People.

Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.

Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
to pedestrians.

Are you out of your ****ing minds?

People get killed for less than this these days.

You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.

That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.

cybercat wrote:
> People.
>
> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
> cars.
> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
> yielding to pedestrians.
>
> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>
> People get killed for less than this these days.
>
> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.

Double Amens on that one.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

cybercat wrote:
> People.
>
> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
>
> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
> to pedestrians.
>
> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>
> People get killed for less than this these days.
>
> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>
> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.

Is it okay to just moon them?

Sheldon Loony

One time on Usenet, "Sheldon" > said:
> cybercat wrote:

> > People.
> >
> > Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
> >
> > Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
> > to pedestrians.
> >
> > Are you out of your ****ing minds?
> >
> > People get killed for less than this these days.
> >
> > You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
> >
> > That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> Is it okay to just moon them?

Heh!! That's the best chuckle I've had all day... :-D

--
"Little Malice" is Jani in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

"Sheldon" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> cybercat wrote:
>> People.
>>
>> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
>> cars.
>>
>> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
>> yielding
>> to pedestrians.
>>
>> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>
>> People get killed for less than this these days.
>>
>> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>
>> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> Is it okay to just moon them?
>

YOU may, Sheldon. But only you.

Sheldon wrote:
> cybercat wrote:
>> People.
>>
>> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
>>
>> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
>> to pedestrians.
>>
>> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>
>> People get killed for less than this these days.
>>
>> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>
>> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> Is it okay to just moon them?

They'd die of disappointment if you didn't.

In article . com>,
says...
>
> cybercat wrote:
> > People.
> >
> > Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
> >
> > Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
> > to pedestrians.
> >
> > Are you out of your ****ing minds?
> >
> > People get killed for less than this these days.
> >
> > You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
> >
> > That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> Is it okay to just moon them?
>
> Sheldon Loony
>
>

I like that one.

In article >, says...
> People.
>
> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
>
> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
> to pedestrians.
>
> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>
> People get killed for less than this these days.
>
> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>
> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.

For the longest time in RI you could just record the license plate
number, go to the DMV, plunk down $5 and get all the info associated
with that plate number.

Very useful let me tell you, until someone figured out the bad things
one could do with that information. I had what is to me a very memorable
plate at the time, it's the same as my email address. I imagine I'd be
easy to find but then I had a stroke of luck - when working at the AG's
office I was legally allowed to change my registration info to the
office.

Imagine peoples surprise when they ran my plate and found out it came
out to the AG's office.

"T" > wrote

> For the longest time in RI you could just record the license plate
> number, go to the DMV, plunk down $5 and get all the info associated
> with that plate number.

You believe that? Same here, $25, I think. Who in the world
thought it would be a good idea to give out your personal information
to any schmo with 25 bucks??? It's crazy.

nancy

cybercat > wrote:
>People.
>
>Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
>
>Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
>to pedestrians.
>
>Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>
>People get killed for less than this these days.
>
>You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>
>That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.

The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
able to follow through.

So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.

--Blair

Nancy Young > wrote:
>
>"T" > wrote
>
>> For the longest time in RI you could just record the license plate
>> number, go to the DMV, plunk down $5 and get all the info associated
>> with that plate number.
>
>You believe that? Same here, $25, I think. Who in the world
>thought it would be a good idea to give out your personal information
>to any schmo with 25 bucks??? It's crazy.

Hey. You PAID to give them your information.

--Blair

"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
. ..
> cybercat > wrote:
>>People.
>>
>>Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
>>cars.
>>
>>Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
>>yielding
>>to pedestrians.
>>
>>Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>
>>People get killed for less than this these days.
>>
>>You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>
>>That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
> able to follow through.
>
> So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.
>

Bad assumption.

It is nearly always a bad idea to initiate aggression, genius.

People get hurt.

Over litter?

Over who goes first at an intersection?

cybercat > wrote:
>
>"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
...
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>People.
>>>Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
>>>cars.
>>>Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
>>>yielding
>>>to pedestrians.
>>>
>>>Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>>People get killed for less than this these days.
>>>You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>>That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>>
>> The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
>> able to follow through.
>> So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.
>
>Bad assumption.
>
>It is nearly always a bad idea to initiate aggression, genius.

Don't let the fact that I'm a genius convince you I can't
deal with aggression in all the ways it can develop.

>People get hurt.
>
>Over litter?
>
>Over who goes first at an intersection?

People get hurt when those things aren't dealt with, too.

--Blair

"T" > wrote in message
> Imagine peoples surprise when they ran my plate and found out it came
> out to the AG's office.

Why would they be surprised? There are a lot of arrogant assholes in
government office.

