Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
an inductive hob or cook thing.
an inexpensive stew pots have circular indentations in the center of the pots. so i wonder if the bottom of the pot sits off the bottom of an inductive hob or glass cookware, will it make the heating too inefficient? i asked the manufacturer but english was not the native language so i could not get through. finally i went physical. i pointed out that the usual rule of thumb with this type of electromagnetic energy was 1 over the radius of the distance cubed, so it drops off dramatically. thank goodness for science. but science was also not the native language of the tech department, so we'll see. i am looking at a sunpentown sr-1851 which unlike the slightly more expensive sr-1881 has a kind of raised circle for the inductive heating. any thoughts? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com>,
" > wrote: > an inductive hob or cook thing. > > an inexpensive stew pots have circular indentations in the center of > the pots. > > so i wonder if the bottom of the pot sits off the bottom of an > inductive hob or glass cookware, will it make the heating too > inefficient? > > i asked the manufacturer but english was not the native language so i > could not get through. finally i went physical. i pointed out that the > usual rule of thumb with this type of electromagnetic energy was 1 over > the radius of the distance cubed, so it drops off dramatically. > thank goodness for science. but science was also not the native > language of the tech department, so we'll see. > > i am looking at a sunpentown sr-1851 which unlike the slightly more > expensive sr-1881 has a kind of raised circle for the inductive > heating. > > any thoughts? Check with the manufacturer of your range, but I suspect that any cook wear that does not sit sit the entire bottom surface contacts the inductive element will not work. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Horwitz wrote:
> > i am looking at a sunpentown sr-1851 which unlike the slightly more > > expensive sr-1881 has a kind of raised circle for the inductive > > heating. > > > > any thoughts? > > Check with the manufacturer of your range, but I suspect that any cook > wear that does not sit sit the entire bottom surface contacts the > inductive element will not work. you're right. someone in the tech department who could understand my question got back to me. any distance increases inefficiencies. the raised circular ring is around 10 inches in diameter. so if a pot is larger than 10 inches, then that pot will be raised a wee bit and heat a wee bit inefficiently. so a part larger than 10 inches in diameter with an indented inner circular bottom would be a double whammy and be less efficient than a perfectly flat bottom. i guess this is one time perfectly flat bottoms are preferred. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Burning question, rye bread | General Cooking | |||
burning fat | Preserving | |||
burning fat | Marketplace | |||
burning fat | Sushi | |||
Burning Question about Yixing brewing... | Tea |