Reg > wrote in
om:

> enigma wrote:
>
>> my dad was doing Top Secret work for the gub'mint at the
>> same
>> time i was making things that went "boom" & protesting the
>> war... so the FBI has my fingerprints (and my little
>> brother's.
>
> Sweet. Nice to know we have a mad bomber in our midst.

hardly mad and i'm damn good. still alive & with all working
body parts.
see, there are people who need to blow up certain things for
certain reasons (none of which should ever involve people or
personal property). then there are people who can't be trusted
with a pop cork...
i have something most people seem to be lacking (besides
common sense). i have principles, which means that even though
i know a lot of ways to 'go boom', i will not use them except
in carefully controled instances and only for sane reasons
(like getting that boulder out of the way).

> Anybody wonder why people are a little hesitant to post
> their own pictures? I don't.

i don't understand how this follows with the rest of the
post. my picture is online in several places. or are you so
vain as to think i might bother to stalk you or something?
yeah... my life is so empty <snicker>

lee <this post made me think of lava cakes... wouldn't it be
cool to make one actually erupt?>
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson

T wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
<snip>
>>I figure between my fingerprints, my mouthful of dental work and my HLA
>>profile on file with the Bone Marrow Donor Registery, if I'm ever
>>disastered they should be able to figure out if it's me or not, even if
>>there's only scraps left.
>
>
> In the case of a catastrophe, they might not even be able to identify
> you via those methods. Just my little cheerful thought for the day.

<shrug> You can only do what you can do. In that case I would hope my
next of kin (however distant they might be) would know enough to
eventually make the appropriate assumptions and initiate procedures to
deal with the situation. It makes no difference to me - dead is dead -
but I take care of documentation as a courtesy to survivors and executors.

Kathleen

Kathleen

In article >,
says...
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:43:20 -0500, T >
> wrote:
>
>
> >Technically your were a minor when it happened. Some day just get an
> >NCIC check done and I'll bet that incident isn't in there.
>
> It's my understanding that getting an NCIC check done isn't easy, and
> puts you back on their radar. That, and that they don't toss your
> fingerprints when they remove an incident from your record.
>
> Serene
>

Mmm... I remember reading the rules and regs for III compliance and
there were pretty strict rules about not retaining prints for NCIC
checks where there was no evidence of prior contact.