Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 19, 7:08?am, Chatty Cathy > wrote:
> maxine in ri wrote: > > > (Notice how I managed to make this a "food" post by adding "carp"?) > > ;-) > > maxine in ri > > maxine, > > I think you deserve an Honorary TFH for doing that.... Please make your > selection ![]() > > -- > Cheers > Chatty Cathy Did I misss something ? I see a survey about dream food.... Any way my opinion, is..... drum roll.... I totally enjoy Ranger's post about his family , brings back happy memories of when my kids were smaller! Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. Rosie |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article om>,
rosie > wrote: > On Jul 19, 7:08?am, Chatty Cathy > wrote: > > maxine in ri wrote: > > > > > (Notice how I managed to make this a "food" post by adding "carp"?) > > > ;-) > > > maxine in ri > > > > maxine, > > > > I think you deserve an Honorary TFH for doing that.... Please make your > > selection ![]() > > > > -- > > Cheers > > Chatty Cathy > > Did I misss something ? I see a survey about dream food.... > Any way my opinion, is..... drum roll.... I totally enjoy Ranger's > post about his family , brings back happy memories of when my kids > were smaller! > > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. > Rosie Some enjoy bitching about OT posts too much to bother using killfiles. Those idiots waste more bandwidth than the OT posts. But they don't seem to be able to catch the clu'. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rosie wrote:
> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. > Rosie > So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:22:07 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote: >rosie wrote: > >> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, >> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. >> Rosie >> > >So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter. -- A husband is someone who takes out the trash and gives the impression he just cleaned the whole house. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, sf wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:22:07 -0400, Goomba38 > > wrote: > > >rosie wrote: > > > >> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, > >> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. > >> Rosie > >> > > > >So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? > > Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block > entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with > them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand > announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first > time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I > still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't > like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't > like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter. Goomba has too much fun bitching... Talk about pot-> kettle -> black. All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts. Evidently she is incapable of learning to use killfiles... Thought she was edumacated! -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Steve Wertz > wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:29:13 -0500, Omelet wrote: > > > All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts. > > Aren't the OT threads the root of the problem? Whining is also OT. > > > Evidently she is incapable of learning to use killfiles... > > And it's a fly ball to right field.... > > -sw High ball. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Omelet wrote:
> In article >, > Steve Wertz > wrote: > > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:29:13 -0500, Omelet wrote: > > > > > All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts. > > > > Aren't the OT threads the root of the problem? > > Whining is also OT. Wrong. Topicality is ALWAYS on-topic. It has been always, and HAS to be. If you can't discuss what is and isn't topical in a group, then what's the point of different groups? Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Steve Wertz > wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 21:03:36 -0500, Omelet wrote: > > > In article >, > > Steve Wertz > wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:29:13 -0500, Omelet wrote: > >> > >>> All the whining takes up more space than the original OT posts. > >> > >> Aren't the OT threads the root of the problem? > > > > Whining is also OT. > > But I'm not starting OT threads. Once an OT thread is started, > how can any responses to it possibly be hypocritical? > > -sw It just makes you an accomplice to the crime... ;-o -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block > entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with > them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand > announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first > time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I > still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't > like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't > like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter. > Thread *drift* is entirely different, IMO, than the blatant introduction of OT posts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:04:37 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote: >sf wrote: > >> Most threads end up Off Topic - remember thread drift. Heck, I block >> entire threads after a few days just because I'm completely bored with >> them. I don't have a problem doing it and I don't make a grand >> announcement when I do. As for Rangers posts. I read them the first >> time around but I ignor them now (they aren't filtered out)... and I >> still think he's one heck of a writer. Rosie is right. If you don't >> like his stories, kill the thread as soon as you see it. If you don't >> like Ranger's posts in general, set up a kill author filter. >> >Thread *drift* is entirely different, IMO, than the blatant introduction >of OT posts. Oh come on! When an OT post is introduced as such by a long time particapant of the group you know it's not SPAM because it has OT in the header, so you can filter or not. -- A husband is someone who takes out the trash and gives the impression he just cleaned the whole house. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
