Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
and lower priced ones.
what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com

see me wrote:
> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
> and lower priced ones.
> what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com

I think all non-stick cookware is garbage.

"Janet Puistonen" > wrote in message
news:mR0Tg.6105$8U2.834@trndny08...
> see me wrote:
>> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
>> and lower priced ones.
>> what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
>
> I think all non-stick cookware is garbage.
>
Why?? I've tons of old copper clad cuisinart, that's on its own excellent.
Recently I sort of inherited a nonstick. I use it all the time. For searing
a steak and deglazing no, but for most of what's left over yes.

Kent

"Kent" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "Janet Puistonen" > wrote in message
> news:mR0Tg.6105$8U2.834@trndny08...
>> see me wrote:
>>> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
>>> and lower priced ones.
>>> what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
>>
>> I think all non-stick cookware is garbage.
>>
> Why?? I've tons of old copper clad cuisinart, that's on its own excellent.
> Recently I sort of inherited a nonstick. I use it all the time. For
> searing a steak and deglazing no, but for most of what's left over yes.
>
>
I have to have teflon for eggs.

In article om>,
says...
> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
> and lower priced ones.
> what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
>
>

Absolutely. Higher price usually means heavier, thicker metal so the
pans heat more evenly and cook better. It also means a better coating
that lasts a lot longer.

--
Peter Aitken
Visit my recipe and kitchen myths pages at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 03:58:10 GMT, Janet Puistonen wrote:

> see me wrote:
>> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
>> and lower priced ones.

>
> I think all non-stick cookware is garbage.

I disagree. Some are better than others and I use them a lot. The quality
of the non stick surface varies tremendously. Don't buy high end pans with
non stick surfaces. I get mine from the local restaurant supply and they
hold up pretty well and are not too expensive. Non stick is not made for
HIGH heat. When they wither you can toss 'em and get another. I would not
be without some non stick pans in my kitchen.

Peter A wrote:
> says...
> > Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
> > and lower priced ones.
> > what do you think?
>
> Absolutely. Higher price usually means heavier, thicker metal so the
> pans heat more evenly and cook better.

Better... how much better and better than what? A
$10 non-stick pan will cook just as well as a $99 non-stick pan... no
non-stick pan can take much heat lest the coating is ruined. Some are
not very accomplished cooks so will benefit from non-stick frypans for
medium temperature use such as frying eggs... but whereas if someone
has just average cooking skills they will do better with inexpensive
properly seasoned carbon steel pans. And carbon steel cookware is far
more user friendly than cast iron (unless one can't get to the gym).

>It also means a better coating that lasts a lot longer.

Last longer than what... even if the coating on the $99 pan lasts twice
as long (which it will not) one can buy quite a few new $10 pans before
equaling out the score.

Personally I see no benefit to non-stick coating on any stove top
cookware... only on some ovenware/bakeware do I see a benefit...
anything containing lots of sugar; sticky buns, brownies, pineapple
upsidedown cake, glazed ham and the like.

Why anyone needs a non-stick pot for soup, stew, boiling pasta, cooking
any liquids, can only be attributed to low IQ pinheadedness... and if
expensive high end designer cook pots with non-stick coating, it simply
means they have more dollars than brain cells. Professional cooks do
not use cast iron cookware, nor do they use non-stick coated.

Sheldon Metalspatula

see me wrote:
> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
> and lower priced ones.
> what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com


Good grief, I can't believe y'all fell for this stupid spammer's trick
by engaging in what seems to be an innocent question. All they wanted
to do is run in and post a message, innocently enough, and then you run
to their site to hopefully buy.

Geeez, I'm disappointed. They're all over the place with their
'innocent' questions.

Janet Puistonen wrote:

> see me wrote:
> > Is there really much difference between high price non-stick
> > cookware and lower priced ones.
> > what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
>
> I think all non-stick cookware is garbage.

Julia Child loved her non-stick skillets. She used them and praised
them in many of her French Chef shows.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Default User wrote:
> Janet Puistonen wrote:
>
> > see me wrote:
> > > Is there really much difference between high price non-stick
> > > cookware and lower priced ones.
> > > what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
> >
> > I think all non-stick cookware is garbage.
>
> Julia Child loved her non-stick skillets. She used them and praised
> them in many of her French Chef shows.

Celebrity chefs praise whatever products their sponsors command them
to.

$heldon

itsjoannotjoann wrote:
> see me wrote:
> > Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
> > and lower priced ones.
> > what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
>
>
> Good grief, I can't believe y'all fell for this stupid spammer's trick
> by engaging in what seems to be an innocent question. All they wanted
> to do is run in and post a message, innocently enough, and then you run
> to their site to hopefully buy.
>
> Geeez, I'm disappointed. They're all over the place with their
> 'innocent' questions.

