Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Heya folks,
My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to decide what to smoke first. All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first time experience? Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() Thanks!!! Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> Heya folks, > > My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to > smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. > > I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to decide > what to smoke first. > > All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first > time experience? > > Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for > it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to > smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() First, do a burn-out/seasoning of the pit. Run the pit at about 250 to 275 for 2 to 3 hours. If there is any residual oils from the manufacturing, it will take of it. Then I would smoke-roast a chicken. Do the chickens at 275F. This will give you a good feel for temperature control, and chicken is cheap. Once you feel comfortable with the pit, then do pork butt. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Christine Dabney" > wrote in message
... > Heya folks, > > My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to > smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. > > I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to decide > what to smoke first. > > All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first > time experience? > > Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for > it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to > smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() > > Thanks!!! > > Christine A whole chicken cooks slowly, so you have time to fix obvious mistakes, like fat going up in flames. Different from something like a salmon fillet, which gives you all of 11 minutes to cook. I know you're talking about smoking rather than cooking, but still...pick something big. And cheap. Try mesquite with that chicken. Awesome. Works great with turkey, too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney > wrote in
: > Heya folks, > > My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to > smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. > > I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to decide > what to smoke first. > > All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first > time experience? > > Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for > it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to > smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() > > Thanks!!! > > Christine > eggs... takes about 2 hours at low temp and is cheap. put in the raw shelled sggs keep temp around 170f...smoke will permeate the shell and viola smoked eggs ready to become smokey deviled eggs. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan It'll be a sunny day in August, when the Moon will shine that night- Elbonian Folklore |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney said...
> Heya folks, > > My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to > smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. > > I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to decide > what to smoke first. > > All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first > time experience? > > Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for > it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to > smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() > > Thanks!!! > > Christine Christine, I'd probably try hickory smoked cheeseburgers. I'm a smoker know-nothing. Is there a Christening for it's "maiden voyage?" Like making the first dent yourself for luck and so the second one won't be so disappointing OR something??? Good luck, Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:39:22 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Christine Dabney wrote: >> All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first >> time experience? >> >> Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for >> it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to >> smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() > >First, do a burn-out/seasoning of the pit. Run the pit at about 250 to 275 >for 2 to 3 hours. If there is any residual oils from the manufacturing, it >will take of it. Then I would smoke-roast a chicken. Do the chickens at >275F. This will give you a good feel for temperature control, and chicken is >cheap. Once you feel comfortable with the pit, then do pork butt. Thanks Dave!!! I never would have thought of seasoning it. Okay, I think I could do that on Saturday, then maybe smoke a chicken on Sunday. I have plenty of chickens in the freezer..so that would work out well. Should I rub the chicken with anything first? Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:43:07 GMT, hahabogus > wrote:
>eggs... takes about 2 hours at low temp and is cheap. put in the raw >shelled sggs keep temp around 170f...smoke will permeate the shell and >viola smoked eggs ready to become smokey deviled eggs. Are you serious? I never ever would have thought of that!!! This sounds intriguing... Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
> "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message > ... >> Heya folks, >> >> My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to >> smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. >> >> I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to >> decide what to smoke first. >> >> All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first >> time experience? >> >> Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for >> it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to >> smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() >> >> Thanks!!! >> >> Christine > > > A whole chicken cooks slowly, so you have time to fix obvious > mistakes, like fat going up in flames. That's not a problem with a WSM. The fat never gets to the wood coals or charcoal. > Different from something like > a salmon fillet, which gives you all of 11 minutes to cook. I know > you're talking about smoking rather than cooking, but still...pick > something big. And cheap. The WSM is for bbq, not grilling. It doesn't do fish all that well. > Try mesquite with that chicken. Awesome. Works great with turkey, too. NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!. Mesquite can foul up an enclosed bbq pit and it will take forever to get the nastiness out. Save the mequite -- in small quantities for the grill. It puts out more btu than most other wood, so it does well. But a little goes a loooong way. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hahabogus wrote:
> Christine Dabney > wrote in > : > >> Heya folks, >> >> My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to >> smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. >> >> I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to >> decide what to smoke first. >> >> All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first >> time experience? >> >> Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for >> it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to >> smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() >> >> Thanks!!! >> >> Christine >> > > eggs... takes about 2 hours at low temp and is cheap. put in the raw > shelled sggs keep temp around 170f...smoke will permeate the shell and > viola smoked eggs ready to become smokey deviled eggs. So you're arguing that the egg comes before the chicken :-) -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:48:57 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >> Try mesquite with that chicken. Awesome. Works great with turkey, too. > >NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!. Mesquite can foul up an enclosed bbq pit and it will take >forever to get the nastiness out. Save the mequite -- in small quantities >for the grill. It puts out more btu than most other wood, so it does well. >But a little goes a loooong way. What wood, if any does work well? I have some hickory chips here... Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is a Weber Bullet the same as a Weber Smoky Mountain?
