General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #201 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,463
Default Rare steak


"Omelet" > wrote in message
news
> In article >,
> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:08:08 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>True dat. One of the questions I get asked every year when renewing my
>> >>home owners insurance is whether or not I have a fire place.
>> >
>> >I haven't talked to my homeowners' underwriter in 15 years.

>>
>> You should at least talk to the agent. You might be under insured by
>> now if your house has appreciated.
>>
>> Lou

>
> We discuss it each year as property value (and property taxes) go up.
> --
> Peace, Om


We have three fireplaces in our house -- we closed them up. Then each
assessment we had another consultation about the pool; they had to tax us
more on the fence around it -- we finally took the pool out last
summer-fall, which cost more than the pool itself, I believe. What a
horrendous job. We took down the pool fence; now we will have to go back
(no doubt) and consult about the fence. We've only had one amount come off
for all these consultations. It's a good thing we didn't have to pay a
lawyer to consult. We appealed one or two times, but it didn't work.

One biggie about a fireplace where we live is that we're in the country; the
fire department is volunteer and water is not available; when we said that
they could pump it from the pool, that was dismissed. So the tax
assessment and insurance assessment is considerable even for those who live
rural. Can't get away from taxes.

Dee Dee





  #202 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,545
Default Rare steak

In article >,
Blair P. Houghton > wrote:

> Lou Decruss > wrote:
> >On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:08:08 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
> >>I haven't talked to my homeowners' underwriter in 15 years.

> >
> >You should at least talk to the agent. You might be under insured by
> >now if your house has appreciated.

>
> The escrow handles it. Probably got revised when I refinanced
> a few years ago.



If the escrow account is handled by the institution that holds your
mortgage, all they care about is whether the insurance covers what you
owe, which probably is even less than what was refinanced.
  #203 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,219
Default Rare steak

On Jul 28, 6:09 pm, Omelet > wrote:
> In article >,
> Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>
>
>
> > Omelet > wrote:
> > > Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
> > >> If you don't want to taste those little ribbons of
> > >> fat, don't waste money buying them and then cooking
> > >> them out.

>
> > >Ooh, but them melting all over the beef spreads the flavor around!!!
> > >Acts as internal basting. ;-d The flavor does not go away just 'cause
> > >the fat melts.

>
> > I was kind of under the impression that beef was
> > beef-flavored all the way through in the first place...

>
> > That much fat is overkill for spreading flavor. The cool
> > ribbons provide a texture and a flavor pattern. Melted fat
> > just coats your tongue and keeps it off the meat.

>
> > --Blair

>
> Fat can be cooked without melting it out of the ribbons.
>
> I cannot stand cold raw beef fat. It's just gross.


I don't think it's gross, just unappealing in large slabs.
>
> Those rib eyes I did the other day were cool pink in the middle but the
> fat was crispy on the outside and soft on the inside. Perfect!
>

I think that you both make good points. I like ribeyes significantly
more done than loin cuts. I love crispy fat, and like to trim steaks
to get crispy fat while avoiding big slabs of fat. Loin gets
Pittsburghed. Rib gets cooked med rare, and I cut away the fat on the
plate. I seldom buy rib, but that's a personal preference.

> --
> Peace, Om


--Bryan

  #204 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,852
Default Rare steak

In article .com>,
Bobo Bonobo(R) > wrote:

> On Jul 28, 6:09 pm, Omelet > wrote:
> > In article >,
> > Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Omelet > wrote:
> > > > Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
> > > >> If you don't want to taste those little ribbons of
> > > >> fat, don't waste money buying them and then cooking
> > > >> them out.

> >
> > > >Ooh, but them melting all over the beef spreads the flavor around!!!
> > > >Acts as internal basting. ;-d The flavor does not go away just 'cause
> > > >the fat melts.

> >
> > > I was kind of under the impression that beef was
> > > beef-flavored all the way through in the first place...

> >
> > > That much fat is overkill for spreading flavor. The cool
> > > ribbons provide a texture and a flavor pattern. Melted fat
> > > just coats your tongue and keeps it off the meat.

