On 2006-09-26, BOB > wrote:
>
> Oh, the irony. Google and gmail filtering spam...

It appears there's been a quantum leap in the effectiveness of ISP's
to filter spam. That, or the 2003 anti-spam law is finally starting
to dig in. Whatever, I've not received a single spam in 2 weeks
through Comcast, not even to my local email client filters. About
damn time!

Now, if they'd only get the rest of the network/computing industry
outta my computer.

nb

Sheldon wrote:
.... khucai is posting through yahoo.com
>
> What a friggin' moroon...
>
>
> S/

Not quite.



[ Informations about 202.58.85.15 ]

IP range : 202.58.80.0 - 202.58.95.255
Network name : UITM-MY
Infos : Universiti Teknologi MARA
Infos : Education Center
Country : Malaysia (MY)
Abuse E-mail :
Source : APNIC

Hello, dear,
Pay no attention to xanthian; actually "xanthian" is just an anemic,
limp turd left in the gutters of California; stepped in, then tracked
into this news group, on the dirty feet of a psycho troll. So go ahead
.. . . killfile . . . kill em all . . . kill . . . kill . . . kill . . .
kill . . . opens up more band width for me.

Truly

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
Alan Truism wrote:
> Steve Wertz wrote:
> > On 24 Sep 2006 20:53:26 -0700, khucai wrote:
> >
> > > please send a recipe a how to make pizza?
> >
> > That's the final straw. I'm kill-filing all Google posts, and
> > their follow-ups. They're all ads, spam, and stupid questions.
> > So if anybody wants to flame me, do it from a real news provider.
> >
> > Hopefully others will take drastic action like this instead of
> > being passive/apathetic about the issue. It'll only get worse.
> >
> > Rainy days and Sundays always get me down.
> >
>
> But google represents all that is good and pure in the world. Google
> saved usenet.
>
> At one time I didn't like google but now I have seen the light. I do
> all my my usenet posting from google now and I'm a better person
> because of it.

Steve Wertz > wrote:
>On 24 Sep 2006 20:53:26 -0700, khucai wrote:
>
>> please send a recipe a how to make pizza?
>
>That's the final straw. I'm kill-filing all Google posts, and
>their follow-ups. They're all ads, spam, and stupid questions.

I think all people posting from Google should kill-file you.

>So if anybody wants to flame me, do it from a real news provider.

I happen to use easynews to read RFC, but almost all
my other Usenet is done on Google. The reasons are
complicated but sound. Unlike yours.

>Hopefully others will take drastic action like this instead of
>being passive/apathetic about the issue. It'll only get worse.

What size bomb-belt do you wear?

>Rainy days and Sundays always get me down.

But they don't hold you under long enough to improve
our lives.

--Blair

Blair P. Houghton wrote:
> Steve Wertz > wrote:
> >On 24 Sep 2006 20:53:26 -0700, khucai wrote:
> >
> >> please send a recipe a how to make pizza?
> >
> >That's the final straw. I'm kill-filing all Google posts, and
> >their follow-ups. They're all ads, spam, and stupid questions.
>
> I think all people posting from Google should kill-file you.
>
> >So if anybody wants to flame me, do it from a real news provider.
>
> I happen to use easynews to read RFC, but almost all
> my other Usenet is done on Google. The reasons are
> complicated but sound. Unlike yours.


Some of us have no option other than Google. My ISP does not provide
email accounts or newsgroup access. I have to used webbased mail
accounts and read newsgroups in Google. That's the price I have to pay
for faster upload speeds. Should I stick with the incredibly
inefficient national phone company, I can have an email address and
newgroups at a blazing upload speed of 4KBS as opposed to my current
upload speed of 126KBS. Because I upload large amounts of material to
my classroom website, I'd rather have the upload speed and forgo the
newsgroup access from the hone company ISP.

-SD-

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:32:09 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:

>I think all people posting from Google should kill-file you.

LOL, people posting from Google can only wish they could KF.

denise~* replied:

>> denise~* asked steve:
>>
>> > Sniff, sniff. Wont you miss me?
>>
>> Not if he gets the windage right.
>
> Baw haw. Actually, I normally post from Mozilla, but on DH's laptop, I
> use Google, because it's easier. I had no idea this was considered as
> bad as web tv?


