Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
Mostly plants."

He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:
http://tinyurl.com/26glv4

You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.
--

modom

http://www.koyote.com/users/modom/home.html

On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:02:48 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
<moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:

>Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
>Mostly plants."
>
>He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:
>http://tinyurl.com/26glv4
>
>You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.

Pound for pound, that's overcharging for the article.

Sue(tm)
Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:09:03 GMT, (Curly
Sue) wrote:

>On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:02:48 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
><moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
>
>>Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
>>Mostly plants."
>>
>>He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:
>>http://tinyurl.com/26glv4
>>
>>You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.
>
>Pound for pound, that's overcharging for the article.
>
You didn't like what he had to say? I found him cogent.
--

modom

http://www.koyote.com/users/modom/home.html

I dont wanna sign up for more stuff...
but far as eating plants? yes. the more water found naturally in a
food the better it is for us.

Like -L. shared... having enough water on board will "unlock" or
"release" acids from our fat cells.
when there is not enough water, the body protects itself from acid by
locking it into a fat cell.

not enough water means one gets fat, but it's not just water, it's
about good food combinations
something most of you know nothing about, you are more into cooking
oppossed to cooking for health
which is fine, but at some point just nurtures the troll in all of us
(we get bored)

HOW MANY WAYS CAN YOU STICK A DAMN CHICKEN

lmao


On Jan 30, 10:03 pm, "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom>
wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:09:03 GMT, (Curly
>
> Sue) wrote:
> >On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:02:48 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
> ><moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
>
> >>Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
> >>Mostly plants."
>
> >>He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:
> >>http://tinyurl.com/26glv4
>
> >>You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.
>
> >Pound for pound, that's overcharging for the article.
>
> You didn't like what he had to say? I found him cogent.
> --
>
> modom
>
> http://www.koyote.com/users/modom/home.html

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:03:14 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
<moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:

>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:09:03 GMT, (Curly
>Sue) wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:02:48 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
>><moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
>>
>>>Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
>>>Mostly plants."
>>>
>>>He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:
>>>http://tinyurl.com/26glv4
>>>
>>>You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.
>>
>>Pound for pound, that's overcharging for the article.
>>
>You didn't like what he had to say? I found him cogent.
>--
I haven't had a chance to read the whole thing yet, but what I read
over the weekend I thought was glib.

Sue(tm)
Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:12:02 GMT, (Curly
Sue) wrote:

>On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:03:14 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
><moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:09:03 GMT, (Curly
>>Sue) wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:02:48 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
>>><moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
>>>>Mostly plants."
>>>>
>>>>He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:
>>>>http://tinyurl.com/26glv4
>>>>
>>>>You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.
>>>
>>>Pound for pound, that's overcharging for the article.
>>>
>>You didn't like what he had to say? I found him cogent.
>>--
>I haven't had a chance to read the whole thing yet, but what I read
>over the weekend I thought was glib.
>
Ah.

I thought his description of the money and politics-infused transition
from food to nutrients in the American discourse was well described. I
probably should have included a PING to Cindy Fuller in the initial
post. I'd much like to hear her well-informed ideas on his discussion
of the science of nutrition and the problems of reductive science,
particularly as it informs his argument regarding what he calls
"nutritionism." Cindy knows her nutrition science onions, but it
seems Pollan knows a thing or two as well.

Like I said, I found Pollan's piece cogent. But Cindy's expert
opinion would surely make for better information.
--

modom

http://www.koyote.com/users/modom/home.html

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:16:22 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
<moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:

>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:12:02 GMT, (Curly
>Sue) wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:03:14 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
>><moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:09:03 GMT, (Curly
>>>Sue) wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 12:02:48 -0600, "modom (palindrome guy)"
>>>><moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
>>>>>Mostly plants."
>>>>>
>>>>>He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:
>>>>>http://tinyurl.com/26glv4
>>>>>
>>>>>You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.
>>>>
>>>>Pound for pound, that's overcharging for the article.
>>>>
>>>You didn't like what he had to say? I found him cogent.
>>>--
>>I haven't had a chance to read the whole thing yet, but what I read
>>over the weekend I thought was glib.
>>
>Ah.
>
>I thought his description of the money and politics-infused transition
>from food to nutrients in the American discourse was well described. I
>probably should have included a PING to Cindy Fuller in the initial
>post. I'd much like to hear her well-informed ideas on his discussion
>of the science of nutrition and the problems of reductive science,
>particularly as it informs his argument regarding what he calls
>"nutritionism." Cindy knows her nutrition science onions, but it
>seems Pollan knows a thing or two as well.
>
>Like I said, I found Pollan's piece cogent. But Cindy's expert
>opinion would surely make for better information.

I like Pollan too, and also enjoyed the piece. e's a journalist, not
a nutritionismist :-) I'd also enjoy hearing the educated opinon of a
scientist-(scientismist?) like CindyF.

I had the opportunity to meet Pollan, by the way, when he was on our
campus for our book project which featured his book, The Omnivore's
Dilemma. Nice guy. Great lecture. Dare I say it? "food for
thought" :-)

TammyM

On Jan 28, 2007, modom (palindrome guy) wrote:

> Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: *
>"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."

I enjoyed reading the article (thanks for the
reference). I thought it was a bit muddled.
It seemed to expand to occupy the desired
amount of space.

On Jan 28, 1:02 pm, "modom (palindrome guy)" <moc.etoyok@modom> wrote:
> Michael Pollan in the NYT Sunday Magazine: "Eat food. Not too much.
> Mostly plants."
>
> He elaborates in today's edition. Here's a link:http://tinyurl.com/26glv4
>
> You'll have to register, I think, but it's free.
> --
>
> modom
>
> http://www.koyote.com/users/modom/home.html

SO I guess deep fried pig ass ring is out of the question

if you fry them, you can stack them on your finger, dip them in catsup

NINETY NINE