Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential hopes!!!

A great day!!!

Thanks, Tim and press members!!!

Andy

--
"Et tu, Crème Brûlée?"
--Orange Julius Caesar Salad Dressing

Andy wrote:
> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
> hopes!!!
>
> A great day!!!
>
> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!

What was it that killed them?
--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

Dave Bugg said...

> Andy wrote:
>> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
>> hopes!!!
>>
>> A great day!!!
>>
>> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>
> What was it that killed them?


You didn't watch it???

If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???

Andy wrote:
> Dave Bugg said...
>
>> Andy wrote:
>>> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
>>> hopes!!!
>>>
>>> A great day!!!
>>>
>>> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>>
>> What was it that killed them?
>
>
> You didn't watch it???
>
> If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???

Nope. I hate shouting at the tube.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> Dave Bugg said...
>
>> Andy wrote:
>>> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
>>> hopes!!!
>>>
>>> A great day!!!
>>>
>>> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>>
>> What was it that killed them?
>
>
> You didn't watch it???
>
> If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???


Come up to the front of the class and summarize what you saw, if possible.

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:38:16 -0600, Andy <q> wrote:

>Dave Bugg said...
>
>> Andy wrote:
>>> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
>>> hopes!!!
>>>
>>> A great day!!!
>>>
>>> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>>
>> What was it that killed them?
>
>
>You didn't watch it???
>
>If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???

got a link to the transcript?

--
See return address to reply by email

Andy wrote:
> Dave Bugg said...
>
>> Andy wrote:
>>> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
>>> hopes!!!
>>>
>>> A great day!!!
>>>
>>> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>> What was it that killed them?
>
>
> You didn't watch it???
>
> If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???


Your reply may have made you feel superior to those of us who DIDN'T
watch, but it didn't answer the question. Heat but no light....

gloria p

Andy wrote:
>
> You didn't watch it???
>
> If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???

A spokesman for Clinton indicated she puts
beans in her chili.

On Feb 25, 5:11 pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
> Andy wrote:
>
> > You didn't watch it???
>
> > If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???
>
> A spokesman for Clinton indicated she puts
> beans in her chili.

and sugar in her corn bread...

Puester said...

> Your reply may have made you feel superior to those of us who DIDN'T
> watch, but it didn't answer the question. Heat but no light....
>
> gloria p


True, but I'd only do it a disservice by trying to recite the remarks.

Andy

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
hopes!!!
>
> A great day!!!
>
> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>
> Andy


Well Andy surely you remember early 1991 when a young governor from a small
southern state named Bill Clinton was panned by the likes of the "press" of
which you speak? Apparently they thought he was completely unelectable.
And surely also, you remember the talking heads all but saying we should
just forgo the congressional elections in 06 because the GOP was completely
unbeatable?

I am befuddled with all of this presidential election talk when we have not
so much as had the first primary. Way too early for you to be so confident.

Paul

"kuvasz guy" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> On Feb 25, 5:11 pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
> > Andy wrote:
> >
> > > You didn't watch it???
> >
> > > If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???
> >
> > A spokesman for Clinton indicated she puts
> > beans in her chili.
>
> and sugar in her corn bread...

Swiss cheese on a Philly steak sandwhich.

Paul

Paul M. Cook said...

> Way too early for you to be so confident.


Why not? I'm entitled. Whether you saw the program or not, there's not
going to another Clinton in the white house.

You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as 1st
"Gentleman")?

Do you remember Hillary was found in possession of 900+ FBI records of US
citizens?

Do you think that Hillary isn't the most embarrassed 1st Lady in history
for the Lewinsky affairs? And the stupidest for not divorcing him after he
was out of office? Do you think she could be a cold and calculating woman?

Do you want a woman like her with a finger on the button?

Never gonna happen.

Andy

> Do you want a woman like her with a finger on the button?

Well what we have now is a dry drunk, moronic megalomaniac with delusions of
messianic glory who is now pondering nothing less than WWIII.

I'd say it can't get much worse.

Paul

Paul M. Cook said...

