"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>
>>>>>>>>>> OK. The ship arrives, and through some magic, we discover a
>>>>>>>>>> container of poisoned toothpaste. Physically, it's already in the
>>>>>>>>>> country. Now what? Tell the shipper to take it somewhere else?
>
>>>>>>>>> Depends on what 'poisoned' involves.
>
>>>>>>>>> With the fish, its just some downsides that the US claims about
>>>>>>>>> the use of antibiotics etc and plenty of countrys have
>>>>>>>>> different attitudes about the use of those in the food
>>>>>>>>> production industrys, so legally you cant destroy it just
>>>>>>>>> because its illegal in the US.
>
>>>>>>>> Let's stick with diethylene glycol, since all sentient beings know
>>>>>>>> it is not fit for human consumption.
>
>>>>>>> Pity that you havent established that its use in toothpaste
>>>>>>> constitutes POISON that results in hospitalisation of anyone.
>
>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>
>>>>>>> It doesnt show up in cough syrup.
>
>>>>>> It has not shown up HERE in cough syrup (yet). It HAS shown up in
>>>>>> other countries, and the cough syrup has killed people. This is
>>>>>> why I'm asking you to explain what you think should happen if a
>>>>>> product like that arrived in a shipping container and was
>>>>>> discovered before being distributed.
>
>>>>> Wouldnt happen, because its just not feasible to inspect at anything
>>>>> like a high enough rate to catch something that rarely seen.
>
>>>> I didn't ask you about the probability of it being spotted. I'm aware
>>>> of the fact that we only inspect a tiny fraction of incoming goods.
>
>>>> I asked what you personally think should be done to poisoned cough
>>>> syrup arriving at one of our ports.
>
>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>>> irrelevant.
>
>>> You might as well try asking what should happen if a shipment of food is
>>> found to have been deliberately contaminated with some deadly poison by
>>> Al Quaeda etc. No relevance what so ever to what is being discussed,
>>> what should be done with a shipment found to not meet US food quality
>>> standards etc but which is legal to import into other countrys.
>
>> Let me guess:
>
> Guess when ready, Griddley. You're always welcome
> to make a spectacular fool of yourself whenever you like.
>
>> You're one of those guys who think it's utterly
>> pointless to discuss hypothetical situations,
>
> Nope. In fact you will find using groups.google that I discuss those quite
> a bit.
>
>> even those which have occurred elsewhere exactly as I've described.
>
>> No hypotheticals for you, right?
>
> Wrong.
>
> Its just got no relevance to what was being discussed, just another of
> your silly little stunts.
>


It's 100% relevant. But, you are uncomfortable answering the question. I'm
not sure why, but I seem to recall your suggesting in the past that because
the poisoned goods still belong to the shipper, we have no legal right to
destroy them. I suspect you're clinging to that idea, but you have realized
that the idea has a major Achilles heel.

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
> ...
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> OK. The ship arrives, and through some magic, we discover a
>>>>>>>>>>> container of poisoned toothpaste. Physically, it's already
>>>>>>>>>>> in the country. Now what? Tell the shipper to take it
>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere else?
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Depends on what 'poisoned' involves.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> With the fish, its just some downsides that the US claims
>>>>>>>>>> about the use of antibiotics etc and plenty of countrys have
>>>>>>>>>> different attitudes about the use of those in the food
>>>>>>>>>> production industrys, so legally you cant destroy it just
>>>>>>>>>> because its illegal in the US.
>>
>>>>>>>>> Let's stick with diethylene glycol, since all sentient beings
>>>>>>>>> know it is not fit for human consumption.
>>
>>>>>>>> Pity that you havent established that its use in toothpaste
>>>>>>>> constitutes POISON that results in hospitalisation of anyone.
>>
>>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from
>>>>>>>>> a ship onto American soil?
>>
>>>>>>>> It doesnt show up in cough syrup.
>>
>>>>>>> It has not shown up HERE in cough syrup (yet). It HAS shown up
>>>>>>> in other countries, and the cough syrup has killed people. This
>>>>>>> is why I'm asking you to explain what you think should happen
>>>>>>> if a product like that arrived in a shipping container and was
>>>>>>> discovered before being distributed.
>>
>>>>>> Wouldnt happen, because its just not feasible to inspect at
>>>>>> anything like a high enough rate to catch something that rarely
>>>>>> seen.
>>
>>>>> I didn't ask you about the probability of it being spotted. I'm
>>>>> aware of the fact that we only inspect a tiny fraction of
>>>>> incoming goods.
>>
>>>>> I asked what you personally think should be done to poisoned cough
>>>>> syrup arriving at one of our ports.
>>
>>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>>>> irrelevant.
>>
>>>> You might as well try asking what should happen if a shipment of
>>>> food is found to have been deliberately contaminated with some
>>>> deadly poison by Al Quaeda etc. No relevance what so ever to what
>>>> is being discussed, what should be done with a shipment found to
>>>> not meet US food quality standards etc but which is legal to
>>>> import into other countrys.
>>
>>> Let me guess:
>>
>> Guess when ready, Griddley. You're always welcome
>> to make a spectacular fool of yourself whenever you like.
>>
>>> You're one of those guys who think it's utterly
>>> pointless to discuss hypothetical situations,
>>
>> Nope. In fact you will find using groups.google that I discuss those
>> quite a bit.
>>
>>> even those which have occurred elsewhere exactly as I've described.
>>
>>> No hypotheticals for you, right?
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>> Its just got no relevance to what was being discussed, just another
>> of your silly little stunts.

