On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:30:28 -0500, Alan wrote:

>I'm wondering why I don't see most of those names that ID the
>pictures also attached to messages in rfc?
>
>Am I just missing them?
>
>Are you using 'net names instead of the one you IDed your photo with?

Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
mind.

My name is attached to my pic. What other pictures are you
referencing?

Christine

On Oct 15, 5:36 pm, Christine Dabney > wrote:

> >Are you using 'net names instead of the one you IDed your photo with?Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
> pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
> mind.
>
> My name is attached to my pic. What other pictures are you
> referencing?
>
> Christine


I've got a pic, but it's 5 years old, nothing newer. :-|

On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:36:34 -0600, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

>Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
>pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
>mind.

Nancy, you vamp, I had no idea!
--
See return address to reply by email

<sf> wrote

> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:36:34 -0600, Christine Dabney
> > wrote:
>
>>Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
>>pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
>>mind.
>
> Nancy, you vamp, I had no idea!

Hey, I don't know how I got dragged into this! (laugh)

nancy

Nancy Young wrote:
> <sf> wrote
>
> > On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:36:34 -0600, Christine Dabney
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
> >>pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
> >>mind.
> >
> > Nancy, you vamp, I had no idea!
>
> Hey, I don't know how I got dragged into this! (laugh)

Just pick your favorite photo of yourself and *drag* and drop! hehe

Sheldon Kodak

In article >,
Christine Dabney > wrote:

> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:30:28 -0500, Alan wrote:
>
> >I'm wondering why I don't see most of those names that ID the
> >pictures also attached to messages in rfc?
> >
> >Am I just missing them?
> >
> >Are you using 'net names instead of the one you IDed your photo with?
>
> Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
> pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
> mind.
>
> My name is attached to my pic. What other pictures are you
> referencing?
>
> Christine

I posted an old halloween pic... Works for me!
I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.
--
Peace, Om

Remove extra . to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

One time on Usenet, Steve Wertz > said:
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 16:36:34 -0600, Christine Dabney wrote:

> > My name is attached to my pic. What other pictures are you
> > referencing?
>
> I notice the same thing. But I don't want to name names for fear
> of maybe offending people - I'd rather wait until they post
> before I offend them.

<Chuckle> I see what you mean though -- some of the gifs have
given names, but no handles. Maybe they just assume people will
recognize their real name from reading the froup? OTOH, some of
them have just their nicknames. I dunno -- FWIW, I asked Cathy
to put my nick *and* my given name under my photo, to avoid
confusion. I'm already confused enough.

> Or maybe we just don't hang out in the same threads (I read maybe
> 25% of the threads, and not in their entirety usually - unless a
> good fight breaks out).

I wish I could chide you for this type of behavior, but well,
pot, kettle, etc... ;-)

--
"Little Malice" is Jani in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

Little Malice wrote:

>
> <Chuckle> I see what you mean though -- some of the gifs have
> given names, but no handles. Maybe they just assume people will
> recognize their real name from reading the froup? OTOH, some of
> them have just their nicknames. I dunno -- FWIW, I asked Cathy
> to put my nick *and* my given name under my photo, to avoid
> confusion. I'm already confused enough.

Hey, "we aim to please". The photos get put up under the names that the
posters request themselves...

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

In article >,
OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote:


> I posted an old halloween pic... Works for me!
> I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.

What makes you think that?

--
Dan Abel

Petaluma, California, USA

In article >,
Dan Abel > wrote:

> In article >,
> OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote:
>
>
> > I posted an old halloween pic... Works for me!
> > I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.
>
> What makes you think that?

<snork>

It's a picture of Manson......
--
Peace, Om

Remove extra . to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Oh pshaw, on Mon 16 Oct 2006 09:55:06a, OmManiPadmeOmelet meant to say...

> In article >,
> Dan Abel > wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote:
>>
>>
>> > I posted an old halloween pic... Works for me!
>> > I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.
>>
>> What makes you think that?
>
> <snork>
>
> It's a picture of Manson......

Aren't they twins?

--
Wayne Boatwright
__________________________________________________

We don't know who discovered water, but we're
pretty sure it wasn't a fish.