Also, the latter's advertising says it includes a "water pan". Why would I want steam and humidity from a water pan messing with my Q??? Is the water optional, I hope? Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:39:22 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: > >> Christine Dabney wrote: > >>> All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first >>> time experience? >>> >>> Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel >>> for it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a >>> day to smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() >> >> First, do a burn-out/seasoning of the pit. Run the pit at about 250 >> to 275 for 2 to 3 hours. If there is any residual oils from the >> manufacturing, it will take of it. Then I would smoke-roast a >> chicken. Do the chickens at 275F. This will give you a good feel for >> temperature control, and chicken is cheap. Once you feel comfortable >> with the pit, then do pork butt. > > Thanks Dave!!! > > I never would have thought of seasoning it. Okay, I think I could do > that on Saturday, then maybe smoke a chicken on Sunday. I have > plenty of chickens in the freezer..so that would work out well. > > Should I rub the chicken with anything first? Rub the chicken with a bit of vegetable oil, not so it's sloppy, just so's it's a light coating. Mix together some salt, course pepper, and granulated garlic. The proportions can match your taste. Rub or sprinkle the mixture on the chicken. Feel free to ask me questions here or via email. Also, check out: http://www.virtualweberbullet.com/ You may have seen it already, but it's a great resource for WSM owners. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:48:57 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: > >> JoeSpareBedroom wrote: > >>> Try mesquite with that chicken. Awesome. Works great with turkey, >>> too. >> >> NOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!. Mesquite can foul up an enclosed bbq pit and it >> will take forever to get the nastiness out. Save the mequite -- in >> small quantities for the grill. It puts out more btu than most other >> wood, so it does well. But a little goes a loooong way. > > What wood, if any does work well? > > I have some hickory chips here... Hickory, oak, and any fruit wood. I love apple, pear and cherry. Just keep in mind that you'll want to avoid exposing meat to thick, dark clouds of smoke. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:56:17 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Feel free to ask me questions here or via email. Also, check out: >http://www.virtualweberbullet.com/ You may have seen it already, but it's a >great resource for WSM owners. Yes, I have seen it. And I was referred there by people on eGullet, about the Minion "method". That was the method I was going to use, to get my smoker going. Is that a good choice, or is there a better one? And I will certainly bug you with questions. Be prepared ...LOL. Probably here on the newsgroup... Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Pope wrote:
> Is a Weber Bullet the same as a Weber Smoky Mountain? Sure is, Steve. It's also called the WSM. Not to be confused with the Weber Smoey Joe. > Also, the latter's advertising says it includes a "water pan". > Why would I want steam and humidity from a water pan messing > with my Q??? Is the water optional, I hope? The water pan is more for a heat sink, to add stability to the thermal mass, than for moisture. It acts as a baffle to direct heat exposure. The best thing is to fill the water pan with sand. That increase the thermal mass making heat regulation a tad bit better. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:51:33 +0000 (UTC), > (Steve Pope) wrote: > >> Is a Weber Bullet the same as a Weber Smoky Mountain? >> >> Also, the latter's advertising says it includes a "water pan". >> Why would I want steam and humidity from a water pan messing >> with my Q??? Is the water optional, I hope? >> >> Steve > > Yes it is the same... > > I don't know the answer to that question, to be honest. I will let one > of the experienced smokers answer that.... See my answer to Steve, Christine. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:57:55 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Hickory, oak, and any fruit wood. I love apple, pear and cherry. Just keep >in mind that you'll want to avoid exposing meat to thick, dark clouds of >smoke. Okay, I have seen apple and cherry in the stores. I might pick up some of that. Another question. I know that the temperature shouldn't go very high... What kind of thermometer should I have for the smoker? I think I have read about using one to monitor the temp... I have instant read thermometers here at the house, but I am willing to go out to get a thermometer that is suited to the smoker if I need one. Christine, realizing she has all sorts of newbie questions |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:56:17 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: > > >> Feel free to ask me questions here or via email. Also, check out: >> http://www.virtualweberbullet.com/ You may have seen it already, >> but it's a great resource for WSM owners. > > Yes, I have seen it. And I was referred there by people on eGullet, > about the Minion "method". That was the method I was going to use, to > get my smoker going. > > Is that a good choice, or is there a better one? For long cooks, the minion method is good. For two to four hour cooks, you won't need to do that. Have you learned about lighting charcoal with a chimney starter? -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:05:08 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Have you learned about lighting charcoal with a chimney starter? Yes, I have one, and use it to start my coals. Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> Another question. I know that the temperature shouldn't go very > high... What kind of thermometer should I have for the smoker? I > think I have read about using one to monitor the temp... This works well, and is good for temperatures below 300F. You wouldn't want to use this setup for grilling. Picture 1: http://i9.tinypic.com/61t9qpl.jpg Picture 2: http://i16.tinypic.com/4lok4tv.jpg > I have instant read thermometers here at the house, but I am willing > to go out to get a thermometer that is suited to the smoker if I need > one. > > Christine, realizing she has all sorts of newbie questions -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:05:08 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: >> Have you learned about lighting charcoal with a chimney starter? > > Yes, I have one, and use it to start my coals. Great; you've already have an essential skill-set down :-) -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:11:14 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Christine Dabney wrote: > >> Another question. I know that the temperature shouldn't go very >> high... What kind of thermometer should I have for the smoker? I >> think I have read about using one to monitor the temp... > >This works well, and is good for temperatures below 300F. You wouldn't want >to use this setup for grilling. >Picture 1: http://i9.tinypic.com/61t9qpl.jpg >Picture 2: http://i16.tinypic.com/4lok4tv.jpg > Oh, okay!!! I have that type of thermometer..and I use it a lot. No clothespins though..guess I will have to find some..LOL. Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Bugg wrote:
> Christine Dabney wrote: > >> Another question. I know that the temperature shouldn't go very >> high... What kind of thermometer should I have for the smoker? I >> think I have read about using one to monitor the temp... > > This works well, and is good for temperatures below 300F. You > wouldn't want to use this setup for grilling. > Picture 1: http://i9.tinypic.com/61t9qpl.jpg > Picture 2: http://i16.tinypic.com/4lok4tv.jpg Forgot to mention: the most accurate temperature reading is on the grill next to the meat. Temperatures measured up in the dome can measure 30 to 50F higher. That will mean you would be cooking at a much cooler temp than intended. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message
... > Steve Pope wrote: > >> Is a Weber Bullet the same as a Weber Smoky Mountain? > > Sure is, Steve. It's also called the WSM. Not to be confused with the > Weber Smoey Joe. > >> Also, the latter's advertising says it includes a "water pan". >> Why would I want steam and humidity from a water pan messing >> with my Q??? Is the water optional, I hope? > > The water pan is more for a heat sink, to add stability to the thermal > mass, than for moisture. It acts as a baffle to direct heat exposure. The > best thing is to fill the water pan with sand. And cover it with foil. Keeps the grease out of the sand and makes for better clean up. > That increase the thermal mass making heat regulation a tad bit better. BOB |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:15:16 -0700, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote: >Forgot to mention: the most accurate temperature reading is on the grill >next to the meat. Temperatures measured up in the dome can measure 30 to 50F >higher. That will mean you would be cooking at a much cooler temp than >intended. Okay, I will have to figure this out. I am sure when I see how it is set up, etc, I will have a better idea of what you are talking about. It just arrived!!!!! I am so excited!!! Not sure I have time to unpack it today...I leave for work in about 40 minutes. Darn. If I had the time, I would start today. Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:20:56 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>"Dave Bugg" > wrote in message >> The water pan is more for a heat sink, to add stability to the thermal >> mass, than for moisture. It acts as a baffle to direct heat exposure. The >> best thing is to fill the water pan with sand. > >And cover it with foil. Keeps the grease out of the sand and makes for >better clean up. > >> That increase the thermal mass making heat regulation a tad bit better. > >BOB Hmm...all these tips. I am going to have to collect these all in one place.... So much to learn. I just peaked inside the box...looks like I will have to wait til tomorrow or Saturday to put it together.... Keep the tips coming, folks.... ![]() Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:15:16 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: > > >> Forgot to mention: the most accurate temperature reading is on the >> grill next to the meat. Temperatures measured up in the dome can >> measure 30 to 50F higher. That will mean you would be cooking at a >> much cooler temp than intended. > > Okay, I will have to figure this out. I am sure when I see how it is > set up, etc, I will have a better idea of what you are talking about. Don't worry, you'll understand once you see it. > It just arrived!!!!! I am so excited!!! Not sure I have time to > unpack it today...I leave for work in about 40 minutes. Darn. If I > had the time, I would start today. Anticipation; a most underated feeling :-) -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Christine Dabney" > wrote in message
... > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:15:16 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: > > >>Forgot to mention: the most accurate temperature reading is on the grill >>next to the meat. Temperatures measured up in the dome can measure 30 to >>50F >>higher. That will mean you would be cooking at a much cooler temp than >>intended. > > Okay, I will have to figure this out. I am sure when I see how it is > set up, etc, I will have a better idea of what you are talking about. > > It just arrived!!!!! I am so excited!!! Not sure I have time to > unpack it today...I leave for work in about 40 minutes. Darn. If I > had the time, I would start today. You'd better wait. Assembly required. There are a couple of pieces that can be assembled upside down. Make sure that you READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. It'll save time. ;-) It's simple, just pay attention. After you've used it a few times, I have several modifications that'll make using the WSM much simpler, not that it needs to be any simpler. Good luck, and good eating. BOB |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Bugg wrote:
> Steve Pope wrote: > > > Is a Weber Bullet the same as a Weber Smoky Mountain? > > Sure is, Steve. It's also called the WSM. Not to be confused with the > Weber Smoey Joe. > > > Also, the latter's advertising says it includes a "water pan". > > Why would I want steam and humidity from a water pan messing > > with my Q??? Is the water optional, I hope? > > The water pan is more for a heat sink, to add stability to the > thermal mass, than for moisture. It acts as a baffle to direct heat > exposure. The best thing is to fill the water pan with sand. That > increase the thermal mass making heat regulation a tad bit better. I actually just run mine empty. It doesn't seem to adversely affect temperature control much, and there's less cleanup problem. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 19:39:41 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>You'd better wait. Assembly required. There are a couple of pieces that >can be assembled upside down. Make sure that you READ THE INSTRUCTIONS. >It'll save time. ;-) > >It's simple, just pay attention. After you've used it a few times, I have >several modifications that'll make using the WSM much simpler, not that it >needs to be any simpler. Thanks! I figured that it needed assembly. And I am one of those folks that does read instructions...LOL. And I look forward to everyone's modifications, tips, etc... I want to get a lot of use out of this! Christine, looking forward to her first pulled pork from the WSM.. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:15:16 -0700, "Dave Bugg" > > wrote: > > >>Forgot to mention: the most accurate temperature reading is on the grill >>next to the meat. Temperatures measured up in the dome can measure 30 to >>50F >>higher. That will mean you would be cooking at a much cooler temp than >>intended. > > Okay, I will have to figure this out. I am sure when I see how it is > set up, etc, I will have a better idea of what you are talking about. > > It just arrived!!!!! I am so excited!!! Not sure I have time to > unpack it today...I leave for work in about 40 minutes. Darn. If I > had the time, I would start today. If you have a deep fryer thermometer, they generally reach close to grill level, have a hook to attach to the upper vent and nicely fit the temperature ranges you'll be using. Easy, cheap and quick is some good sausage. > > Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Default User wrote:
> Dave Bugg wrote: > >> Steve Pope wrote: >> >>> Is a Weber Bullet the same as a Weber Smoky Mountain? >> >> Sure is, Steve. It's also called the WSM. Not to be confused with the >> Weber Smoey Joe. >> >>> Also, the latter's advertising says it includes a "water pan". >>> Why would I want steam and humidity from a water pan messing >>> with my Q??? Is the water optional, I hope? >> >> The water pan is more for a heat sink, to add stability to the >> thermal mass, than for moisture. It acts as a baffle to direct heat >> exposure. The best thing is to fill the water pan with sand. That >> increase the thermal mass making heat regulation a tad bit better. > > I actually just run mine empty. It doesn't seem to adversely affect > temperature control much, and there's less cleanup problem. You're right, Brian, especially in warm weather. During colder weather the sand-filled pan makes more of a difference. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:33:03 -0600, Christine Dabney
> wrote: >My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to >smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. I quit smoking in the late 60's...but Salem used to be good. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Bugg > wrote:
