Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chatty Cathy wrote:
> http://www.news24.com/News24/World/N...105147,00.html It's a taste condom. New Zealand requires that all McDs provide taste condoms with each order. By slipping the condom on the tongue, one is partially protected from bad taste. It's part of a Safer Eating program. -- "So long, so long, and thanks for all the fish!" Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Bugg wrote:
> Chatty Cathy wrote: >> http://www.news24.com/News24/World/N...105147,00.html > > It's a taste condom. New Zealand requires that all McDs provide taste > condoms with each order. By slipping the condom on the tongue, one is > partially protected from bad taste. It's part of a Safer Eating program. > ROFLMAO! -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
> Chatty Cathy > > : > >> http://www.news24.com/News24/World/N...105147,00.html >> > > <huge eyeroll> I don't see what the big deal is. The kid is 7 and hasn't > a clue what a condom is. Apparently the sports bag was mistakenly handed > out and the condom, in it's package, was there beforehand. It was human > error, a mistake. Gawd, can you imagine if that happened here in the US? > There would be lawsuits with TV interviews and indignant statements from > the religious right. Exactly. I didn't see what the big deal was about with the whole "hot coffee in the lap" thing either ![]() -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote:
> Chatty Cathy > > : > >> Exactly. I didn't see what the big deal was about with the whole "hot >> coffee in the lap" thing either ![]() > > B...b...but you mean a cup of coffee will actually burn if dropped in the > lap ![]() Not according to my lawyer... ![]() -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chatty Cathy" > wrote in message ... > http://www.news24.com/News24/World/N...105147,00.html I don't see anything wrong. However, if it was used, that would be a different story. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 26, 4:12 pm, Chatty Cathy > wrote:
> http://www.news24.com/News24/World/N...105147,00.html > > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy As everyone knows one fills them with water and drops them on adults ( preferably from the 2nd floor to have time to make an escape. ) John Kane, Kingston ON Canada |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:09:55 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote: >Michael "Dog3" Lonergan wrote: >> Chatty Cathy > >> : >> >>> Exactly. I didn't see what the big deal was about with the whole "hot >>> coffee in the lap" thing either ![]() >> >> B...b...but you mean a cup of coffee will actually burn if dropped in the >> lap ![]() > >Not according to my lawyer... ![]() god damn it, i am tired of this being referred to as some kind of 'frivolous' lawsuit. the woman had ****ing third degree burns over six percent of her body and needed skin grafts. the corporation had had over 700 similar complaints. the cheap *******s refused to pay any of her medical expenses, which would have more than satisfied her. "The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages. This amount was reduced to $160,000 because the jury found Liebeck 20 percent at fault in the spill. The jury also awarded Liebeck $2.7 million in punitive damages, which equals about two days of McDonalds' coffee sales." <http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm> so spare me sympathy for poor put-upon mcdougals. this is a right-wing meme designed to generate sympathy for 'tort reform' so that corporations won't be inconvenienced by suits when they maim their customers. stop spreading their bullshit for them. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
blake murphy wrote:
<snip> -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 26, 2:12 pm, Chatty Cathy > wrote:
> http://www.news24.com/News24/World/N...105147,00.html > When I first saw the subject header, I figured it was a troll, because such posts are common on alt.food.fast-food. The next thing I thought was, I hope it was in the big kids' meal, not the Happy Meal. I like the idea, since it would infuriate the anti-sex, abstinence- only, fundamentalist Neanderthals. > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:19:59 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\" Lonergan"
> wrote: >blake murphy > : > >> >> god damn it, i am tired of this being referred to as some kind of >> 'frivolous' lawsuit. the woman had ****ing third degree burns over >> six percent of her body and needed skin grafts. > ><snip rest of story for space> > >So I take it you also think HOT coffee should not burn when one drops it in >the lap. Whatever. I don't give a flying fig about McDonald's either. > >Michael > this was not a woman complaining because she had an 'owie' from hot coffee. it destroyed her skin, and she wasn't the first. suppose she had carefully opened the coffee and took a big gulp. yum! she's loving it! your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:14:15 +0200, Chatty Cathy
> wrote: >blake murphy wrote: > > ><snip> very witty, chatty. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
blake murphy wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:14:15 +0200, Chatty Cathy > > wrote: > >> blake murphy wrote: >> >> >> <snip> > > very witty, chatty. > > your pal, > blake Thanks. -- Cheers Chatty Cathy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
blake murphy wrote:
> this was not a woman complaining because she had an 'owie' from hot > coffee. it destroyed her skin, and she wasn't the first. > > suppose she had carefully opened the coffee and took a big gulp. yum! > she's loving it! > > your pal, > blake Any hot coffee, even not as hot as hers was, could also burn if spilled and held against the skin by the clothing. I find her somewhat at fault for putting a cup of known hot coffee between her legs. It just seems to be asking for trouble. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:39:19 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote: >blake murphy wrote: > >> this was not a woman complaining because she had an 'owie' from hot >> coffee. it destroyed her skin, and she wasn't the first. >> >> suppose she had carefully opened the coffee and took a big gulp. yum! >> she's loving it! >> >> your pal, >> blake > >Any hot coffee, even not as hot as hers was, could also burn if spilled >and held against the skin by the clothing. >I find her somewhat at fault for putting a cup of known hot coffee >between her legs. It just seems to be asking for trouble. and the jury found her to be twenty percent at fault. the fact remains that the coffee was too hot to be handled safely. your pal, blake |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
stuff to do with almond meal and flax meal | Diabetic | |||
any good condom dessert recipes? | General Cooking | |||
Chateau Condom AOC Cotes de Duras Red | Restaurants | |||
Chateau Condom AOC Cotes de Duras Red | Winemaking | |||
Chateau Condom AOC Cotes de Duras Red | Wine |