General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,216
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

On Jul 19, 7:08?am, Chatty Cathy > wrote:
> maxine in ri wrote:
>
> > (Notice how I managed to make this a "food" post by adding "carp"?)
> > ;-)
> > maxine in ri

>
> maxine,
>
> I think you deserve an Honorary TFH for doing that.... Please make your
> selection
>
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy


Did I misss something ? I see a survey about dream food....
Any way my opinion, is..... drum roll.... I totally enjoy Ranger's
post about his family , brings back happy memories of when my kids
were smaller!

Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
Rosie

  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,852
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

In article om>,
rosie > wrote:

> On Jul 19, 7:08?am, Chatty Cathy > wrote:
> > maxine in ri wrote:
> >
> > > (Notice how I managed to make this a "food" post by adding "carp"?)
> > > ;-)
> > > maxine in ri

> >
> > maxine,
> >
> > I think you deserve an Honorary TFH for doing that.... Please make your
> > selection
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Chatty Cathy

>
> Did I misss something ? I see a survey about dream food....
> Any way my opinion, is..... drum roll.... I totally enjoy Ranger's
> post about his family , brings back happy memories of when my kids
> were smaller!
>
> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
> Rosie


Some enjoy bitching about OT posts too much to bother using killfiles.

Those idiots waste more bandwidth than the OT posts.

But they don't seem to be able to catch the clu'.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,984
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT)parenting posts

rosie wrote:

> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
> Rosie
>


So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,876
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:22:07 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote:

>rosie wrote:
>
>> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
>> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
>> Rosie
>>

>
>So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?


Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block
entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with
them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand
announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first
time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I
still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't
like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't
like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter.


--

A husband is someone who takes out the trash and gives the impression he just cleaned the whole house.
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,852
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

In article >, sf wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:22:07 -0400, Goomba38 >
> wrote:
>
> >rosie wrote:
> >
> >> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
> >> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
> >> Rosie
> >>

> >
> >So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?

>
> Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block
> entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with
> them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand
> announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first
> time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I
> still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't
> like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't
> like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter.


Goomba has too much fun bitching...

Talk about pot-> kettle -> black.

All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts.
Evidently she is incapable of learning to use killfiles...

Thought she was edumacated!
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson


  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,852
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

In article >,
Steve Wertz > wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:29:13 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
> > All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts.

>
> Aren't the OT threads the root of the problem?


Whining is also OT.

>
> > Evidently she is incapable of learning to use killfiles...

>
> And it's a fly ball to right field....
>
> -sw


High ball.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,235
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

Omelet wrote:

> In article >,
> Steve Wertz > wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:29:13 -0500, Omelet wrote:
> >
> > > All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts.

> >
> > Aren't the OT threads the root of the problem?

>
> Whining is also OT.


Wrong. Topicality is ALWAYS on-topic. It has been always, and HAS to
be. If you can't discuss what is and isn't topical in a group, then
what's the point of different groups?



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)
  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,852
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

In article >,
Steve Wertz > wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:03:36 -0500, Omelet wrote:
>
> > In article >,
> > Steve Wertz > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:29:13 -0500, Omelet wrote:
> >>
> >>> All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts.
> >>
> >> Aren't the OT threads the root of the problem?

> >
> > Whining is also OT.

>
> But I'm not starting OT threads. Once an OT thread is started,
> how can any responses to it possibly be hypocritical?
>
> -sw


It just makes you an accomplice to the crime... ;-o
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,984
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT)parenting posts

sf wrote:

> Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block
> entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with
> them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand
> announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first
> time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I
> still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't
> like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't
> like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter.
>

Thread *drift* is entirely different, IMO, than the blatant introduction
of OT posts.
  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,876
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:04:37 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote:

>sf wrote:
>
>> Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block
>> entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with
>> them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand
>> announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first
>> time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I
>> still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't
>> like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't
>> like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter.
>>

>Thread *drift* is entirely different, IMO, than the blatant introduction
>of OT posts.


Oh come on! When an OT post is introduced as such by a long time
particapant of the group you know it's not SPAM because it has OT in
the header, so you can filter or not.


--

A husband is someone who takes out the trash and gives the impression he just cleaned the whole house.