In article >,
Steve Wertz > wrote:

> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 00:09:07 -0500, OmManiPadmeOmelet wrote:
>
> > I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.
>
> Still trying to scan that picture of me when I was 23 (2 <cough>
> years ago). There really are no current pictires of me. Except
> for that one of my pearly white ass I posted in ABF a few years
> ago.
>
> -sw

<steeples finger> Do tell???
--
Peace, Om

Remove extra . to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

In article 9>,
Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh pshaw, on Mon 16 Oct 2006 09:55:06a, OmManiPadmeOmelet meant to say...
>
> > In article >,
> > Dan Abel > wrote:
> >
> >> In article >,
> >> OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > I posted an old halloween pic... Works for me!
> >> > I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.
> >>
> >> What makes you think that?
> >
> > <snork>
> >
> > It's a picture of Manson......
>
> Aren't they twins?

ROFLMAO!!!

Thanks for that!!!
--
Peace, Om

Remove extra . to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Oh pshaw, on Mon 16 Oct 2006 11:54:10a, Steve Wertz meant to say...

> On 16 Oct 2006 19:39:20 +0200, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>
>> Oh pshaw, on Mon 16 Oct 2006 09:55:06a, OmManiPadmeOmelet meant to
say...
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> Dan Abel > wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article >,
>>>> OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I posted an old halloween pic... Works for me!
>>>> > I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.
>>>>
>>>> What makes you think that?
>>>
>>> <snork>
>>>
>>> It's a picture of Manson......
>>
>> Aren't they twins?
>
> And _I'm_ the Evil One.
>
> -sw
>

We know that, Steve.

--
Wayne Boatwright
__________________________________________________

We don't know who discovered water, but we're
pretty sure it wasn't a fish.

Oh pshaw, on Mon 16 Oct 2006 12:03:50p, Damsel in dis Dress meant to say...

> On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 18:54:10 GMT, Steve Wertz
> > wrote:
>
>>On 16 Oct 2006 19:39:20 +0200, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>
>>> Oh pshaw, on Mon 16 Oct 2006 09:55:06a, OmManiPadmeOmelet meant to
say...
>>>
>>>> In article >,
>>>> Dan Abel > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>> OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > I posted an old halloween pic... Works for me!
>>>>> > I note that Wertz did not post a real pic.
>>>>>
>>>>> What makes you think that?
>>>>
>>>> <snork>
>>>>
>>>> It's a picture of Manson......
>>>
>>> Aren't they twins?
>>
>>And _I'm_ the Evil One.
>
> All this time, I thought you were The Cute One!

The Empress Alexandra thought Rasputin was quite a catch, too!

--
Wayne Boatwright
__________________________________________________

We don't know who discovered water, but we're
pretty sure it wasn't a fish.

Chatty Cathy > wrote in news2OYg.41$yy2.28
@newsfe11.phx:

> Little Malice wrote:
>
>>
>> <Chuckle> I see what you mean though -- some of the gifs have
>> given names, but no handles. Maybe they just assume people will
>> recognize their real name from reading the froup? OTOH, some of
>> them have just their nicknames. I dunno -- FWIW, I asked Cathy
>> to put my nick *and* my given name under my photo, to avoid
>> confusion. I'm already confused enough.
>
> Hey, "we aim to please". The photos get put up under the names that
the
> posters request themselves...
>


Hmmmmmmmmmm, I might change my name...........



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

On 16 Oct 2006 22:17:41 GMT, PeterL > wrote:

>Chatty Cathy > wrote in news2OYg.41$yy2.28
:
>
>>
>> Hey, "we aim to please". The photos get put up under the names that
>the
>> posters request themselves...
>>
>
>
>Hmmmmmmmmmm, I might change my name...........

I bet it wouldn't be a problem if you notified her and asked that your
mug shot reflect the change.
--
See return address to reply by email

sf wrote in :

> On 16 Oct 2006 22:17:41 GMT, PeterL > wrote:
>
>>Chatty Cathy > wrote in news2OYg.41$yy2.28
:
>>
>>>
>>> Hey, "we aim to please". The photos get put up under the names that
>>the
>>> posters request themselves...
>>>
>>
>>
>>Hmmmmmmmmmm, I might change my name...........
>
> I bet it wouldn't be a problem if you notified her and asked that your
> mug shot reflect the change.