>> Thread *drift* is entirely different, IMO, than the blatant introduction >> of OT posts. > > Oh come on! When an OT post is introduced as such by a long time > particapant of the group you know it's not SPAM because it has OT in > the header, so you can filter or not. > Again, blatant introduction of OT posts is cheapening this group, IMO. A newcomer wouldn't know OT or spam was unwelcome if they pulled this group up to read. How could it be if *some* "long time participants" are encouraged to post crap but others discouraged? Heck- we even have "regulars" who post some of the most inane crap and urban legends out there! You know, those "Don't buy gas on this day" type pleas? So being a "regular long term poster" isn't exactly much of a reference either. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:22:07 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote: >rosie wrote: > >> Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, >> then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. >> Rosie >> > >So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? i don't know how your feed works, but you can usually tell spam by the subject line, if a message slips by your filters. just don't read/download. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote:
> rosie wrote: > > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, > > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. > > Rosie > > So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? No Goomba, I just don't read them.I do enjoy Ranger's stories. Rosie |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:51:46 -0700, rosie > wrote:
>On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote: >> rosie wrote: >> > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, >> > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. >> > Rosie >> >> So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? > >No Goomba, I just don't read them. A person can actually make that decision?? LOL >I do enjoy Ranger's stories. I don't, so I just don't read most of them. It's very simple and I don't have to waste keystrokes complaining. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Lou Decruss > wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:51:46 -0700, rosie > wrote: > > >On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote: > >> rosie wrote: > >> > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, > >> > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. > >> > Rosie > >> > >> So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? > > > >No Goomba, I just don't read them. > > A person can actually make that decision?? LOL > > >I do enjoy Ranger's stories. > > I don't, so I just don't read most of them. It's very simple and I > don't have to waste keystrokes complaining. > > Lou She _enjoys_ complaining... Or so it seems. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 23:06:43 -0500, Omelet >
wrote: >In article >, > Lou Decruss > wrote: > >> On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 08:51:46 -0700, rosie > wrote: >> >> >On Jul 19, 6:22?pm, Goomba38 > wrote: >> >> rosie wrote: >> >> > Hate to say this again BUT, if someone does not care for a poster, >> >> > then Killfile it or do not read it.. No big deal.. >> >> > Rosie >> >> >> >> So using your logic on Off Topic posts, spammers are welcome here too, eh? >> > >> >No Goomba, I just don't read them. >> >> A person can actually make that decision?? LOL >> >> >I do enjoy Ranger's stories. >> >> I don't, so I just don't read most of them. It's very simple and I >> don't have to waste keystrokes complaining. >> >> Lou > >She _enjoys_ complaining... > >Or so it seems. That's really sad. I just started post a bit again after 2 months of being very busy including moving. I consider this my relax/learning time. The last thing I want to do online is be negative. I see too much of that in the real world. Thanks for being such a fun poster Om. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Lou Decruss > wrote: > That's really sad. I just started post a bit again after 2 months of > being very busy including moving. I consider this my relax/learning > time. The last thing I want to do online is be negative. I see too > much of that in the real world. Thanks for being such a fun poster > Om. > > Lou I try... There is enough negativity in the world! The 'net should be fun. :-) -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(2007-09-26) New survey on the RFC site: Yet *another* cilantro survey... | General Cooking | |||
(2007-09-14) New survey on the RFC site: Silly survey: Friday nightfood | General Cooking | |||
(2007-09-02) New survey on the RFC site: Fun survey:You say / I saytomato... | General Cooking | |||
(2007-08-27) New survey on the RFC site: Thoughtful Survey: Type 2 Diabetes | General Cooking | |||
(2007-07-31) New survey on the RFC site: | General Cooking |