http://www.recfoodcooking.com/

Vote now!


--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Chatty Cathy wrote:
> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
> Vote now!

I liked this one.

-L.

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:11:59 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote:

>http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
>Vote now!

I particularly like the question about shooting people who don't trim
their posts.

TammyM

On 2006-10-21, Chatty Cathy > wrote:
> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
> Vote now!

Another shortsighted survey. Decent questions, but inadequate
answers. The first question should have included "all the above".
The last question should have included "no problem" or some similar
option. I didn't want to answer the last question, there being no
applicable choice, but your survey script doesn't allow it. Another
flaw.

Don't take offense, just constructive criticism.

nb

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 18:11:59 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote:

>http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
>Vote now!

Excellent!

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:50:01 GMT, (TammyM) wrote:

>I particularly like the question about shooting people who don't trim
>their posts.

That was my favorite, as well.

On 2006-10-21, Michael "Dog3" Lonergan > wrote:

> Me too and you can tell who voted for top posting

Don't tell me ...uh.. ...umm..... top posters!!

Good catch, Dog!

nb

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:12:56 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> wrote:

>On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:50:01 GMT, (TammyM) wrote:
>
>>I particularly like the question about shooting people who don't trim
>>their posts.
>
>That was my favorite, as well.

Me too.

Christine

notbob wrote:
> I didn't want to answer the last question, there being no
> applicable choice,

I wonder which answer you missed. It was a yes/no question, so there
were 2 answers more than you need. Either you have or haven't, so you
can always choose yes or no.


--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music, Recipes, Photos, and mo

http://www.sequoiagrove.dk

"You don´t frighten us, English pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottoms, sons
of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and
all your silly English kaniggets. Thppppt!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Michael Archon Sequoia Nielsen wrote:
> notbob wrote:
>> I didn't want to answer the last question, there being no
>> applicable choice,
>
> I wonder which answer you missed. It was a yes/no question, so there
> were 2 answers more than you need. Either you have or haven't, so you
> can always choose yes or no.

Forget it - I was looking at the garlic survey when I wondered how you
could not answer yes or no to "have you ever tasted garlic icecream"

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music, Recipes, Photos, and mo

http://www.sequoiagrove.dk

"You don´t frighten us, English pig-dogs! Go and boil your bottoms, sons
of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called Arthur-king, you and
all your silly English kaniggets. Thppppt!"
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

In article >,
Chatty Cathy > wrote:

> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
> Vote now!
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy

That one was fun! :-)
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 13:12:56 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress
> > wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 17:50:01 GMT, (TammyM) wrote:
> >
> >>I particularly like the question about shooting people who don't trim
> >>their posts.
> >
> >That was my favorite, as well.
>
> Me too.
>
> Christine

And you didn't trim your post while chiming in with your asinine "me
too". LOL

notbob wrote:

> Another shortsighted survey. Decent questions, but inadequate
> answers. The first question should have included "all the above".
> The last question should have included "no problem" or some similar
> option. I didn't want to answer the last question, there being no
> applicable choice, but your survey script doesn't allow it. Another
> flaw.
>
> Don't take offense, just constructive criticism.

No offense taken. I forgot to put in "I can't answer this question...."
My bad.

But I still can't figure out why you would have answered "all the above"
for the first question... How can one be both "A complete nitwit" *and*
"Friendly and knowledgeable" at the same time? - that does not make
sense to me. Also, to be honest, I thought "I only read them if the
subject line interests me" pretty much covered the OT post question, as
that applies to ALL posts - at least it does to me...I guess we don't
think alike 'eh? Mind you, I suppose I could have put in "They don't
bother me" or something? I live and learn.

Oh well, if you get another idea for a survey, *you* write it up and
we'll see what the reaction is to it. Deal? I bet you five bucks that
someone out there will also have some constructive criticism for your
survey questions/answers too. LOL.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:53:29 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote:

>But I still can't figure out why you would have answered "all the above"
>for the first question... How can one be both "A complete nitwit" *and*
>"Friendly and knowledgeable" at the same time? - that does not make
>sense to me.

IMO, it does make sense. My interpretation of that answer is: they
can range from knowledgeable to nitwit.

>Also, to be honest, I thought "I only read them if the
>subject line interests me" pretty much covered the OT post question, as
>that applies to ALL posts - at least it does to me...

Me too.

> I guess we don't
>think alike 'eh? Mind you, I suppose I could have put in "They don't
>bother me" or something? I live and learn.

That would have been fine too, but I thought "I only read them if the
subject line inerests me" covered it.

In any case, I thought you done good girl. No complaints from me.



--
See return address to reply by email

sf wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 06:53:29 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> > wrote:

<snip>
>
> IMO, it does make sense. My interpretation of that answer is: they
> can range from knowledgeable to nitwit.

Its interesting how people interpret things, I didn't see it like
that... oh well. I could have put that in as an answer tho'. Just didn't
occur to me.

<some more snipping - to avoid being shot >

> In any case, I thought you done good girl. No complaints from me.

Thanks, sf.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
> "-L." >
> oups.com:
>
> >
> > Chatty Cathy wrote:
> >> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
> >>
> >> Vote now!
- Erma Bombeck


Awwww, I wish there had been a catagory .... All of the above--- with
so many people who post, this really covers every one at one time or
another...

In article >, says...
> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
> Vote now!
>
>
>

Interesting questions, particulary the top/bottom posting thing.

I've been on Usenet using a variety of domain names, usernames, etc.
since 1992. It's always been considered impolite to top post in replies.
Replies that address by paragraph are ok, but top posting wreaks of AOL,
same with all caps.