"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
. ..
> cybercat > wrote:
>>
>>"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
m...
>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>>People.
>>>>Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
>>>>cars.
>>>>Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
>>>>yielding
>>>>to pedestrians.
>>>>
>>>>Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>>>People get killed for less than this these days.
>>>>You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>>>That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>>>
>>> The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
>>> able to follow through.
>>> So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.
>>
>>Bad assumption.
>>
>>It is nearly always a bad idea to initiate aggression, genius.
>
> Don't let the fact that I'm a genius convince you I can't
> deal with aggression in all the ways it can develop.

Uh, right. You stud you.

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
>
> "T" > wrote in message
>> Imagine peoples surprise when they ran my plate and found out it came
>> out to the AG's office.
>
> Why would they be surprised? There are a lot of arrogant assholes in
> government office.
>
I wondered what this particular one did to make someone want to run it's
plates.

>
> Imagine peoples surprise when they ran my plate and found out it came
> out to the AG's office.
-------------
And what, please is "the AG's office??
Thanks

nancree asked:

>> Imagine peoples surprise when they ran my plate and found out it came
>> out to the AG's office.
> -------------
> And what, please is "the AG's office??
> Thanks

Attorney General

Bob

cybercat said...

> People.
>
> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
> cars.
>
> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
> yielding to pedestrians.
>
> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>
> People get killed for less than this these days.
>
> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>
> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.


The one and only time I exhibited road rage was in L.A. I was driving on
a two lane, two way city street on a blind uphill stretch when a cab
driver tried to pass me! When he got side by side, I threw my lit
cigarette into his cab! All I remember hearing was "What..." as he pulled
over to put out the fire.

The idiot could've killed us both if an oncoming car had come over the
hill.

No remorse,

Andy

In article . com>,
"Sheldon" > wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
> > People.
> >
> > Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
> >
> > Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
> > to pedestrians.
> >
> > Are you out of your ****ing minds?
> >
> > People get killed for less than this these days.
> >
> > You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
> >
> > That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> Is it okay to just moon them?
>
> Sheldon Loony

Careful...
Many folks carry a digicam now. In their cell phones most often. <G>

You never know what might appear on the internet......
--
Peace!
Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch"
-- Jack Nicholson

In article >,
Blair P. Houghton > wrote:

> cybercat > wrote:
> >People.
> >
> >Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
> >
> >Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
> >to pedestrians.
> >
> >Are you out of your ****ing minds?
> >
> >People get killed for less than this these days.
> >
> >You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
> >
> >That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
> able to follow through.
>
> So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.
>
> --Blair

Good point Blair. ;-)
--
Peace!
Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch"
-- Jack Nicholson

"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote

> The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
> able to follow through.
>
> So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.

Oh, no, you just reminded me of a pedestrian aggression
incident in my past. Hey, the guy almost hit me. Then
he tried to intimidate me for calling him a jerk! Oh, well,
he couldn't have known.

nancy

Nancy Young said...

>
> "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote
>
>> The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
>> able to follow through.
>>
>> So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.
>
> Oh, no, you just reminded me of a pedestrian aggression
> incident in my past. Hey, the guy almost hit me. Then
> he tried to intimidate me for calling him a jerk! Oh, well,
> he couldn't have known.
>
> nancy


That reminds me (I DON'T know why) of an incident where a woman in high-
heels accidently stepped "heel to toe" on my foot. OUCH!

She apoligized, "I'm so sorry".

I replied, "That's quite alright. I've got nine left."

What WAS I thinking!?? (VBG)

Andy

cybercat wrote:

> People.
>
> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their cars.
>
> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of yielding
> to pedestrians.
>
> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>
> People get killed for less than this these days.
>
> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>

We aren't initiating it. We are unleashing it.

"Andy" <q> wrote

> Nancy Young said...

>> Oh, no, you just reminded me of a pedestrian aggression
>> incident in my past. Hey, the guy almost hit me. Then
>> he tried to intimidate me for calling him a jerk! Oh, well,
>> he couldn't have known.

> That reminds me (I DON'T know why) of an incident where a woman in high-
> heels accidently stepped "heel to toe" on my foot. OUCH!
>
> She apoligized, "I'm so sorry".
>
> I replied, "That's quite alright. I've got nine left."
>
> What WAS I thinking!?? (VBG)

Heh heh, no, I wasn't wearing heels. But I think he learned
about using his signal.

nancy

Nancy Young said...