> >
> > > --Blair

> >
> > Fat can be cooked without melting it out of the ribbons.
> >
> > I cannot stand cold raw beef fat. It's just gross.

>
> I don't think it's gross, just unappealing in large slabs.
> >
> > Those rib eyes I did the other day were cool pink in the middle but the
> > fat was crispy on the outside and soft on the inside. Perfect!
> >

> I think that you both make good points. I like ribeyes significantly
> more done than loin cuts. I love crispy fat, and like to trim steaks
> to get crispy fat while avoiding big slabs of fat. Loin gets
> Pittsburghed. Rib gets cooked med rare, and I cut away the fat on the
> plate. I seldom buy rib, but that's a personal preference.
>
> > --
> > Peace, Om

>
> --Bryan


So do you ever eat raw beef?
--
Peace, Om

Remove _ to validate e-mails.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson
  #205 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 489
Default Rare steak

On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:26:26 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:

>In article >,
> Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>
>> Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> >On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 22:08:08 GMT, Blair P. Houghton > wrote:
>> >>I haven't talked to my homeowners' underwriter in 15 years.
>> >
>> >You should at least talk to the agent. You might be under insured by
>> >now if your house has appreciated.

>>
>> The escrow handles it. Probably got revised when I refinanced
>> a few years ago.

>
>
>If the escrow account is handled by the institution that holds your
>mortgage, all they care about is whether the insurance covers what you
>owe, which probably is even less than what was refinanced.


They also don't care about contents. Most people in the age range
this group seems to be, have far more than they did 15 years ago. I
was a few years out of a nasty divorce and I didn't have much. My
kitchen could have been replaced for a few hundred dollars. It would
be a minimum of 5 grand now. A meager wardrobe is 5 grand. I'm not
going to go count pots, pans, knives and my clothes, but my initial
insurance after my divorce wouldn't even be 10% of what I'd need to
replace what I have now.

Lou



  #206 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,730
Default Rare steak

Lou Decruss > wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 19:26:26 -0700, Dan Abel > wrote:
>>If the escrow account is handled by the institution that holds your
>>mortgage, all they care about is whether the insurance covers what you
>>owe, which probably is even less than what was refinanced.

>
>They also don't care about contents. Most people in the age range
>this group seems to be, have far more than they did 15 years ago. I
>was a few years out of a nasty divorce and I didn't have much. My
>kitchen could have been replaced for a few hundred dollars. It would
>be a minimum of 5 grand now. A meager wardrobe is 5 grand. I'm not
>going to go count pots, pans, knives and my clothes, but my initial
>insurance after my divorce wouldn't even be 10% of what I'd need to
>replace what I have now.


My current personal attitude towards excess insurance
is that actuarially it's cheaper for me to "self-insure"
than to give profits to the insurance companies.

I.e., I'm betting that I won't need it, rather than
guaranteeing that I'll pay more than that over time.
And if I do need it, I'll have the cash I saved from
not paying premiums to pay for it.

--Blair
  #207 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,762
Default Rare steak


"Blair P. Houghton" > wrote

> My current personal attitude towards excess insurance
> is that actuarially it's cheaper for me to "self-insure"
> than to give profits to the insurance companies.
>
> I.e., I'm betting that I won't need it, rather than
> guaranteeing that I'll pay more than that over time.
> And if I do need it, I'll have the cash I saved from
> not paying premiums to pay for it.


Absolutely. You can save a ton of money if you think of insurance
as for catastrophes. If you can, save up enough cash to cover a
high deductible, and hope you never need to use it. If you want
a payout every time you visit a doctor or a tree topples over in
your yard, you're going to pay big.

nancy


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rare Cooking Paul M. Cook General Cooking 17 05-09-2014 11:11 PM
Redigaffi 2000 100Rp RARE..RARE wine renato Wine 0 15-02-2007 08:34 PM
Rare Day Off Terry Pulliam Burd General Cooking 11 20-12-2006 02:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"