convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
> >Approach to diets:
>
> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
> Approach and not a Diet?

It can stand for "Day" if that will help your brain wrap itself more
easily around the simple concept of eating less not being a diet.
However, your hatred of the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, will
always make the 2PD-OMER Approach difficult for you to swallow because
this is from HIM as part of HIS design of our bodies.

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

It is my hope that you will soon come to realize that the hatred you
have in your heart is what killed our late Bob (this one) Pastorio (my
continued condolences to his surviving friends and family) and is
killing you.

Bob (this one) Pastorio dying on April Fool's day is a sign from GOD
as to how our LORD has judged him.

It was not "cancer of unknown origin" but "cancer from GOD."

The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are not perfect though we have
stopped sinning with HIS help. We have HIS help because we are
forgiven.

Suggested viewing:

http://www.interviewwithgod.com/forgiven

"It is done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End.
To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the
spring of the water of life. He who overcomes will inherit all this,
and I will be his GOD and he will be MY son. But the cowardly, the
unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who
practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars-their place will be
in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death." -- GOD
(Revelation 21:6-8)

Amen.

"Name-calling is lying." -- Holy Spirit

Amen.

May all who have eyes read and understand this.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you hungrier than you have
ever been in your life.

Prayerfully in Jesus' ever-lasting love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

May HIS immortal brethren pray for our dying mortal friends and
neighbors:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

In memory of our dearly departed Bob(this one) Pastorio:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

The Official SMC FAQ List:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/TheTruth/FAQ

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > popped their head through
the hatch and pleaded:

> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>>>Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
>>>Approach to diets:
>>
>> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
>> Approach and not a Diet?
>
> It can stand for "Day" if that will help your brain wrap itself more
> easily around the simple concept of eating less not being a diet.

If "2PD-OMER" is not a diet, it isn't an "approach", either. Words don't
mean what you want them to, and if you weren't a psychopath, you would
understand that.


> However, your hatred of the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, will
> always make the 2PD-OMER Approach difficult for you to swallow because
> this is from HIM as part of HIS design of our bodies.
>

No, it's from CHUNG, and it's part of his cover story.

> Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>

Take this hammer.....

> It is my hope that you will soon come to realize that the hatred you
> have in your heart is what killed our late Bob (this one) Pastorio (my
> continued condolences to his surviving friends and family) and is
> killing you.
>

You're a freak. That's not name-calling, it's objective truth.

> Bob (this one) Pastorio dying on April Fool's day is a sign from GOD
> as to how our LORD has judged him.
>
> It was not "cancer of unknown origin" but "cancer from GOD."
>

You just get nastier and nastier, Earthquack. I think you're training your
mind to become a serial killer.

> The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are not perfect though we have
> stopped sinning with HIS help. We have HIS help because we are
> forgiven.
>

I can smell the fanaticism of David Koresh in your words.

> Suggested viewing:
>
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vi...3&fr=yfp-t-501

>

> "Name-calling is lying." -- Holy Spirit
>

You just called yourself a liar.

--
David Silverman AA#2208
Earthquack: A sort of cyberManson

It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article om>:

>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
>> >Approach to diets:
>>
>> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
>> Approach and not a Diet?
>
>It can stand for "Day"

That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
more you called it a "Two Pound Diet." Google doesn't lie, but liars
get Googled.
--
Don Kirkman

"Don Kirkman" > wrote in message
...
> It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
> article om>:
>
>>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>
>>> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
>>> >Approach to diets:
>>>
>>> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
>>> Approach and not a Diet?
>>
>>It can stand for "Day"
>
> That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
> more you called it a "Two Pound Diet." Google doesn't lie, but liars
> get Googled.
> --
> Don Kirkman

YA SEE CLUNKERS-AGAIN YOU ARE CAUGHT WITH YOUR PANTY'S DOWN.
YOUR SUCH A ****ING JOKE.
AND A GOD DAMNED LIAR AS WELL AS MANY OTHER DEMONIC THINGS.

convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
> >> >Approach to diets:
> >>
> >> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
> >> Approach and not a Diet?
> >
> >It can stand for "Day"
>
> That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
> more you called it a "Two Pound Diet."

It had been the "two pounds per day diet approach" from the outset.

The shortened name "Two Pound Diet" did not change the Approach.

> Google doesn't lie, but liars get Googled.

Actually, being Googled is not the criteria for being judged by GOD to
be a liar.

It is being untruthful with the intent to deceive that will be HIS
criterion.