>
>> Do you want a woman like her with a finger on the button?
>
> Well what we have now is a dry drunk, moronic megalomaniac with
> delusions of messianic glory who is now pondering nothing less than
> WWIII.
>
> I'd say it can't get much worse.
>
> Paul


"Let's drop the BIG ONE now..."
--Randy Newman, "Political Science" (Sail Away, 1972)

Andy

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> Paul M. Cook said...
>
>> Way too early for you to be so confident.
>
>
> Why not? I'm entitled. Whether you saw the program or not, there's not
> going to another Clinton in the white house.

You're entitled? You ****ing dolt. Put down the booze, come back tomorrow,
and explain the entire premise of your original post in this thread.

Since you're too hammered to understand the word "premise", here's something
for you. Have your toilet explain it to you.

Main Entry: 1prem·ise
Variant(s): also pre·miss /'pre-m&s/
Function: noun
Etymology: in sense 1, from Middle English premisse, from Anglo-French, from
Medieval Latin praemissa, from Latin, feminine of praemissus, past
participle of praemittere to place ahead, from prae- pre- + mittere to send;
in other senses, from Middle English premisses, from Medieval Latin
praemissa, from Latin, neuter plural of praemissus
1 a : a proposition antecedently supposed or proved as a basis of argument
or inference; specifically : either of the first two propositions of a
syllogism from which the conclusion is drawn b : something assumed or taken
for granted : PRESUPPOSITION
2 plural : matters previously stated; specifically : the preliminary and
explanatory part of a deed or of a bill in equity
3 plural [from its being identified in the premises of the deed] a : a tract
of land with the buildings thereon b : a building or part of a building
usually with its appurtenances (as grounds)

Andy wrote:

> Why not? I'm entitled. Whether you saw the program or not, there's not
> going to another Clinton in the white house.
>
> You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as 1st
> "Gentleman")?
>
> Do you remember Hillary was found in possession of 900+ FBI records
> of US citizens?
>
> Do you think that Hillary isn't the most embarrassed 1st Lady in
> history for the Lewinsky affairs? And the stupidest for not divorcing
> him after he was out of office? Do you think she could be a cold and
> calculating woman?
>
> Do you want a woman like her with a finger on the button?
>
> Never gonna happen.
>
> Andy

Well Bill may have been impeached but he stayed in office and to be honest
if he could run again he would win. Beside the choices out there are all
better than the 2 we have now that should be impeached but won't be. However
history will be cruel to W I'm sure, even Jimmy Carter was perhaps better.
Just my opinion on it and now back to cooking.

--

Joe Cilinceon

Paul wrote:

>>> A spokesman for Clinton indicated she puts
>>> beans in her chili.
>>
>> and sugar in her corn bread...
>
> Swiss cheese on a Philly steak sandwhich.

and ketchup in her Pad Thai.

Bob

Joe wrote:

> history will be cruel to W I'm sure, even Jimmy Carter was perhaps better.

Speaking of Jimmy Carter, I heard that he'd like to see Al Gore as the
Democratic Presidential candidate in 2008. Since Gore expects Washington DC
to be underwater before too long, where do you suppose he'd like to move the
Capitol?

ObFood: I've got about five overripe bananas. To use them up, I want to make
banana bread, and I'm considering adding dutched cocoa to a standard banana
bread recipe. Any pitfalls I might encounter?

Bob

In article >, Andy <q> says...
> Puester said...
>
> > Your reply may have made you feel superior to those of us who DIDN'T
> > watch, but it didn't answer the question. Heat but no light....
> >
> > gloria p
>
>
> True, but I'd only do it a disservice by trying to recite the remarks.
>
> Andy
>

Translation: You do not remember or understand the remarks. In other
words, you are threatened by a woman who is vastly more intelligent,
knowldegeable, and capable than you are - but of course that is 99% of
women.

--
Peter Aitken

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:19:11 -0600, Andy <q> wrote:

>You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as 1st
>"Gentleman")?

Nixon was impeached, not Clinton.

Bush is lucky he had a majority in the house and senate or there would
have been an impeachment movement against him (it's coming). As it is
the Dems won't actually impeach Bush because look who takes his place!
Better to have Dumbo in office. He might be stupid, but at least he's
not evil.

--
See return address to reply by email

On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:38:16 -0600, Andy <q> rummaged among random
neurons and opined:

>Dave Bugg said...
>
>> Andy wrote:
>>> Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
>>> hopes!!!
>>>
>>> A great day!!!
>>>
>>> Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>>
>> What was it that killed them?
>
>
>You didn't watch it???
>
>If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???

