General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder

Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.

(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
old Queen.)

This one looks good:

http://tinyurl.com/29479d

What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf,
at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives.

Yes, I am also googling the group.



  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,962
Default Meat Grinder

cybercat said...

> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>
> (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you
> flabby old Queen.)
>
> This one looks good:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>
> What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and
> meatloaf, at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after
> it arrives.
>
> Yes, I am also googling the group.



Have you thought to get a motorized one. 4-5 pounds of meat is a lot to
grind. And my grinder suggests grinding using both disks, large first,
small second.

But if you want to buff up your arm muscles that looks like a fine choice.

Imho,

Andy
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

Andy wrote:
> cyberswallow sputters:
>
> > Some input would be nice.

>
> > This one looks good:

>
> >http://tinyurl.com/29479d

>
> > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max.

>
> Have you thought to get a motorized one. 4-5 pounds of meat is a lot to
> grind. And my grinder suggests grinding using both disks, large first,
> small second.
>
> But if you want to buff up your arm muscles that looks like a fine choice.


Do you really think the ****alator will wank that herself, da good ol'
bums are lined up six deep... ol' cyberswallow has a large stock of
Northern Tool's finast:

http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...7474_200047474


Sheldon


  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,949
Default Meat Grinder

On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:25:51 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>
>(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
>old Queen.)
>
>This one looks good:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>
>What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf,
>at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives.
>
>Yes, I am also googling the group.
>
>


You might want to ask on rec.food.equipment, as well.

Christine
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

Christine wrote:
> "cyber****" wrote:
>
> >Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.

>
> >(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
> >old Queen.)

>
> >This one looks good:

>
> >http://tinyurl.com/29479d

>
> >What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf,
> >at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives.

>
> >Yes, I am also googling the group.

>
> You might want to ask on rec.food.equipment, as well.


What for... just enlarge the picturre at the web site... res ipsa
loquitur.




  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,334
Default Meat Grinder


"Christine Dabney" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:25:51 -0500, "cybercat" >
> wrote:
>
>>Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>>
>>(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
>>old Queen.)
>>
>>This one looks good:
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>>
>>What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and
>>meatloaf,
>>at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives.
>>
>>Yes, I am also googling the group.
>>
>>

>
> You might want to ask on rec.food.equipment, as well.
>
> Christine


Do you have a Kitchen Aid? There is an attachment for grinding meat.


  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Kswck" > wrote
> Do you have a Kitchen Aid? There is an attachment for grinding meat.


I don't. Do you use yours for grinding meat?


  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,334
Default Meat Grinder

Yes and for grinding pork for sausage.

"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Kswck" > wrote
>> Do you have a Kitchen Aid? There is an attachment for grinding meat.

>
> I don't. Do you use yours for grinding meat?
>



  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Kswck" > wrote in message
...
> Yes and for grinding pork for sausage.
>


How much beef, say, do you grind at a time?


  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,555
Default Meat Grinder

cybercat wrote:
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>
> (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
> old Queen.)
>
> This one looks good:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>
> What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf,
> at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives.
>
> Yes, I am also googling the group.
>
>
>



That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was young, we
would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage at a time.

Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from
Northern a few years ago that works great)

Bob


  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"zxcvbob" >
>
> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was young, we
> would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage at a time.
>
> Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from
> Northern a few years ago that works great)
>



This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.

http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"cybercat" > wrote in message
.. .
>
> "zxcvbob" >
>>
>> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was young, we
>> would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage at a time.
>>
>> Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from
>> Northern a few years ago that works great)
>>

>
>
> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe
>
>

Duh, the number 10 is on the side. So it is the same size. The bigger the
number, the smaller the unit, eh?
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,883
Default Meat Grinder

cybercat wrote:
> "zxcvbob" >
>>
>> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was
>> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage
>> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I
>> bought from
>> Northern a few years ago that works great)
>>

>
>
> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe


Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you
prepared to have screws drilled into your table?

Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage


  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> cybercat wrote:
>> "zxcvbob" >
>>>
>>> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was
>>> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage
>>> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I
>>> bought from
>>> Northern a few years ago that works great)
>>>

>>
>>
>> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe

>
> Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you
> prepared to have screws drilled into your table?
>
> Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage


Ohhh, I see. I had thought the free standing ones were somehow weighted. So
now I have to decide between a clamp-on or an electric. Do you have one?


