> wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>
> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>
> You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
> Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
> 911,
> claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>
> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>
>
> And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
> explains
> this astonishing FACT:
> http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>
> Happy sweating it ;-)

**** off.

As a former Marine I would take any of my brothers out back and slap them
silly if they believed that shit.

I saw 1 plane fly into the tower LIVE ON ****ING TV.

FOAD!

Off Topic, but hot topic ...

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html

You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
911,
claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.

http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html


And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
explains
this astonishing FACT:
http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html

Happy sweating it ;-)

"Tentacle Pr0n" > wrote in message
...
>
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>>
>> Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>>
>> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>>
>> You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
>> Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
>> 911,
>> claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>>
>> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>>
>>
>> And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
>> explains
>> this astonishing FACT:
>> http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>>
>> Happy sweating it ;-)
>
> **** off.
>
> As a former Marine I would take any of my brothers out back and slap them
> silly if they believed that shit.
>
> I saw 1 plane fly into the tower LIVE ON ****ING TV.
>
> FOAD!
>

LOL, I think we all saw the ****ing planes hit the WTC towers, what a joke.
There is some question about the Pentagon and certainly a lot of unanswered
questions by our own government but what hit the towers is not one of them.



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Go an slap this Marine... maybe he slaps you back, maybe for 8
minutes,
like the fist-fight in THEY LIVE (Carpenter)... it took 8 minutes
beating each other to pulp
until they guy was willing to put on the glasses THAT ALLOWED HIM TO
SEE.

Here is yet another proof of FAKE TV
http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/...act-video.html

No planes, thats right, no planes.

You can swear, you can threaten violence, you can get mad as hell....

http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/...act-video.html

Tentacle Pr0n wrote:
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>> Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>>
>> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>>
>> You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
>> Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
>> 911,
>> claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>>
>> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>>
>>
>> And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
>> explains
>> this astonishing FACT:
>> http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>>
>> Happy sweating it ;-)
>
> **** off.
>
> As a former Marine I would take any of my brothers out back and slap them
> silly if they believed that shit.
>
> I saw 1 plane fly into the tower LIVE ON ****ING TV.
>
> FOAD!
>
>

Again, http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u...HoganvsWTC.jpg

--
NiGHTS/Nightcrawler [mWo]
Fear Is The Mindkiller

"just a curtain jerking jobber here in RSPWland" -Lord Gow
"a laughably shitty shitbag" -The Teacher
"pretty pathetic" -rwa2play
"a sarcastic douchebag" -Cain
"NiGHTS is ***!!!" -Corey

wrote in
oups.com:

>
> Go an slap this Marine... maybe he slaps you back, maybe for 8
> minutes,
> like the fist-fight in THEY LIVE (Carpenter)... it took 8 minutes
> beating each other to pulp
> until they guy was willing to put on the glasses THAT ALLOWED HIM TO
> SEE.
>
> Here is yet another proof of FAKE TV
> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/...c-impact-video.
> html
>
> No planes, thats right, no planes.
>
> You can swear, you can threaten violence, you can get mad as hell....
>
> http://u2r2h-documents.blogspot.com/...c-impact-video.
> html
>
>

Unfortunately, even if we treat this as a sane proposition, it falls
apart under even cursory examination. CNN wasn't the only organization
covering the event; many pieces of planes and remnants of those on board
them have been recovered; the vast number of individuals who would
necessarily be involved in pulling off such a spectacular hoax all but
guarantees that *someone* would have been struck by conscience and come
forward in the last six years.

I think there are a great number of unanswered questions about the events
of 9-11, and I think that most of them will never be answered to my
satisfaction. Believe me, if there were a way that stands up to logical
examination to firmly accuse the current administration of (intentional)
complicity in that unfathomable tragedy, I'd be the first one to shove it
down people's throats until they could not ignore it. Indeed, the month
of September hadn't even run out, back in 2001, before I was loudly
pointing out the various failures and provocations of US foreign policy,
intelligence, and security priorities that allowed 9-11 to happen, and
I'm still taking shit for it to this day.

But as of right now, the only people I've seen who seriously believed
that our government was intentionally involved in allowing (or helping)
9-11 to happen have been every bit as deluded and willing to
intentionally ignore common sense and established objective facts as the
idiots who still think Iraq had something to do with it.

