Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined.
(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby old Queen.) This one looks good: http://tinyurl.com/29479d What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf, at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives. Yes, I am also googling the group. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat said...
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you > flabby old Queen.) > > This one looks good: > > http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and > meatloaf, at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after > it arrives. > > Yes, I am also googling the group. Have you thought to get a motorized one. 4-5 pounds of meat is a lot to grind. And my grinder suggests grinding using both disks, large first, small second. But if you want to buff up your arm muscles that looks like a fine choice. Imho, Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
> cyberswallow sputters: > > > Some input would be nice. > > > This one looks good: > > >http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max. > > Have you thought to get a motorized one. 4-5 pounds of meat is a lot to > grind. And my grinder suggests grinding using both disks, large first, > small second. > > But if you want to buff up your arm muscles that looks like a fine choice. Do you really think the ****alator will wank that herself, da good ol' bums are lined up six deep... ol' cyberswallow has a large stock of Northern Tool's finast: http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...7474_200047474 Sheldon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:25:51 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote: >Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > >(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby >old Queen.) > >This one looks good: > >http://tinyurl.com/29479d > >What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf, >at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives. > >Yes, I am also googling the group. > > You might want to ask on rec.food.equipment, as well. Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine wrote:
> "cyber****" wrote: > > >Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > >(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby > >old Queen.) > > >This one looks good: > > >http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > >What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf, > >at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives. > > >Yes, I am also googling the group. > > You might want to ask on rec.food.equipment, as well. What for... just enlarge the picturre at the web site... res ipsa loquitur. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Christine Dabney" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:25:51 -0500, "cybercat" > > wrote: > >>Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. >> >>(Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby >>old Queen.) >> >>This one looks good: >> >>http://tinyurl.com/29479d >> >>What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and >>meatloaf, >>at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives. >> >>Yes, I am also googling the group. >> >> > > You might want to ask on rec.food.equipment, as well. > > Christine Do you have a Kitchen Aid? There is an attachment for grinding meat. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kswck" > wrote > Do you have a Kitchen Aid? There is an attachment for grinding meat. I don't. Do you use yours for grinding meat? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes and for grinding pork for sausage.
"cybercat" > wrote in message ... > > "Kswck" > wrote >> Do you have a Kitchen Aid? There is an attachment for grinding meat. > > I don't. Do you use yours for grinding meat? > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kswck" > wrote in message ... > Yes and for grinding pork for sausage. > How much beef, say, do you grind at a time? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby > old Queen.) > > This one looks good: > > http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf, > at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives. > > Yes, I am also googling the group. > > > That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from Northern a few years ago that works great) Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zxcvbob" > > > That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was young, we > would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage at a time. > > Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from > Northern a few years ago that works great) > This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "cybercat" > wrote in message .. . > > "zxcvbob" > >> >> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was young, we >> would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage at a time. >> >> Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from >> Northern a few years ago that works great) >> > > > This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. > > http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe > > Duh, the number 10 is on the side. So it is the same size. The bigger the number, the smaller the unit, eh? > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> "zxcvbob" > >> >> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was >> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage >> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I >> bought from >> Northern a few years ago that works great) >> > > > This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. > > http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you prepared to have screws drilled into your table? Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > cybercat wrote: >> "zxcvbob" > >>> >>> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was >>> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage >>> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I >>> bought from >>> Northern a few years ago that works great) >>> >> >> >> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. >> >> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe > > Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you > prepared to have screws drilled into your table? > > Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage Ohhh, I see. I had thought the free standing ones were somehow weighted. So now I have to decide between a clamp-on or an electric. Do you have one? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message > ... >> cybercat wrote: >>> "zxcvbob" > >>>> >>>> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was >>>> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of >>>> sausage at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric >>>> #12 that I bought from >>>> Northern a few years ago that works great) >>>> >>> >>> >>> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. >>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe >> >> Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you >> prepared to have screws drilled into your table? >> >> Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage > > Ohhh, I see. I had thought the free standing ones were somehow > weighted. So now I have to decide between a clamp-on or an electric. > Do you have one? I do have a clamp on one but a long time ago I bought an electric one ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Ophelia wrote: > cybercat wrote: > > "zxcvbob" > > >> > >> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was > >> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage > >> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I > >> bought from > >> Northern a few years ago that works great) > >> > > > > > > This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. > > > > http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe > > Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you > prepared to have screws drilled into your table? > > Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage > > No worries, she has a speculum and stirrups drilled right into her dining room table so the neighborhood boys can come in for lascivious viewing sessions, she charges a solid quarter from what I hear...she calls it "cybertwot's THRILL Arcade". :-D -- Best Greg "I am smarter than you think I am" - Maryanne "Loafhead" Kehoe to me in alt.gossip.celebrities |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 4, 12:15?am, "Gregory Morrow"
