Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:

> BUBBA!!!! Thankee for the vindication. ROFL! (Have you tried my
> chili, kiddo?)

Not yet, but it is in my future. I like chili and I like black beans.
I'm planning to omit the green pepper (don't like bell peppers) and add
more chili powder and cayenne pepper. Not sure I'll retain the "chili"
name of the dish, either. ;-)

Bubba

Default User > wrote:

> Victor Sack wrote:
>
> > Default User > wrote:
> >
> > > My usual comment is that I find it strange to have both ground and
> > > diced beef in the same chili.
> >
> > It gives a range of textures. It may not be to one's preference, but
> > strange it ain't, at least not to me. I'm reminded of gazpacho, which
> > often consists of puréed or very finely chopped vegetables, as well as
> > the same vegetables diced.
>
> We're talking about chili, not gazpacho. Large variations in texture is
> not normally considered a plus.

You are kind of contradicting yourself. First, you say you find it
strange to have different textures in chili; now you say it is not
normally considered a plus. If it is strange, then who has been
considering all those textures for pluses or minuses and defining them
as normal or not? Are you sure you are not mixing up personal
expectations or preferences and statistics?

Victor

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:48:02 +0200, (Victor Sack)
wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>
>> BUBBA!!!! Thankee for the vindication. ROFL! (Have you tried my
>> chili, kiddo?)
>
>Not yet, but it is in my future. I like chili and I like black beans.
>I'm planning to omit the green pepper (don't like bell peppers) and add
>more chili powder and cayenne pepper. Not sure I'll retain the "chili"
>name of the dish, either. ;-)

Oh, so you're one of THEM! I see how it is now. Whatcha gonna call
it? Black bean slop? ROFL!

(Some people are so difficult)
Carol

--
www.caringbridge.org/visit/kilikini/

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 08:20:06 +0100, "Ophelia" > wrote:

>sf wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:57:36 -0700, Damsel in dis Dress
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> This looks scrumptious! Wonder what we'd do with the rest of the
>>> bottle of champagne. Do they sell it in mini bottles?
>>
BTW: Yes, but you'll probably have to hunt for it.

>> the recipe I use calls for a full bottle of champagne. What you do is
>> add it in two parts and reduce it to a syrup each time. I just use
>> leftover champagne (whatever the amount) for that dish. It's a great
>> way to dispose of champage from a party the night before.
>
>Hmm I don't understand the concept of leftover champagne <G>
>
LOL! I totally understand, but even the impossible happens from time
to time. No need to sacrifice a perfectly good bottle of fresh
champagne as a mere ingredient.




--

A husband is someone who takes out the trash and gives the impression he just cleaned the whole house.

sf wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:57:36 -0700, Damsel in dis Dress
> > wrote:
>
>
>>This looks scrumptious! Wonder what we'd do with the rest of the
>>bottle of champagne. Do they sell it in mini bottles?
>
>
> the recipe I use calls for a full bottle of champagne. What you do is
> add it in two parts and reduce it to a syrup each time. I just use
> leftover champagne (whatever the amount) for that dish. It's a great
> way to dispose of champage from a party the night before.
>
>
I have a recipe for a spit roasted lobster that is basted in champagne
and butter, with a basting pan to catch the juices as they drop off, and
the contents of which are turned into a sauce to serve with the lobster,
Homard a la Broche.
--
JL

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 13:18:38 -0700, Joseph Littleshoes
> wrote:

>sf wrote:

>> the recipe I use calls for a full bottle of champagne. What you do is
>> add it in two parts and reduce it to a syrup each time. I just use
>> leftover champagne (whatever the amount) for that dish. It's a great
>> way to dispose of champage from a party the night before.
>>
>>
>I have a recipe for a spit roasted lobster that is basted in champagne
>and butter, with a basting pan to catch the juices as they drop off, and
>the contents of which are turned into a sauce to serve with the lobster,
>Homard a la Broche.

Spit roasted lobster? How do you get them on the spit?



--

A husband is someone who takes out the trash and gives the impression he just cleaned the whole house.

sf wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:57:36 -0700, Damsel in dis Dress
> > wrote:
>
>
>>This looks scrumptious! Wonder what we'd do with the rest of the
>>bottle of champagne. Do they sell it in mini bottles?
>
>
> the recipe I use calls for a full bottle of champagne. What you do is
> add it in two parts and reduce it to a syrup each time. I just use
> leftover champagne (whatever the amount) for that dish. It's a great
> way to dispose of champage from a party the night before.
>
>
I have a recipe for a spit roasted lobster that is basted in champagne
and butter, with a basting pan to catch the juices as they drop off, and
the contents of which are turned into a sauce to serve with the lobster,
Homard a la Broche.
--
JL

Victor Sack wrote:

> Default User > wrote:
>
> > Victor Sack wrote:

> > > It gives a range of textures. It may not be to one's preference,
> > > but strange it ain't, at least not to me. I'm reminded of
> > > gazpacho, which often consists of puréed or very finely chopped
> > > vegetables, as well as the same vegetables diced.
> >
> > We're talking about chili, not gazpacho. Large variations in
> > texture is not normally considered a plus.
>
> You are kind of contradicting yourself. First, you say you find it
> strange to have different textures in chili; now you say it is not
> normally considered a plus. If it is strange, then who has been
> considering all those textures for pluses or minuses and defining them
> as normal or not? Are you sure you are not mixing up personal
> expectations or preferences and statistics?

There's two things:

1. My personal reaction the texture.

2. The general standard for the dish.

It could well be that in general, a variation in texture is considered
a plus, but that I don't personally care for it. However, in this case
I am agreeing with the general consensus (or at least what I perceive
to be the general consensus).



Brian


--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)