Your posts are fine. I was just being flippant. Sorry if that didn't come
across.

Bob

Steve replied to Jude:

>> Thank godness! I've been trying to find a way to shake this loser for a
>> long time now.......
>
> I hate to break it to you, but my kill-filing you doesn't keep you
> from seeing my posts.
>
> But - since I've never followed-up to any of your posts, I'll add
> you to the exception list and make a note to give you some
> feedback on your cooking techniques - which are impecable, I'm
> sure.

Jude's one of MY favorite posters. Her culinary ideas are well-founded and
innovative, and I've gotten some VERY good recipes from her, including a
soup recipe which wowed my guests at a cookout earlier this year. (Of
course, it's entirely possible that my praising Jude will cause others to
find her guilty by association..)

Bob

"-SD-" > wrote
>
>
> Some of us have no option other than Google.

Nope. You have plenty of options.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On 25 Sep 2006 04:40:02 -0500, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>ensapadajim replied to steve:
>
>>>*plonk*
>>>
>>>-sw
>>
>>
>> Got your panties in a bunch, I see.
>
>Oh, you got him good there. You got him right in the jimmies. You got the
>last word on someone who killfiled you. What a great victory; what glorious
>triumph against a fearsome foe. Yes, you have truly demonstrated your
>strength, put forth your best effort, and slain the dragon. Surely fame and
>fortune will be yours for the asking, and all the pretty girls will desire
>you now.
>
>What are you going to do for your next victory, have a foot race with a
>person in a persistent vegetative state?
>
>Bob
>


I was counting on some moron like you to reply and that he will see!


jim

On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:30:09 GMT, Steve Wertz
> wrote:

>On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:31:12 -0500, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
>
>> I think he lacks patience...
>>
>> Hence his avoidance of more complex recipes?
>
>Huh? I spend hours in the kitchen preparing a meal. Not to
>mention BBQ'ing, at home or away. And the gathering of special
>ingredients, without a car. That's patience.
>
>This is what I made this weekend, for example:
>
>Beef Ordinair (Ordinary Beef)
>
> Sauce
> 3 Tablespoons Nepalese Goat Butter
> 1 1/2 Cups Minced Alaskan Shallots
> 2 1945 Mouton Rothschilds 3 liters
> 1 1875 Taylor Fladgate Port 750ml
> 48 Ounces Reindeer Demi Glace
> 3 Sprigs Fresh Peruvian Rosemary
> 25 Pounds Fresh Maine Lobster
> 2 1990 Domaine Romanee Conti Mersault 750ml
>
> Melt butter in heavy, very large, copper soup pot over
>medium-high heat. Add shallots and saute' until tender. Stir in
>wine and port. Reduce wine to 1/8 original volume. While wine is
>reducing, fill another very large copper soup pot with water and
>white wine. Bring to a boil. Add Lobster to cook, about 25
>minutes. When Lobster is ready, remove from pot and remove
>meat. Place meat in a press and squeeze out as much juice as
>possible. Set juice aside and discard Lobster meat. When wine
>sauce is reduced add lobster juice and simmer for 6.3 minutes.
>add Demi Glace & Rosemary and boil for 22.8 minutes. Strain
>sauce and set aside. (Can be prepared one day ahead. Cover and
>refrigerate.)
>
> Steaks
> 18 Pounds Chinese Teak Wood
> 8 Kobe Tenderloin Medallions
> 4 Ounces Monteveertine Olive Oil
> 24 Ounces Remy Martin Louis XIII Cognac
> Salt & Pepper to taste.
>
>In barbecue, burn wood until white hot. Marinate meat in Cognac
>for 3.7 minutes. Remove from marinade and discard Cognac. Rub meat
>with olive oil. Add salt & pepper to taste.
>Grill to desired tenderness.
>
> Garnish
> 18 White Truffles
> 1 Pound Dordogne Foie Gras
> 8 Ounces Beluga Caviar
> 100 Year Old Balsamic Vinegar
>
>Hollow out truffles. Fill with Foie Gras. Top with Caviar. Drizzle
>with vinegar after arranging on plate.
>
>Add enough sauce to coat middle of plate. Add beef. Arrange
>truffles around meat and drizzle with vinegar.
>
>-sw


Anyone can copy a recipe, can you prove that you have actually made
this?


jim

ensenadajim wrote:


> Anyone can copy a recipe, can you prove that you have actually made
> this?

