Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
....culinarily speaking, anyways. Howzabout you...???
;-) It's going to be a super - cold and sub - zero weekend here in Chicago, wind chills in the minus 20 or so cataegory...great for making stick - to - the - ribs fare. I am all stocked up vittles - wise. On the menu to make is: - Guinness beef stew (crockpot) w/buttermilk bisquits - Chicken - sausage gumbo (crockpot) w/cheddar - jalapeno cornbread - Bread - baking! I'm going to try my had at this "Artisan bread in five minutes" recipe, has anyone tried it? (I am *not* going to fiddle with a baking stone, no need for that, a baking sheet will do) : http://krisgardens.blogspot.com/2008...nutes-day.html Friday, January 4, 2008 Artisan Bread in Five Minutes a Day "I found the bread recipe that I'm experimenting with published on a local TV website. So, here is what they published. The book starts with this basic dough recipe and also has tons of other doughs that follow the same basic principles. The book is "Artisan Bread in Five Minutes a Day" by Jeff Hertzberg and Zoe Francois. Their website is http://www.artisanbreadinfive.com/ Master Recipe Artisan Bread in Five Minutes a Day: the Discovery that Revolutionizes Home Baking (Thomas Dunne Books / St. Martin's Press, Nov 2007) The full recipe as it appears in the book provides more detail, but most home bakers will be able to get a start on five-minute a day homemade bread with this short version of the recipe. Preparation time: 15 minutes to prepare enough dough for four loaves, to be baked over four days. Each daily loaf will average 5 minutes of active preparation time.Makes four 1-pound loaves 3 cups lukewarm water (about 100º F) 1 1/2 tablespoons granulated yeast 1 1/2 tablespoons kosher or other coarse salt 6 1/2 cups all-purpose white flour (no need to sift) Cornmeal for the pizza peel. In a 5-quart bowl, mix the yeast, water and salt. Add all the flour, then use a wooden spoon to mix until all ingredients are uniformly moist. It is not necessary to knead or continue mixing once the ingredients are uniformly moist. This will produce a loose and very wet dough. 2.Cover with a lid (not airtight). Allow the mixture to rise at room temperature until it begins to collapse, about 2 hours, but no more than 5 hours. 3. After rising, the dough can be baked immediately, or covered (non completely airtight) and refrigerated up to 14 days. The dough will be easier to work with after at least 3 hours refrigeration. 4. On baking day, prepare a pizza peel by sprinkling it liberally with cornmeal to prevent the bread from sticking when you transfer it to the oven. Uncover the dough and sprinkle the surface with flour. Pull up and cut off a 1-pound (grapefruit-size) piece of dough (serrated knives are best). Store the remaining dough in the bowl and refrigerate for baking at another time. 5. Hold the mass of dough in your hands and add a little more flour as needed so it won't stick. Create a smooth ball of dough by gently pulling the sides down around to the bottom, rotating the ball a quarter-turn as you go. While shaping, most of the dusting flour will fall off. The bottom of the loaf may appear to be a collection of bunched ends, but it will flatten out during resting and baking. Shaping the loaf this way should take no more than 1 minute. 6.Place the dough on the pizza peel. Allow the loaf to rest for about 40 minutes. It does not need to be covered. The bread may not rise much during this time. 7. Twenty minutes before baking, place a pizza stone on the center rack of the oven. If you don't have a baking stone, use another baking sheet. Remove any upper racks. Place a broiler pan on a rack below the pizza stone or on the floor of the oven. Preheat oven to 450 F. 8. When the dough has rested for 40 minutes, dust the top liberally with flour, then use a serrated knife to slash a 1/4-inch-deep cross or tic-tac-toe pattern into the top. 9.Slide the loaf off the peel and onto the baking stone. Quickly but carefully pour 1 cup of hot water into the broiler tray and close the oven door. 10.Bake for about 30 minutes, or until the crust is nicely browned and firm to the touch. Allow the bread to cool completely, preferably on a wire cooling rack. (I do the original mix with a Kitchen Aid mixer) What I like about this recipe over the No-Knead recipe is that you make enough for 4-8 loaves at one time - let it rise about 2 hrs - stick it in the refrigerator - and then make the bread by the loaf over the next 14 days. Each day that you make a loaf, you take less than a minute to shape the loaf and let it rise for up to 40 minutes - and bake for about 30 minutes. My experience with the No Knead was that our house is too cool in the winter, and it took over 30 hours to rise - and I had to do that for each loaf. I