  #15 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,883
Default Meat Grinder

cybercat wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> cybercat wrote:
>>> "zxcvbob" >
>>>>
>>>> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was
>>>> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of
>>>> sausage at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric
>>>> #12 that I bought from
>>>> Northern a few years ago that works great)
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.
>>>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe

>>
>> Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you
>> prepared to have screws drilled into your table?
>>
>> Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage

>
> Ohhh, I see. I had thought the free standing ones were somehow
> weighted. So now I have to decide between a clamp-on or an electric.
> Do you have one?


I do have a clamp on one but a long time ago I bought an electric one




  #16 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 163
Default Meat Grinder


Ophelia wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
> > "zxcvbob" >
> >>
> >> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was
> >> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage
> >> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I
> >> bought from
> >> Northern a few years ago that works great)
> >>

> >
> >
> > This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe

>
> Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you
> prepared to have screws drilled into your table?
>
> Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage
>
>



No worries, she has a speculum and stirrups drilled right into her dining
room table so the neighborhood boys can come in for lascivious viewing
sessions, she charges a solid quarter from what I hear...she calls it
"cybertwot's THRILL Arcade".

:-D

--
Best
Greg

"I am smarter than you think I am"
- Maryanne "Loafhead" Kehoe to me
in alt.gossip.celebrities




  #17 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

On Nov 4, 12:15?am, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:
> > cybercat wrote:
> > > "zxcvbob" >

>
> > >> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was
> > >> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage
> > >> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I
> > >> bought from
> > >> Northern a few years ago that works great)

>
> > > This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.

>
> > >http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe

>
> > Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you
> > prepared to have screws drilled into your table?

>
> > Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage

>
> No worries, she has a speculum and stirrups drilled right into her dining
> room table so the neighborhood boys can come in for lascivious viewing
> sessions, she charges a solid quarter from what I hear...she calls it
> "cybertwot's THRILL Arcade".


Cybertwot's the one receiving all the THRILLS, knowing young boys are
viewing her cavernous gaping maw without their puking.

  #18 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:02:20 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>
>> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe

>
> The stainless steel is certainly a huge plus, but for $20-$50
> more you could get a pretty decent electric versions that support
> other types of attachments.


I read a review that said the stainless model did not hold up for
one purchaser. But I think he was grinding whole deer, hooves
and all.



  #19 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"zxcvbob" > wrote
> Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from
> Northern a few years ago that works great)
>


Does this one actually say "52??"

http://tinyurl.com/yraj5k



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #20 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

"cyberbeast" wrote:
> "zxcvbob" > wrote
>
> > Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from
> > Northern a few years ago that works great)

>
> Does this one actually say "52??"


That's your hip measurement.




  #21 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,555
Default Meat Grinder

cybercat wrote:
> "zxcvbob" > wrote
>> Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from
>> Northern a few years ago that works great)
>>

>
> Does this one actually say "52??"
>
> http://tinyurl.com/yraj5k
>
>
>



"32". That's the largest size you can readily buy plates and knives for.

"22" is smaller, but still pretty big.

"10" and "12" are smaller still and use interchangeable cutters. 10
clamps to the edge of the table and 12 bolts to it.

There are also #8 and #5 grinders. I would not get anything smaller
than an #8.

Bob
  #22 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"zxcvbob" > wrote
>
> "32". That's the largest size you can readily buy plates and knives for.
>
> "22" is smaller, but still pretty big.
>
> "10" and "12" are smaller still and use interchangeable cutters. 10
> clamps to the edge of the table and 12 bolts to it.
>
> There are also #8 and #5 grinders. I would not get anything smaller than
> an #8.
>


Oh. I see. When you said you had a number 12, from the context of the
post I thought larger numbers meant smaller grinder. Looks like the #10 is
the smallest Northern Tools carries.

Do you have an electric? And if yours is manual does it clamp or screw or
just sit there? Is there no grinder that does not have to be attached to
something,
unless it is electric?


