We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing. We
hear people complaining of their weight, or health issues, but if we
look at our diets, and how much time we spend preparing healthy meals,
a lot of us would have to say, not enough time preparing well balanced
meals, that contain ingredients we can pronounce.

Please click here for more info: http://www.hippiepower.com/right-stuff-or-food-porn/

Peace and Love Hippie Chick

www.hippiepower.com

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> Hippie Chick wrote:
>> We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
>> winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.
>
> You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for "where"
> as
> a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers* click
> on
> links posted by someone they don't know.
>
>


.....and plagiarize cool terms like "right stuff" and "food porn" from
reputable publications like the Nutrition Action Newsletter.

http://www.cspinet.org/nah/index.htm

Hippie Chick wrote:
> We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
> winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.

You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for "where" as
a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers* click on
links posted by someone they don't know.

On Mar 20, 12:40 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> Hippie Chick wrote:
> > We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
> > winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.
>
> You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for "where" as
> a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers* click on
> links posted by someone they don't know.

Instead of criticizing, maybe look at the article and learn something
from it.

Peace and Love Hippie Chick

www.hippiepower.com

"Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> On Mar 20, 12:40 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>> Hippie Chick wrote:
>> > We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
>> > winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.
>>
>> You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for "where"
>> as
>> a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers* click
>> on
>> links posted by someone they don't know.
>
> Instead of criticizing, maybe look at the article and learn something
> from it.
>
> Peace and Love Hippie Chick
>
> www.hippiepower.com
>

You're still a plagiarist. You should look up the word in the nearest
dictionary, if any.

"Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> On Mar 20, 12:40 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> > Hippie Chick wrote:
> > > We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
> > > winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.
> >
> > You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for
"where" as
> > a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers*
click on
> > links posted by someone they don't know.
>
> Instead of criticizing, maybe look at the article and learn something
> from it.

Perhaps if you would stop trying to force your lifestyle choices down other
people's throats, you wouldn't be criticized. Your life, your choice....My
life, my choice ..... leave it at that and we can all live happily ever
after in our own little microcosim.

Peace Out!

KW

>
> Peace and Love Hippie Chick
>
> www.hippiepower.com
>

On Mar 21, 10:14 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
> "Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
>
> oups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 12:40 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> >> Hippie Chick wrote:
> >> > We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
> >> > winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.
>
> >> You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for "where"
> >> as
> >> a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers* click
> >> on
> >> links posted by someone they don't know.
>
> > Instead of criticizing, maybe look at the article and learn something
> > from it.
>
> > Peace and Love Hippie Chick
>
> >www.hippiepower.com
>
> You're still a plagiarist. You should look up the word in the nearest
> dictionary, if any.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

LOL....its a post, not a church service LOL. You don't have to read it
if you don't want to. Freedom of choice baby!!
It's sad to see people with closed minds in this world. So much to
learn, and really so little time. This article I quoted on has a lot
of really great info on it, I did not write it, but I do support it.
If you choose other wise, then that is groovy.

Peace, Love and Sunshine Hippie Chick

www.hippiepower.com

"Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> On Mar 21, 10:14 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
>> "Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
>>
>> oups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 20, 12:40 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
>> >> Hippie Chick wrote:
>> >> > We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
>> >> > winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.
>>
>> >> You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for
>> >> "where"
>> >> as
>> >> a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers*
>> >> click
>> >> on
>> >> links posted by someone they don't know.
>>
>> > Instead of criticizing, maybe look at the article and learn something
>> > from it.
>>
>> > Peace and Love Hippie Chick
>>
>> >www.hippiepower.com
>>
>> You're still a plagiarist. You should look up the word in the nearest
>> dictionary, if any.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> LOL....its a post, not a church service LOL. You don't have to read it
> if you don't want to. Freedom of choice baby!!
> It's sad to see people with closed minds in this world. So much to
> learn, and really so little time. This article I quoted on has a lot
> of really great info on it, I did not write it, but I do support it.
> If you choose other wise, then that is groovy.
>
> Peace, Love and Sunshine Hippie Chick

I was referring to the subject line of your message: Right Stuff or Food
Porn. Stolen from a publication.