> It's 100% relevant.

Nope, nothing to do with what to do with unsatisfactory imports
are ever likely to be discovered during inspection on import.

> But, you are uncomfortable answering the question.

Wrong, as always. Its just not relevant to what was being discussed and
even someone as stupid as you should be able to find plenty of examples
of me rubbing fools noses in what is irrelevant using groups.google.

> I'm not sure why, but I seem to recall your suggesting in
> the past that because the poisoned goods still belong to the shipper, we have no legal right to
> destroy them.

Nope, that if they are acceptible in other countrys, the US
has no right to destroy what isnt acceptable to the US.

> I suspect you're clinging to that idea, but you have realized that the idea has a major Achilles
> heel.

More fool you, and no surprise that no one has ever been
stupid enough to employ you to do anything technical.

There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health care items
laced with diethylene glycol in place of glycerine. There goes your excuse.

Answer the question, you ****ing twit.

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:

> There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health care items laced with diethylene
> glycol in place of glycerine.

Pity this thread wasnt about diethylene glycol in place of glycerine.
That was always you completely irrelevant straw man.

> There goes your excuse.

Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant drug crazed liar fantasyland.

> Answer the question, you ****ing twit.

Go and **** yourself, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist.

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health care items
> laced with diethylene glycol in place of glycerine. There goes your excuse.
>
> Answer the question, you ****ing twit.
>
>
You can not win a debate with welfare boy. When you disagree he goes
into tantrums, post proof and he tells you they are "irrelevant" or
"bullshit" but you will know you have really gotten to him when you see
his paper bag,pig or flushing bots. Extra points if he calls you "****wit".
Keep in mind that Rod has had one job in his adult life and was fired
before lunch on the first day.

On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:41:02 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
> wrote:

>There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health care items
>laced with diethylene glycol in place of glycerine. There goes your excuse.
>
>Answer the question, you ****ing twit.
>
Looks like you lost the "debate" Joe.
Cussing. Name calling. tsk tsk
You should just debate the issues, if you can find your way out of
that paper bag.
Good catch, Rod.

--Vic

"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>
>> There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health care items
>> laced with diethylene glycol in place of glycerine.
>
> Pity this thread wasnt about diethylene glycol in place of glycerine.
> That was always you completely irrelevant straw man.
>
>> There goes your excuse.
>
> Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant drug crazed liar fantasyland.
>
>> Answer the question, you ****ing twit.
>
> Go and **** yourself, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist.
>


Uh oh. You used the words "straw man", meaning that you are afraid to deal
with hypothetical questions. You think they are a bad thing. Too bad.
Perhaps you can learn something from these people in funny robes, who use
hypothetical questions all day long to thresh new understandings from legal
situations:

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_a...anscripts.html

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
> Rod Speed > wrote
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote

>>> There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health care items laced with diethylene
>>> glycol in place of glycerine.

>> Pity this thread wasnt about diethylene glycol in place of glycerine.
>> That was always you completely irrelevant straw man.

>>> There goes your excuse.

>> Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant drug crazed liar fantasyland.

>>> Answer the question, you ****ing twit.

>> Go and **** yourself, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist.

> Uh oh. You used the words "straw man",

You quite sure you aint one of those rocket scientist shelf stacking monkeys ?

> meaning that you are afraid to deal with hypothetical questions. You think they are a bad thing.

Have fun explaining how come I have discussed them so often when they are relevant.

Even you should be able to find plenty of examples using groups.google if someone
was actually stupid enough to lend you a seeing eye dog and a white cane.

> Too bad. Perhaps you can learn something from these people in funny robes, who use hypothetical
> questions all day long to thresh new understandings from legal situations:

> http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_a...anscripts.html

Been doing it LONG before that shit ever turned up thanks child.

"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>
>>>> There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health care
>>>> items laced with diethylene glycol in place of glycerine.
>
>>> Pity this thread wasnt about diethylene glycol in place of glycerine.
>>> That was always you completely irrelevant straw man.
>
>>>> There goes your excuse.
>
>>> Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant drug crazed liar fantasyland.
>
>>>> Answer the question, you ****ing twit.
>
>>> Go and **** yourself, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit artist.
>
>> Uh oh. You used the words "straw man",
>
> You quite sure you aint one of those rocket scientist shelf stacking
> monkeys ?
>
>> meaning that you are afraid to deal with hypothetical questions. You
>> think they are a bad thing.
>
> Have fun explaining how come I have discussed them so often when they are
> relevant.


Have fun explaining why you are afraid to address the current hypothetical
question.