> wrote: > Ophelia wrote: > > cybercat wrote: > > > "zxcvbob" > > > > >> That one is too large for small batches like that. when I was > > >> young, we would use a #10 grinder to make 20 to 30 pounds of sausage > > >> at a time. Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I > > >> bought from > > >> Northern a few years ago that works great) > > > > This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. > > > >http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe > > > Since it has holes drilledinto it to secure it to the table, are you > > prepared to have screws drilled into your table? > > > Those clamp ones do at least cause (very little) damage > > No worries, she has a speculum and stirrups drilled right into her dining > room table so the neighborhood boys can come in for lascivious viewing > sessions, she charges a solid quarter from what I hear...she calls it > "cybertwot's THRILL Arcade". Cybertwot's the one receiving all the THRILLS, knowing young boys are viewing her cavernous gaping maw without their puking. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:02:20 -0500, cybercat wrote: > >> This one looks smaller, but I cannot find any specs. >> >> http://tinyurl.com/2eb8oe > > The stainless steel is certainly a huge plus, but for $20-$50 > more you could get a pretty decent electric versions that support > other types of attachments. I read a review that said the stainless model did not hold up for one purchaser. But I think he was grinding whole deer, hooves and all. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zxcvbob" > wrote > Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from > Northern a few years ago that works great) > Does this one actually say "52??" http://tinyurl.com/yraj5k -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"cyberbeast" wrote:
> "zxcvbob" > wrote > > > Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from > > Northern a few years ago that works great) > > Does this one actually say "52??" That's your hip measurement. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> "zxcvbob" > wrote >> Is there a #22 available? (I have an electric #12 that I bought from >> Northern a few years ago that works great) >> > > Does this one actually say "52??" > > http://tinyurl.com/yraj5k > > > "32". That's the largest size you can readily buy plates and knives for. "22" is smaller, but still pretty big. "10" and "12" are smaller still and use interchangeable cutters. 10 clamps to the edge of the table and 12 bolts to it. There are also #8 and #5 grinders. I would not get anything smaller than an #8. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zxcvbob" > wrote > > "32". That's the largest size you can readily buy plates and knives for. > > "22" is smaller, but still pretty big. > > "10" and "12" are smaller still and use interchangeable cutters. 10 > clamps to the edge of the table and 12 bolts to it. > > There are also #8 and #5 grinders. I would not get anything smaller than > an #8. > Oh. I see. When you said you had a number 12, from the context of the post I thought larger numbers meant smaller grinder. Looks like the #10 is the smallest Northern Tools carries. Do you have an electric? And if yours is manual does it clamp or screw or just sit there? Is there no grinder that does not have to be attached to something, unless it is electric? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zxcvbob" > wrote: > > There are also #8 and #5 grinders. I would not get anything smaller than > an #8. > This one looks all right. http://tinyurl.com/ywt8el -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Thu 01 Nov 2007 05:25:51p, cybercat meant to say...
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you > flabby old Queen.) > > This one looks good: > > http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and > meatloaf, at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after > it arrives. > > Yes, I am also googling the group. > > > > Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric. -- Wayne Boatwright (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com) __________________________________________________ ____________ Reality is nothing but a collective hunch. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote > > Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric. > Just for ease of use? -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh pshaw, on Fri 02 Nov 2007 11:08:48a, cybercat meant to say...
> > "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote >> >> Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric. >> > > Just for ease of use? > > > Yes... Call me lazy! :-) Actually, I would feel that I could be more productive. Also, if you're inclined to use the sausage stuffer, you have 2 free hands to work with it, rather than having to crank with one. Of course, that's a moot point if you have more than one person. -- Wayne Boatwright (to e-mail me direct, replace cox dot net with gmail dot com) __________________________________________________ ____________ Reality is nothing but a collective hunch. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message .184... > Oh pshaw, on Fri 02 Nov 2007 11:08:48a, cybercat meant to say... > >> >> "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote >>> >>> Nothing at all wrong with that one, but I would prefere electric. >>> >> >> Just for ease of use? >> >> >> > > Yes... Call me lazy! :-) > > Actually, I would feel that I could be more productive. Also, if you're > inclined to use the sausage stuffer, you have 2 free hands to work with > it, > rather than having to crank with one. Of course, that's a moot point if > you have more than one person. > The chief draw, for me, of a manual *anything* is that it is cheaper to replace/repair. I am not sure if I would make my own sausage or not. It sounds tempting. Thanks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 7:25 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby > old Queen.) > > This one looks good: > > http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf, > at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives. >From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops out in front of you onto...I guess a plate. To me, it looks like it would be awkward to use. Is there a way to anchor it down? Because it's going to require some elbow grease to do this and you don't want the whole thing sliding around as you grind. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 7:59?pm, Christopher Helms > wrote:
> On Nov 1, 7:25 pm, "cybercat" > wrote: > > > Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby > > old Queen.) > > > This one looks good: > > >http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and meatloaf, > > at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after it arrives. > >From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with > > the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops > out in front of you onto...I guess a plate. To me, it looks like it > would be awkward to use. Is there a way to anchor it down? Because > it's going to require some elbow grease to do this and you don't want > the whole thing sliding around as you grind. That particular style grinder is designed to be bolted directly to a table/counter or bolted directly to a sturdy piece of lumber and then the lumber clamped to a table/counter with a couple of heavy C clamps. But that size grinder is much too large for home use, and would be too difficult to crank without having others take turns, or convert it to motorized (very dangerous), and it's very important to grind meat expeditiously, to get the job done quickly before the meat and the grinder become warm. And that particular size/type grinder would be okay for someone with hundreds of pounds of meat to grind once a year if it wasn't the poorest quality piece of made in china crap $40 could buy... I wouldn't buy it for $4 (in fact I wouldn't have one for free), it wouldn't even make a decent door stop. There's a lot more to know about grinding meat than buying the biggest cheapest piece of crap grinder.... the smallest lowest priced electric ginder is a hundred times better than that cybercooz crap... even the teensy toys r us kitchen aid attachment is better than that chinese hunk-a-junk. Anyone wanting to buy a grinder you need to spend for something of quality or you're not giving the concept a fair chance from the start... a grinder costing less than the meat you grind says something about those who would consider it, and not very nice. Sheldon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 7:22 pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:59:52 -0700, Christopher Helms wrote: > > From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with > > the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops > > out in front of you onto...I guess a plate. > > All the manual grinders I've seen are designed that way - to be > used over the edge of the counter. Even the ones that are taller > and clamp to the edge of a table/counter. > > Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage. > > -sw The ones that clamp onto the edge of a table or counter easily will allow the ground meat to fall into a dish in front of the grinder - NOT over the edge. I have my gramma's, and that's how it works. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy2" > wrote in message ps.com... > On Nov 1, 7:22 pm, Sqwertz > wrote: >> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:59:52 -0700, Christopher Helms wrote: >> > From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with >> > the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops >> > out in front of you onto...I guess a plate. >> >> All the manual grinders I've seen are designed that way - to be >> used over the edge of the counter. Even the ones that are taller >> and clamp to the edge of a table/counter. >> >> Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage. >> >> -sw > > > The ones that clamp onto the edge of a table or counter easily will > allow the ground meat to fall into a dish in front of the grinder - > NOT over the edge. I have my gramma's, and that's how it works. > I really don't want one that clamps. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"cybercat" wrote:
> > I really don't want one that clamps. Why not, most women do.... wait, maybe I can give you a few nips n' tucks, let me get my gorilla glue. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> > Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage. Your personal stats... making a pass at cybersquat. hehe |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sheldon wrote: > Sqwertz wrote: > > > > Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage. > > Your personal stats... making a pass at cybersquat. hehe > "The mind judders..." -- Best Greg "I am smarter than you think I am" - Maryanne "Loafhead" Kehoe to me in alt.gossip.celebrities |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:59:52 -0700, Christopher Helms wrote: > >> From the photo, the handle seems too long. You'll be cranking it with >> the handle over the edge of the counter while the ground meat drops >> out in front of you onto...I guess a plate. > > All the manual grinders I've seen are designed that way - to be > used over the edge of the counter. Even the ones that are taller > and clamp to the edge of a table/counter. > > Squat body to help stability; and long handle for leverage. > > -sw I've got one with a long handle like that. Remember the longer the lever arm, the easier it is to grind. Just make sure whatever you anchor it to is hefty enough that it won't lift up if you hit a tough spot in the meat. Been there, done that when the kitchen table started to tilt the wrong way. I now use the kitchen counter top to anchor to. -- Jack N2MPU Proud NRA Life Member |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "cybercat" > wrote in message ... > Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby > old Queen.) > > This one looks good: > > http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > What I want it for is grinding 4-5 lbs of beef max for burgers and > meatloaf, at least for now. I'm sure I will find other uses for it after > it arrives. > > Yes, I am also googling the group. Looks like possibly a bit large for 5 pounds at a time, but will get the job done. Good price also. I use the grinder attachment for the KA and do 15 to 20 pounds at a time for sausage. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 1, 7:25 pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> Some input would be nice, from those of you who may be so inclined. > > (Except you, Sheldon, you stupid old dickhead. And you Morrow, you flabby > old Queen.) > > This one looks good: > > http://tinyurl.com/29479d > > What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's securely fastened to something. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy2" > wrote >> > What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's > securely fastened to something. > Okay, I get it. Tell me this: does it mess up the thing is it clamped to? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 2, 2:39?pm, "cybercat" > wrote:
> "Nancy2" > wrote > > > > > What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's > > securely fastened to something. > > Okay, I get it. Tell me this: does it mess up the thing is it clamped to? Not if it's clamped to your face. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> "Nancy2" > wrote >>> >> What are you going to fasten it to? You can't use it unless it's >> securely fastened to something. >> > > Okay, I get it. Tell me this: does it mess up the thing is it clamped > to? If you put something between the clamp and the table ie cloth or paper, it ought not not mess it up ![]() I guess it depends on how posh your table is ![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Meat Grinder | Barbecue | |||
Not A Meat Grinder. | General Cooking | |||
New meat grinder | Barbecue | |||
meat mincer meat grinder | Cooking Equipment | |||
meat grinder now what! | Preserving |