still have some kinks to work out before I'm completely sold on this - but so far, I'm thinking it might be a winner. If you're interested in the No Knead bread, Kitt has an excellent step-by-step post at: http://kittbo.blogspot.com/2006/12/n...p-by-step.html From the "comments" section: Hi Kris, My name is Zoe Francois and I am one of the co-authors of Artisan Bread In Five Minutes A Day. Thank you so much for trying the bread, your loaf looks beautiful! I'm glad you've posted the recipe so others can try it. There are two things that I do to prevent the dough from sticking to the peel. I use a generous amount of corn meal under the loaf and just before I slide it onto the stone I give the bread a slight nudge to make sure it isn't stuck to the peel. If it is, I dust just a little more cornmeal under the loaf. I also use a metal bench scraper or spatula to clean the cornmeal off the stone so that I don't get smoked out of house and home. I find this only happens when I am baking pizza at 550 degrees so I was interested to read that you are having it happen at 450 degrees. If you venture into the book check out the errata page on my website www.zoebakes.com first. As much as we tried to catch all the errors while editing we missed some things. Thanks again and I look forward to hearing more about your experience with the bread. Zoe 1/06/2008 11:23 PM " </> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message ... > > Hi Kris, > > My name is Zoe Francois and I am one of the co-authors of Artisan Bread In > Five Minutes A Day. Thank you so much for trying the bread, your loaf > looks > beautiful! <snipped> I'm glad you've posted the recipe so others can try it.> If you venture into the book check out the errata page on my website. > www.zoebakes.com first. As much as we tried to catch all the errors while > editing we missed some things. > > Zoe > > 1/06/2008 11:23 PM " > Regarding the book by Zoe, I just purchased the book and am waiting for it's arrival. On errata page, this certainly concerns me: She says: "Throughout the book we call for 1 1/2 tablespoons of yeast (1 1/2 packets), It should read (2 packets!!!)" I always thought that a packet is 2-1/4 teaspoons. So, in each recipe all of them should use 5-1/2 teaspoons? Depending on how much flour is used, that's a LOT of yeast! The same amount of yeast is used in each and every recipe? Now, I'm starting to question the whole book's recipes. :-((( Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee.Dee" > wrote in message ... > > "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in > message ... > >> >> Hi Kris, >> >> My name is Zoe Francois and I am one of the co-authors of Artisan Bread >> In >> Five Minutes A Day. Thank you so much for trying the bread, your loaf >> looks >> beautiful! > > <snipped> > > I'm glad you've posted the recipe so others can try it.> If you venture > into the book check out the errata page on my website. >> www.zoebakes.com first. As much as we tried to catch all the errors while >> editing we missed some things. >> > >> Zoe >> >> 1/06/2008 11:23 PM " >> > > > Regarding the book by Zoe, I just purchased the book and am waiting for > it's arrival. > > On errata page, this certainly concerns me: > > She says: > "Throughout the book we call for 1 1/2 tablespoons of yeast (1 1/2 > packets), It should read (2 packets!!!)" > > > I always thought that a packet is 2-1/4 teaspoons. So, in each recipe all > of them should use 5-1/2 teaspoons? > > Depending on how much flour is used, that's a LOT of yeast! > The same amount of yeast is used in each and every recipe? > > Now, I'm starting to question the whole book's recipes. :-((( > > Dee Dee > > Correction: 4-1/2 teaspoons! Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee.Dee" > wrote in
: > I always thought that a packet is 2-1/4 teaspoons. So, in each recipe > all of them should use 5-1/2 teaspoons? > 1 tablespoon (in the USA) is 3 tsp. Therefore 1/2 tbsp is 1 1/2 tsp. Hence 1 1/2 tbsp is 4 1/2 tsp not the 5 1/2 so you figured. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan It'll be a sunny day in August, when the Moon will shine that night- Elbonian Folklore |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hahabogus" > wrote in message ... > "Dee.Dee" > wrote in > : > >> I always thought that a packet is 2-1/4 teaspoons. So, in each recipe >> all of them should use 5-1/2 teaspoons? >> > > 1 tablespoon (in the USA) is 3 tsp. Therefore 1/2 tbsp is 1 1/2 tsp. > > Hence 1 1/2 tbsp is 4 1/2 tsp not the 5 1/2 so you figured. > Yes, I corrected myself immediately. typo. Still, that was not my point -- 4-1/2 tsp, depending on amount of flour is probably too much for me or anyone else unless they like the totally yeasty taste -- and the fact that ALL receipes use the same amount -- really, now! Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee.Dee" > wrote in message