  #23 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"zxcvbob" > wrote:
>
> There are also #8 and #5 grinders. I would not get anything smaller than
> an #8.
>


This one looks all right.

http://tinyurl.com/ywt8el



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #24 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,971
Default Meat Grinder

Oh pshaw, on Thu 01 Nov 2007 05:25:51p, cybercat meant to say...

> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>
> (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you
> flabby old Queen.)
>
> This one looks good:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>
> What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and
> meatloaf, at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after
> it arrives.
>
> Yes, I am also googling the group.
>
>
>
>


Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric.

--
Wayne Boatwright

(to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
__________________________________________________ ____________

Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.





  #25 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote
>
> Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric.
>


Just for ease of use?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com



  #26 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,971
Default Meat Grinder

Oh pshaw, on Fri 02 Nov 2007 11:08:48a, cybercat meant to say...

>
> "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote
>>
>> Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric.
>>

>
> Just for ease of use?
>
>
>


Yes... Call me lazy! :-)

Actually, I would feel that I could be more productive. Also, if you're
inclined to use the sausage stuffer, you have 2 free hands to work with it,
rather than having to crank with one. Of course, that's a moot point if
you have more than one person.

--
Wayne Boatwright

(to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com)
__________________________________________________ ____________

Reality is nothing but a collective hunch.





  #27 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
.184...
> Oh pshaw, on Fri 02 Nov 2007 11:08:48a, cybercat meant to say...
>
>>
>> "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote
>>>
>>> Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric.
>>>

>>
>> Just for ease of use?
>>
>>
>>

>
> Yes... Call me lazy! :-)
>
> Actually, I would feel that I could be more productive. Also, if you're
> inclined to use the sausage stuffer, you have 2 free hands to work with
> it,
> rather than having to crank with one. Of course, that's a moot point if
> you have more than one person.
>


The chief draw, for me, of a manual *anything* is that it is cheaper to
replace/repair. I am not sure if I would make my own sausage or not. It
sounds tempting. Thanks.


  #28 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 464
Default Meat Grinder

On Nov 1, 7:25 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>
> (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
> old Queen.)
>
> This one looks good:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>
> What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf,
> at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives.



>From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with

the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops
out in front of you onto...I guess a plate. To me, it looks like it
would be awkward to use. Is there a way to anchor it down? Because
it's going to require some elbow grease to do this and you don't want
the whole thing sliding around as you grind.

  #29 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

On Nov 1, 7:59?pm, Christopher Helms > wrote:
> On Nov 1, 7:25 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
>
> > Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.

>
> > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
> > old Queen.)

>
> > This one looks good:

>
> >http://tinyurl.com/29479d

>
> > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf,
> > at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives.
> >From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with

>
> the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops
> out in front of you onto...I guess a plate. To me, it looks like it
> would be awkward to use. Is there a way to anchor it down? Because
> it's going to require some elbow grease to do this and you don't want
> the whole thing sliding around as you grind.


That particular style grinder is designed to be bolted directly to a
table/counter or bolted directly to a sturdy piece of lumber and then
the lumber clamped to a table/counter with a couple of heavy C clamps.

But that size grinder is much too large for home use, and would be too
difficult to crank without having others take turns, or convert it to
motorized (very dangerous), and it's very important to grind meat
expeditiously, to get the job done quickly before the meat and the
grinder become warm. And that particular size/type grinder would be
okay for someone with hundreds of pounds of meat to grind once a year
if it wasn't the poorest quality piece of made in china crap $40 could
buy... I wouldn't buy it for $4 (in fact I wouldn't have one for
free), it wouldn't even make a decent door stop. There's a lot more
to know about grinding meat than buying the biggest cheapest piece of
crap grinder.... the smallest lowest priced electric ginder is a
hundred times better than that cybercooz crap... even the teensy toys
r us kitchen aid attachment is better than that chinese hunk-a-junk.

Anyone wanting to buy a grinder you need to spend for something of
quality or you're not giving the concept a fair chance from the
start... a grinder costing less than the meat you grind says something
about those who would consider it, and not very nice.

Sheldon

  #30 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,256
Default Meat Grinder

On Nov 1, 7:22 pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:59:52 -0700, Christopher Helms wrote:
> > From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with
> > the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops
> > out in front of you onto...I guess a plate.

