"Little Malice" > wrote in message
...
> Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> miss you...
>
> --
> Jani in WA


I missed a few weeks' posts of his, but they came back yesterday. I hadn't
changed my filterings or anything; they just stopped; then started back
again. I looked to see if I had blocked him (by mistake, of course ;-)) but
I hadn't.

'tis a puzzlement.

Dee Dee

Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
miss you...

--
Jani in WA

One time on Usenet, "Dee.Dee" > said:
>
> "Little Malice" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> > using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> > posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> > will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> > miss you...
> >
> > --
> > Jani in WA
>
>
> I missed a few weeks' posts of his, but they came back yesterday. I hadn't
> changed my filterings or anything; they just stopped; then started back
> again. I looked to see if I had blocked him (by mistake, of course ;-)) but
> I hadn't.
>
> 'tis a puzzlement.

Indeed -- it may just be my server, but I was thinking it's because
he's actually got gmail.com in his from header, even though it's a bit
munged. I'll do some filter testing, tomorrow...

--
Jani in WA

Oh pshaw, on Wed 31 Oct 2007 10:35:26a, Little Malice meant to say...

> Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> miss you...
>

I don't know if you'll see this one, but if you're filtering gmail that may
be the problem. Unless I leave my gmail address out altogether and change
it to something else, I'm not sure what would work.

Let me know if you see this one.

--
Wayne Boatwright
__________________________________________________

I have a rock garden, but three of them died last week.

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:35:26 GMT, (Little
Malice) wrote:

>Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
>using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
>posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
>will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
>miss you...

yeah, yeah, yeah.... you love him and you don't love me. <whine>

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first

On Oct 31, 10:35 am, (Little Malice) wrote:
> Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> miss you...
>
> --
> Jani in WA

I'm sorry, Jani. I'm using Google Groups today from work, but I'll
look into it tonight. I'm not exactly sure what to change. I see all
of your posts just fine.

Hope I can work it out...

Best,
Wayne

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:35:26 GMT, (Little
Malice) wrote:

>Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
>using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
>posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
>will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
>miss you...

You might check your newsreader and see if it has watch filters and
priorities. That way you can set a watch with a higher priority for
the gmail people you want to see and ignore the rest.
--
Susan N.

"Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral,
48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy."
Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974)

In article >,
(Little Malice) wrote:

> One time on Usenet, "Dee.Dee" > said:
> >
<snip>
> >
> > I missed a few weeks' posts of his, but they came back yesterday. I hadn't
> > changed my filterings or anything; they just stopped; then started back
> > again. I looked to see if I had blocked him (by mistake, of course ;-))
> > but
> > I hadn't.
> >
> > 'tis a puzzlement.
>
> Indeed -- it may just be my server, but I was thinking it's because
> he's actually got gmail.com in his from header, even though it's a bit
> munged. I'll do some filter testing, tomorrow...

If I'm not mistaken he munged his addy to "_gmail" and that tosses him
to my garbage pail. Om munged hers to "g_mail" and her posts, like yours
(g33mail), escape my gmail filter. Sf gets through too. But I notice her
headers read simply "From: sf" and gmail doesn't appear there though it
shows up in the "Reply-To" line. My filter works on the "From" line
("Kill if From contains gmail"). I don't know why sf doesn't show her
gmail address, but I'm glad she doesn't cause I'd hate to kill her
posts (especially if she's going to whine about it).

My kill filter is picking up an alarming number of posts since I killed
gmail. Some days it catches almost 10% of rfc posts. Some of these are
the ones I don't want to see. But I'm sure some, like Wayne's, are posts
I'd like to be able to read.

I use MT-NewsWatcher. It has "kill" filters, "highlight" filters, and
"keep" filters. I wonder what would happen if I killed gmail, but set up
a filter to highlight or keep Wayne's. Maybe that would do the trick? Or
perhaps my newsreader would suffer a psychotic break?

Regards,
Dave W.

Oh pshaw, on Wed 31 Oct 2007 10:35:26a, Little Malice meant to say...

> Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> miss you...
>

Jani, it would seem that you're not the only one having trouble with
filtering gmail accounts.

I have totally changed my headers to reflect a bogus address (not at
gmail). Instructions are in my sig on how to reply directly to me through
e-mail. Hope this helps!

Cheers!
Wayne

Oh pshaw, on Thu 01 Nov 2007 10:52:50a, Wayne Boatwright meant to say...

> Oh pshaw, on Wed 31 Oct 2007 10:35:26a, Little Malice meant to say...
>
>> Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
>> using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
>> posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
>> will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
>> miss you...
>>
>
> Jani, it would seem that you're not the only one having trouble with
> filtering gmail accounts.
>
> I have totally changed my headers to reflect a bogus address (not at
> gmail). Instructions are in my sig on how to reply directly to me
> through e-mail. Hope this helps!
>
> Cheers!
> Wayne
>

Well, that didn't work, so let's try this one...

--
Wayne Boatwright

(to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
__________________________________________________ ____________

It would seem that no matter how you slice it, it
still comes up Velveeta.

