Hi,

I'm trying to replicate a sweet papardella & scamoras dish that I
previously enjoyed in a restaurant and I have several questions:

Should I cook the sausage and onions separately and then add them to
the red sauce, or should I cook the sausage and onions in the sauce?

Also, there are the scamoras. When should I add them? Just before
serving? How fast do they melt?

I decided to use a "rustic" sauce for this dish and I started looking
at recipes for sausage pasta dishes. Some of the recipes used red wine
and other white. I really don't know how to cook with wine. Why the
difference?

Thanx,
Ed

> ha scritto nel messaggio
oups.com...
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to replicate a sweet papardella & scamoras dish that I
> previously enjoyed in a restaurant and I have several questions:
>
> Should I cook the sausage and onions separately and then add them to
> the red sauce, or should I cook the sausage and onions in the sauce?
>
> Also, there are the scamoras. When should I add them? Just before
> serving? How fast do they melt?
>
> I decided to use a "rustic" sauce for this dish and I started looking
> at recipes for sausage pasta dishes. Some of the recipes used red wine
> and other white. I really don't know how to cook with wine. Why the
> difference?
>
> Thanx,
> Ed
>
I don't understand what is your problem. Do you want to make a sausage
tomato sauce for your pappardelle?
I want also to ask you : what are "scamoras"?

--
Merry Christmas
Pandora

Pandora wrote:
> > ha scritto nel messaggio
> oups.com...
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to replicate a sweet papardella & scamoras dish that I
>> previously enjoyed in a restaurant and I have several questions:
>>
>> Should I cook the sausage and onions separately and then add them to
>> the red sauce, or should I cook the sausage and onions in the sauce?
>>
>> Also, there are the scamoras. When should I add them? Just before
>> serving? How fast do they melt?
>>
>> I decided to use a "rustic" sauce for this dish and I started looking
>> at recipes for sausage pasta dishes. Some of the recipes used red wine
>> and other white. I really don't know how to cook with wine. Why the
>> difference?
>>
>> Thanx,
>> Ed
>>
> I don't understand what is your problem. Do you want to make a sausage
> tomato sauce for your pappardelle?
> I want also to ask you : what are "scamoras"?
>


Do you suppose he means "scamorza"?

gloria p

I meant scamorzas, smoked mozzarella.

The sauce should be a red sauce where I place the sausage and
scamorzas.

On Dec 17, 5:34 pm, Puester > wrote:
> Pandora wrote:
> > > ha scritto nel messaggio
> roups.com...
> >> Hi,
>
> >> I'm trying to replicate a sweet papardella & scamoras dish that I
> >> previously enjoyed in a restaurant and I have several questions:
>
> >> Should I cook the sausage and onions separately and then add them to
> >> the red sauce, or should I cook the sausage and onions in the sauce?
>
> >> Also, there are the scamoras. When should I add them? Just before
> >> serving? How fast do they melt?
>
> >> I decided to use a "rustic" sauce for this dish and I started looking
> >> at recipes for sausage pasta dishes. Some of the recipes used red wine
> >> and other white. I really don't know how to cook with wine. Why the
> >> difference?
>
> >> Thanx,
> >> Ed
>
> > I don't understand what is your problem. Do you want to make a sausage
> > tomato sauce for your pappardelle?
> > I want also to ask you : what are "scamoras"?Do you suppose he means "scamorza"?
>
> gloria p

On 18 Dec 2006 18:53:21 -0800, wrote:

>I meant scamorzas, smoked mozzarella.

The #1 search on google says it resembles Provolne
http://www.cheese.com/Description.asp?Name=Scamorza

Epicurious says: scamorze cheese; scamorza; scamorzo
there is no "s" on the end.

Thank you for the alternative name, I'll stick with smoked provolne...

--
See return address to reply by email

> ha scritto nel messaggio
oups.com...
>I meant scamorzas, smoked mozzarella.

Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying pan
with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
cheers
Pandora

>
> The sauce should be a red sauce where I place the sausage and
> scamorzas.
>
> On Dec 17, 5:34 pm, Puester > wrote:
>> Pandora wrote:
>> > > ha scritto nel messaggio
>> roups.com...
>> >> Hi,
>>
>> >> I'm trying to replicate a sweet papardella & scamoras dish that I
>> >> previously enjoyed in a restaurant and I have several questions:
>>
>> >> Should I cook the sausage and onions separately and then add them to
>> >> the red sauce, or should I cook the sausage and onions in the sauce?
>>
>> >> Also, there are the scamoras. When should I add them? Just before
>> >> serving? How fast do they melt?
>>
>> >> I decided to use a "rustic" sauce for this dish and I started looking
>> >> at recipes for sausage pasta dishes. Some of the recipes used red
>> >> wine
>> >> and other white. I really don't know how to cook with wine. Why the
>> >> difference?
>>
>> >> Thanx,
>> >> Ed
>>
>> > I don't understand what is your problem. Do you want to make a sausage
>> > tomato sauce for your pappardelle?
>> > I want also to ask you : what are "scamoras"?Do you suppose he means
>> > "scamorza"?
>>
>> gloria p
>

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:45:24 +0100, "Pandora" >
wrote:

>Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying pan
>with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>cheers
>Pandora


Instant what?

--
See return address to reply by email

<sf> ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:45:24 +0100, "Pandora" >
> wrote:
>
>>Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying pan
>>with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>cheers
>>Pandora
>
>
> Instant what?


Moments, minutes ...

--
Merry Christmas
Pandora

sf wrote:

>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying
>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>
> Instant what?

On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you mix for
a few SECONDS.

Bob

"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> sf wrote:
>
>>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying
>>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>
>> Instant what?
>
> On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you mix
> for a few SECONDS.
>
> Bob
Yes. Thank you Bob. Dont' you say : instants? Perhaps I was wrong because
in italian "istanti" means seconds, moments...
Thank you
Pandora

"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> sf wrote:
>
>>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying
>>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>
>> Instant what?
>
> On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you mix
> for a few SECONDS.
>
> Bob
>

But yes. Now I have controlled on vocabulary and you too says :"Instants"
for moments.
Why sf didn't understand?
cheers
Pandora

On 19 Dec 2006 00:46:02 -0600, "Bob Terwilliger"
> wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying
>>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>
>> Instant what?
>
>On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you mix for
>a few SECONDS.
>
I wasn't kidding. Some things just whiz right past me.

--
See return address to reply by email

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:50:27 +0100, "Pandora" >
wrote:

>
>"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
>> sf wrote:
>>
>>>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying
>>>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>>
>>> Instant what?
>>
>> On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you mix
>> for a few SECONDS.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>
>But yes. Now I have controlled on vocabulary and you too says :"Instants"
>for moments.
>Why sf didn't understand?

Brain fart. I use "instant" mainly as an adjective.

--
See return address to reply by email

Pandora wrote:

> Yes. Thank you Bob. Dont' you say : instants? Perhaps I was wrong
> because in italian "istanti" means seconds, moments...

Yes, we do say that; what you wrote was perfectly correct. However, the word
"instant" is also used as a description for things that cook quickly, like
instant oatmeal, instant pudding, instant coffee, and so forth. (It's also
used for things like Instant Messaging on the computer.)

I think sf just got it stuck in her head that you were using the word
"instant" in that way, rather than in the way you meant.

Bob

<sf> ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:50:27 +0100, "Pandora" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
>>> sf wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying
>>>>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>>>
>>>> Instant what?
>>>
>>> On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you mix
>>> for a few SECONDS.
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>
>>But yes. Now I have controlled on vocabulary and you too says :"Instants"
>>for moments.
>>Why sf didn't understand?
>
> Brain fart. I use "instant" mainly as an adjective.

Oh , Sf , if I Am wrong you can tell me. But if I Am right you must tell me
the same .
Thank you
Pandora

"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> Pandora wrote:
>
>> Yes. Thank you Bob. Dont' you say : instants? Perhaps I was wrong
>> because in italian "istanti" means seconds, moments...
>
> Yes, we do say that; what you wrote was perfectly correct. However, the
> word "instant" is also used as a description for things that cook quickly,
> like instant oatmeal, instant pudding, instant coffee, and so forth. (It's
> also used for things like Instant Messaging on the computer.)