>
> "Andy" <q> wrote
>
>> Nancy Young said...
>
>>> Oh, no, you just reminded me of a pedestrian aggression
>>> incident in my past. Hey, the guy almost hit me. Then
>>> he tried to intimidate me for calling him a jerk! Oh, well,
>>> he couldn't have known.
>
>> That reminds me (I DON'T know why) of an incident where a woman in
high-
>> heels accidently stepped "heel to toe" on my foot. OUCH!
>>
>> She apoligized, "I'm so sorry".
>>
>> I replied, "That's quite alright. I've got nine left."
>>
>> What WAS I thinking!?? (VBG)
>
> Heh heh, no, I wasn't wearing heels. But I think he learned
> about using his signal.
>
> nancy


I've always figured you as the agrgessive type!

My kind of woman! <smootch>

Andy

Nancy Young wrote:

> > The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
> > able to follow through.
> >
> > So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.
>
> Oh, no, you just reminded me of a pedestrian aggression
> incident in my past. Hey, the guy almost hit me. Then
> he tried to intimidate me for calling him a jerk! Oh, well,
> he couldn't have known.
>

There are all sorts of jerks in the world who have no problems
screwing other people around and inconveniencing others and who
get away with it all the time. They are jerks, and they are
pretty well guaranteed to act even more the jerk when called on
their behaviour, but it may make them think the next time they
try it again. It has been suggested here that pedestrians should
be careful in their reactions to a jerk drivers because the
driver may become violent. By the same token, the drivers
should be learning that pedestrians may do the same.

Sorry, but I got fed up with bobbing and weaving to avoid
running into people in crowds. I stopped jumping out of their
way. I discovered that most of them are a lot more aware of
their surroundings than they let on. They are not completely
oblivious to your presence, just ignoring you so that they can
walk in front of you and know that you won't walk right into
them.

The other day when I had that encounter with the litterbug I
continued on my ride and I ran into four different groups of
cyclists coming the other way. In each one of those groups there
was at least one person riding alongside another cyclist. The
trail isn't wide enough for three. I watched each pair coming on
and the one on my side of the trail was always acting as if
totally unaware of our collision course. The first time I moved
over and said something, but the next three times I tried a
different approach. I moved to the middle and made it clear that
I was not yielding to them until the one on my side went back
into single file and then I moved over to the right.

"Andy" <q> wrote

> Nancy Young said...

>> Heh heh, no, I wasn't wearing heels. But I think he learned
>> about using his signal.

> I've always figured you as the agrgessive type!
>
> My kind of woman! <smootch>

(laugh) Perhaps you're not the shy type when someone almost
runs you over while you're walking, either? Maybe I shouldn't
have said Jerk, but what am I supposed to do when he then turns
around, pulls up right next to me and says, you better watch who
you call jerk. I only asked him (as I moved to face him) are you
*threatening me*? and explained the rules of the road, and how
a BIG STRONG JERK like you could manage the turn signal, no?

He didn't know I'm not originally from here. I had to take care of
myself before. I only looked like a pushover.

nancy

"Nancy Young" > wrote :
>
> (laugh) Perhaps you're not the shy type when someone almost
> runs you over while you're walking, either? Maybe I shouldn't
> have said Jerk

Saying "jerk," while probably not wise, is not the same as
physically assaulting someone by throwing trash in their window
or their car by striking it.

It is still not smart, though, because less has gotten people
seriously hurt.

What's his name actually had a point regarding aggression:
it is a choice, but if you are going to go that way, be sure
you have the biggest stick. I recommend a legal handgun.

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> cybercat said...
>
>> People.
>>
>> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
>> cars.
>>
>> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
>> yielding to pedestrians.
>>
>> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>
>> People get killed for less than this these days.
>>
>> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>
>> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
>
> The one and only time I exhibited road rage was in L.A. I was driving on
> a two lane, two way city street on a blind uphill stretch when a cab
> driver tried to pass me! When he got side by side, I threw my lit
> cigarette into his cab! All I remember hearing was "What..." as he pulled
> over to put out the fire.
>
> The idiot could've killed us both if an oncoming car had come over the
> hill.
>
> No remorse,
>

I think that was a healthy reflex. It served to get him to drop back, right?

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> nancree asked:
>
>>> Imagine peoples surprise when they ran my plate and found out it
>>> came out to the AG's office.
>> -------------
>> And what, please is "the AG's office??
>> Thanks
>
> Attorney General
>
> Bob

And they can (and I'm sure they do) employ just as many irritating people as
any other walk of life

Jill

OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
> In article . com>,
> "Sheldon" > wrote:
>
>> Is it okay to just moon them?
>>
>> Sheldon Loony
>
> Careful...
> Many folks carry a digicam now. In their cell phones most often. <G>
>
> You never know what might appear on the internet......