If they'd move Meet the Press to after church hours, I might watch it.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd

--
"Most vigitaryans I iver see looked enough like their food to be
classed as cannybals."

Finley Peter Dunne (1900)

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"

Andy <q> wrote in :


> You didn't watch it???
>
> If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???


You great idiot, did you ever think that only one country gets that stupid
show?

--
Peter Lucas
Brisbane
Australia

'Enjoy today, it was paid for by a veteran'

http://www.beccycole.com/albums/vide...ter_girl.shtml

<sf> wrote in message ...
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:19:11 -0600, Andy <q> wrote:
>
>>You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as 1st
>>"Gentleman")?
>
> Nixon was impeached, not Clinton.
>
> Bush is lucky he had a majority in the house and senate or there would
> have been an impeachment movement against him (it's coming). As it is
> the Dems won't actually impeach Bush because look who takes his place!
> Better to have Dumbo in office. He might be stupid, but at least he's
> not evil.

Nixon was not impeached. He surely would have been and the votes were there
in the senate to convict. So he was talked into resigning. Clinton was
impeached. He was never convicted in fact the senate exonerated him of the
charges. An impeachment is the equivalent of a criminal indictment.

Paul

sf wrote:

>> You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as 1st
>> "Gentleman")?
>
> Nixon was impeached, not Clinton.


WHAT? Where do you get these idea?

Clinton was impeached. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment:

"Impeachment is so rare that the term is often misunderstood. A typical
misconception is to confuse it with involuntary removal from office; in
fact, it is only the legal statement of charges, parallelling an indictment
in criminal law. An official who is impeached faces a second legislative
vote (whether by the same body or another), which determines conviction, or
failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment."

In the USA, impeachment of the President is done by the House of
Representatives. They did vote to impeach Clinton, and delivered the
Articles of Impeachment to the Senate on December 19, 1998. The Senate chose
not to remove Clinton from office, but that doesn't take away the fact that
he was impeached.

Nixon wasn't impeached. He resigned before the House began the impeachment
process.


Are you SURE you're a teacher?

Bob

Paul M. Cook wrote:
> <sf> wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:19:11 -0600, Andy <q> wrote:
>>
>>> You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as
>>> 1st "Gentleman")?
>>
>> Nixon was impeached, not Clinton.
>>
>> Bush is lucky he had a majority in the house and senate or there
>> would have been an impeachment movement against him (it's coming).
>> As it is the Dems won't actually impeach Bush because look who takes
>> his place! Better to have Dumbo in office. He might be stupid, but
>> at least he's not evil.
>
> Nixon was not impeached. He surely would have been and the votes
> were there in the senate to convict. So he was talked into
> resigning. Clinton was impeached. He was never convicted in fact
> the senate exonerated him of the charges. An impeachment is the
> equivalent of a criminal indictment.
>
> Paul

Yes, Paul is correct, Nixon resigned before he could be impeached. Clinton
was impeached. Impeach does not mean de-presidented (I just made up a new
word). :~)

kili

sf wrote:

> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:19:11 -0600, Andy <q> wrote:
>
>
>>You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as 1st
>>"Gentleman")?

Impeached, and it was purely political. The legislators
actually outsleazed the sleazy President in the whole
matter.

An abuse of the system, in my view.

> Nixon was impeached, not Clinton.

No. Impeachment refers to a specific process where
charges are brought by the legislative body. It doesn't
denote actual guilt.

Clinton was impeached on charges of perjury and
obstruction of justice, then acquitted.

Nixon was not impeached. He resigned before it
could be carried out.

--
Reg

Abe said...

> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:11:27 -0600, Andy <q> wrote:
>
>>Meet The Press press members killed Hillary Clinton's presidential
hopes!!!
>>
>>A great day!!!
>>
>>Thanks, Tim and press members!!!
>>
>>Andy
> Calm down. I saw the show . You're way overstating things. You're
> clearly jumping for joy because you don't like Hillary, and a few
> political insiders agree that she will have difficult time being
> elected. No one said she's unelectable.


Abe,

I don't yet have a presidential candidate that I'd like to see in the oval
office, but I sure as hell can campaign against the ones I don't want.

The press said what the politicians were afraid to bring up.

