Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
'Tis the day after Thanksgiving and I am going to strip the turkey
carcass, then make more gravy. Usually I just toss the remains in the stock pot and simmer for hours along with other odds and ends. But usually I don't strip the carcass very thoroughly....so am wondering whether roasting the carcass a second time might provide more drippings and other flavorful bits, which would be great for gravy. There's still a lot of fat and meat bits on there. Then, of course, the remains would go into the stock pot for a last extraction. The younger daughter looks forward to Thanksgiving, but she doesn't particularly like turkey. She likes her daddy's turkey gravy, on mashed potatoes... Best -- Terry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used
instead of pan drippings. I made a pretty decent gravy last night using diced portabello mushrooms, which I sauteed and then stirred in at the end. Portabellos (at least these) have very dark gills, and that made the entire gravy a very dark brown, almost black. Everybody thought it was wiked looking and tasted good. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Pope wrote:
> I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used > instead of pan drippings. > The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is it really gravy? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Goomba38 > wrote:
>Steve Pope wrote: >> I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used >> instead of pan drippings. >The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're >what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a >couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is >it really gravy? By my definition, it's gravy even if it's (horrors!) vegetarian. However if you use *nothing* to give it color (roux, mushrooms, Kitchen Bouquet) it's going to look pale-grey and nobody will eat it. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Goomba38 wrote: > Steve Pope wrote: > > I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used > > instead of pan drippings. > > > > > The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're > what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a > couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is > it really gravy? I have yet to get pan drippings. This year, I put 2 cups of wine in the bottom of the roaster, and 3 hours later, poured off what was in there. It was all fat. Really. It conjealed and there was nothing under it. I threw another cup of wine in there, scrapped the areas that weren't too burnt looking, and added that to the giblet broth, a little roux, and cooked it down. Strained it and it was lovely. But it's always burnt on the bottom of the roasting pan. Whatamidoingwrong? maxine in ri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maxine in ri wrote:
> I have yet to get pan drippings. This year, I put 2 cups of wine in > the bottom of the roaster, and 3 hours later, poured off what was in > there. It was all fat. Really. It conjealed and there was nothing > under it. > > I threw another cup of wine in there, scrapped the areas that weren't > too burnt looking, and added that to the giblet broth, a little roux, > and cooked it down. Strained it and it was lovely. > > But it's always burnt on the bottom of the roasting pan. > Whatamidoingwrong? I don't deglaze the pan until after the turkey is off and out. There aren't always a lot, but it is there and I'll use what I have. I don't add liquid to the pan during roasting either. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Goomba38 > wrote: > Steve Pope wrote: > > I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used > > instead of pan drippings. > > > > > The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're > what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a > couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is > it really gravy? I have to agree with this... It's the roasted flavor of the drippings that really "makes" a good turkey gravy. I started my gravy with a good rich giblet and neck stock, (I bought extra necks for it) and added some 1/2 and 1/2 and all of the drippings from the roasting pan, then thickened with arrowroot slurry. It was _damn_ good! -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com>,
"maxine in ri" > wrote: > Goomba38 wrote: > > Steve Pope wrote: > > > I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used > > > instead of pan drippings. > > > > > > > > > The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're > > what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a > > couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is > > it really gravy? > > I have yet to get pan drippings. This year, I put 2 cups of wine in > the bottom of the roaster, and 3 hours later, poured off what was in > there. It was all fat. Really. It conjealed and there was nothing > under it. > > I threw another cup of wine in there, scrapped the areas that weren't > too burnt looking, and added that to the giblet broth, a little roux, > and cooked it down. Strained it and it was lovely. > > But it's always burnt on the bottom of the roasting pan. > Whatamidoingwrong? > > maxine in ri Add water or wine to the pan ahead of time. I did not and had _plenty_ of pan drippings (a good quart) but I was using that enclosed roaster, not an oven. The turkey was MUCH less dry. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maxine in ri > wrote:
>Goomba38 wrote: >> Steve Pope wrote: >> > I'm no gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used >> > instead of pan drippings. >> The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're >> what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a >> couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is >> it really gravy? >I have yet to get pan drippings. This year, I put 2 cups of wine in >the bottom of the roaster, and 3 hours later, poured off what was in >there. It was all fat. Really. It conjealed and there was nothing >under it. >I threw another cup of wine in there, scrapped the areas that weren't >too burnt looking, and added that to the giblet broth, a little roux, >and cooked it down. Strained it and it was lovely. >But it's always burnt on the bottom of the roasting pan. >Whatamidoingwrong? Probably nothing, the above describes exactly what happened to us on Thursday. The roasting pan started with some water/stock in it, by the time the turkey came out that had all evaporated off and only fat was in it. Poured off the fat and noted no aquaeous phase at all in the gravy separator. My friend then said, "so deglaze it", and that gave us water-based "drippings" which went into the (successful) gravy. I can only imagine if you start with or eventually use more liquid in the roasting pan, the final result might not be all fat, so you'd be able to use some of the first pour-off. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Sun 26 Nov 2006 11:45:58a, Dan Abel meant to say...
