Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to sci.med.cardiology,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism,alt.support.diabetes,rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
convicted and stricken FR wrote:
> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote: > > friend > wrote: > > > friend "Mu" > wrote: > > >> deceased neighbor Bob (this one) Pastorio wrote: > > > >>> "Funny thing about that. No reason why they should admit it. Chung was > > >>> fired for giving substandard medical care. An arbitrator upheld the > > >>> firing. He was out of there in less than 3 months. If Chung's story were > > >>> true, he'd at least have had grounds for a suit himself. Ooops. No suit. > > >>> Canned. > > > > > >As an attorney, I disagree. The fact that the matter went to arbitration > > >strongly suggests that Dr. Chung's employment contract had an arbitration > > >clause in it. Generally speaking, the party whose contract contains the > > >arbitration clause - in this case the medical practice -makes sure that the > > >arbitrator is a business like the American Arbitration Association which is > > >known for being favorable to the party which contracts for its services. > > > > > >And since the contract likely had an arbitration clause, that means that Dr. > > >Chung couldn't have filed a lawsuit. Well, he could have, but the employer > > >would have filed a motion to compel arbitration and it would have been > > >granted. > > > > > >And as I've noted before, I just don't understand all the venom against Dr. > > >Chung. Yes, his religious views certainly appear eccentric to many of us, > > >but he has a medical degree from an eccelent medical school and he shares > > >his knowledge with people here for free. It's obvious that most of his > > >"haters" just enjoy sparring with him. > > > > Chung desperately wants to be a victim. No. GOD's will be done and not my will. > Chung wants to appear to be the victim. See above. http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are not perfect. We are simply forgiven: http://InterviewWithGOD.com/Forgiven Laus Deo ! ! ! Marana tha Prayerfully in Jesus' ever-lasting love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD http://EmoryCardiology.com May HIS immortal brethren pray for our dying mortal friends and neighbors: http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts In memory of our dearly departed Bob(this one) Pastorio: http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love The Official SMC FAQ List: http://HeartMDPhD.com/TheTruth/FAQ |
Posted to sci.med.cardiology,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism,rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD > with yet
another email address spewed: >convicted and stricken FR wrote: >> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote: Coward. >> > friend > wrote: >> > > friend "Mu" > wrote: >> > >> deceased neighbor Bob (this one) Pastorio wrote: >> >> > >>> "Funny thing about that. No reason why they should admit it. Chung was >> > >>> fired for giving substandard medical care. An arbitrator upheld the >> > >>> firing. He was out of there in less than 3 months. If Chung's story >> > >>> were >> > >>> true, he'd at least have had grounds for a suit himself. Ooops. No >> > >>> suit. >> > >>> Canned. >> > > >> > >As an attorney, I disagree. The fact that the matter went to arbitration >> > >strongly suggests that Dr. Chung's employment contract had an arbitration >> > >clause in it. Generally speaking, the party whose contract contains the >> > >arbitration clause - in this case the medical practice -makes sure that >> > >the >> > >arbitrator is a business like the American Arbitration Association which >> > >is >> > >known for being favorable to the party which contracts for its services. >> > > >> > >And since the contract likely had an arbitration clause, that means that >> > >Dr. >> > >Chung couldn't have filed a lawsuit. Well, he could have, but the employer >> > >would have filed a motion to compel arbitration and it would have been >> > >granted. >> > > >> > >And as I've noted before, I just don't understand all the venom against >> > >Dr. >> > >Chung. Yes, his religious views certainly appear eccentric to many of us, >> > >but he has a medical degree from an eccelent medical school and he shares >> > >his knowledge with people here for free. It's obvious that most of his >> > >"haters" just enjoy sparring with him. >> > >> > Chung desperately wants to be a victim. > >No. > >GOD's will be done and not my will. Replying through a proxy is a sign of cowardice. > >> Chung wants to appear to be the victim. > >See above. How many times are you going to be spamming the same subject line, spammer? -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco? The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco." -- Dr. David Tholen "Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from attribution problems?" -- Dr. David Tholen |
Posted to sci.med.cardiology,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism,rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Deco wrote:
> False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD > with yet > another email address spewed: > >> convicted and stricken FR wrote: >>> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote: > > Coward. > >>>> friend > wrote: >>>>> friend "Mu" > wrote: >>>>>> deceased neighbor Bob (this one) Pastorio wrote: >>>>>>> "Funny thing about that. No reason why they should admit it. Chung was >>>>>>> fired for giving substandard medical care. An arbitrator upheld the >>>>>>> firing. He was out of there in less than 3 months. If Chung's story >>>>>>> were >>>>>>> true, he'd at least have had grounds for a suit himself. Ooops. No >>>>>>> suit. >>>>>>> Canned. >>>>> As an attorney, I disagree. The fact that the matter went to arbitration >>>>> strongly suggests that Dr. Chung's employment contract had an arbitration >>>>> clause in it. Generally speaking, the party whose contract contains the >>>>> arbitration clause - in this case the medical practice -makes sure that >>>>> the >>>>> arbitrator is a business like the American Arbitration Association which >>>>> is >>>>> known for being favorable to the party which contracts for its services. >>>>> >>>>> And since the contract likely had an arbitration clause, that means that >>>>> Dr. >>>>> Chung couldn't have filed a lawsuit. Well, he could have, but the employer >>>>> would have filed a motion to compel arbitration and it would have been >>>>> granted. >>>>> >>>>> And as I've noted before, I just don't understand all the venom against >>>>> Dr. >>>>> Chung. Yes, his religious views certainly appear eccentric to many of us, >>>>> but he has a medical degree from an eccelent medical school and he shares >>>>> his knowledge with people here for free. It's obvious that most of his >>>>> "haters" just enjoy sparring with him. >>>> Chung desperately wants to be a victim. >> No. >> >> GOD's will be done and not my will. > > Replying through a proxy is a sign of cowardice. >>> Chung wants to appear to be the victim. >> See above. > > How many times are you going to be spamming the same subject line, > spammer? Scared *** Ducks shouldn't complain about spam. > |
Posted to sci.med.cardiology,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism,rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
friend Henry Schmidt wrote:
> satan via another sockpuppet (demon) wrote: > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:: > >> convicted and stricken FR wrote: > >>> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote: > >>>> friend > wrote: > >>>>> friend "Mu" > wrote: > >>>>>> deceased neighbor Bob (this one) Pastorio wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> "Funny thing about that. No reason why they should admit it. Chung was > >>>>>>> fired for giving substandard medical care. An arbitrator upheld the > >>>>>>> firing. He was out of there in less than 3 months. If Chung's story > >>>>>>> were > >>>>>>> true, he'd at least have had grounds for a suit himself. Ooops. No > >>>>>>> suit. > >>>>>>> Canned. > >>>>> > >>>>> As an attorney, I disagree. The fact that the matter went to arbitration > >>>>> strongly suggests that Dr. Chung's employment contract had an arbitration > >>>>> clause in it. Generally speaking, the party whose contract contains the > >>>>> arbitration clause - in this case the medical practice -makes sure that > >>>>> the > >>>>> arbitrator is a business like the American Arbitration Association which > >>>>> is > >>>>> known for being favorable to the party which contracts for its services. > >>>>> > >>>>> And since the contract likely had an arbitration clause, that means that > >>>>> Dr. > >>>>> Chung couldn't have filed a lawsuit. Well, he could have, but the employer > >>>>> would have filed a motion to compel arbitration and it would have been > >>>>> granted. > >>>>> > >>>>> And as I've noted before, I just don't understand all the venom against > >>>>> Dr. > >>>>> Chung. Yes, his religious views certainly appear eccentric to many of us, > >>>>> but he has a medical degree from an eccelent medical school and he shares > >>>>> his knowledge with people here for free. It's obvious that most of his > >>>>> "haters" just enjoy sparring with him. > > >>>> Chung desperately wants to be a victim. > > >> No. > >> > >> GOD's will be done and not my will. > > > > <hiss sputter hiss hiss> > > >>> Chung wants to appear to be the victim. > > >> See above. > > > > How many times are you going to be spamming the same subject line, > > spammer? > > Scared *** Ducks shouldn't complain about spam. Especially when they have lost their free will because satan owns them: > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...9f72abe5705dc? May GOD bless you. Prayerfully in Jesus' ever-lasting love, Andrew <>< -- Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD http://EmoryCardiology.com May HIS immortal brethren pray for our dying mortal friends and neighbors: http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts In memory of our dearly departed Bob(this one) Pastorio: http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17). http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love The Official SMC FAQ List: http://HeartMDPhD.com/TheTruth/FAQ |
Posted to sci.med.cardiology,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism,rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD > with yet