Ok, that's a *plonk* from me too.



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On 2006-09-25, Bryce Utting > wrote:
> Alan Truism > wrote:
>> But google represents all that is good and pure in the world. Google
>> saved usenet.

But goolge-groups killed the usernet star!


> AND you even put your pod out with the recycling!

Your Ecopod? I think someone else has to put that out for you.

http://www.ecopod.co.uk/

--
The dark smell of dankness grew stronger and stronger.
[G.P. Taylor]

"notbob" > wrote

> It appears there's been a quantum leap in the effectiveness of ISP's
> to filter spam. That, or the 2003 anti-spam law is finally starting
> to dig in. Whatever, I've not received a single spam in 2 weeks
> through Comcast, not even to my local email client filters. About
> damn time!

How funny that you would say that. This thread made me realize I have
not received *one single* spam email since I signed up for Comcast.
Since I still have my old account, I'm still inundated with email from
some company selling services of some kind ... in French! I can't
get rid of them, they keep changing their 'name' ... grrrr.

It's been a relief. Also funny, I only get those Paypal and ebay phishing
emails to my old account. Haha, in case I didn't already know, you
are a fraud because that is not my address any longer!

nancy

sf wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:32:09 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>
> >I think all people posting from Google should kill-file you.
>
> LOL, people posting from Google can only wish they could KF.

That is the understatement of the year! That is the thing I miss about
my ISP not having email or newsgroups. But...I'll take the higher
speeds over low speed/complete stalling on uploads in place of the
email and newsgroups anyday.

-SD-

sf wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:32:09 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>
> >I think all people posting from Google should kill-file you.
>
> LOL, people posting from Google can only wish they could KF.

http://www.holysmoke.org/ggf/index.htm

Nancy Young said...

>
> "notbob" > wrote
>
>> It appears there's been a quantum leap in the effectiveness of ISP's
>> to filter spam. That, or the 2003 anti-spam law is finally starting
>> to dig in. Whatever, I've not received a single spam in 2 weeks
>> through Comcast, not even to my local email client filters. About
>> damn time!
>
> How funny that you would say that. This thread made me realize I have
> not received *one single* spam email since I signed up for Comcast.
> Since I still have my old account, I'm still inundated with email from
> some company selling services of some kind ... in French! I can't
> get rid of them, they keep changing their 'name' ... grrrr.
>
> It's been a relief. Also funny, I only get those Paypal and ebay
> phishing emails to my old account. Haha, in case I didn't already
> know, you are a fraud because that is not my address any longer!
>
> nancy


nancy,

I am at comcast as well. In outlook express. To snag and delete mail
you can just create a new mail rule and enter @france and/or .com.fr or
..fr addresses to delete all those emails. I also have @yahoo and @hotmail
in effect as I don't know anyone who uses those mail systems. And I check
"Do not download it from server" as the action. Let comcast empty their
own trash!

I still get false "mail subsystem delivery error" emails. I know they're
false because they come into mailboxes that I assigned garbage Outging
SMTP server addresses to, so mail can't be sent from them.

I create new mailboxes for each website and listserv I register to. This
lets me see who's passing my email addresses around. I delete them in
junkiest first rotation if I run out of mailboxes.

Once I got an email from a software developer host site I used and it
wasn't sent as a Blind carbon copy, BCC. Every developer got an email
with the the entire site's mailing list (100s of addresses). In a not so
mild email I chewed the offender's head off for being so careless!
Luckily, software developers are a pretty noble bunch and nothing came of
it!

All the best,

Andy
I hate spam.