On Mar 21, 12:06 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
> "Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
>
> oups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 21, 10:14 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
> >> "Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
>
> groups.com...
>
> >> > On Mar 20, 12:40 pm, "jmcquown" > wrote:
> >> >> Hippie Chick wrote:
> >> >> > We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
> >> >> > winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing.
>
> >> >> You certainly lost out on an education. I can forgive "were" for
> >> >> "where"
> >> >> as
> >> >> a typo. But the word is "losing" not "loosing". And only *losers*
> >> >> click
> >> >> on
> >> >> links posted by someone they don't know.
>
> >> > Instead of criticizing, maybe look at the article and learn something
> >> > from it.
>
> >> > Peace and Love Hippie Chick
>
> >> >www.hippiepower.com
>
> >> You're still a plagiarist. You should look up the word in the nearest
> >> dictionary, if any.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > LOL....its a post, not a church service LOL. You don't have to read it
> > if you don't want to. Freedom of choice baby!!
> > It's sad to see people with closed minds in this world. So much to
> > learn, and really so little time. This article I quoted on has a lot
> > of really great info on it, I did not write it, but I do support it.
> > If you choose other wise, then that is groovy.
>
> > Peace, Love and Sunshine Hippie Chick
>
> I was referring to the subject line of your message: Right Stuff or Food
> Porn. Stolen from a publication.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Those are not my words...nor do I take credit for them, they belong to
the article I posted from The Nutrition Action Healthletter. Center
for Science In The Public Interest. The link and credit goes directly
to them!

Happy Spring.

Peace and Love Hippie Chick.

www.hippiepower.com

On Mar 20, 9:27 am, "Hippie Chick" > wrote:
> We are living in the fast food age. Were faster and easier are
> winning. But look around us, we are not winning, we are loosing. We
> hear people complaining of their weight, or health issues, but if we
> look at our diets, and how much time we spend preparing healthy meals,
> a lot of us would have to say, not enough time preparing well balanced
> meals, that contain ingredients we can pronounce.

Ingredients like "goo" & "pap"?

rowrbazzle!

T.

On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "Hippie Chick" > wrote:
>
> Those are not my words...nor do I take credit for them, they belong to
> the article I posted from The Nutrition Action Healthletter. Center
> for Science In The Public Interest. The link and credit goes directly
> to them!

Actually, no, the link goes to your little site, which then gives a
link to the CSPI site. If this is typical of their newsletter I'm not
impressed. It says organic low sodium refried beans are better for
you than Burger King's stacked meat and cheese things. It makes no
effort to compare the pitched brand of canned beans with any of their
many competitors, organic and not. Not exactly earth shaking science.

But thanks for playing. -aem

On Mar 21, 2:48 pm, "aem" > wrote:
> On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "Hippie Chick" > wrote:
>
>
>
> > Those are not my words...nor do I take credit for them, they belong to
> > the article I posted from The Nutrition Action Healthletter. Center
> > for Science In The Public Interest. The link and credit goes directly
> > to them!
>
> Actually, no, the link goes to your little site, which then gives a
> link to the CSPI site. If this is typical of their newsletter I'm not
> impressed. It says organic low sodium refried beans are better for
> you than Burger King's stacked meat and cheese things. It makes no
> effort to compare the pitched brand of canned beans with any of their
> many competitors, organic and not. Not exactly earth shaking science.
>
> But thanks for playing. -aem

I was not referring to the link on here, but the link from my site to
theirs.
Someone has a little too much time on their hands. I got work to do.
Have a good one!

"Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> On Mar 21, 2:48 pm, "aem" > wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "Hippie Chick" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Those are not my words...nor do I take credit for them, they belong to
>> > the article I posted from The Nutrition Action Healthletter. Center
>> > for Science In The Public Interest. The link and credit goes directly
>> > to them!
>>
>> Actually, no, the link goes to your little site, which then gives a
>> link to the CSPI site. If this is typical of their newsletter I'm not
>> impressed. It says organic low sodium refried beans are better for
>> you than Burger King's stacked meat and cheese things. It makes no
>> effort to compare the pitched brand of canned beans with any of their
>> many competitors, organic and not. Not exactly earth shaking science.
>>
>> But thanks for playing. -aem
>
> I was not referring to the link on here, but the link from my site to
> theirs.
> Someone has a little too much time on their hands. I got work to do.
> Have a good one!
>

You're creating a web site that points to other peoples' research, and you
think WE have too much time on our hands? :-)

On Mar 21, 4:30 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
> "Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
>
> oups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 21, 2:48 pm, "aem" > wrote:
> >> On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "Hippie Chick" > wrote:
>
> >> > Those are not my words...nor do I take credit for them, they belong to
> >> > the article I posted from The Nutrition Action Healthletter. Center
> >> > for Science In The Public Interest. The link and credit goes directly
> >> > to them!
>
> >> Actually, no, the link goes to your little site, which then gives a
> >> link to the CSPI site. If this is typical of their newsletter I'm not
> >> impressed. It says organic low sodium refried beans are better for
> >> you than Burger King's stacked meat and cheese things. It makes no
> >> effort to compare the pitched brand of canned beans with any of their
> >> many competitors, organic and not. Not exactly earth shaking science.
>
> >> But thanks for playing. -aem
>
> > I was not referring to the link on here, but the link from my site to
> > theirs.
> > Someone has a little too much time on their hands. I got work to do.
> > Have a good one!
>
> You're creating a web site that points to other peoples' research, and you
> think WE have too much time on our hands? :-)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

YUP! that's what I said, at least you understand that. I really have
wasted enough of my time on this conversation as it is. If you don't
like it don't read it. Really its very simple. You can't please
everyone, that is groovy by me.