You like her? Fine! Fine?... Fein... Feinstein... Diane Feinstein... VP
Diane Feinstein???

Abe, remember WHY you're hoping for better days ahead come election day,
2008. Let your conscience be your guide.

Andy

PeterL said...

> Andy <q> wrote in :
>
>
>> You didn't watch it???
>>
>> If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???
>
>
> You great idiot, did you ever think that only one country gets that
stupid
> show?


I could care less if you get "Romper Room" on TV.

If I had a floater in my hand... Ya BUM!!!

Having said that, I took the subject to a more appropriate web forum.

Andy

sf wrote in :

> On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:19:11 -0600, Andy <q> wrote:
>
>>You're OK with an impeached president back in the white
>>house (as 1st "Gentleman")?
>
> Nixon was impeached, not Clinton.
>
> Bush is lucky he had a majority in the house and senate or
> there would have been an impeachment movement against him
> (it's coming). As it is the Dems won't actually impeach
> Bush because look who takes his place! Better to have Dumbo
> in office. He might be stupid, but at least he's not evil.

they can impeach Cheney at the same time. it's possible to
impeach the entire Cabinet.

lee
--
Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if
there be
one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of
blindfolded
fear. - Thomas Jefferson

"Andy" <q> wrote in message ...
> Paul M. Cook said...
>
>> Way too early for you to be so confident.
snip
> Do you think that Hillary isn't the most embarrassed 1st Lady in history
> for the Lewinsky affairs? And the stupidest for not divorcing him after he
> was out of office? Do you think she could be a cold and calculating woman?
snip
> Andy

This is your weakest argument. A great many of U.S. Presidents had affairs
and many were not so discreet. However, in earlier times, the Press made a
point of protecting the image of the President whether dalliances or ill
health. Women everywhere have to put up with men that can't keep their
pants zipped. It is sheer stupidity to advocate that a woman give up all
aspirations in her life because her spouse sniffs around. Get real. No man
is that important.
Janet

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> ObFood: I've got about five overripe bananas. To use them up, I want to make
> banana bread, and I'm considering adding dutched cocoa to a standard banana
> bread recipe. Any pitfalls I might encounter?
>
> Bob
>
>
No problems IME except that the banana and cocoa kind of cancel each
other out, flavor-wise. I've had better luck adding chocolate chips to
banana bread.

gloria p

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 16:43:10 GMT, unge (Little
Malice) wrote:

>One time on Usenet, "Paul M. Cook" > said:
>>
>> "kuvasz guy" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>> > On Feb 25, 5:11 pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
>> > > Andy wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > You didn't watch it???
>> > >
>> > > > If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???
>> > >
>> > > A spokesman for Clinton indicated she puts
>> > > beans in her chili.
>> >
>> > and sugar in her corn bread...
>>
>> Swiss cheese on a Philly steak sandwhich.
>
>And boils her ribs...

And sour cream in her alfredo sauce :-)

TammyM

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:26 -0500, "kilikini"
> wrote:

>Puester wrote:
>> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>>
>>> ObFood: I've got about five overripe bananas. To use them up, I want
>>> to make banana bread, and I'm considering adding dutched cocoa to a
>>> standard banana bread recipe. Any pitfalls I might encounter?
>>>
>>> Bob
>>>
>>>
>> No problems IME except that the banana and cocoa kind of cancel each
>> other out, flavor-wise. I've had better luck adding chocolate chips
>> to banana bread.
>>
>> gloria p
>
>Oooooooooh, Gloria! Chocolate chips in banana bread! I love that idea.
>You've done flung a craving on me!

I've done this as well. It's really nice. So I second Gloria's
recommendation.

TammyM

One time on Usenet, Andy <q> said:
> Paul M. Cook said...
>
> > Way too early for you to be so confident.
>
>
> Why not? I'm entitled.

Not in rec.food.cooking, you're not. I like you, Andy, but I'm
getting very tired of your totally off-topic posts. At least mark
them as such -- ever heard of "OT"?

--
Jani in WA

One time on Usenet, "Paul M. Cook" > said:
>
> "kuvasz guy" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> > On Feb 25, 5:11 pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
> > > Andy wrote:
> > >
> > > > You didn't watch it???
> > >
> > > > If it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press... ???
> > >
> > > A spokesman for Clinton indicated she puts
> > > beans in her chili.
> >
> > and sugar in her corn bread...
>
> Swiss cheese on a Philly steak sandwhich.