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
> ...
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>
>>>>> There is NO country where it is legal to import food or health
>>>>> care items laced with diethylene glycol in place of glycerine.
>>
>>>> Pity this thread wasnt about diethylene glycol in place of
>>>> glycerine. That was always you completely irrelevant straw man.
>>
>>>>> There goes your excuse.
>>
>>>> Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant drug crazed liar
>>>> fantasyland.
>>
>>>>> Answer the question, you ****ing twit.
>>
>>>> Go and **** yourself, you pathetic excuse for a lying bullshit
>>>> artist.
>>
>>> Uh oh. You used the words "straw man",
>>
>> You quite sure you aint one of those rocket scientist shelf stacking
>> monkeys ?
>>
>>> meaning that you are afraid to deal with hypothetical questions. You
>>> think they are a bad thing.
>>
>> Have fun explaining how come I have discussed them so often when
>> they are relevant.
>
>
> Have fun explaining why you are afraid to address the current hypothetical question.

That 'afraid' is just your bare faced lie, shelf stacker.

What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of
nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a ship onto American soil?

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:

> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of nasty cough syrup was
> about to be offloaded from a ship onto American soil?

No relevance to what was being discussed.

"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>
>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of
>> nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a ship onto American
>> soil?
>
> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>

I still want an answer. Why are you scared of the question?

What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of
nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a ship onto American soil?

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
> Rod Speed > wrote
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote

>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of nasty cough syrup was
>>> about to be offloaded from a ship onto American soil?

>> No relevance to what was being discussed.

> I still want an answer.

You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly irrelevant.

You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.

> Why are you scared of the question?

Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.

> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of nasty cough syrup was
> about to be offloaded from a ship onto American soil?

No relevance to what was being discussed.

"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>
>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container
>>>> of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a ship onto
>>>> American soil?
>
>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>
>> I still want an answer.
>
> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
> irrelevant.
>
> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>
>> Why are you scared of the question?
>
> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>
>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of
>> nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a ship onto American
>> soil?
>
> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>
>

What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of
nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a ship onto American soil?

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
> ...
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>
>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>
>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>
>>> I still want an answer.
>>
>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>> irrelevant.
>>
>> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>>
>>> Why are you scared of the question?
>>
>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>
>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>> ship onto American soil?
>>
>> No relevance to what was being discussed.

> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of nasty cough syrup was
> about to be offloaded from a ship onto American soil?

No relevance to what was being discussed.

"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>
>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>
>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>
>>>> I still want an answer.
>>>
>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>>> irrelevant.
>>>
>>> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>>>
>>>> Why are you scared of the question?
>>>
>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>
>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>
>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>
>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a container of
>> nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a ship onto American
>> soil?
>
> No relevance to what was being discussed.


What would you like for dinner 3 days from now?

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
> ...
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>
>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>
>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>
>>>>> I still want an answer.
>>>>
>>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>>>> irrelevant.
>>>>
>>>> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>>>>
>>>>> Why are you scared of the question?
>>>>
>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>
>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>
>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>
>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>> ship onto American soil?
>>
>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>
>
> What would you like for dinner 3 days from now?

No relevance to what was being discussed.

"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I still want an answer.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>>>>> irrelevant.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are you scared of the question?
>>>>>
>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>>
>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>>
>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>
>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>
>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>
>>
>> What would you like for dinner 3 days from now?
>
> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>
>


Pansy!

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
> ...
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from
>>>>>>>>> a ship onto American soil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I still want an answer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>>>>>> irrelevant.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are you scared of the question?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>
>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>
>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>
>>>
>>> What would you like for dinner 3 days from now?
>>
>> No relevance to what was being discussed.

> Pansy!

Shelf stacking ****wit!!

"Rod Speed" > wrote in message
...
> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>>>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from
>>>>>>>>>> a ship onto American soil?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I still want an answer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and utterly
>>>>>>> irrelevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why are you scared of the question?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys, child.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>>
>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What would you like for dinner 3 days from now?
>>>
>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>
>> Pansy!
>
> Shelf stacking ****wit!!
>

No...seriously. You're afraid of a simple question, whether it's relevant or
not.

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
> ...
>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:
>>>>>>> "Rod Speed" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed > wrote
>>>>>>>>>> JoeSpareBedroom > wrote
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded
>>>>>>>>>>> from a ship onto American soil?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I still want an answer.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You have always been, and always will be, completely and
>>>>>>>> utterly irrelevant.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're just some stupid shelf stacking monkey.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why are you scared of the question?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just another of your pathetic little drug crazed fantasys,
>>>>>>>> child.
>>>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from
>>>>>>>>> a ship onto American soil?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What EXACTLY do you think should be done if (for example) a
>>>>>>> container of nasty cough syrup was about to be offloaded from a
>>>>>>> ship onto American soil?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What would you like for dinner 3 days from now?
>>>>
>>>> No relevance to what was being discussed.
>>
>>> Pansy!
>>
>> Shelf stacking ****wit!!

> No...seriously. You're afraid of a simple question, whether it's relevant or not.

You're a shelf stacking ****wit.

ROFL!

JoeSpareBedroom > wrote:

> ROFL!

Village eejut imitations cut no mustard, ****wit shelf stacker.