>
> All the manual grinders I've seen are designed that way - to be
> used over the edge of the counter. Even the ones that are taller
> and clamp to the edge of a table/counter.
>
> Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage.
>
> -sw



The ones that clamp onto the edge of a table or counter easily will
allow the ground meat to fall into a dish in front of the grinder -
NOT over the edge. I have my gramma's, and that's how it works.

N.



  #31 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Nancy2" > wrote in message
ps.com...
> On Nov 1, 7:22 pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:59:52 -0700, Christopher Helms wrote:
>> > From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with
>> > the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops
>> > out in front of you onto...I guess a plate.

>>
>> All the manual grinders I've seen are designed that way - to be
>> used over the edge of the counter. Even the ones that are taller
>> and clamp to the edge of a table/counter.
>>
>> Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage.
>>
>> -sw

>
>
> The ones that clamp onto the edge of a table or counter easily will
> allow the ground meat to fall into a dish in front of the grinder -
> NOT over the edge. I have my gramma's, and that's how it works.
>

I really don't want one that clamps.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

  #32 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

"cybercat" wrote:
>
> I really don't want one that clamps.


Why not, most women do.... wait, maybe I can give you a few nips n'
tucks, let me get my gorilla glue.




  #33 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

Sqwertz wrote:
>
> Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage.


Your personal stats... making a pass at cybersquat. hehe

  #34 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 163
Default Meat Grinder


Sheldon wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> > Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage.

>
> Your personal stats... making a pass at cybersquat. hehe
>


"The mind judders..."


--
Best
Greg

"I am smarter than you think I am"
- Maryanne "Loafhead" Kehoe to me
in alt.gossip.celebrities



  #35 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default Meat Grinder

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:59:52 -0700, Christopher Helms wrote:
>
>> From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with
>> the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops
>> out in front of you onto...I guess a plate.

>
> All the manual grinders I've seen are designed that way - to be
> used over the edge of the counter. Even the ones that are taller
> and clamp to the edge of a table/counter.
>
> Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage.
>
> -sw

I've got one with a long handle like that. Remember the longer the lever
arm, the easier it is to grind. Just make sure whatever you anchor it to
is hefty enough that it won't lift up if you hit a tough spot in the
meat. Been there, done that when the kitchen table started to tilt the
wrong way. I now use the kitchen counter top to anchor to.
--
Jack N2MPU
Proud NRA Life Member


  #36 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,799
Default Meat Grinder


"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>
> (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
> old Queen.)
>
> This one looks good:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>
> What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and
> meatloaf, at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after
> it arrives.
>
> Yes, I am also googling the group.


Looks like possibly a bit large for 5 pounds at a time, but will get the job
done. Good price also.

I use the grinder attachment for the KA and do 15 to 20 pounds at a time for
sausage.


  #37 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,256
Default Meat Grinder

On Nov 1, 7:25 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
>
> (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby
> old Queen.)
>
> This one looks good:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/29479d
>
>

What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's
securely fastened to something.

N.

  #38 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,454
Default Meat Grinder


"Nancy2" > wrote
>>

> What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's
> securely fastened to something.
>


Okay, I get it. Tell me this: does it mess up the thing is it clamped to?


  #39 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,551
Default Meat Grinder

On Nov 2, 2:39?pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> "Nancy2" > wrote
>
>
>
> > What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's
> > securely fastened to something.

>
> Okay, I get it. Tell me this: does it mess up the thing is it clamped to?


Not if it's clamped to your face.

  #40 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,883
Default Meat Grinder

cybercat wrote:
> "Nancy2" > wrote
>>>

>> What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's
>> securely fastened to something.
>>

>
> Okay, I get it. Tell me this: does it mess up the thing is it clamped
> to?


If you put something between the clamp and the table ie cloth or paper, it
ought not not mess it up

I guess it depends on how posh your table is)




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Meat Grinder [email protected] Barbecue 1 12-11-2009 04:09 PM
Not A Meat Grinder. Andy[_2_] General Cooking 10 06-05-2007 09:55 PM
New meat grinder Nonnymus Barbecue 5 04-12-2006 12:31 PM
meat mincer meat grinder gingerking Cooking Equipment 0 11-06-2006 07:00 AM
meat grinder now what! Survivalbill.com Preserving 9 18-05-2004 12:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"