If you and your marine friends wish to bring attention to the failures
and malfeasance of this administration as relates to 9-11, concentrate on
the vast tapestry of lies that was woven for the american people - and
the rest of the world, who didn't swallow it nearly as eagerly - to
justify attacking Iraq in retaliation for 9-11. That's where people are
dying NOW for no good reason, fighting a war that even the most hawkish
of occupation advocates in the administration refuse to prosecute in an
intelligent and effective manner, because they're too busy worrying about
politics and not busy enough worrying about what's going to happen if we
keep half-assing over there.

And for the record, while I completely disagree with the Iraq war, I also
disagree with anyone who thinks that a complete pullout is even a
realistic option, let alone a good idea. I'd rather we never went in the
first place...but now that we're there, we have an ethical obligation to
stop dicking around and just do what needs to be done: send every
available warm body to the borders and tighten a noose around the whole
place, checking every damn inch of that country for any kind of weapon
bigger than a razorblade and making damn sure nobody's coming in behind
us to dump more arms in. The only way you'll have peace in that country
is by eliminating any realistic capability to create war, from inside or
outside. We're an occupying power - we need to stop pussyfooting around
and pretending to be something less than that, because as long as we're
half-assing this job, the job will never be finished and the Iraqi people
will never be safe.

You don't have a ****ing war with Marquis of Queensbury rules, folks, and
political correctness or kowtowing to conventional wisdom has no place on
a battlefield. I thought we learned that lesson 40 years ago.

--
Yes, THE John Henry

On Aug 10, 1:24 pm, wrote:
> Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>
> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...-war-economics...
>
> You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
> Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
> 911,
> claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>
> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...-war-economics...
>
> And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
> explains
> this astonishing FACT:http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>
> Happy sweating it ;-)

You have a right to your opinion so please continue to spew your drug
addled nonsense.

On Aug 11, 6:24 am, wrote:
> Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>
> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...-war-economics...
>
> You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
> Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
> 911,
> claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>
> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...-war-economics...
>
> And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
> explains
> this astonishing FACT:http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>
> Happy sweating it ;-)


I watched it live on TV from a country far far away.

It didn't happen like you, I, or anyone else, were led
to believe in my mind. There are too many unaddupables.

George W knows a lot more than he will ever tell,
and even I'm not really that interested in conspiricy
theory.

There is a stink of rotten fish around it as far as
US GovCo go.

In article >,
"Rotten Arse" > wrote:

> LOL, I think we all saw the ****ing planes hit the WTC towers, what a joke.
> There is some question about the Pentagon and certainly a lot of unanswered
> questions by our own government but what hit the towers is not one of them.

Nor the Pentagon. I know too many people who witnessed one or the other.
In fact, I was just talking about 9/11 with a colleague who was IN the
Pentagon on that day who saw the fireball and who's wife happened to see
the plane go by before it hit the Pentagon.

These conspiracy theorists really need to go back on their Prozak.

On 8/10/07 4:22 PM, in article ,
"Tentacle Pr0n" > wrote:

>
> > wrote in message
> oups.com...
>>
>> Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>>
>> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>>
>> You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
>> Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
>> 911,
>> claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>>
>> http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>>
>>
>> And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
>> explains
>> this astonishing FACT:
>> http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>>
>> Happy sweating it ;-)
>
> **** off.
>
> As a former Marine I would take any of my brothers out back and slap them
> silly if they believed that shit.

good point.

Ever see a large building professionally demolished? They set the
charges at the base of the supporting infrastructure. On detonation,
there is a large explosion at the base, and the whole thing comes
tumbling down to street level.

I didn't even read the Marine thing. Too scatterbrained.

On 9/11, it all came tumbling down. Then they cordoned everything
off (with Juliani's help) so that no independent verification of
the evidence could be done. As a result neither a coherent
conspiracy theory nor acceptance of the gov't position is possible
for those that do not drown in bias of one sort or another.

In watching something like "Loose Change", one shouldn't worry
about conspiracy theories. Just note indisputable facts like
the size of the steel girders, the fact that the towers were
-engineered- to withstand plane impact, etc.

There's no way that the planes, hitting the upper stories of the
towers could cause them to *totally* destruct and tumble to street
level given the video. Demolition maybe 20 min. after plane
impact is the only viable explanation I can find.

But, if you don't wanna believe that, there's -always- Bldg.
#7 ...

It's funny, funny times, folks. Watch very carefully to see
what they do next (and presumably prior to the 2008 US election).

