http://www.recfoodcooking.com/

Vote now!

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:19:34 +0200, Chatty Cathy wrote:

> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
> Vote now!

#3 needs an answer, "I don't know how/who/where to suggest a
survey and possible answers"

Chatty Cathy said...

> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
> Vote now!


C'MON folks...get out and VOTE!!!

Take 30 seconds out of your hectic lives and vote for DAILY surveys!!!

This is easily the most important survey yet!

Don't LURK! BE COUNTED!!!



Andy
Vote early and often

Andy wrote:
>
> C'MON folks...get out and VOTE!!!
>
> Take 30 seconds out of your hectic lives and vote for DAILY surveys!!!
>
> This is easily the most important survey yet!
>
> Don't LURK! BE COUNTED!!!
>

There's no evidence that the surveyor recognizes sarcasm....

The numerator of the "who is interested in surveys" fraction is the
number of respondents. The denominator is the total number of viewers,
which is not knowable. (The website administrator can count clicks on
the website, but not viewers of the rfc group.) Only Cathy can
determine whether it's worth her effort, but many surveys elicit fewer
than 100 votes.... -aem

On 23 Oct 2006 14:12:18 -0700, "aem" > wrote:

>Andy wrote:
>>
>> C'MON folks...get out and VOTE!!!
>>
>> Take 30 seconds out of your hectic lives and vote for DAILY surveys!!!
>>
>> This is easily the most important survey yet!
>>
>> Don't LURK! BE COUNTED!!!
>
>There's no evidence that the surveyor recognizes sarcasm....

Depends on the type of sarcasm. Cathy has an outstanding sense of
humor. And I think Andy's pretty serious about wanting a daily
survey. My concern with that is that we'd probably run out of things
to ask questions about to quickly that way.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:18:42 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress My concern
with that is that we'd probably run out of things
>to ask questions about to quickly that way.

Plus, I am thinking we would get very weary of them very quickly...and
they would stop being fun.

Christine

Christine Dabney said...

> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:18:42 -0500, Damsel in dis Dress My concern
> with that is that we'd probably run out of things
>>to ask questions about to quickly that way.
>
> Plus, I am thinking we would get very weary of them very quickly...and
> they would stop being fun.
>
> Christine


But... but... wouldn't that be the equivalent of running out of things to
talk about??

Taking part in r.f.c--usneet is a neverending series of unstructured
opinion polls, after all, isn't it?!?

Cathy will certainly do as she wishes. We're just the bozos she's kind
enough to entertain in one manner or another.

Thanks, Cathy!

Andy
CotD #2

aem said...

> Andy wrote:
>>
>> C'MON folks...get out and VOTE!!!
>>
>> Take 30 seconds out of your hectic lives and vote for DAILY surveys!!!
>>
>> This is easily the most important survey yet!
>>
>> Don't LURK! BE COUNTED!!!
>>
>
> There's no evidence that the surveyor recognizes sarcasm....
>
> The numerator of the "who is interested in surveys" fraction is the
> number of respondents. The denominator is the total number of viewers,
> which is not knowable. (The website administrator can count clicks on
> the website, but not viewers of the rfc group.) Only Cathy can
> determine whether it's worth her effort, but many surveys elicit fewer
> than 100 votes.... -aem


I like to vote.

Take a break from serious!

Geez...

Andy

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:19:43 -0500, Andy <q> wrote:

>I like to vote.
>
>Take a break from serious!
>
>Geez...

Okay, here's one.

Are you a serious cook?
Cooking is no laughing matter
I make Martha Stewart look like a slob when I entertain
I wear my white jacket and poofy hat when I cook
I wear my husband's tighty whities on my head when I cook
Do we *really* need paper plates? Aren't napkins enough?

I could go on ....

Damsel in dis Dress said...

> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:19:43 -0500, Andy <q> wrote:
>
>>I like to vote.
>>
>>Take a break from serious!
>>
>>Geez...
>
> Okay, here's one.
>
> Are you a serious cook?
> Cooking is no laughing matter
> I make Martha Stewart look like a slob when I entertain
> I wear my white jacket and poofy hat when I cook
> I wear my husband's tighty whities on my head when I cook
> Do we *really* need paper plates? Aren't napkins enough?
>
> I could go on ....


Good poll but I don't see any levers or buttons or #2 pencil squares to
fill in.

I vote lots of polls at http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl and elsewhere.

Andy

In article >, Andy <q> wrote:

> Chatty Cathy said...
>
> > http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
> >
> > Vote now!
>
>
> C'MON folks...get out and VOTE!!!
>
> Take 30 seconds out of your hectic lives and vote for DAILY surveys!!!
>
> This is easily the most important survey yet!
>
> Don't LURK! BE COUNTED!!!
>
>
>
> Andy
> Vote early and often

Heh!

CC has put up one heckuva cool website. :-)

Daily surveys would be too hard on her, unless she got a LOT more list
participation!
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:10:48 -0500, OmManiPadmeOmelet
> wrote:

>
>CC has put up one heckuva cool website. :-)
>
>Daily surveys would be too hard on her, unless she got a LOT more list
>participation!