It's actually a legitimate question that's asked here often and by
plain ordinary folks who are selling nothing. Being a newbie you're
the only one bringing in the spam issue. I'm pretty sure none of the
regular posters visited the honey.com site until they saw your whine...
I didn't until you complained... but now that I did it's a pretty
useful site in some respects, and aspparently it has some association
with amazon.com

Shelly whined then broke down and wrote:

>
> It's actually a legitimate question that's asked here often and by
> plain ordinary folks who are selling nothing. Being a newbie you're
> the only one bringing in the spam issue. I'm pretty sure none of the
> regular posters visited the honey.com site until they saw your whine...
> I didn't until you complained... but now that I did it's a pretty
> useful site in some respects, and aspparently it has some association
> with amazon.com


Twit, I'm not a newbie. Put down the bottle of whiskey and pay
attention. And yesssss, it IS spam.

itsjoannotjoann wrote:
> Shelly whined then broke down and wrote:
>
> >
> > It's actually a legitimate question that's asked here often and by
> > plain ordinary folks who are selling nothing. Being a newbie you're
> > the only one bringing in the spam issue. I'm pretty sure none of the
> > regular posters visited the honey.com site until they saw your whine...
> > I didn't until you complained... but now that I did it's a pretty
> > useful site in some respects, and aspparently it has some association
> > with amazon.com
>
>
> I'm not a newbie. And yesssss, it IS spam.

It's not spam. Quite a few regular posters incude a web site in their
sig where they're selling various products but that does not make a
post spam. You don't know what constitutes spam and that alone proves
you are most definitely a newbie.

"itsjoannotjoann" > wrote:
>
>
> Put down the bottle of whiskey and pay
> attention.

hahaha!



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

jay wrote:

> On 29 Sep 2006 12:32:11 -0700, Sheldon wrote:
>
> > Default User wrote:
> >> Janet Puistonen wrote:
>
> >> Julia Child loved her non-stick skillets. She used them and praised
> >> them in many of her French Chef shows.
> >
> > Celebrity chefs praise whatever products their sponsors command them
> > to.

> Absolutely! The coated/nonstick cookware that I have are baking pans,
> sheet pans and skillets.

Julia was on PBS. No cookware manufacturer was sponsor at that time.

To accuse her of shilling, well coming from Sheldumb the Moron I can
understand.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

see me wrote:
> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
> and lower priced ones.
> what do you think?

I buy mid price - the really cheap stuff is put onto thin pans that
warp, and the really expensive stuff is not worth my money. Analon pans
with my 20% off Bed Bath and Beyond coupons fit my needs for price and
quality. I cook sticky things with it (eggs, fried rice).

June

Default LUser wrote:
> jay wrote:
> > Sheldon wrote:
> > > Default User wrote:
> > >> Janet Puistonen wrote:
> >
> > >> Julia Child loved her non-stick skillets. She used them and praised
> > >> them in many of her French Chef shows.
> > >
> > > Celebrity chefs praise whatever products their sponsors command them
> > > to.
>
> > Absolutely! The coated/nonstick cookware that I have are baking pans,
> > sheet pans and skillets.
>
> No cookware manufacturer was sponsor at that time.

Bull shit... LUser must be blind.

see me > wrote:
>Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
>and lower priced ones.

In some cases, no.

In some cases, the nonstick is much tougher and lasts
a lot longer.

>what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shxptillyoudrophoney.com

Cooking spam on the stuff you sell will destroy it.

--Blair

cybercat > wrote:
>I have to have teflon for eggs.

There's nothing like flipping a fried egg with enough
control to keep it intact.

--Blair

itsjoannotjoann > wrote:
>
>see me wrote:
>> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
>> and lower priced ones.
>> what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
>
>
>Good grief, I can't believe y'all fell for this stupid spammer's trick
>by engaging in what seems to be an innocent question.

They didn't.

If they'd wandered off to the spammer's website, THEN
they would have fallen for the trick.

He's over in his mom's basement now wondering why he's
not getting any clicks...

--Blair

Sheldon > wrote:
>It's not spam. Quite a few regular posters incude a web site in their
>sig where they're selling various products but that does not make a
>post spam. You don't know what constitutes spam and that alone proves
>you are most definitely a newbie.

Pick up the whiskey and resume drinking.

Anything that keeps you from posting and proving your
ignorance, stupidity, and mean-spiritedness is okay
with Usenet.

--Blair

Blair P. Houghton wrote:
> itsjoannotjoann > wrote:
>
>> see me wrote:
>>
>>> Is there really much difference between high price non-stick cookware
>>> and lower priced ones.
>>> what do you think?.......Your friend from...Shoptillyoudrophoney.com
>>>
>> Good grief, I can't believe y'all fell for this stupid spammer's trick
>> by engaging in what seems to be an innocent question.
>>
>
> They didn't.
>
> If they'd wandered off to the spammer's website, THEN
> they would have fallen for the trick.
>
> He's over in his mom's basement now wondering why he's
> not getting any clicks...
>
> --Blair
>
Agreed. But what's wrong with a discussion about non-stick pans anyway?
I love my Scanpan, frittattas just slide out of it. Worth every cent.

Christine