You have been shown to be untruthful on many occasions as archived in
Google. If your intent has been to deceive, you now know how GOD will
judge you.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

Google


> Don Kirkman

False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD > with yet
another email address spewed:

>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
>> >> >Approach to diets:
>> >>
>> >> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
>> >> Approach and not a Diet?
>> >
>> >It can stand for "Day"
>>
>> That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
>> more you called it a "Two Pound Diet."
>
>It had been the "two pounds per day diet approach" from the outset.
>
>The shortened name "Two Pound Diet" did not change the Approach.
>
>> Google doesn't lie, but liars get Googled.
>
>Actually, being Googled is not the criteria for being judged by GOD to
>be a liar.
>
>It is being untruthful with the intent to deceive that will be HIS
>criterion.
>
>You have been shown to be untruthful on many occasions as archived in
>Google. If your intent has been to deceive, you now know how GOD will
>judge you.

You need to look in the mirror, Andy.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

On Apr 15, 12:57 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" >
wrote:
> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > >> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
> > >> >Approach to diets:
>
> > >> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
> > >> Approach and not a Diet?
>
> > >It can stand for "Day"
>
> > That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
> > more you called it a "Two Pound Diet."
>
> It had been the "two pounds per day diet approach" from the outset.
>
> The shortened name "Two Pound Diet" did not change the Approach.
>
> > Google doesn't lie, but liars get Googled.
>
> Actually, being Googled is not the criteria for being judged by GOD to
> be a liar.
>
> It is being untruthful with the intent to deceive that will be HIS
> criterion.
>

Every breath you take....

convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >> >> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
> >> >> >Approach to diets:
>
> >> >> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
> >> >> Approach and not a Diet?
>
> >> >It **can** stand for "Day"

** emphasis ** added

> >> That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
> >> more you called it a "Two Pound Diet."
>
> >It had been the "two pounds per day diet approach" from the outset.
>
> >The shortened name "Two Pound Diet" did not change the Approach.
>
> Your first message I find about the 2PD in Google in scm was on October
> 8, 2000:
>
> [Begin]
> Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, sci.med, sci.med.nutrition
> From: "Andrew Chung, MD/PhD" >
> Date: 2000/10/08
> Subject: Lose weight *permanently*
>
> Lagasch wrote:
> > Nope, the FIRST STEP step is to know about and pay attention to the
> > composition of whatever food you eat.
>
> This is already a given for most people who see, smell, and taste.
>
> > Good studies have consistently
> > pointed out that education is directly associated with better health and
> > less overweight.
>
> Good investigators recognize that it is difficult to disassociate the
> variables
> education and higher socioeconomic status and make them truly
> independent of
> each other. Fresh fruits and vegetables are more expensive per pound
> then fast
> foods so that one would expect educated/wealthier people to have more
> access to
> these foods that (in moderation) allow better health and less obesity.
>
> > Where is the study that confirms that any voluntary
> > volumetric or caloric restriction works over time?
>
> Actually, it follows from a postulate from physics known as conservation
> of
> mass and energy. It also follows from common sense. Because of the
> *huge*
> interest, in the upcoming few days, I will be designing a prospective
> randomized controlled study (not blinded) involving volunteering
> participants
> from these newsgroups. The volunteers will be randomized to either the
> Mediterranean diet or the Two Pound diet. I will follow them for six
> months
> and then tabulate the results. Then I will follow longitudinally for
> several
> years to establish whether obtained weight loss is permanent.
> [End]
>
> Note that you were setting up your study between the Mediterranean diet
> or the Two Pound diet. The word "approach" is not in that message.

It should be obvious from the content that what you cite is not the
first on-line reference to this approach to losing weight.

> And how are your subjects doing six and a half years later?

Sustained weight loss without exception. No sustained weight loss for
the control group. The usenet population is no different from the non-
usenet population in this regard.

> >> Google doesn't lie, but liars get Googled.
>
> >Actually, being Googled is not the criteria for being judged by GOD to
> >be a liar.
>
> God will judge you in his own time. It's a bunch of humans judging your
> credibility right now.

Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).

> >It is being untruthful with the intent to deceive that will be HIS
> >criterion.
>
> Be afraid! Be very afraid!

Those who reverently fear GOD, do not dread anything (especially your
opinion) that is of this world:

http://TruthRUS.org/DreadNought

If your intent has been to deceive, GOD's plan for you includes a
second death (Revelation 21:6-8).

> >You have been shown to be untruthful on many occasions as archived in
> >Google. If your intent has been to deceive, you now know how GOD will
> >judge you.
>
> Post one or two examples.

Per your request:

> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...d4340b018f899?

> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...79ad8c52aec58?

Bottomline: You remain untruthful.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way:

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:01:35 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
>> >Approach to diets:
>>
>> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
>> Approach and not a Diet?
>
> It can stand for "Day" if that will help your brain wrap itself more
> easily around the simple concept of eating less not being a diet.

Look at Andy try to lie his way out of years of calling it a "diet"...

--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace
alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing
it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H. L. Mencken

On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:57:39 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
>> >> >Approach to diets:
>> >>
>> >> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was
>> >> an Approach and not a Diet?
>> >
>> >It can stand for "Day"
>>
>> That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
>> more you called it a "Two Pound Diet."
>
> It had been the "two pounds per day diet approach" from the outset.