I can always go back to my James Bond picture :-)

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

On 17 Oct 2006 04:25:24 GMT, PeterL > wrote:

>sf wrote in :
>
>> On 16 Oct 2006 22:17:41 GMT, PeterL > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>Hmmmmmmmmmm, I might change my name...........
>>
>> I bet it wouldn't be a problem if you notified her and asked that your
>> mug shot reflect the change.
>
>
>
>I can always go back to my James Bond picture :-)

Oh, you you're such a dooood!
--
See return address to reply by email

PeterL wrote:

>
>
> I can always go back to my James Bond picture :-)
>
Yes you could I still have it somewhere LOL

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

sf wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2006 22:17:41 GMT, PeterL > wrote:
>
>> Chatty Cathy > wrote in news2OYg.41$yy2.28
>> @newsfe11.phx:
>>
>>> Hey, "we aim to please". The photos get put up under the names that
>> the
>>> posters request themselves...
>>>
>>
>> Hmmmmmmmmmm, I might change my name...........
>
> I bet it wouldn't be a problem if you notified her and asked that your
> mug shot reflect the change.

No its not a problem. Easy enough to change...


--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Christine Dabney wrote:
> Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
> pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
> mind.

Where do I submit a photo?

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music, Recipes, Photos, and mo

http://www.sequoiagrove.dk

"You don´t frighten us, English pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottoms, sons
of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and
all your silly English kaniggets. Thppppt!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michael Archon Sequoia Nielsen wrote:
> Christine Dabney wrote:
>> Some people that are frequent posters here in rfc will not post their
>> pics no matter what. Nancy Young and sf are two people that come to
>> mind.
>
> Where do I submit a photo?
>
Just email it to me:

webmaster (at) recfoodcooking (dot) com

Thanks.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Chatty Cathy > wrote in news:zA%Yg.48$yy2.6
@newsfe11.phx:

> PeterL wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I can always go back to my James Bond picture :-)
>>
> Yes you could I still have it somewhere LOL
>


:-)

Have a look at the picture on the RFC map ;-)



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

PeterL wrote:

>
> Have a look at the picture on the RFC map ;-)

Ahem... isn't that a bit small? LOL.
Send me the "big" one and we can talk - oh and it must be the "right
way up" too... <veg>

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:05:31 -0700, sf wrote:



>>I can always go back to my James Bond picture :-)
>
>Oh, you you're such a dooood!

And this is coming from the person who won't let her own picture be
exhibited?

Christine

On 17 Oct 2006 14:00:35 GMT, PeterL > wrote:

>Have a look at the picture on the RFC map ;-)

I like that one! Hmmmm, James Bond, or the crazy guy in the air ...

On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:55:52 -0600, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

>On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:05:31 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>>Oh, you you're such a dooood!
>
>And this is coming from the person who won't let her own picture be
>exhibited?

She's an attractive lady. She shouldn't be so shy.

Chatty Cathy > wrote in news:Kt5Zg.53$yy2.2
@newsfe11.phx:

> PeterL wrote:
>
>>
>> Have a look at the picture on the RFC map ;-)
>
> Ahem... isn't that a bit small? LOL.


They won't let you put large ones on there.


> Send me the "big" one and we can talk


It's on it's way.


>- oh and it must be the "right
> way up" too... <veg>


It *is* the right way up, you just have to stand on your head to look at
it..... damn furiner!! ;-)



--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
news
> On 17 Oct 2006 14:00:35 GMT, PeterL > wrote:
>
>>Have a look at the picture on the RFC map ;-)
>
> I like that one! Hmmmm, James Bond, or the crazy guy in the air ...



Oi!! I resemble that remark......... errrrrrrrrrr, resent that remark!! ;-)


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
:

> On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:55:52 -0600, Christine Dabney
> > wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:05:31 -0700, sf wrote:
>>
>>>Oh, you you're such a dooood!
>>
>>And this is coming from the person who won't let her own picture be
>>exhibited?
>
> She's an attractive lady. She shouldn't be so shy.


Why is she shy about posting a picture of herself in a bikini?? ;-)


--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'