Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Inventor's bright idea for perfect boiled egg
Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:55 AM ET LONDON (Reuters) - A British inventor says he has cracked the age-old riddle of how to boil the perfect egg -- get rid of the water. Simon Rhymes uses powerful light bulbs instead of boiling water to cook the egg. The gadget does the job in six minutes, and then chops off the top of the egg to allow dipping with toast. "Many people are confused," the 23-year-old product design student told BBC radio Wednesday. "This simply uses four 500-watt bulbs to heat the egg directly." Rhymes said he has secured a patent and is in talks to mass-produce the device. © Reuters 2006. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world. http://today.reuters.com/news/articl...GG.xml&src=rss -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chatty Cathy" > wrote in message
... > Inventor's bright idea for perfect boiled egg > Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:55 AM ET > > LONDON (Reuters) - A British inventor says he has cracked the age-old > riddle of how to boil the perfect egg -- get rid of the water. Great! Just the thing for people who can't boil water and read a clock. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chatty Cathy" > wrote > Inventor's bright idea for perfect boiled egg > Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:55 AM ET > > LONDON (Reuters) - A British inventor says he has cracked the age-old > riddle of how to boil the perfect egg -- get rid of the water. > > Simon Rhymes uses powerful light bulbs instead of boiling water to cook > the egg. > > The gadget does the job in six minutes, and then chops off the top of the > egg to allow dipping with toast. So it's not even a hard boiled egg. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
. .. > > "Chatty Cathy" > wrote > >> Inventor's bright idea for perfect boiled egg >> Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:55 AM ET >> >> LONDON (Reuters) - A British inventor says he has cracked the age-old >> riddle of how to boil the perfect egg -- get rid of the water. >> >> Simon Rhymes uses powerful light bulbs instead of boiling water to cook >> the egg. >> >> The gadget does the job in six minutes, and then chops off the top of the >> egg to allow dipping with toast. > > So it's not even a hard boiled egg. > > nancy > It's well lit, though. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> "Nancy Young" > wrote in message >>> >>> The gadget does the job in six minutes, and then chops off the top of the >>> egg to allow dipping with toast. >> So it's not even a hard boiled egg. > > It's well lit, though. I woulda called it lightly boiled ![]() -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote > "Nancy Young" > wrote >> "Chatty Cathy" > wrote >> >>> Inventor's bright idea for perfect boiled egg >>> Wed Oct 11, 2006 7:55 AM ET >>> >>> LONDON (Reuters) - A British inventor says he has cracked the age-old >>> riddle of how to boil the perfect egg -- get rid of the water. >>> >>> Simon Rhymes uses powerful light bulbs instead of boiling water to cook >>> the egg. >>> >>> The gadget does the job in six minutes, and then chops off the top of >>> the egg to allow dipping with toast. >> >> So it's not even a hard boiled egg. > It's well lit, though. He's just candling the eggs to excess. And how large is this device, big enough to hold 4 lightbulbs. Or is that light bulbs? Or lamps. Anyway, it does seem to be a pretty useless device. And I'm confused why he says Many people are confused. About what? Maybe about where they'd store this one trick wonder? nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young > wrote:
>So it's not even a hard boiled egg. A good soft-boiled egg is like a good fried egg without the grease or a good poached egg without the water. --Blair |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote > Nancy Young > wrote: >>So it's not even a hard boiled egg. > > A good soft-boiled egg is like a good fried egg without > the grease or a good poached egg without the water. Heh, ode to the soft-boiled egg. I was really thinking of his claims of time-saving. It doesn't take all that long to make one hard-boiled, and he's not even taking it that far. In other words, just how much time is he saving with his 2000 Watts of lightbulbs? That was rhetorical. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young wrote:
> > "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote > > > Nancy Young > wrote: > >>So it's not even a hard boiled egg. > > > > A good soft-boiled egg is like a good fried egg without > > the grease or a good poached egg without the water. > > Heh, ode to the soft-boiled egg. I was really thinking of his > claims of time-saving. It doesn't take all that long to make > one hard-boiled, and he's not even taking it that far. In other > words, just how much time is he saving with his 2000 Watts > of lightbulbs? That was rhetorical. > > nancy Given the elimination of the large thermal mass of the pan and water, I'd expect it saves both a fair amount of time waiting for the water to boil and energy heating all that mass that will just be wasted. Pete C. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy Young" > wrote in message ... > > "Blair P. Houghton" > wrote > >> Nancy Young > wrote: >>>So it's not even a hard boiled egg. >> >> A good soft-boiled egg is like a good fried egg without >> the grease or a good poached egg without the water. > > Heh, ode to the soft-boiled egg. I was really thinking of his > claims of time-saving. It doesn't take all that long to make > one hard-boiled, and he's not even taking it that far. In other > words, just how much time is he saving with his 2000 Watts > of lightbulbs? That was rhetorical. > > nancy > We have decided to poach all our hard cooked eggs from now on. Ours are just so fresh that they are always difficult to peel no matter how we do them. Don't have that problem with store bought eggs so that tells you how stale they are. -- My Word in FERGUS/HARLINGEN http://www.mompeagram.homestead.com/index.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-10-15, MY WORD > wrote:
> just so fresh that they are always difficult to peel no matter how we do > them. Hmmm... I've never had this problem, even when buying fresh eggs from my boss at work. Those were the most awesome eggs I've ever eaten in my life, but they still succumbed to the my old h/b egg trick of immediately sticking pan of h/b eggs under cold running water for 10 mins. The running water chills the eggs quickly and they pull away from the shell making peeling easier. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chatty Cathy said...
