Thousands of people throughout the world are returning to the raw food
diet intended as the diet for all creatures on planet earth.
Out of thousands of species on earth, only one species eats cooked
food! We are actually in the minority. Which species has the most
health problems?
I'll confess that the idea of 100% raw food can be quite a change. It
was for me a couple of years ago. But listen to your heart - doesn't
it make sense?
I'll let you in on a secret. There are some sacrifices. But over time
the benefits get greater and greater, and the sacrifices grow smaller
and smaller. Your tastes literally awaken - living food tastes so
good!
To get the benefits, you must have faith and hope to begin. To begin,
you need the knowledge and skills in this Raw Food Diet ebook. You can
read about the ten benefits of the miracle food Chia Seed. Chia gives
you calcium, and builds energy.
http://rawfoodyynw.blogspot.com/#

katie anderson wrote:

> Thousands of people throughout the world are returning to the raw food
> diet intended as the diet for all creatures on planet earth.

Intended by who or what?

If you're Christian or Jewish, remember that while Adam was given
dominion over all living creatures, he broke the contract.

If you are what you eat, raw foodist are poisoners. Plants are full of
poisons, intended to discourage animals (including primates) from
eating them.

--
Dan Goodman
All political parties die at last of swallowing their own lies.
John Arbuthnot (1667-1735), Scottish writer, physician.
Journal http://dsgood.livejournal.com
Links http://del.icio.us/dsgood
Political http://www.dailykos.com/user/dsgood

On 14 Jan 2007 23:58:01 GMT, "Dan Goodman" > wrote:

>katie anderson wrote:
>
>> Thousands of people throughout the world are returning to the raw food
>> diet intended as the diet for all creatures on planet earth.
>
>Intended by who or what?
>
>If you're Christian or Jewish, remember that while Adam was given
>dominion over all living creatures, he broke the contract.
>
>If you are what you eat, raw foodist are poisoners. Plants are full of
>poisons, intended to discourage animals (including primates) from
>eating them.

I missed the OP... but it's true. There is a movement to raw foods.
We even have restaurants (not many) that serve only raw food here in
the San Francisco area.

--
See return address to reply by email

<sf> wrote in message ...
> On 14 Jan 2007 23:58:01 GMT, "Dan Goodman" > wrote:
>
>>katie anderson wrote:
>>
>>> Thousands of people throughout the world are returning to the raw food
>>> diet intended as the diet for all creatures on planet earth.
>>
>>Intended by who or what?
>>
>>If you're Christian or Jewish, remember that while Adam was given
>>dominion over all living creatures, he broke the contract.
>>
>>If you are what you eat, raw foodist are poisoners. Plants are full of
>>poisons, intended to discourage animals (including primates) from
>>eating them.
>
> I missed the OP... but it's true. There is a movement to raw foods.
> We even have restaurants (not many) that serve only raw food here in
> the San Francisco area.
>

I do believe their are restaurants in the SF area that serve just about
anything you can think of. Every time we go to the bay I notice something
else I have either never heard of, or never imagined eating. Funny though,
we always seem to go to the same restaurants over and over once we find one
we like.

Cindi

> --
> See return address to reply by email

On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:10:22 GMT, "Cindi - HappyMamatoThree"
> wrote:

>
><sf> wrote in message ...
>>
>> I missed the OP... but it's true. There is a movement to raw foods.
>> We even have restaurants (not many) that serve only raw food here in
>> the San Francisco area.
>>
>
>I do believe their are restaurants in the SF area that serve just about
>anything you can think of. Every time we go to the bay I notice something
>else I have either never heard of, or never imagined eating. Funny though,
>we always seem to go to the same restaurants over and over once we find one
>we like.
>
That's not unusual and it's ok Cindi. LOL! I'm certainly not going
to tell you you aren't adventurous because I do the same thing. What
I hate the most is going to a new restaurant with an *extensive* menu.
It takes me way too long to decide what I want and I spend the rest of
the meal thinking "I maybe shouldda ordered...." I think it's human
nature.

--
See return address to reply by email

<sf> wrote in message ...
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 02:10:22 GMT, "Cindi - HappyMamatoThree"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>><sf> wrote in message ...
>>>
>>> I missed the OP... but it's true. There is a movement to raw foods.
>>> We even have restaurants (not many) that serve only raw food here in
>>> the San Francisco area.
>>>
>>
>>I do believe their are restaurants in the SF area that serve just about
>>anything you can think of. Every time we go to the bay I notice something
>>else I have either never heard of, or never imagined eating. Funny though,
>>we always seem to go to the same restaurants over and over once we find
>>one
>>we like.
>>
> That's not unusual and it's ok Cindi. LOL! I'm certainly not going
> to tell you you aren't adventurous because I do the same thing. What
> I hate the most is going to a new restaurant with an *extensive* menu.
> It takes me way too long to decide what I want and I spend the rest of
> the meal thinking "I maybe shouldda ordered...." I think it's human
> nature.

Shew I am glad that in the city of unending dining possibilities, I am not
the only one who finds a good spot, and just stops being adventurous. Maybe
I fear being served something I can't identify. Or worse, that I can
identify but don't like the results of the identification.

I think it's about time for another trip to The House of Prime Rib or
perhaps Scomas. My children can eat more food in one meal at those two
places, than I can put away in three or four meals.

Ahhh Goood Food.

Cindi
>
> --
> See return address to reply by email