"reeper" > wrote in message
...
>

wahhhh wahhhhh wahhhhhhhhhhh

Do something for someone else for a change.

On Jun 11, 5:23 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> "reeper" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
> wahhhh wahhhhh wahhhhhhhhhhh
>
> Do something for someone else for a change.

get up, stay on the scene

"reeper" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> On Jun 11, 5:23 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
>> "reeper" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> wahhhh wahhhhh wahhhhhhhhhhh
>>
>> Do something for someone else for a change.
>
> get up, stay on the scene
>

par klee

jewr

eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

~ ~ ~ ~ >O:

"reeper" > wrote in message
...
>

reep this

On Jun 11, 7:31 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:

> reep this

just stoppit

"reeper" > wrote in message
ups.com...
> On Jun 11, 7:31 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
>
>> reep this
>
> just stoppit
>
stop this

"Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:31:39 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>
>> "reeper" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>
>> reep this
>
> Why dfo you feel as if you have to respond to each troll two times?
> Especailly the Barry-troll (and you did it twice to the Sheldon troll,
> too).
>
> Has your husband mentioned that you mumble about "Barry" in your sleep?
>
> New addition to the rule. For those of you fortunate to be usinf 40tude
> dialog, here's the a line for your killfile:
>
>[*]
> !delete Xref {rec.pets} {alt.religion.kibology} {sci.med.cardiology}
>
> -sw

Why are you addressing me? And try not to post drunk. If there are
any trolls around here, Steve, you're among them.

Nobody likes a control freak. Or a dickhead.

"Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 00:04:39 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>
>> "Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 19:31:39 -0400, cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> "reeper" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> reep this
>>>
>>> Why dfo you feel as if you have to respond to each troll two times?
>>> Especailly the Barry-troll (and you did it twice to the Sheldon troll,
>>> too).
>>>
>>> Has your husband mentioned that you mumble about "Barry" in your sleep?
>>>
>>> New addition to the rule. For those of you fortunate to be usinf 40tude
>>> dialog, here's the a line for your killfile:
>>>
>>>[*]
>>> !delete Xref {rec.pets} {alt.religion.kibology} {sci.med.cardiology}
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> Why are you addressing me? And try not to post drunk.
>
> Ahh, that's the Usenet Kook Spirit! Accuse somebody of being
> drunk when that somebody has you dead to rights and you can't
> even begin to defend yourself any other way.

Um. Steve? Look at what you wrote:

>Why dfo you feel as if you have to respond to each troll two times?
> Especailly the Barry-troll (and you did it twice to the >Sheldon troll,
> too).
> Has your husband mentioned that you mumble about "Barry" in your sleep?

If you weren't drunk when you wrote this, it is certainly kind of me to
attribute it to inebriation. Because if you weren't drunk when you wrote
this, you're a bigger idiot than I thought you were. Would you like me to
tell you why, little man? I would be happy to.

>
> So, did you make Barry feel good? I think you give more pleasure
> to Barry than you do your own, senseless husband.
>

Now this is a stellar comment on your part, about two men and a woman you
don't know in the least. Strange speculation, Steve. If you're not drunk or
****ed up on prescription drugs (or something), then you're just a puerile
little dickless whining girl in the vein of Greg Morrow. Speculating about
things that are none of your business and taking Usenet wayyyy too
seriously. And that is putting it kindly.

I'm just not as petty or small or icky as you are Steve. God knows I try,
but you have to have a lot of schlock in you to even approach your level of
old womanish, diseased commentary.

Anything else?

On Jun 11, 11:39 pm, Steve Wertz > wrote:
> Has your husband mentioned that you mumble about "Barry" in your sleep?

Mark knows all about them -- he just doesn't care because she's lousy
in bed. As long as she has an income, it's all good for him.

He gets his swerve on -- don't worry.

On Jun 11, 11:02 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:

> stop this

http://tinyurl.com/2dzsba