Yes , I know also instant yeast . But I know also instant as substantive.
Don't tell me you know only the adjective

>
> I think sf just got it stuck in her head that you were using the word
> "instant" in that way, rather than in the way you meant.

I 've always said english language was an anbiguous language
Poor me! I only hope you are able to understand me because my english (..and
I know very well this) is not very good

Cheers and thank you
Pandora

Pandora wrote:
I only hope you are able to understand me because my english (..and
> I know very well this) is not very good

Your English is no worse, in fact sometimes better, than even some
native speakers. You're doing just fine.
Goomba

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:16:42 +0100, "Pandora" >
wrote:

>
><sf> ha scritto nel messaggio
.. .
>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:50:27 +0100, "Pandora" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
.. .
>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the frying
>>>>>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>>>>
>>>>> Instant what?
>>>>
>>>> On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you mix
>>>> for a few SECONDS.
>>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>>
>>>
>>>But yes. Now I have controlled on vocabulary and you too says :"Instants"
>>>for moments.
>>>Why sf didn't understand?
>>
>> Brain fart. I use "instant" mainly as an adjective.
>
>Oh , Sf , if I Am wrong you can tell me. But if I Am right you must tell me
>the same .

I wasn't trying to make you wrong Pandora. I didn't follow "some
instants" and thought you were talking about another ingredient.

--
See return address to reply by email

<sf> ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:16:42 +0100, "Pandora" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>><sf> ha scritto nel messaggio
. ..
>>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 07:50:27 +0100, "Pandora" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
. ..
>>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh! Scamorza! Ok. But you have to put scamorza (minced) in the
>>>>>>> frying
>>>>>>> pan with the sauce and pasta. Then you mix for some instants.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Instant what?
>>>>>
>>>>> On the off-chance that you're truly puzzled, Pandora meant that you
>>>>> mix
>>>>> for a few SECONDS.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>But yes. Now I have controlled on vocabulary and you too says
>>>>:"Instants"
>>>>for moments.
>>>>Why sf didn't understand?
>>>
>>> Brain fart. I use "instant" mainly as an adjective.
>>
>>Oh , Sf , if I Am wrong you can tell me. But if I Am right you must tell
>>me
>>the same .
>
> I wasn't trying to make you wrong Pandora. I didn't follow "some
> instants" and thought you were talking about another ingredient.

OK, ok . Don't worry.

--
Merry Christmas
Pandora

On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:23:00 +0100, "Pandora" >
wrote:

>
>"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
>> Pandora wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. Thank you Bob. Dont' you say : instants? Perhaps I was wrong
>>> because in italian "istanti" means seconds, moments...
>>
>> Yes, we do say that; what you wrote was perfectly correct. However, the
>> word "instant" is also used as a description for things that cook quickly,
>> like instant oatmeal, instant pudding, instant coffee, and so forth. (It's
>> also used for things like Instant Messaging on the computer.)
>
>Yes , I know also instant yeast . But I know also instant as substantive.
>Don't tell me you know only the adjective

No, we certainly do have "instant" as a noun.

Serene
--
"I can't decide if I feel more like four ten-year-olds or ten four-year-olds." Laurie Anderson , on turning 40.

http://serenejournal.livejournal.com

"Serene" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:23:00 +0100, "Pandora" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bob Terwilliger" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
>>> Pandora wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes. Thank you Bob. Dont' you say : instants? Perhaps I was wrong
>>>> because in italian "istanti" means seconds, moments...
>>>
>>> Yes, we do say that; what you wrote was perfectly correct. However, the
>>> word "instant" is also used as a description for things that cook
>>> quickly,
>>> like instant oatmeal, instant pudding, instant coffee, and so forth.
>>> (It's
>>> also used for things like Instant Messaging on the computer.)
>>
>>Yes , I know also instant yeast . But I know also instant as
>>substantive.
>>Don't tell me you know only the adjective
>
> No, we certainly do have "instant" as a noun.
>
> Serene

Thank you.

--
Merry Christmas
Pandora