come with a huge band of fat
and gristle. If you pot roast this thing should you trim some or all of that band? Or will it break down and add flavor? Could be a half pound or more of the weight you're purchasing. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
stark wrote:
> The english roasts where I shop usually come with a huge band of fat > and gristle. If you pot roast this thing should you trim some or all of > that band? Or will it break down and add flavor? Could be a half pound > or more of the weight you're purchasing. English Roast? That is a term I am not familiar with. I am not a huge fan of fat, but I will be the first to admit that it adds flavour. If you are roasting a good size chunk of beef you want to have some fat in there to keep it moist and to get some hot fat for Yorkshire puddings. Pot roast beef should not have too much fat on it. It will just end up as a lot of grease on top of the braising liquid and will have to be discarded before you thicken the juice. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Smith wrote: > stark wrote: > English Roast? That is a term I am not familiar with. It's a shoulder cut, usually 2 to 3 1/2 lbs. It's sort of a flat cut, the weight depending on the thickness. But this band, usually around half the outside, seems more than fat. Almost like a belt, 1/4 inch thick. I usually cut it off, but am wondering if I should leave it on for cooking, then trim it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Sat 23 Sep 2006 12:04:56p, stark meant to say...
> > Dave Smith wrote: >> stark wrote: >> English Roast? That is a term I am not familiar with. > > It's a shoulder cut, usually 2 to 3 1/2 lbs. It's sort of a flat cut, > the weight depending on the thickness. But this band, usually around > half the outside, seems more than fat. Almost like a belt, 1/4 inch > thick. I usually cut it off, but am wondering if I should leave it on > for cooking, then trim it. Personally, I would leave it on while cooking as it will add to both the texture and flavor of the meat and juices. The liquid can be defatted after cooking. -- Wayne Boatwright __________________________________________________ Useless Invention: Double-sided playing cards. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() stark wrote: > The english roasts where I shop usually come with a huge band of fat > and gristle. If you pot roast this thing should you trim some or all of > that band? Or will it break down and add flavor? Could be a half pound > or more of the weight you're purchasing. Some fat is necessary but no more than !/4"... and all silver skin and visible gristle should be trimmed away. If all that thick fat is on one side carefully trim away half in one piece and tie to the lean side. Sheldon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:14:50 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >English Roast? That is a term I am not familiar with. I am not a huge fan >of fat, but I will be the first to admit that it adds flavour. I only recently have seen English roasts in stores. I cut most of the fat off and made Italian beef with it. Turned out great. A local store had it on sale for $1.68 a pound so I bought several roasts. Excellent value. Lou |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Trimming Posts? | General Cooking | |||
trimming asparagus | General Cooking | |||
New scam alert! Non-English-speaking illegals as foster parentsof monolingual English U.S. kids! | General Cooking | |||
Trimming Spareribs | General Cooking | |||
Trimming Posts... | General Cooking |