In article 4>,
Wayne Boatwright > wrote:

<snip>
> >
> > I have totally changed my headers to reflect a bogus address (not at
> > gmail). Instructions are in my sig on how to reply directly to me
> > through e-mail. Hope this helps!
> >
> > Cheers!
> > Wayne
> >
>
> Well, that didn't work, so let's try this one...

I'm glad you're back. More to the point, I'm glad I can _see_ that
you're back.

Regards,
Dave W.

Oh pshaw, on Fri 02 Nov 2007 05:18:16a, Dave W meant to say...

> In article 4>,
> Wayne Boatwright > wrote:
>
> <snip>
>> >
>> > I have totally changed my headers to reflect a bogus address (not at
>> > gmail). Instructions are in my sig on how to reply directly to me
>> > through e-mail. Hope this helps!
>> >
>> > Cheers!
>> > Wayne
>> >
>>
>> Well, that didn't work, so let's try this one...
>
> I'm glad you're back. More to the point, I'm glad I can _see_ that
> you're back.
>
> Regards,
> Dave W.
>

Thanks, Dave!

--
Wayne Boatwright

(to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
__________________________________________________ ____________

Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.

Oh pshaw, on Sat 03 Nov 2007 08:17:41p, Little Malice meant to say...

> One time on Usenet, Wayne Boatwright > said:
>> Oh pshaw, on Wed 31 Oct 2007 10:35:26a, Little Malice meant to say...
>>
>> > Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
>> > using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
>> > posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
>> > will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
>> > miss you...
>> >
>>
>> Jani, it would seem that you're not the only one having trouble with
>> filtering gmail accounts.
>>
>> I have totally changed my headers to reflect a bogus address (not at
>> gmail). Instructions are in my sig on how to reply directly to me
>> through e-mail. Hope this helps!
>
> Thanks Wayne, you're coming through loud and clear now... ;-)
>

Glad to hear it, Jani. I would miss your posts, too, if I weren't seeing
them.

--
Wayne Boatwright

(to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
__________________________________________________ ____________

It's lonely at the top, but you eat better.

One time on Usenet, said:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:35:26 GMT, (Little
> Malice) wrote:
>
> >Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> >using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> >posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> >will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> >miss you...
>
> yeah, yeah, yeah.... you love him and you don't love me. <whine>

I love you too, Barbara; but I've been getting your posts just
fine... :-)

--
Jani in WA

One time on Usenet, Wayne Boatwright > said:
> Oh pshaw, on Wed 31 Oct 2007 10:35:26a, Little Malice meant to say...
>
> > Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> > using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> > posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> > will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> > miss you...
> >
>
> Jani, it would seem that you're not the only one having trouble with
> filtering gmail accounts.
>
> I have totally changed my headers to reflect a bogus address (not at
> gmail). Instructions are in my sig on how to reply directly to me through
> e-mail. Hope this helps!

Thanks Wayne, you're coming through loud and clear now... ;-)

--
Jani in WA

One time on Usenet, Wayne Boatwright > said:
> Oh pshaw, on Sat 03 Nov 2007 08:17:41p, Little Malice meant to say...
>
> > One time on Usenet, Wayne Boatwright > said:
> >> Oh pshaw, on Wed 31 Oct 2007 10:35:26a, Little Malice meant to say...
> >>
> >> > Hey Wayne, since I started filtering gmail.com (I know, I'm
> >> > using it myself, but so many spammers do too), I'm missing your
> >> > posts. Could you possibly change your headers a bit? I know, someone
> >> > will try to chew my ass about asking you to change anything, but I
> >> > miss you...
> >> >
> >>
> >> Jani, it would seem that you're not the only one having trouble with
> >> filtering gmail accounts.
> >>
> >> I have totally changed my headers to reflect a bogus address (not at
> >> gmail). Instructions are in my sig on how to reply directly to me
> >> through e-mail. Hope this helps!
> >
> > Thanks Wayne, you're coming through loud and clear now... ;-)
> >
>
> Glad to hear it, Jani. I would miss your posts, too, if I weren't seeing
> them.

You're sweet, thanks!

--
Jani in WA

On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:16:49 GMT, (Little
Malice) wrote:

>One time on Usenet, said:
>>
>> yeah, yeah, yeah.... you love him and you don't love me. <whine>
>
>I love you too, Barbara; but I've been getting your posts just
>fine... :-)

whew!

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first

On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:35:30 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

> I would miss your posts, too, if I weren't seeing them.

LOLOL! You're a smooth one, Wayne. No wonder the girls love you.



--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first

Oh pshaw, on Sat 03 Nov 2007 09:55:29p, meant to say...

> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 02:35:30 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > wrote:
>
>> I would miss your posts, too, if I weren't seeing them.
>
> LOLOL! You're a smooth one, Wayne. No wonder the girls love you.
>
>
>

Heh... You know, the right words at the right time are never
inappropriate. :-)

--
Wayne Boatwright

(to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
__________________________________________________ ____________

It's lonely at the top, but you eat better.