General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 133
Default Eggs as loss leaders

Normally in the week or two before Easter my local grocery stores have
eggs as loss leaders (real cheap), but this year this does not appear
to be the case. Egg prices appear to be high in this area, and I
thought that might be the reason. Then I thought well maybe nobody
boils or decorates Easter eggs anymore because most kids do not like
hard boiled eggs or people worry about diease. So putting them on sale
does not entice anyone to the market.

By the way I was at a supermarket last week, and large eggs were
selling for around $1.50 per dozen. Then I noticed they had brown eggs
for 82 cents per dozen which really amazed me, because usually brown
eggs are more expensive than white eggs. I asked the clerk if they
were mismarked, and he said no. Of course there is no difference
between the two, and I remember as a kid my mother would buy a dozen
eggs and some would be brown, and some would be white.

Tom

  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 743
Default Eggs as loss leaders

> wrote:
> Normally in the week or two before Easter my local grocery stores have
> eggs as loss leaders (real cheap), but this year this does not appear
> to be the case. Egg prices appear to be high in this area, and I
> thought that might be the reason. Then I thought well maybe nobody
> boils or decorates Easter eggs anymore because most kids do not like
> hard boiled eggs or people worry about diease. So putting them on sale
> does not entice anyone to the market.
>
> By the way I was at a supermarket last week, and large eggs were
> selling for around $1.50 per dozen. Then I noticed they had brown eggs
> for 82 cents per dozen which really amazed me, because usually brown
> eggs are more expensive than white eggs. I asked the clerk if they
> were mismarked, and he said no. Of course there is no difference
> between the two, and I remember as a kid my mother would buy a dozen
> eggs and some would be brown, and some would be white.


I looked at the price of large eggs in my supermarket and was shocked.
Normally they run around $1.59 to $1.79 a dozen, and $0.99 to $1.29 when on
sale. The current price is $3.09 a dozen. I hope it's just Easter, but if it
is, I consider it price gouging. Unbelievable. I don't recall there being
any big kills of flocks or anything, I don't think they froze to death,
didn't hear about any hurricanes, tornadoes or earthquakes that might cause
a shortage otherwise.

Tomorrow starts a new sales week, so I'll see if the price changes.

--
wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net

  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,762
Default Eggs as loss leaders


"wff_ng_7" > wrote

> I looked at the price of large eggs in my supermarket and was shocked.
> Normally they run around $1.59 to $1.79 a dozen, and $0.99 to $1.29 when
> on sale. The current price is $3.09 a dozen. I hope it's just Easter, but
> if it is, I consider it price gouging. Unbelievable. I don't recall there
> being any big kills of flocks or anything, I don't think they froze to
> death, didn't hear about any hurricanes, tornadoes or earthquakes that
> might cause a shortage otherwise.
>
> Tomorrow starts a new sales week, so I'll see if the price changes.


This was discussed a couple of weeks ago in a thread titled:
What's happened to egg prices?

They've been pricier than usual for a couple months now, I think.

nancy


  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 743
Default Eggs as loss leaders

"Nancy Young" > wrote:
> "wff_ng_7" > wrote
>
>> I looked at the price of large eggs in my supermarket and was shocked.
>> Normally they run around $1.59 to $1.79 a dozen, and $0.99 to $1.29 when
>> on sale. The current price is $3.09 a dozen. I hope it's just Easter, but
>> if it is, I consider it price gouging. Unbelievable. I don't recall there
>> being any big kills of flocks or anything, I don't think they froze to
>> death, didn't hear about any hurricanes, tornadoes or earthquakes that
>> might cause a shortage otherwise.
>>
>> Tomorrow starts a new sales week, so I'll see if the price changes.

>
> This was discussed a couple of weeks ago in a thread titled:
> What's happened to egg prices?
>
> They've been pricier than usual for a couple months now, I think.
>
> nancy


I'll look up the thread. In any case, this increase to the $3 range was
within the last few weeks or so, and it was in the below $2 range right
before that.

Just checked my last purchase... it was on 2/20, and the price was $1.29 but
in a different supermarket chain (which is always a bit lower than my
regular supermarket).

--
wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net

  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,773
Default Eggs as loss leaders

On Mar 27, 8:25 pm, "wff_ng_7" > wrote:
> "Nancy Young" > wrote:
> > "wff_ng_7" > wrote

>
> >> I looked at the price of large eggs in my supermarket and was shocked.
> >> Normally they run around $1.59 to $1.79 a dozen, and $0.99 to $1.29 when
> >> on sale. The current price is $3.09 a dozen. I hope it's just Easter, but
> >> if it is, I consider it price gouging. Unbelievable. I don't recall there
> >> being any big kills of flocks or anything, I don't think they froze to
> >> death, didn't hear about any hurricanes, tornadoes or earthquakes that
> >> might cause a shortage otherwise.