... > > > > Yes, I corrected myself immediately. typo. > > Still, that was not my point -- 4-1/2 tsp, depending on amount of flour is > probably too much for me or anyone else unless they like the totally > yeasty taste -- and the fact that ALL receipes use the same amount -- > really, now! > Dee Dee Haven't seen any of the other recipes, but if they all make 4 loaves it's not surprising they all call for the same amount of yeast. The recipe as posted above calls for 6 1/2 cups of flour. A quick Google yielded what is claimed to be James Beard's bread recipe (I'm too lazy to go downstairs and dig out bread recipes. The recipe calls for about 3 3/4 cups of flour and 1 package of yeast. Two packages to 6 1/2 cups of flour sounds about right to me. Anny |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Anny Middon" > wrote in message ... > "Dee.Dee" > wrote in message > ... >> >> >> >> Yes, I corrected myself immediately. typo. >> >> Still, that was not my point -- 4-1/2 tsp, depending on amount of flour >> is probably too much for me or anyone else unless they like the totally >> yeasty taste -- and the fact that ALL receipes use the same amount -- >> really, now! >> Dee Dee > Haven't seen any of the other recipes, but if they all make 4 loaves it's > not surprising they all call for the same amount of yeast. > > The recipe as posted above calls for 6 1/2 cups of flour. A quick Google > yielded what is claimed to be James Beard's bread recipe (I'm too lazy to > go downstairs and dig out bread recipes. The recipe calls for about 3 3/4 > cups of flour and 1 package of yeast. > > Two packages to 6 1/2 cups of flour sounds about right to me. > > Anny My standard for yeast is no more than 1-1/2 teaspoons for 4 cups. Depending on the receipe, even less at times. Four loaves can mean any sized loaf. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MOMMY!!! Scary man, mommy!
<wail!!> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee.Dee" > wrote in message ... > > "Dee.Dee" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in >> message ... >> >>> >>> Hi Kris, >>> >>> My name is Zoe Francois and I am one of the co-authors of Artisan >>> Bread In >>> Five Minutes A Day. Thank you so much for trying the bread, your loaf >>> looks >>> beautiful! >> >> <snipped> >> >> I'm glad you've posted the recipe so others can try it.> If you >> venture into the book check out the errata page on my website. >>> www.zoebakes.com first. As much as we tried to catch all the errors >>> while >>> editing we missed some things. >>> >> >>> Zoe >>> >>> 1/06/2008 11:23 PM " >>> >> >> >> Regarding the book by Zoe, I just purchased the book and am waiting >> for it's arrival. >> >> On errata page, this certainly concerns me: >> >> She says: >> "Throughout the book we call for 1 1/2 tablespoons of yeast (1 1/2 >> packets), It should read (2 packets!!!)" >> >> >> I always thought that a packet is 2-1/4 teaspoons. So, in each recipe >> all of them should use 5-1/2 teaspoons? >> >> Depending on how much flour is used, that's a LOT of yeast! >> The same amount of yeast is used in each and every recipe? >> >> Now, I'm starting to question the whole book's recipes. :-((( >> >> Dee Dee >> >> > Correction: 4-1/2 teaspoons! > Dee Dee And a Tablespoon is 3 tsp, so 1 1/2 Tablespoons is 4.5 tsp or 2 packages. That is for a recipe with 3 cups water and 6 1/2 cups flour. Doesn't seem excessive to me. > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:44:43 -0500, "kilikini"
> wrote: > When I get off my butt, I'm going to make some stock here in a bit >so that I can make some sort of soup tomorrow. > Stock is an all day (night for me) affair - hope you managed to get it done. I know your soup will be delicious with a rich stock like you're making! -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:26:22 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: > >My standard for yeast is no more than 1-1/2 teaspoons for 4 cups. >Depending on the receipe, even less at times. Sounds like you like a slow rise. I like it yeasty and fast. ![]() -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Del Cecchi" > wrote in message ... > > "Dee.Dee" > wrote in message > ... >> >> "Dee.Dee" > wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in >>> message ... >>> >>>> >>>> Hi Kris, >>>> >>>> My name is Zoe Francois and I am one of the co-authors of Artisan Bread >>>> In >>>> Five Minutes A Day. Thank you so much for trying the bread, your loaf >>>> looks >>>> beautiful! >>> >>> <snipped> >>> >>> I'm glad you've posted the recipe so others can try it.