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:12:03 -0400, "Nancy Young" >
wrote:

>
>"notbob" > wrote
>
>> It appears there's been a quantum leap in the effectiveness of ISP's
>> to filter spam. That, or the 2003 anti-spam law is finally starting
>> to dig in. Whatever, I've not received a single spam in 2 weeks
>> through Comcast, not even to my local email client filters. About
>> damn time!
>
>How funny that you would say that. This thread made me realize I have
>not received *one single* spam email since I signed up for Comcast.
>Since I still have my old account, I'm still inundated with email from
>some company selling services of some kind ... in French! I can't
>get rid of them, they keep changing their 'name' ... grrrr.
>
>It's been a relief. Also funny, I only get those Paypal and ebay phishing
>emails to my old account. Haha, in case I didn't already know, you
>are a fraud because that is not my address any longer!
>
>nancy
>

The account I use here is not the private account so I know that any
Paypal, etc. mail is a fraud.

I do read the mail (what little bit that does not automatically go
into the junk mail box.)

I do not get junk mail at Roadrunner. I have the new Agent and am
trying to train the junk mail, but I don't seem to get enough. 4 in
over 3 months.
--
Susan N.

"Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral,
48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy."
Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974

"-SD-" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> sf wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:32:09 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>>
>> >I think all people posting from Google should kill-file you.
>>
>> LOL, people posting from Google can only wish they could KF.
>
> That is the understatement of the year! That is the thing I miss about
> my ISP not having email or newsgroups. But...I'll take the higher
> speeds over low speed/complete stalling on uploads in place of the
> email and newsgroups anyday.
>

Do you have Outlook Express on your computer?

"Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
...
> On 25 Sep 2006 18:57:38 -0700, itsjoannotjoann wrote:
>
>> Sheldon wrote:
>> ... khucai is posting through yahoo.com
>>>
>>> What a friggin' moroon...
>>>
>>>
>>> S/
>>
>> Not quite.
>>
>> [ Informations about 202.58.85.15 ]
>>
>> IP range : 202.58.80.0 - 202.58.95.255
>> Network name : UITM-MY
>> Infos : Universiti Teknologi MARA
>> Infos : Education Center
>> Country : Malaysia (MY)
>> Abuse E-mail :
>> Source : APNIC
>
> What ISP they used to post from doesn't matter. It was posted to
> USENET through Google.
>
> -sw

If you can get them to understand this, you must have experience teaching in
an elementary school. If you are successful in explaining it, I will somehow
e-mail you a beer.

Steve Wertz wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2006 05:34:22 -0700, Alan Truism wrote:
>
> > sf wrote:
> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:32:09 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
> >>
> >>>I think all people posting from Google should kill-file you.
> >>
> >> LOL, people posting from Google can only wish they could KF.
> >
> > http://www.holysmoke.org/ggf/index.htm
>
> I'd be leary of something written VB6 using a 5-year old version
> of the Web Browser Active-X Control.
>
> But if it makes Googler's feel any better, I've turned on
> X-No-Archive (which in effect kill-files me after 7-10 days).
>
Back when Deja News still owned the archive and was up and running they
didn't display any posts with the x-no-archive header, not even for a
few days.

Steve Wertz said...

> But if it makes Googler's feel any better, I've turned on
> X-No-Archive (which in effect kill-files me after 7-10 days).
>
> -sw


Steve,

But once somebody quotes you in a reply, replacing news header with theirs,
your quoted text will be permanently archived, unless "everyone" in the
thread also has x-noarchive=yes in use. Or so I thought.

Andy

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> Steve Wertz said...
>
>> But if it makes Googler's feel any better, I've turned on
>> X-No-Archive (which in effect kill-files me after 7-10 days).
>>
>> -sw
>
>
> Steve,
>
> But once somebody quotes you in a reply, replacing news header with
> theirs,
> your quoted text will be permanently archived, unless "everyone" in the
> thread also has x-noarchive=yes in use. Or so I thought.
>
It's true.

cybercat said...

>
> "Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
>> Steve Wertz said...
>>
>>> But if it makes Googler's feel any better, I've turned on
>>> X-No-Archive (which in effect kill-files me after 7-10 days).
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> But once somebody quotes you in a reply, replacing news header with
>> theirs,
>> your quoted text will be permanently archived, unless "everyone" in
the
>> thread also has x-noarchive=yes in use. Or so I thought.
>>
> It's true.


cybercat,

Still, all original posts and replies sent with x-noarchive=yes will be
removed leaving the posting user unsearchable by name and the related
thread somewhat incomplete. Affording folks some measure of anonymity.