And boils her ribs...

--

Jani (Someone had to say it)

Puester wrote:
> Bob Terwilliger wrote:
>
>> ObFood: I've got about five overripe bananas. To use them up, I want
>> to make banana bread, and I'm considering adding dutched cocoa to a
>> standard banana bread recipe. Any pitfalls I might encounter?
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
> No problems IME except that the banana and cocoa kind of cancel each
> other out, flavor-wise. I've had better luck adding chocolate chips
> to banana bread.
>
> gloria p

Oooooooooh, Gloria! Chocolate chips in banana bread! I love that idea.
You've done flung a craving on me!

kili

On Feb 25, 10:34?pm, "Bob Terwilliger" >
wrote:
> sf wrote:
> >> You're OK with an impeached president back in the white house (as 1st
> >> "Gentleman")?
>
> > Nixon was impeached, not Clinton.
>
> WHAT? Where do you get these idea?
>
> Clinton was impeached. Fromhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment:
>
> "Impeachment is so rare that the term is often misunderstood. A typical
> misconception is to confuse it with involuntary removal from office; in
> fact, it is only the legal statement of charges, parallelling an indictment
> in criminal law. An official who is impeached faces a second legislative
> vote (whether by the same body or another), which determines conviction, or
> failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment."
>
> In the USA, impeachment of the President is done by the House of
> Representatives. They did vote to impeach Clinton, and delivered the
> Articles of Impeachment to the Senate on December 19, 1998. The Senate chose
> not to remove Clinton from office, but that doesn't take away the fact that
> he was impeached.
>
> Nixon wasn't impeached. He resigned before the House began the impeachment
> process.
>
> Are you SURE you're a teacher?
>
> Bob

Why do you think so many can't read... those who can't teach.

Sheldon

One time on Usenet, "kilikini" > said:
> Puester wrote:
> > Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> >> ObFood: I've got about five overripe bananas. To use them up, I want
> >> to make banana bread, and I'm considering adding dutched cocoa to a
> >> standard banana bread recipe. Any pitfalls I might encounter?

> > No problems IME except that the banana and cocoa kind of cancel each
> > other out, flavor-wise. I've had better luck adding chocolate chips
> > to banana bread.

> Oooooooooh, Gloria! Chocolate chips in banana bread! I love that idea.
> You've done flung a craving on me!

I've never done it with banana bread (great idea, Gloria), but have
made a recipe that Penzey's had in their catalog a while back. These
are soooo good:

Banana Chocolate Chip Muffins - Penzey's

1/2 C. butter, softened
1 1/4 C. sugar
2 eggs
1 T. vanilla extract
1 1/2 C. flour (I used cake flour)
1 tsp. baking soda
1/2 tsp. cinnamon
1 C. ripe bananas, mashed (about 2 bananas)
1/2 C. mini chocolate chips

Lightly grease 2 12 cup muffin tins and set aside. Preheat
oven to 350° F. Cream together butter and sugar until light
and fluffy. Add the eggs one at a time, beating well after
each addition. Stir in vanilla. In separate bowl, sift
together flour, baking soda, and cinnamon. Stir into bowl
with butter mixture and mix until just blended. Fold in
bananas and chocolate chips. Spoon batter into muffin tins,
filling 18 of the holes to 3/4 full. Bake for 15-18 minutes
or until a toothpick inserted into the center comes out
clean.

--
Jani in WA

Little Malice said...

> One time on Usenet, Andy <q> said:
>> Paul M. Cook said...
>>
>> > Way too early for you to be so confident.
>>
>>
>> Why not? I'm entitled.
>
> Not in rec.food.cooking, you're not. I like you, Andy, but I'm
> getting very tired of your totally off-topic posts. At least mark
> them as such -- ever heard of "OT"?


Jani,

You can't tell me or anyone else for that matter, where I am or am not
entitled to post!!!

Tell you what, Jani, you put a stop to the spam posts and lazy users who
post instead of google "pressure cookers," etc., and I'll never post
another OT!

At least my posts are original OT or otherwise.

I mentioned elsewhere in this thread I took this subject to a web forum.

Andy