Frying fright: Cancer risk from high-temperature cooking, says paper
 

http://www.ng2000.com/news.php?tp=cooking

Stir-fry cooking without good ventilation may boost the risk of lung cancer,
according to a review published in a specialist journal, Lancet Oncology.

Frying fright: Cancer risk from high-temperature cooking, says paper
 

"NG2000" > wrote in message
...
> http://www.ng2000.com/news.php?tp=cooking
>
> Stir-fry cooking without good ventilation may boost the risk of lung
> cancer,
> according to a review published in a specialist journal, Lancet Oncology.


Wow, I'm still freaked out about spinach... and now this? After I learned
that the terrorists have the spinach, I've been afraid to leave the house
and have been stir-frying everything indoors with bad ventilation...

Hasta,
Curt Nelson

Frying fright: Cancer risk from high-temperature cooking, says paper
 

In article >, says...
> http://www.ng2000.com/news.php?tp=cooking
>
> Stir-fry cooking without good ventilation may boost the risk of lung cancer,
> according to a review published in a specialist journal, Lancet Oncology.
>
>
>

I have to say it, but if that was the case you'd have lots of dead
Chinese people. Anyone got the stats on the prevalence of lung cancer in
China?

Frying fright: Cancer risk from high-temperature cooking, says paper
 

On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:27:29 -0800, "NG2000" > wrote:

>http://www.ng2000.com/news.php?tp=cooking
>
>Stir-fry cooking without good ventilation may boost the risk of lung cancer,
>according to a review published in a specialist journal, Lancet Oncology.


It is time to stop readiong all of these scare articles and enjoy
life. Living in Los Angeles, NYC, or other urban areas with smog
certainly present a greater health risk than stir-frying food. If you
were really worried about everything, you could live in a bubble and
make sure that you filter your air, eat only what you grow and watch
the world around you move on.

Each and everyone of us is going to die, sooner or later. Aging is
the biggest killer that there is, yet, the press does not bother to
print that.

David