AQ

"Look out, kid,
they keep it all hid!"
-from "Subterranean Homesick Blues", "Country Bob"
(from Hibbing) who passed on around 1964 or so. :-)

On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:24:06 -0700, wrote:

>
>Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>
>http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>
>You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
>Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
>911,
>claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>
>http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...economics.html
>
>
>And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
>explains
>this astonishing FACT:
>http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>
>Happy sweating it ;-)

On Aug 11, 1:46 am, Steady Eddy > wrote:
> On Aug 10, 1:24 pm, wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Off Topic, but hot topic ...
>
> >http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...-war-economics...
>
> > You all have heard the 911 conspiracies?
> > Yes, US Marines demand the truth about the incredible inside job of
> > 911,
> > claim it was a conspiracy by USA psyops.
>
> >http://u2r2h.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...-war-economics...
>
> > And yes, NO PLANES flew into the towers ... there is a good video that
> > explains
> > this astonishing FACT:http://tangibleinfo.blogspot.com/200...tv-fakery.html
>
> > Happy sweating it ;-)
>
> You have a right to your opinion so please continue to spew your drug
> addled nonsense.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Don't blame this one on drugs Eddy. Anyone who really believes that no
planes flew into the WTC or that the US Government had anything to do
with it, is truly either crazy, has not looked at the evidence or most
likely is guilty of both premises. As much as I think the government
is corrupt and incompetent, it is beyond comprehension that anyone
believes that they had anything to do with the Islamofascist suicide
bombers. Maybe, they could have shot down the 4th plane and covered it
up because they did not want to tell the public, but even that is
unlikely and while George Bush may be arrogant and ignorant, he is not
a monomaniac like Hitler or Stalin.

When you listen to some of these people who want to believe this and
have made movies about it claiming certain things were not possible,
anyone who has any knowledge of science whatsoever can see their
fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models
do not always agree, especially when there is a single data point to
base the model on. This is not analogous to Global Warming, where the
argument can be made that the complications of the weather patterns
make constructing an accurate model difficult: this is like trying to
figure out Newton's 3 Laws of Motion with one a single datum. It
cannot be done.

MobiusDick

On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:

> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick >
> wrote:
>
>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
>>WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models
>
> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
> anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
> building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>
> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
> to the building and use her for a target.

Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
O'Donnell is another matter.

On Aug 13, 3:26 pm, Ivan Marsh > wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick >
> > wrote:
>
> >>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
> >>WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
> >>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models
>
> > Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
> > anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
> > building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>
> > To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
> > to the building and use her for a target.
>
> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
> O'Donnell is another matter.

I used to like Rosie a lot, I could never understand why she was so
unpopular in the survey I did... but, I'm not a such a big fan
anymore...
I think she was too tough on Bill Clinton...


-"Jordy"

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:32:52 -0700, jordy wrote:

> On Aug 13, 3:26 pm, Ivan Marsh > wrote:
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>> > On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick >
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>> >>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>> >>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>> >>models
>>
>> > Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>> > demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>> > plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>
>> > To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>> > O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>>
>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>
> I used to like Rosie a lot, I could never understand why she was so
> unpopular in the survey I did... but, I'm not a such a big fan
> anymore...
> I think she was too tough on Bill Clinton...

She's one of those people that got the idea that their little bit of fame
means that no one will ever want them to just STFU. Being adjacent to
Madonna does not make you Madonna... and Madonna had the good sense to
keep her mouth shut most of the time.

Just like Sinéad O'Connor... Hey you stupid, bald bitch, guess what, you
are NOT Bono.

....So a young rock star goes to rock star heaven and finds St. Peter
waiting for him.

blah, blah, blah...

....and St. Peter says "No, that's God... he's just pretending to be Bono."

Ivan Marsh > wrote in newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666
@you.now:

> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
>>>WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>>>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models
>>
>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
>> anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
>> building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>
>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
>> to the building and use her for a target.
>
> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
> O'Donnell is another matter.

I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct response
to my long post on this thread, particularly from the original poster.

--
Yes, THE John Henry

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:

> Ivan Marsh > wrote in newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666
> @you.now:
>
>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into the
>>>>WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>>>>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and models
>>>
>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be demolished
>>> anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the plane and the
>>> building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>
>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie O'Donnell
>>> to the building and use her for a target.
>>
>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>
> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct response
> to my long post on this thread, particularly from the original poster.

