The Raw Secrets will help you live sustainably on the raw vegan diet
and overcome the problems you may have encountered in doing so.
Based on logical principles, the raw vegan diet still often falls short
of expectation. Instead of improvements in their health, many people
see deterioration. Others experience less rejuvenation than they
anticipated, or find themselves unable to maintain balance in the
long-term. This results solely from a lack of understanding of the
guiding principles of natural diet, from the widespread misinformation
about it, and the gross errors that follow.
The 28, succinct chapters give unique insights on many topics affecting
those considering a high-raw or all-raw diet. Each holds dozens of tips
to help you eat a pure, simple, nourishing diet.
If you are tired of the same, boring, repetitive information found in
nearly every other book on the raw vegan diet, then you're in for a
surprise!
If you seek groundbreaking research and a fresh perspective on raw
ating, you will find them in The Raw Secrets !
http://rawfoodos.blogspot.com/#

In article .com>,
"christina reynolds" > wrote:

> The Raw Secrets will help you live sustainably on the raw vegan diet
> and overcome the problems you may have encountered in doing so.
> Based on logical principles, the raw vegan diet still often falls short
> of expectation. Instead of improvements in their health, many people
> see deterioration. Others experience less rejuvenation than they
> anticipated, or find themselves unable to maintain balance in the
> long-term. This results solely from a lack of understanding of the
> guiding principles of natural diet, from the widespread misinformation
> about it, and the gross errors that follow.
> The 28, succinct chapters give unique insights on many topics affecting
> those considering a high-raw or all-raw diet. Each holds dozens of tips
> to help you eat a pure, simple, nourishing diet.
> If you are tired of the same, boring, repetitive information found in
> nearly every other book on the raw vegan diet, then you're in for a
> surprise!
> If you seek groundbreaking research and a fresh perspective on raw
> ating, you will find them in The Raw Secrets !
> http://rawfoodos.blogspot.com/#

This is raw spam. People do not receive rejuvenation from a raw food
diet mostly because the diet is deficient in protein and other vital
nutrients.

Cindy, resident PhD in nutrition

--
C.J. Fuller

Delete the obvious to email me

Cindy Fuller wrote:
> In article .com>,
> "christina reynolds" > wrote:
>
> > The Raw Secrets will help you live sustainably on the raw vegan diet
> > and overcome the problems you may have encountered in doing so.
> > Based on logical principles, the raw vegan diet still often falls short
> > of expectation. Instead of improvements in their health, many people
> > see deterioration. Others experience less rejuvenation than they
> > anticipated, or find themselves unable to maintain balance in the
> > long-term. This results solely from a lack of understanding of the
> > guiding principles of natural diet, from the widespread misinformation
> > about it, and the gross errors that follow.
> > The 28, succinct chapters give unique insights on many topics affecting
> > those considering a high-raw or all-raw diet. Each holds dozens of tips
> > to help you eat a pure, simple, nourishing diet.
> > If you are tired of the same, boring, repetitive information found in
> > nearly every other book on the raw vegan diet, then you're in for a
> > surprise!
> > If you seek groundbreaking research and a fresh perspective on raw
> > ating, you will find them in The Raw Secrets !
> > http://rawfoodos.blogspot.com/#
>
> This is raw spam. People do not receive rejuvenation from a raw food
> diet mostly because the diet is deficient in protein and other vital
> nutrients.
>
> Cindy, resident PhD in nutrition
>
> --
> C.J. Fuller
>
> Delete the obvious to email me

The resident English grad student says, never trust an informational
book whose marketing material is riddled with basic errors. If they
can't even edit copy, why would they check facts?

Leila

In article . com>,
"Leila" > wrote:

> Cindy Fuller wrote:
> > In article .com>,
> > "christina reynolds" > wrote:
> >
> > > The Raw Secrets will help you live sustainably on the raw vegan diet
> > > and overcome the problems you may have encountered in doing so.
> > > Based on logical principles, the raw vegan diet still often falls short
> > > of expectation. Instead of improvements in their health, many people
> > > see deterioration. Others experience less rejuvenation than they
> > > anticipated, or find themselves unable to maintain balance in the
> > > long-term. This results solely from a lack of understanding of the
> > > guiding principles of natural diet, from the widespread misinformation
> > > about it, and the gross errors that follow.
> > > The 28, succinct chapters give unique insights on many topics affecting
> > > those considering a high-raw or all-raw diet. Each holds dozens of tips
> > > to help you eat a pure, simple, nourishing diet.
> > > If you are tired of the same, boring, repetitive information found in
> > > nearly every other book on the raw vegan diet, then you're in for a
> > > surprise!
> > > If you seek groundbreaking research and a fresh perspective on raw
> > > ating, you will find them in The Raw Secrets !
> > > http://rawfoodos.blogspot.com/#
> >
> > This is raw spam. People do not receive rejuvenation from a raw food
> > diet mostly because the diet is deficient in protein and other vital
> > nutrients.
> >
> > Cindy, resident PhD in nutrition
> >
> > --
> > C.J. Fuller
> >
> > Delete the obvious to email me
>
> The resident English grad student says, never trust an informational
> book whose marketing material is riddled with basic errors. If they
> can't even edit copy, why would they check facts?
>
> Leila

I was focusing on the content, which was bad enough. "Style? We don't
need no stinking style!" (Yes, I know that's not grammatically correct.
It's not supposed to be.)

OB Food: Mark Bittman had an update on the no-knead bread:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/06/di...tml?ref=dining

Cindy

--
C.J. Fuller

Delete the obvious to email me

Cindy Fuller wrote:

> I was focusing on the content, which was bad enough. "Style? We don't
> need no stinking style!" (Yes, I know that's not grammatically correct.
> It's not supposed to be.)

It's idiomatic, used for emphasis. In casual prose, everybody knows
what you mean, and nobody would "ding" you.

Besides, isn't there an etiquette rule on the usenet about not
correcting other people's grammar, usage etc.?

I just finished taking a class in how to teach English Composition. The
accepted practice now is, don't litter the paper with red marks. Pick
the most salient dings you're going to mark. Use some accepted research
to analyze where the errors come from, and work with the student
accordingly.

Therefore, I would never correct you, Cindy, for the above statement!

It's not as if I have the most perfect grammar on the planet. I'm an
MFA, not an M.A. We MFAs are more arty and less frenzied about such
matters. But I'm learning lots of arcane things that were mysterious to
me before grad school.

Fond regards,
Leila


>
> OB Food: Mark Bittman had an update on the no-knead bread:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/06/di...tml?ref=dining

Thanks, I'll go look...

Fond regards,
L.
>
> Cindy
>
> --
> C.J. Fuller
>
> Delete the obvious to email me