>Default User wrote: >> Dave Bugg wrote: >>> Steve Pope wrote: >>>> Also, the latter's advertising says it includes a "water pan". >>>> Why would I want steam and humidity from a water pan messing >>>> with my Q??? Is the water optional, I hope? >>> The water pan is more for a heat sink, to add stability to the >>> thermal mass, than for moisture. It acts as a baffle to direct heat >>> exposure. The best thing is to fill the water pan with sand. That >>> increase the thermal mass making heat regulation a tad bit better. >> I actually just run mine empty. It doesn't seem to adversely affect >> temperature control much, and there's less cleanup problem. >You're right, Brian, especially in warm weather. During colder weather the >sand-filled pan makes more of a difference. Thanks for the info. This increases my interest in scoring one of these units -- I was worried that you were somehow required to create artificial humidity. Steve |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:43:07 GMT, hahabogus > wrote: > > >eggs... takes about 2 hours at low temp and is cheap. put in the raw > >shelled sggs keep temp around 170f...smoke will permeate the shell and > >viola smoked eggs ready to become smokey deviled eggs. > > Are you serious? I never ever would have thought of that!!! > > This sounds intriguing... > > Christine I've never heard of putting raw eggs (I think 'hahabogus' means raw eggs?) in a grill/bbq/smoker to cook that way. Definitely very intriguing! Sounds like it'll be time to experiment <G>. Sky |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Bugg" > wrote in news:Ieyli.54$b43.0
@newsfe02.lga: > hahabogus wrote: >> Christine Dabney > wrote in >> : >> >>> Heya folks, >>> >>> My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to >>> smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. >>> >>> I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to >>> decide what to smoke first. >>> >>> All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first >>> time experience? >>> >>> Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel for >>> it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a day to >>> smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. ![]() >>> >>> Thanks!!! >>> >>> Christine >>> >> >> eggs... takes about 2 hours at low temp and is cheap. put in the raw >> shelled sggs keep temp around 170f...smoke will permeate the shell and >> viola smoked eggs ready to become smokey deviled eggs. > > So you're arguing that the egg comes before the chicken :-) > If smoking a egg at 170f or lower is below your skill level....forget sausage making. the plus is eggs is cheaper than chickens. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan It'll be a sunny day in August, when the Moon will shine that night- Elbonian Folklore |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sky > wrote in news:4696CC37.4DC9
@NOsbcglobal.SnPeAtM: > Christine Dabney wrote: >> >> On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:43:07 GMT, hahabogus > wrote: >> >> >eggs... takes about 2 hours at low temp and is cheap. put in the raw >> >shelled sggs keep temp around 170f...smoke will permeate the shell and >> >viola smoked eggs ready to become smokey deviled eggs. >> >> Are you serious? I never ever would have thought of that!!! >> >> This sounds intriguing... >> >> Christine > > I've never heard of putting raw eggs (I think 'hahabogus' means raw > eggs?) in a grill/bbq/smoker to cook that way. Definitely very > intriguing! Sounds like it'll be time to experiment <G>. > > Sky > yes raw in the shell eggs...we are going for a true deviled egg. Now it think hickory would work but oak might be nice. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan It'll be a sunny day in August, when the Moon will shine that night- Elbonian Folklore |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hahabogus wrote:
> "Dave Bugg" > wrote in news:Ieyli.54$b43.0 > @newsfe02.lga: > >> hahabogus wrote: >>> Christine Dabney > wrote in >>> : >>> >>>> Heya folks, >>>> >>>> My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able >>>> to smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. >>>> >>>> I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to >>>> decide what to smoke first. >>>> >>>> All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a >>>> first time experience? >>>> >>>> Something relatively easy would be nice: so that I can get a feel >>>> for it...and preferably something that will not take forever and a >>>> day to smoke. Plus inexpensive would be a wonderful thing too. >>>> ![]() >>>> >>>> Thanks!!! >>>> >>>> Christine >>>> >>> >>> eggs... takes about 2 hours at low temp and is cheap. put in the raw >>> shelled sggs keep temp around 170f...smoke will permeate the shell >>> and viola smoked eggs ready to become smokey deviled eggs. >> >> So you're arguing that the egg comes before the chicken :-) >> > > If smoking a egg at 170f or lower is below your skill level....forget > sausage making. Stow the thin skin and the lame attempt at an insult, bubba. What I said was a joke based on the age-old question: 'What comes first, the chicken or the egg'. I had mentioned smoking chickens, you had mentioned doing eggs. > the plus is eggs is cheaper than chickens. But they don't have drumsticks. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney > wrote:
>My Weber Bullet is due to arrive today. However I won't be able to >smoke anything until the weekend at the earliest. > >I want to give it my first run this weekend, and I am trying to decide >what to smoke first. > >All you experienced smokers: do you have any suggestions for a first >time experience? I'm not an experienced smoker, but were it my unit I would try either brisket or ribs or pork shoulder, since just about anything else can be adequately cooked/smoked in an ordinary Weber kettle grill. Go for broke in other words. ![]() Steve |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
up in smoke | General Cooking | |||
What do you smoke? | Barbecue | |||
too much smoke | Barbecue | |||
Need smoke | Barbecue | |||
What to smoke for the first try | Barbecue |