Andy

Alan Truism wrote:

> But google represents all that is good and pure in the world. Google
> saved usenet.

As AOL and WebTV before it...

-mi

Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> denise~* replied:
>
> >> denise~* asked steve:
> >>
> >> > Sniff, sniff. Wont you miss me?
> >>
> >> Not if he gets the windage right.
> >
> > Baw haw. Actually, I normally post from Mozilla, but on DH's laptop, I
> > use Google, because it's easier. I had no idea this was considered as
> > bad as web tv?
>
>
> Your posts are fine. I was just being flippant. Sorry if that didn't come
> across.
>
> Bob

I knew you were joshing me :-)

OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote in message
news
> In article >,
> Steve Wertz > wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 02:28:44 -0500, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
> >
> > > In article >, "cybercat"
>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
> > >
> > >> Damn but we are twitchy tonight, aren't we?
> > >
> > > Probably needs to get laid. ;-)
> >
> > Don't you wish! I thought you were the one practicing involuntary
> > celibacy.
> >
> > -sw
>
> Nope!
> It's voluntary..... ;-)
> After posting on Austin.singles for a bit, I found I could get laid
> anytime I want. One of the perks of being female.
>
> Only thing is, I won't sleep with just anyone. I have to know them,
> trust them, be friends with them first!
>
> I'm picky that way.....
> --
> Peace!
> Om

<most men (note I said 'most' not 'all') can be replaced with a food
processor and a vibrator.
-ginny

"Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:23:22 -0500, Andy wrote:
>
>> Steve Wertz said...
>>
>>> But if it makes Googler's feel any better, I've turned on
>>> X-No-Archive (which in effect kill-files me after 7-10 days).
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Steve,
>>
>> But once somebody quotes you in a reply, replacing news header with
>> theirs,
>> your quoted text will be permanently archived, unless "everyone" in the
>> thread also has x-noarchive=yes in use. Or so I thought.
>
> --
> That's fine. If I really wanted to be a dick, I could put all my
> text below sig delimiters like this, making it hard for Googlers
> and other newsreaders to properly quote my posts ;-)
>

Pfft. You ARE such a dick nobody wants to quote your posts.

In article >,
Steve Wertz > wrote:

> Ba Ghr, 26 Frc 2006 11:23:22 -0500, Naql jebgr:
>
> > Fgrir Jregm fnvq...
> >
> >> Ohg vs vg znxrf Tbbtyre'f srry nal orggre, V'ir ghearq ba
> >> K-Ab-Nepuvir (juvpu va rssrpg xvyy-svyrf zr nsgre 7-10 qnlf).
> >>
> >> -fj
> >
> > Fgrir,
> >
> > Ohg bapr fbzrobql dhbgrf lbh va n ercyl, ercynpvat arjf urnqre jvgu gurvef,
> > lbhe dhbgrq grkg jvyy or creznaragyl nepuvirq, hayrff "rirelbar" va gur
> > guernq nyfb unf k-abnepuvir=lrf va hfr. Be fb V gubhtug.
>
> --
> Gung'f svar. Vs V ernyyl jnagrq gb or n qvpx, V pbhyq chg nyy zl
> grkg orybj fvt qryvzvgref yvxr guvf, znxvat vg uneq sbe Tbbtyref
> naq bgure arjfernqref gb cebcreyl dhbgr zl cbfgf ;-)
>
> -fj

Then there is the above nonsense........ ;-)

Rot 13 filters are weird!
--
Peace!
Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch"
-- Jack Nicholson

Puester > wrote in message
...
> Julia Altshuler wrote:
> > Steve Wertz wrote:
> >
> >> This is what I made this weekend, for example:
>
> ---
> >
> > Great recipe! Have you sent it to Posh Nosh? Or gotten it from there?
> >
> >
> > --Lia
> >
>
>
> The recipe sounds as though it was stolen from that
> famous website, I.M. Delusional.com.
>
> gloria p



I wanna know how the goat reacted to being shook hard enough to give butter.
-ginny

cybercat wrote:

> "Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>That's fine. If I really wanted to be a dick, I could put all my
>>text below sig delimiters like this, making it hard for Googlers
>>and other newsreaders to properly quote my posts ;-)
>>
>
>
> Pfft. You ARE such a dick nobody wants to quote your posts.