>
> >> Tomorrow starts a new sales week, so I'll see if the price changes.

>
> > This was discussed a couple of weeks ago in a thread titled:
> > What's happened to egg prices?

>
> > They've been pricier than usual for a couple months now, I think.

>
> > nancy

>
> I'll look up the thread. In any case, this increase to the $3 range was
> within the last few weeks or so, and it was in the below $2 range right
> before that.
>
> Just checked my last purchase... it was on 2/20, and the price was $1.29 but
> in a different supermarket chain (which is always a bit lower than my
> regular supermarket).
>
> --
> wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net


They're $1.29 in a few places, Seabra had them for "10 cents each" or
$1.20 a dozen, and Walgreens has them for 99 cents this week.
This time of year, the white eggs are pricier because everyone wants
them to decorate for Easter. Brown eggs are cheaper because they are
not as nifty in the decorating department.

Me, I buy about 9-10 dozen for Passover. Prefer white ones because
the brown ones too often have spots that aren't seen when they are
candled.

maxine in ri




  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 743
Default Eggs as loss leaders

"maxine in ri" > wrote:
>> Just checked my last purchase... it was on 2/20, and the price was $1.29
>> but
>> in a different supermarket chain (which is always a bit lower than my
>> regular supermarket).
>>
>> --
>> wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net

>
> They're $1.29 in a few places, Seabra had them for "10 cents each" or
> $1.20 a dozen, and Walgreens has them for 99 cents this week.
> This time of year, the white eggs are pricier because everyone wants
> them to decorate for Easter. Brown eggs are cheaper because they are
> not as nifty in the decorating department.


I didn't look at the prices of brown eggs because normally they are more
expensive. I hadn't thought of them being cheaper around now.

I looked at today's sales flyer for my local supermaket (Safeway). Eggs are
"on sale" this week. Not that it does me any good. The sale is a buy one,
get one free deal on an 18 pack of large eggs. I don't know what the normal
price is though, so I don't know the final cost per dozen. But it's 3 dozen
eggs total. There is no way I as a single person can use that many eggs
before they go bad. Aside from eating the eggs whole, I also use them for
baking including glazing bread loaves. There are only so many uses in a
household of one.

--
wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net

  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,983
Default Eggs as loss leaders

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 23:16:15 GMT, "wff_ng_7" >
wrote:

> wrote:
>> Normally in the week or two before Easter my local grocery stores have
>> eggs as loss leaders (real cheap), but this year this does not appear
>> to be the case. Egg prices appear to be high in this area, and I
>> thought that might be the reason. Then I thought well maybe nobody
>> boils or decorates Easter eggs anymore because most kids do not like
>> hard boiled eggs or people worry about diease. So putting them on sale
>> does not entice anyone to the market.
>>
>> By the way I was at a supermarket last week, and large eggs were
>> selling for around $1.50 per dozen. Then I noticed they had brown eggs
>> for 82 cents per dozen which really amazed me, because usually brown
>> eggs are more expensive than white eggs. I asked the clerk if they
>> were mismarked, and he said no. Of course there is no difference
>> between the two, and I remember as a kid my mother would buy a dozen
>> eggs and some would be brown, and some would be white.

>
>I looked at the price of large eggs in my supermarket and was shocked.
>Normally they run around $1.59 to $1.79 a dozen, and $0.99 to $1.29 when on
>sale. The current price is $3.09 a dozen. I hope it's just Easter, but if it
>is, I consider it price gouging. Unbelievable. I don't recall there being
>any big kills of flocks or anything, I don't think they froze to death,
>didn't hear about any hurricanes, tornadoes or earthquakes that might cause
>a shortage otherwise.
>
>Tomorrow starts a new sales week, so I'll see if the price changes.


it's all part of the war on easter, sort of a mopping-up operation to
the war on christmas.

your pal,
bill o.

  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,773
Default Eggs as loss leaders

On Mar 28, 9:48 am, "wff_ng_7" > wrote:
> "maxine in ri" > wrote:
>
> >> Just checked my last purchase... it was on 2/20, and the price was $1.29
> >> but
> >> in a different supermarket chain (which is always a bit lower than my
> >> regular supermarket).