I think you can assume that says something about your post.

On Aug 13, 4:40 pm, Ivan Marsh > wrote:
> Just like Sinéad O'Connor... Hey you stupid, bald bitch, guess what, you
> are NOT Bono.
>

I don't know much about her, but it was brave of her to rip up the
picture of the pope
on SNL back in 1992... I always wondered though why she didn't rip it
into more pieces...




-"Jordy"

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 09:01:38 -0700, jordy wrote:

> On Aug 13, 4:40 pm, Ivan Marsh > wrote:
>> Just like Sinéad O'Connor... Hey you stupid, bald bitch, guess what,
>> you are NOT Bono.
>
> I don't know much about her, but it was brave of her to rip up the
> picture of the pope on SNL back in 1992... I always wondered though why
> she didn't rip it into more pieces...

Brave maybe... stupid, without question, career over.

Much like KD Lang criticizing the beef industry. Not that I think there's
anything wrong with criticizing the beef industry (or anything else for
that matter) but when the majority of your audience are a bunch of red
neck wanna' be cowboys insulting cowboys is a bad idea. I guess she's
lucky she still had he ******* audience or she might have disappeared
completely.

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:16:28 -0500, Ivan Marsh wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
>> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
>> newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot do
>>>>>anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>>>models
>>>>
>>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>>>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>>>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>>
>>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>>>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>>>
>>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>>
>> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
>> response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the original
>> poster.
>
> I think you can assume that says something about your post.

'swonds! I'm mortally felled.

Polly wanna' cracker?

Ivan Marsh > wrote in
news
> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
>
>> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
>> newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
>>
>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot
>>>>>do anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>>>models
>>>>
>>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>>>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>>>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>>
>>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>>>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>>>
>>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>>
>> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
>> response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the
>> original poster.
>
> I think you can assume that says something about your post.
>

I do. I assume that it says my post was either irrefutable in general,
or the OP couldn't think of a single point to criticize in it, even
though I completely disagreed with him.

--
Yes, THE John Henry

On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:39 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:

> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
> news
>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
>>> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
>>> newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
>>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>>>>the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot
>>>>>>do anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>>>>models
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>>>>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>>>>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>>>
>>>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>>>>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>>>>
>>>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>>>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>>>
>>> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
>>> response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the
>>> original poster.
>>
>> I think you can assume that says something about your post.
>
> I do. I assume that it says my post was either irrefutable in general,
> or the OP couldn't think of a single point to criticize in it, even
> though I completely disagreed with him.

Do you keep your ego in the spare bedroom?

Ivan Marsh wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 03:01:39 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
>
>> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
>> news
>>> On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 01:04:41 +0000, Yes, THE John Henry wrote:
>>>> Ivan Marsh > wrote in
>>>> newsan.2007.08.13.19.26.28.654666 @you.now:
>>>>> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 01:21:51 +0000, CyberDroog wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:35:54 -0700, MobiusDick
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fallacies. Since we are not able to recreate plowing two 747's into
>>>>>>> the WTC and allowing it to burn in the name of science, we cannot
>>>>>>> do anything other than model what would happen. The real world and
>>>>>>> models
>>>>>> Why can't it be recreated? Find a building that needs to be
>>>>>> demolished anyway and a plane that has seen better years. Pack the
>>>>>> plane and the building full of conspiracy theorists and crash it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To make the YouTube video even better, they should strap Rosie
>>>>>> O'Donnell to the building and use her for a target.
>>>>> Buildings are designed to withstand being hit by aircraft... Rosie
>>>>> O'Donnell is another matter.
>>>> I find it intensely interesting that there's not been one direct
>>>> response to my long post on this thread, particularly from the
>>>> original poster.
>>> I think you can assume that says something about your post.
>> I do. I assume that it says my post was either irrefutable in general,
>> or the OP couldn't think of a single point to criticize in it, even
>> though I completely disagreed with him.
>
> Do you keep your ego in the spare bedroom?
>

I can predict what joke comes up when Cain gets around to reading this.

--
NiGHTS/Nightcrawler [mWo]
Fear Is The Mindkiller

"just a curtain jerking jobber here in RSPWland" -Lord Gow
"a laughably shitty shitbag" -The Teacher
"pretty pathetic" -rwa2play
"a sarcastic douchebag" -Cain
"NiGHTS is ***!!!" -Corey