Cathy has done an awesome job! I visited the old rfc web site once or
twice a year at best. Now I do it at least once or twice a week. She
has done a great job of making us all aware of it and giving it some
interest to the general rfc reader. I love the tabs for time,
currency and units. She made everything sooo easy to find.




--
See return address to reply by email

sf wrote:

>
> Cathy has done an awesome job! I visited the old rfc web site once or
> twice a year at best. Now I do it at least once or twice a week. She
> has done a great job of making us all aware of it and giving it some
> interest to the general rfc reader. I love the tabs for time,
> currency and units. She made everything sooo easy to find.
>
>
>

Thanks for saying so, sf. <blush> But I only put the stuff on the
website and try to "make it look pretty", and have added a few "bells
and whistles". Damsel started this site - way back when - but
unfortunately the guys that took over from her "moved on to other
things", so they put out a call for someone to take over. I volunteered
Damsel and a lot of other RFC-ers (including yourself) have made this
site what it is - by supplying me with new content and/or giving me good
ideas, so thank them, not me.

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

In article >, says...
> Thanks for saying so, sf. <blush> But I only put the stuff on the
> website and try to "make it look pretty", and have added a few "bells
> and whistles". Damsel started this site - way back when - but
> unfortunately the guys that took over from her "moved on to other
> things", so they put out a call for someone to take over. I volunteered
> Damsel and a lot of other RFC-ers (including yourself) have made this
> site what it is - by supplying me with new content and/or giving me good
> ideas, so thank them, not me.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy
>
>


The site is great and I am not alone in thanking you for your efforts.

--
Peter Aitken
Visit my recipe and kitchen myths pages at www.pgacon.com/cooking.htm

One time on Usenet, Chatty Cathy > said:
> sf wrote:

> > Cathy has done an awesome job! I visited the old rfc web site once or
> > twice a year at best. Now I do it at least once or twice a week. She
> > has done a great job of making us all aware of it and giving it some
> > interest to the general rfc reader. I love the tabs for time,
> > currency and units. She made everything sooo easy to find.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for saying so, sf. <blush> But I only put the stuff on the
> website and try to "make it look pretty", and have added a few "bells
> and whistles". Damsel started this site - way back when - but
> unfortunately the guys that took over from her "moved on to other
> things", so they put out a call for someone to take over. I volunteered
>

Hey, so did I! But I just couldn't get my act together -- heck,
it's *still* not quite together. I'm really glad you're handling
it, you're doing an excellent job.

> Damsel and a lot of other RFC-ers (including yourself) have made
this
> site what it is - by supplying me with new content and/or giving me good
> ideas, so thank them, not me.

Yeah, but what good are ideas if no one impliments them? You deserve
much of the credit, modest or not... :-)

--
"Little Malice" is Jani in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 18:02:22 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>>
>> Cathy has done an awesome job! I visited the old rfc web site once or
>> twice a year at best. Now I do it at least once or twice a week. She
>> has done a great job of making us all aware of it and giving it some
>> interest to the general rfc reader. I love the tabs for time,
>> currency and units. She made everything sooo easy to find.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Thanks for saying so, sf. <blush> But I only put the stuff on the
>website and try to "make it look pretty", and have added a few "bells
>and whistles". Damsel started this site - way back when - but
>unfortunately the guys that took over from her "moved on to other
>things", so they put out a call for someone to take over. I volunteered
> Damsel and a lot of other RFC-ers (including yourself) have made this
>site what it is - by supplying me with new content and/or giving me good
>ideas, so thank them, not me.


OK, so you've supplied the grunt work. You've done a fantastic job,
so just sit back, take the compliments and stop acting so darned
*female*.



--
See return address to reply by email

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:58:18 -0700, sf wrote:

>Cathy has done an awesome job! I visited the old rfc web site once or
>twice a year at best. Now I do it at least once or twice a week. She
>has done a great job of making us all aware of it and giving it some
>interest to the general rfc reader. I love the tabs for time,
>currency and units. She made everything sooo easy to find.

It's my home page. Cathy's doing a fantastic job.

Thanks, lady!

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:

>
> It's my home page. Cathy's doing a fantastic job.
>
> Thanks, lady!



--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 15:44:57 -0500, Andy <q> wrote:

>Take 30 seconds out of your hectic lives

*Thirty* seconds? That long????? OMG


--
See return address to reply by email

On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:19:34 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote:

>http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
>Vote now!

Of course after this vote you have to figure out what twice a week
means. LOL

--
See return address to reply by email

sf wrote:

>
> Of course after this vote you have to figure out what twice a week
> means. LOL
>

Yup! LOL. And I am still trying to figure out how long to leave the
survey about the survey there before changing it <veg>.

BTW, I want to thank the posters who have sent in more suggestions!
Please keep them coming

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Chatty Cathy wrote:
> http://www.recfoodcooking.com/
>
> Vote now!
>
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy


Mayonnaise or salad dressing. Blows have been thrown over this.
-ginny