In short, it's a diet.

--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace
alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing
it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H. L. Mencken

As I've said before, your posts indicate not just mental problems, but also
serious character problems.

Living inside a fantasy like christianity makes you vulnerable and afraid of
truths that will break through the fantasies and lies. You react by chanting
and burrowing your head in the sand.

Also, it makes you hate and gloat over the misfortunes of people like Bob
P. - whose only offense was to investigate you and then post what he found.

Christinaity, like all religions and world view fantasies, is dangerous to
everyone - but especially dangerous to those who have existing mental
problems, like you Andrew.

On Apr 15, 4:59 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" >
wrote:
> convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
>
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> > >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >> >convicted neighbor Don Kirkman wrote:
> > >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > >> >> >Thankfully the 2PD-OMER Approach is not even a diet but rather an
> > >> >> >Approach to diets:
>
> > >> >> Remind me again; what does the "D" stand for since you decided it was an
> > >> >> Approach and not a Diet?
>
> > >> >It **can** stand for "Day"
>
> ** emphasis ** added
>
>
>
> > >> That should have been made clear at the creation, when for a year or
> > >> more you called it a "Two Pound Diet."
>
> > >It had been the "two pounds per day diet approach" from the outset.
>
> > >The shortened name "Two Pound Diet" did not change the Approach.
>
> > Your first message I find about the 2PD in Google in scm was on October
> > 8, 2000:
>
> > [Begin]
> > Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, sci.med, sci.med.nutrition
> > From: "Andrew Chung, MD/PhD" >
> > Date: 2000/10/08
> > Subject: Lose weight *permanently*
>
> > Lagasch wrote:
> > > Nope, the FIRST STEP step is to know about and pay attention to the
> > > composition of whatever food you eat.
>
> > This is already a given for most people who see, smell, and taste.
>
> > > Good studies have consistently
> > > pointed out that education is directly associated with better health and
> > > less overweight.
>
> > Good investigators recognize that it is difficult to disassociate the
> > variables
> > education and higher socioeconomic status and make them truly
> > independent of
> > each other. Fresh fruits and vegetables are more expensive per pound
> > then fast
> > foods so that one would expect educated/wealthier people to have more
> > access to
> > these foods that (in moderation) allow better health and less obesity.
>
> > > Where is the study that confirms that any voluntary
> > > volumetric or caloric restriction works over time?
>
> > Actually, it follows from a postulate from physics known as conservation
> > of
> > mass and energy. It also follows from common sense. Because of the
> > *huge*
> > interest, in the upcoming few days, I will be designing a prospective
> > randomized controlled study (not blinded) involving volunteering
> > participants
> > from these newsgroups. The volunteers will be randomized to either the
> > Mediterranean diet or the Two Pound diet. I will follow them for six
> > months
> > and then tabulate the results. Then I will follow longitudinally for
> > several
> > years to establish whether obtained weight loss is permanent.
> > [End]
>
> > Note that you were setting up your study between the Mediterranean diet
> > or the Two Pound diet. The word "approach" is not in that message.
>
> It should be obvious from the content that what you cite is not the
> first on-line reference to this approach to losing weight.
>
> > And how are your subjects doing six and a half years later?
>
> Sustained weight loss without exception. No sustained weight loss for
> the control group. The usenet population is no different from the non-
> usenet population in this regard.
>
> > >> Google doesn't lie, but liars get Googled.
>
> > >Actually, being Googled is not the criteria for being judged by GOD to
> > >be a liar.
>
> > God will judge you in his own time. It's a bunch of humans judging your
> > credibility right now.
>
> Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> > >It is being untruthful with the intent to deceive that will be HIS
> > >criterion.
>
> > Be afraid! Be very afraid!
>
> Those who reverently fear GOD, do not dread anything (especially your
> opinion) that is of this world:
>
> http://TruthRUS.org/DreadNought
>
> If your intent has been to deceive, GOD's plan for you includes a
> second death (Revelation 21:6-8).
>
> > >You have been shown to be untruthful on many occasions as archived in
> > >Google. If your intent has been to deceive, you now know how GOD will
> > >judge you.
>
> > Post one or two examples.
>
> Per your request:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...d4340b018f899?
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.m...79ad8c52aec58?
>
> Bottomline: You remain untruthful.

2PD That funny, silvery liquid from inside of fluorescent tubes.

As I've said before, your posts indicate not just mental problems, but also
serious character problems.

Living inside a fantasy like christianity makes you vulnerable and afraid of
truths that will break through the fantasies and lies. You react by chanting
and burrowing your head in the sand.

Also, it makes you hate and gloat over the misfortunes of people like Bob
P. - whose only offense was to investigate you and then post what he found.

Christinaity, like all religions and world view fantasies, is dangerous to
everyone - but especially dangerous to those who have existing mental
problems, like you Andrew.