Provably wrong, but only if you know how to count.

--
Reg

In article >,
"Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote:

> > > Don't you wish! I thought you were the one practicing involuntary
> > > celibacy.
> > >
> > > -sw
> >
> > Nope!
> > It's voluntary..... ;-)
> > After posting on Austin.singles for a bit, I found I could get laid
> > anytime I want. One of the perks of being female.
> >
> > Only thing is, I won't sleep with just anyone. I have to know them,
> > trust them, be friends with them first!
> >
> > I'm picky that way.....
> > --
> > Peace!
> > Om
>
> Most men (note I said 'most' not 'all') can be replaced with a food
> processor and a vibrator.
> -ginny

<cough> Thanks, you owe me a new keyboard... ;-)

Truer words were never spoken! <rofl!!!>

Women need a reason to have sex.
Men just need a place...

and the word "Yes" is the simplest of aphrodesiacs? <smirk>
--
Peace!
Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch"
-- Jack Nicholson

Virginia Tadrzynski wrote:

> <most men (note I said 'most' not 'all') can be replaced with a food
> processor and a vibrator.


Nonsense. Who would you get to do the heavy lifting?


The way I heard it: "Men are good for only two things, and one of them
is moving heavy furniture."


--Lia

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" > wrote in message
news
> Women need a reason to have sex.

"Hey....it's time to change the sheets anyway."

In article >,
"JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:

> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" > wrote in message
> news >
> > Women need a reason to have sex.
>
> "Hey....it's time to change the sheets anyway."

;-D

YOU get to sleep in the wet spot this time!!!

Dammit!
--
Peace!
Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch"
-- Jack Nicholson

In article >,
Julia Altshuler > wrote:

> Virginia Tadrzynski wrote:
>
> > <most men (note I said 'most' not 'all') can be replaced with a food
> > processor and a vibrator.
>
>
> Nonsense. Who would you get to do the heavy lifting?
>
>
> The way I heard it: "Men are good for only two things, and one of them
> is moving heavy furniture."
>
>
> --Lia

Providing they are not asleep on it. ;-)
--
Peace!
Om

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch"
-- Jack Nicholson

"OmManiPadmeOmelet" > wrote in message
news
> In article >,
> "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
>
>> "OmManiPadmeOmelet" > wrote in message
>> news >>
>> > Women need a reason to have sex.
>>
>> "Hey....it's time to change the sheets anyway."
>
> ;-D
>
> YOU get to sleep in the wet spot this time!!!
>
> Dammit!

Sleep?

Steve Wertz wrote:
> On 26 Sep 2006 01:47:01 -0500, Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
> > Steve replied to Jude:
> >
> >> But - since I've never followed-up to any of your posts, I'll add
> >> you to the exception list and make a note to give you some
> >> feedback on your cooking techniques - which are impecable, I'm
> >> sure.
> >
> > Jude's one of MY favorite posters. Her culinary ideas are well-founded and
> > innovative, and I've gotten some VERY good recipes from her, including a
> > soup recipe which wowed my guests at a cookout earlier this year.
>
> She's added to the exception list, but I'll have to keep my eye on
> here now that I know she has this crush on me.
>
> ;-)
>
> -sw

I love you too, darling.

But I'm a tad insulted that you don't remember replying to my
posts......you beat it through my head how to spell (and pronounce)
co-ti-ja cheese. So much so that i even went to the grocery clerk and
told them they had it spelled wrong on the shelf label. You made a
permanent inpact on my cooking....and my heart <3

Speaking of google, is it having trouble today, or is the problem on my
side? I've gone to www.google.com a few times today and gotten nowhere
with my searches. I just get the hourglass figure that it's thinking
about it forever, no search results.


--Lia

Steve Wertz wrote:
> --
> That's fine. If I really wanted to be a dick, I could put all my
> text below sig delimiters like this, making it hard for Googlers
> and other newsreaders to properly quote my posts ;-)
>
> -sw

Google just quotes you, sig and all.