>
> >> --
> >> wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net

>
> > They're $1.29 in a few places, Seabra had them for "10 cents each" or
> > $1.20 a dozen, and Walgreens has them for 99 cents this week.
> > This time of year, the white eggs are pricier because everyone wants
> > them to decorate for Easter. Brown eggs are cheaper because they are
> > not as nifty in the decorating department.

>
> I didn't look at the prices of brown eggs because normally they are more
> expensive. I hadn't thought of them being cheaper around now.
>
> I looked at today's sales flyer for my local supermaket (Safeway). Eggs are
> "on sale" this week. Not that it does me any good. The sale is a buy one,
> get one free deal on an 18 pack of large eggs. I don't know what the normal
> price is though, so I don't know the final cost per dozen. But it's 3 dozen
> eggs total. There is no way I as a single person can use that many eggs
> before they go bad. Aside from eating the eggs whole, I also use them for
> baking including glazing bread loaves. There are only so many uses in a
> household of one.
>
> --
> wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net


They do survive quite a while in the fridge. The older they are, the
better for
hard boiling, but they still make a decent fried egg altho the whites
are runnier.
At one egg a day, that's around 5 weeks. Time to do some baking<g>.

maxine in ri

  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,256
Default Eggs as loss leaders

On Mar 28, 8:48 am, "wff_ng_7" > wrote:
> "maxine in ri" > wrote:
>
> >> Just checked my last purchase... it was on 2/20, and the price was $1.29
> >> but
> >> in a different supermarket chain (which is always a bit lower than my
> >> regular supermarket).

>
> >> --
> >> wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net

>
> > They're $1.29 in a few places, Seabra had them for "10 cents each" or
> > $1.20 a dozen, and Walgreens has them for 99 cents this week.
> > This time of year, the white eggs are pricier because everyone wants
> > them to decorate for Easter. Brown eggs are cheaper because they are
> > not as nifty in the decorating department.

>
> I didn't look at the prices of brown eggs because normally they are more
> expensive. I hadn't thought of them being cheaper around now.
>
> I looked at today's sales flyer for my local supermaket (Safeway). Eggs are
> "on sale" this week. Not that it does me any good. The sale is a buy one,
> get one free deal on an 18 pack of large eggs. I don't know what the normal
> price is though, so I don't know the final cost per dozen. But it's 3 dozen
> eggs total. There is no way I as a single person can use that many eggs
> before they go bad. Aside from eating the eggs whole, I also use them for
> baking including glazing bread loaves. There are only so many uses in a
> household of one.
>
> --
> wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net



If they're pretty fresh right when you buy them (and they probably
will be, given the "sale"), they will last 6-8 weeks in the
refrigerator, no problem.

N.

  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 743
Default Eggs as loss leaders

"Nancy2" > wrote:
> If they're pretty fresh right when you buy them (and they probably
> will be, given the "sale"), they will last 6-8 weeks in the
> refrigerator, no problem.


But I'm commitment phobic! I'm not willing to get into a long term
relationship with these eggs. ;-)

The reason I want fresh eggs is because of the way I use them. For eating
eggs themselves, I want them very fresh for two reasons. First, on frying
and poaching, they come out a lot better when the white is still thick. As
they age, it thins out considerably. The second reason is I like eggs
lightly cooked (whether fried, poached, soft boiled, omelet, zabaglione) and
I believe fresher would tend to decrease salmonella problems.

For baking, I have no qualms about "old" eggs. But I don't bake as often as
I'd like (weight control issues!).

--
wff_ng_7 (at) verizon (dot) net

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SofTeC 2011: Meet testing leaders from Microsoft,Oracle,Applabsand others on Mar 26, Hyd slbangalore sl General Cooking 0 11-03-2011 01:48 PM
SofTeC 2011: Meet testing leaders from Microsoft,Oracle,Applabsand others on Mar 26, Hyd slbangalore sl General Cooking 0 11-03-2011 01:48 PM
Natural weight loss tactics to lose weight forever and never gain itback. All the weight-loss secrets! mada General Cooking 0 18-08-2010 04:31 PM
"Leaders sipped a Montepulciano d'Abruzzo before Berlusconi pouredBarack Obama a glass of Cerasuolo Hedos Cantina Tollo 2008, the president'sfavourite wine..." aesthete8 Wine 3 09-07-2010 09:55 PM
Pickled Eggs, Asparagus, Kimchi and Beans (was: Scotch Eggs) Monroe, of course... Barbecue 3 15-12-2003 01:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"