> "This simply uses four 500-watt bulbs to heat the > egg directly." What's wrong with this picture? 2,000 watts? The BUM!!! Put eggs in a pot and cover with cold water. Put on the stove and wait for it to come to a boil. Remove from heat, cover and let sit for 12 minutes. Then pour off the water and rinse in cold water, peel or chill in the fridge for later. Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
> Chatty Cathy said... > >> "This simply uses four 500-watt bulbs to heat the >> egg directly." > > > What's wrong with this picture? 2,000 watts? The BUM!!! > > Put eggs in a pot and cover with cold water. Put on the stove and > wait for it to come to a boil. Remove from heat, cover and let sit > for 12 minutes. Then pour off the water and rinse in cold water, peel > or chill in the fridge for later. > > Andy But Andy, you're talking about hard boiled eggs. Regardless of this person's "invention", which makes no sense to me since a pan and water work, it's a soft boiled egg if you use toast to sop it up ![]() Hmmm, now I'm craving soft boiled eggs and toast! Dangit! Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown said...
> Andy wrote: >> Chatty Cathy said... >> >>> "This simply uses four 500-watt bulbs to heat the >>> egg directly." >> >> >> What's wrong with this picture? 2,000 watts? The BUM!!! >> >> Put eggs in a pot and cover with cold water. Put on the stove and >> wait for it to come to a boil. Remove from heat, cover and let sit >> for 12 minutes. Then pour off the water and rinse in cold water, peel >> or chill in the fridge for later. >> >> Andy > > But Andy, you're talking about hard boiled eggs. Regardless of this > person's "invention", which makes no sense to me since a pan and water > work, it's a soft boiled egg if you use toast to sop it up ![]() > > Hmmm, now I'm craving soft boiled eggs and toast! Dangit! > > Jill Jill, Yep, I goofed. How about we discuss the finer points after a couple of three minute eggs??? ![]() Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Andy <q> wrote:
> Chatty Cathy said... > > > "This simply uses four 500-watt bulbs to heat the > > egg directly." > > > What's wrong with this picture? 2,000 watts? The BUM!!! > > Put eggs in a pot and cover with cold water. Put on the stove and wait for > it to come to a boil. Remove from heat, cover and let sit for 12 minutes. Yuh ain't gonna be dippin' no toast in *that* egg, I reckon. :-) -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California, USA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which brings up a question I've had for several years. I have
purchased eggs, and cooked them all the same. But, I remember that different cartons of eggs, sometimes act differently in the peeling process. What I mean, is sometimes I will boil a dozen, and they are darned near impossible to peel cleanly. Other times, I will boil a dozen and they peel very easily. What is making the difference? I don't let eggs sit around before cooking, so freshness shouldn't be an issue. Myrl Jeffcoat http://www.myrljeffcoat.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've often wondered if freshness could be an issue. I recall one
particular Easter though, I bought a couple of different brands from different stores on the same day (Safeway and Raleys). I was amazed that one batch peeled really easily, and the other had peels that stuck to them like lockjawed terriers. I think brand sometimes makes a difference, but can't understand why! Maybe in just the way they are handled? Myrl Jeffcoat http://www.myrljeffcoat.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Nobody's Perfect | General Cooking | |||
perfect boiled eggs | General Cooking | |||
The Perfect... "Boiled" Egg | General Cooking | |||
The perfect foil creates the perfect setup again! | Vegan | |||
Perfect Hard Boiled Eggs | Recipes (moderated) |