> In article >, > Omelet > wrote: > >> In article >, >> Goomba38 > wrote: >> >> > Steve Pope wrote: >> > > I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used instead >> > > of pan drippings. > >> > The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're >> > what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a >> > couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is >> > it really gravy? >> >> I have to agree with this... >> It's the roasted flavor of the drippings that really "makes" a good >> turkey gravy. > > > There's no such thing! > >:-) > > I don't really like turkey, but it's a tradition and my wife likes it. > I eat the white meat and doctor it up with spices, so it doesn't taste > like turkey. But turkey gravy tastes like turkey, and I don't like it. > I've made it a couple of times, and a little taste for the seasoning is > all I eat. > > My daughter wanted gravy, but my son said that since he was smoking the > turkey, there would be no edible gravy from it. I've made gravy a > couple of times from canned beef broth, and it's OK. I asked my > daughter if she wanted chicken or beef. She didn't care, but my wife > wanted chicken. So I made a roux with flour and olive oil, and added > the canned chicken broth. I threw in a dash of cayenne pepper and a > couple of grinds of white pepper. My wife said it was good. I didn't > eat any. I put butter on my mashed potatoes and sweet potatoes. > "Gravy" implies drippings and meat juices. While you may have liked it, what you made was a sauce, nothing more. I don't like turkey either, but will eat a bit of the white meat in deference to the holiday. Turkey gravy can be quite good if made properly. I do eat it on dressing and potatoes. -- Wayne Boatwright __________________________________________________ You're not as real as you think you are. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Omelet > wrote: > In article >, > Goomba38 > wrote: > > > Steve Pope wrote: > > > I'm not gravy expert, but any watery liquid can be used > > > instead of pan drippings. > > The pan drippings are not in replacement for any watery liquid. They're > > what gives gravy a good rich flavor. You don't need much either, a > > couple of tablespoons will do, but if you don't have them in there...is > > it really gravy? > > I have to agree with this... > It's the roasted flavor of the drippings that really "makes" a good > turkey gravy. There's no such thing! :-) I don't really like turkey, but it's a tradition and my wife likes it. I eat the white meat and doctor it up with spices, so it doesn't taste like turkey. But turkey gravy tastes like turkey, and I don't like it. I've made it a couple of times, and a little taste for the seasoning is all I eat. My daughter wanted gravy, but my son said that since he was smoking the turkey, there would be no edible gravy from it. I've made gravy a couple of times from canned beef broth, and it's OK. I asked my daughter if she wanted chicken or beef. She didn't care, but my wife wanted chicken. So I made a roux with flour and olive oil, and added the canned chicken broth. I threw in a dash of cayenne pepper and a couple of grinds of white pepper. My wife said it was good. I didn't eat any. I put butter on my mashed potatoes and sweet potatoes. -- Dan Abel Petaluma, California, USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My nephew making biscuits and gravy on the TV | General Cooking | |||
gravy without doing a roast | General Cooking | |||
Roast Turkey with Gravy | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Pot-Roast With Sour Cream Gravy | Recipes | |||
Great Gravy Pot Roast | Recipes (moderated) |