Do you honestly think Sheldon would care? He'd probably ask them to
wait while he struck a more obscene pose. ;-)

gloria p

cybercat said...

>
> "Andy" <q> wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat said...
>>
>>> People.
>>>
>>> Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into
>>> their cars.
>>>
>>> Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
>>> yielding to pedestrians.
>>>
>>> Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>>
>>> People get killed for less than this these days.
>>>
>>> You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>>
>>> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>>
>>
>> The one and only time I exhibited road rage was in L.A. I was driving
>> on a two lane, two way city street on a blind uphill stretch when a
>> cab driver tried to pass me! When he got side by side, I threw my lit
>> cigarette into his cab! All I remember hearing was "What..." as he
>> pulled over to put out the fire.
>>
>> The idiot could've killed us both if an oncoming car had come over
>> the hill.
>>
>> No remorse,
>>
>
> I think that was a healthy reflex. It served to get him to drop back,
> right?


Yes it sure did. I don't suppose he tried that ever again but what do I
know?

Andy

"Puester" > wrote:
> OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
>> "Sheldon" > wrote:
>>> Is it okay to just moon them?
>>
>> Careful... Many folks carry a digicam now. In their cell phones most
>> often. <G>
>>
>> You never know what might appear on the internet......
>
> Do you honestly think Sheldon would care? He'd probably ask them to wait
> while he struck a more obscene pose. ;-)

Some people do try really hard at that! ;-)

I wasn't real aware of youtube.com until Senator Allen's "maccaca moment" a
little while back. Boy, some of the things people post on youtube! ;-) Your
not kidding about people wanting it to be more obscene... or at least more
distasteful. There are some who try repeatedly to get in just under the
site's propriety limits and keep having their videos removed. These are not
videos of someone else... these are videos of themselves!

--
( #wff_ng_7# at #verizon# period #net# )

In article >, says...
>
> "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "T" > wrote in message
> >> Imagine peoples surprise when they ran my plate and found out it came
> >> out to the AG's office.
> >
> > Why would they be surprised? There are a lot of arrogant assholes in
> > government office.
> >
> I wondered what this particular one did to make someone want to run it's
> plates.
>
>
>

Don't know. It was offered when I took the job so I just did it.

Nancy Young said...

> I only looked like a pushover.
>
> nancy


Boink!

??

In article >,
Puester > wrote:

> OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
> > In article . com>,
> > "Sheldon" > wrote:
> >
> >> Is it okay to just moon them?
> >>
> >> Sheldon Loony
> >
> > Careful...
> > Many folks carry a digicam now. In their cell phones most often. <G>
> >
> > You never know what might appear on the internet......
>
>
>
> Do you honestly think Sheldon would care? He'd probably ask them to
> wait while he struck a more obscene pose. ;-)
>
> gloria p

<lol>!!!
--
Peace!
Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch"
-- Jack Nicholson

cybercat > wrote:
>
>"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
...
>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>
>>>"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote in message
om...
>>>> cybercat > wrote:
>>>>>People.
>>>>>Do not toss trash that others throw out of their cars back into their
>>>>>cars.
>>>>>Do not thump people's vehicles when they go right on red instead of
>>>>>yielding
>>>>>to pedestrians.
>>>>>
>>>>>Are you out of your ****ing minds?
>>>>>People get killed for less than this these days.
>>>>>You are INITIATING aggression, for shit's sake.
>>>>>That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>>>>
>>>> The idea behind initiating aggression is you need to be
>>>> able to follow through.
>>>> So I assume you're talking only to those who can't.
>>>
>>>Bad assumption.
>>>
>>>It is nearly always a bad idea to initiate aggression, genius.
>>
>> Don't let the fact that I'm a genius convince you I can't
>> deal with aggression in all the ways it can develop.
>
>Uh, right. You stud you.

I can't deny I'm rather well put together.

And I used to kill people for a living.

--Blair

"Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
...
> On 24 Sep 2006 00:31:01 +0200, cybercat wrote:
>
>> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
>
> I knew I should have kill-filed you on your first appearance.
>

Have at it dickhead. What mystifies me is why you feel you have to announce
it. But if it makes you feeeeeel better ....

lol

cybercat wrote:

> "Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 24 Sep 2006 00:31:01 +0200, cybercat wrote:
> >
> >> That is all. You may resume cooking and flapping.
> >
> > I knew I should have kill-filed you on your first appearance.
> >
>
> Have at it dickhead. What mystifies me is why you feel you have to announce
> it. But if it makes you feeeeeel better ....
>

It's a cyber bitch slap :-)