Later...much later!

"jmcquown" > wrote

> Hippie Chick wrote:

>> YUP! that's what I said, at least you understand that. I really have
>> wasted enough of my time on this conversation as it is. If you don't
>> like it don't read it. Really its very simple. You can't please
>> everyone, that is groovy by me.
>>
>> Later...much later!
>
> Oh go back to your commune!

Really. She gives Hippies and Chicks everywhere a bad name.

nancy

Hippie Chick wrote:
> On Mar 21, 4:30 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
>> "Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
>>
>> oups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 21, 2:48 pm, "aem" > wrote:
>>>> On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "Hippie Chick" > wrote:
>>
>>>>> Those are not my words...nor do I take credit for them, they
>>>>> belong to the article I posted from The Nutrition Action
>>>>> Healthletter. Center for Science In The Public Interest. The link
>>>>> and credit goes directly to them!
>>
>>>> Actually, no, the link goes to your little site, which then gives a
>>>> link to the CSPI site. If this is typical of their newsletter I'm
>>>> not impressed. It says organic low sodium refried beans are
>>>> better for you than Burger King's stacked meat and cheese things.
>>>> It makes no effort to compare the pitched brand of canned beans
>>>> with any of their many competitors, organic and not. Not exactly
>>>> earth shaking science.
>>
>>>> But thanks for playing. -aem
>>
>>> I was not referring to the link on here, but the link from my site
>>> to theirs.
>>> Someone has a little too much time on their hands. I got work to do.
>>> Have a good one!
>>
>> You're creating a web site that points to other peoples' research,
>> and you think WE have too much time on our hands? :-)- Hide quoted
>> text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> YUP! that's what I said, at least you understand that. I really have
> wasted enough of my time on this conversation as it is. If you don't
> like it don't read it. Really its very simple. You can't please
> everyone, that is groovy by me.
>
> Later...much later!

Oh go back to your commune!

Nancy Young wrote:
> "jmcquown" > wrote
>
>> Hippie Chick wrote:
>
>>> YUP! that's what I said, at least you understand that. I really have
>>> wasted enough of my time on this conversation as it is. If you don't
>>> like it don't read it. Really its very simple. You can't please
>>> everyone, that is groovy by me.
>>>
>>> Later...much later!
>> Oh go back to your commune!
>
> Really. She gives Hippies and Chicks everywhere a bad name.

Thank you!

Serene

"Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> On Mar 21, 4:30 pm, "JoeSpareBedroom" > wrote:
>> "Hippie Chick" > wrote in message
>>
>> oups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 21, 2:48 pm, "aem" > wrote:
>> >> On Mar 21, 9:00 am, "Hippie Chick" > wrote:
>>
>> >> > Those are not my words...nor do I take credit for them, they belong
>> >> > to
>> >> > the article I posted from The Nutrition Action Healthletter. Center
>> >> > for Science In The Public Interest. The link and credit goes
>> >> > directly
>> >> > to them!
>>
>> >> Actually, no, the link goes to your little site, which then gives a
>> >> link to the CSPI site. If this is typical of their newsletter I'm not
>> >> impressed. It says organic low sodium refried beans are better for
>> >> you than Burger King's stacked meat and cheese things. It makes no
>> >> effort to compare the pitched brand of canned beans with any of their
>> >> many competitors, organic and not. Not exactly earth shaking science.
>>
>> >> But thanks for playing. -aem
>>
>> > I was not referring to the link on here, but the link from my site to
>> > theirs.
>> > Someone has a little too much time on their hands. I got work to do.
>> > Have a good one!
>>
>> You're creating a web site that points to other peoples' research, and
>> you
>> think WE have too much time on our hands? :-)- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> YUP! that's what I said, at least you understand that. I really have
> wasted enough of my time on this conversation as it is. If you don't
> like it don't read it. Really its very simple. You can't please
> everyone, that is groovy by me.
>
> Later...much later!
>

You apparently have NOT wasted enough time, because you keep coming back.