another email address spewed: >friend Henry Schmidt wrote: Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahah >> satan via another sockpuppet (demon) wrote: Coward. >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:: >> >> convicted and stricken FR wrote: >> >>> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote: >> >>>> friend > wrote: >> >>>>> friend "Mu" > wrote: >> >>>>>> deceased neighbor Bob (this one) Pastorio wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> "Funny thing about that. No reason why they should admit it. Chung >> >>>>>>> was >> >>>>>>> fired for giving substandard medical care. An arbitrator upheld the >> >>>>>>> firing. He was out of there in less than 3 months. If Chung's story >> >>>>>>> were >> >>>>>>> true, he'd at least have had grounds for a suit himself. Ooops. No >> >>>>>>> suit. >> >>>>>>> Canned. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> As an attorney, I disagree. The fact that the matter went to >> >>>>> arbitration >> >>>>> strongly suggests that Dr. Chung's employment contract had an >> >>>>> arbitration >> >>>>> clause in it. Generally speaking, the party whose contract contains the >> >>>>> arbitration clause - in this case the medical practice -makes sure that >> >>>>> the >> >>>>> arbitrator is a business like the American Arbitration Association >> >>>>> which >> >>>>> is >> >>>>> known for being favorable to the party which contracts for its >> >>>>> services. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> And since the contract likely had an arbitration clause, that means >> >>>>> that >> >>>>> Dr. >> >>>>> Chung couldn't have filed a lawsuit. Well, he could have, but the >> >>>>> employer >> >>>>> would have filed a motion to compel arbitration and it would have been >> >>>>> granted. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> And as I've noted before, I just don't understand all the venom against >> >>>>> Dr. >> >>>>> Chung. Yes, his religious views certainly appear eccentric to many of >> >>>>> us, >> >>>>> but he has a medical degree from an eccelent medical school and he >> >>>>> shares >> >>>>> his knowledge with people here for free. It's obvious that most of his >> >>>>> "haters" just enjoy sparring with him. >> >> >>>> Chung desperately wants to be a victim. >> >> >> No. >> >> >> >> GOD's will be done and not my will. >> > >> > <hiss sputter hiss hiss> >> >> >>> Chung wants to appear to be the victim. >> >> >> See above. >> > >> > How many times are you going to be spamming the same subject line, >> > spammer? >> >> Scared *** Ducks shouldn't complain about spam. > >Especially when they have lost their free will because satan owns >them: You're an idiot, Chung. You and PorchMonki are perfect for each other. It remains my free will to laugh in your general direction. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco? The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco." -- Dr. David Tholen "Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from attribution problems?" -- Dr. David Tholen |
Posted to sci.med.cardiology,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism,rec.food.cooking,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art Deco wrote:
> False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD > with yet > another email address spewed: > >> friend Henry Schmidt wrote: > > Hahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahah > >>> satan via another sockpuppet (demon) wrote: > > Coward. > >>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:: >>>>> convicted and stricken FR wrote: >>>>>> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote: >>>>>>> friend > wrote: >>>>>>>> friend "Mu" > wrote: >>>>>>>>> deceased neighbor Bob (this one) Pastorio wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "Funny thing about that. No reason why they should admit it. Chung >>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>> fired for giving substandard medical care. An arbitrator upheld the >>>>>>>>>> firing. He was out of there in less than 3 months. If Chung's story >>>>>>>>>> were >>>>>>>>>> true, he'd at least have had grounds for a suit himself. Ooops. No >>>>>>>>>> suit. >>>>>>>>>> Canned. >>>>>>>> As an attorney, I disagree. The fact that the matter went to >>>>>>>> arbitration >>>>>>>> strongly suggests that Dr. Chung's employment contract had an >>>>>>>> arbitration >>>>>>>> clause in it. Generally speaking, the party whose contract contains the >>>>>>>> arbitration clause - in this case the medical practice -makes sure that >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> arbitrator is a business like the American Arbitration Association >>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> known for being favorable to the party which contracts for its >>>>>>>> services. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And since the contract likely had an arbitration clause, that means >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> Dr. >>>>>>>> Chung couldn't have filed a lawsuit. Well, he could have, but the >>>>>>>> employer >>>>>>>> would have filed a motion to compel arbitration and it would have been >>>>>>>> granted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And as I've noted before, I just don't understand all the venom against >>>>>>>> Dr. >>>>>>>> Chung. Yes, his religious views certainly appear eccentric to many of >>>>>>>> us, >>>>>>>> but he has a medical degree from an eccelent medical school and he >>>>>>>> shares >>>>>>>> his knowledge with people here for free. It's obvious that most of his >>>>>>>> "haters" just enjoy sparring with him. >>>>>>> Chung desperately wants to be a victim. >>>>> No. >>>>> >>>>> GOD's will be done and not my will. >>>> <hiss sputter hiss hiss> >>>>>> Chung wants to appear to be the victim. >>>>> See above. >>>> How many times are you going to be spamming the same subject line, >>>> spammer? >>> Scared *** Ducks shouldn't complain about spam. >> Especially when they have lost their free will because satan owns >> them: > > You're an idiot, Chung. You and PorchMonki are perfect for each other. > It remains my free will to laugh in your general direction. > *** Ducks are giggling naives. AD=PTP=quivering *** Duckie |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|