  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,984
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT)parenting posts

sf wrote:

>> Thread *drift* is entirely different, IMO, than the blatant introduction
>> of OT posts.

>
> Oh come on! When an OT post is introduced as such by a long time
> particapant of the group you know it's not SPAM because it has OT in
> the header, so you can filter or not.
>

Again, blatant introduction of OT posts is cheapening this group, IMO. A
newcomer wouldn't know OT or spam was unwelcome if they pulled this
group up to read. How could it be if *some* "long time participants" are
encouraged to post crap but others discouraged? Heck- we even have
"regulars" who post some of the most inane crap and urban legends out
there! You know, those "Don't buy gas on this day" type pleas? So being
a "regular long term poster" isn't exactly much of a reference either.
  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,983
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:22:07 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote:

>rosie wrote:
>
>> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
>> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
>> Rosie
>>

>
>So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?


i don't know how your feed works, but you can usually tell spam by the
subject line, if a message slips by your filters. just don't
read/download.

your pal,
blake
  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,216
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote:
> rosie wrote:
> > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
> > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
> > Rosie

>
> So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?


No Goomba, I just don't read them.I do enjoy Ranger's stories.

Rosie

  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 489
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:51:46 -0700, rosie > wrote:

>On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote:
>> rosie wrote:
>> > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
>> > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
>> > Rosie

>>
>> So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?

>
>No Goomba, I just don't read them.


A person can actually make that decision?? LOL

>I do enjoy Ranger's stories.


I don't, so I just don't read most of them. It's very simple and I
don't have to waste keystrokes complaining.

Lou
  #15 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,852
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

In article >,
Lou Decruss > wrote:

> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:51:46 -0700, rosie > wrote:
>
> >On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote:
> >> rosie wrote:
> >> > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
> >> > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
> >> > Rosie
> >>
> >> So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?

> >
> >No Goomba, I just don't read them.

>
> A person can actually make that decision?? LOL
>
> >I do enjoy Ranger's stories.

>
> I don't, so I just don't read most of them. It's very simple and I
> don't have to waste keystrokes complaining.
>
> Lou


She _enjoys_ complaining...

Or so it seems.
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson


  #16 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 489
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:06:43 -0500, Omelet >
wrote:

>In article >,
> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:51:46 -0700, rosie > wrote:
>>
>> >On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote:
>> >> rosie wrote:
>> >> > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster,
>> >> > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal..
>> >> > Rosie
>> >>
>> >> So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh?
>> >
>> >No Goomba, I just don't read them.

>>
>> A person can actually make that decision?? LOL
>>
>> >I do enjoy Ranger's stories.

>>
>> I don't, so I just don't read most of them. It's very simple and I
>> don't have to waste keystrokes complaining.
>>
>> Lou

>
>She _enjoys_ complaining...
>
>Or so it seems.


That's really sad. I just started post a bit again after 2 months of
being very busy including moving. I consider this my relax/learning
time. The last thing I want to do online is be negative. I see too
much of that in the real world. Thanks for being such a fun poster
Om.

Lou
  #17 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,852
Default (2007-07-17) Special Survey on the RFC site: The Ranger's (OT) parenting posts

In article >,
Lou Decruss > wrote:

> That's really sad. I just started post a bit again after 2 months of
> being very busy including moving. I consider this my relax/learning
> time. The last thing I want to do online is be negative. I see too
> much of that in the real world. Thanks for being such a fun poster
> Om.
>
> Lou


I try...
There is enough negativity in the world!

The 'net should be fun. :-)
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
(2007-09-26) New survey on the RFC site: Yet *another* cilantro survey... ChattyCathy General Cooking 4 26-09-2007 04:46 PM
(2007-09-14) New survey on the RFC site: Silly survey: Friday nightfood ChattyCathy General Cooking 47 21-09-2007 02:53 AM
(2007-09-02) New survey on the RFC site: Fun survey:You say / I saytomato... ChattyCathy General Cooking 23 04-09-2007 11:15 PM
(2007-08-27) New survey on the RFC site: Thoughtful Survey: Type 2 Diabetes ChattyCathy General Cooking 37 29-08-2007 03:39 PM
(2007-07-31) New survey on the RFC site: Chatty Cathy General Cooking 62 14-08-2007 05:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"