> If you venture >>> into the book check out the errata page on my website. >>>> www.zoebakes.com first. As much as we tried to catch all the errors >>>> while >>>> editing we missed some things. >>>> >>> >>>> Zoe >>>> >>>> 1/06/2008 11:23 PM " >>>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding the book by Zoe, I just purchased the book and am waiting for >>> it's arrival. >>> >>> On errata page, this certainly concerns me: >>> >>> She says: >>> "Throughout the book we call for 1 1/2 tablespoons of yeast (1 1/2 >>> packets), It should read (2 packets!!!)" >>> >>> >>> I always thought that a packet is 2-1/4 teaspoons. So, in each recipe >>> all of them should use 5-1/2 teaspoons? >>> >>> Depending on how much flour is used, that's a LOT of yeast! >>> The same amount of yeast is used in each and every recipe? >>> >>> Now, I'm starting to question the whole book's recipes. :-((( >>> >>> Dee Dee >>> >>> >> Correction: 4-1/2 teaspoons! >> Dee Dee > And a Tablespoon is 3 tsp, so 1 1/2 Tablespoons is 4.5 tsp or 2 packages. > That is for a recipe with 3 cups water and 6 1/2 cups flour. Doesn't seem > excessive to me. > > However, it is to me. At any rate, I bought the book for the different techniques for different recipes, and I will hope that my adjustment of yeast will not ruin each recipe -- gee, do all the recipes call for the same hydration? I do not like yeasty bread and bread will rise wonderfully without that much yeast. I would use no more than 2 1/4 teaspoon (1 packet) for 6 cups (however, I measure my flour in ounces, and perhaps these recipes don't measure in ounces or grams.) Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() <sf> wrote in message ... > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:26:22 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > >> >>My standard for yeast is no more than 1-1/2 teaspoons for 4 cups. >>Depending on the receipe, even less at times. > > Sounds like you like a slow rise. I like it yeasty and fast. > > ![]() > > -- To me, 1-1/2 teasp for 4 cups isn't necessarily a slow rise; it is a standard for pizza dough in a bread machine rise, and if anyone has done dough in a bread machine, it pumps-up fast. However, I do like to rise in the refrigerator overnight for a slow rise. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:26:57 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: > >To me, 1-1/2 teasp for 4 cups isn't necessarily a slow rise; it is a >standard for pizza dough in a bread machine rise, and if anyone has done >dough in a bread machine, it pumps-up fast. ah. No bread machine here. I tough it out. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:17:14 -0500, "kilikini"
> wrote: >sf wrote: >> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:44:43 -0500, "kilikini" >> > wrote: >> >>> When I get off my butt, I'm going to make some stock here in a bit >>> so that I can make some sort of soup tomorrow. >>> >> Stock is an all day (night for me) affair - hope you managed to get it >> done. I know your soup will be delicious with a rich stock like >> you're making! > >I didn't realize that there was a ham bone in my "parts", so I've got a mix >of chicken and ham stock. I'm going to use some of it to make a potpie >filling today. And, yes, it WAS an all day affair and I had a blast doing >it. I really enjoy making stock. Allan came home from work yesterday (I >had lemon-garlic chicken in the oven roasting as well) and went, "Dang it >smells good in here!" (I even had all the doors and windows open, too!) > Ham bone? That pot is begging for some beans! -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() <sf> wrote in message ... > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:26:57 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > >> >>To me, 1-1/2 teasp for 4 cups isn't necessarily a slow rise; it is a >>standard for pizza dough in a bread machine rise, and if anyone has done >>dough in a bread machine, it pumps-up fast. > > ah. No bread machine here. I tough it out. > I don't tough it out; I've got tools up the whazoo to help me out. I never was strong enough to knead bread even in my 'younger' years. Happy kneading :-)) Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:57:06 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: > ><sf> wrote in message ... >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:26:57 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> wrote: >> >>> >>>To me, 1-1/2 teasp for 4 cups isn't necessarily a slow rise; it is a >>>standard for pizza dough in a bread machine rise, and if anyone has done >>>dough in a bread machine, it pumps-up fast. >> >> ah. No bread machine here. I tough it out. >> > > >I don't tough it out; I've got tools up the whazoo to help me out. >I never was strong enough to knead bread even in my 'younger' years. > >Happy kneading :-)) >Dee Dee I'm plenty strong and see no need to knead by hand when there's a bread machine and a KA mixer with a dough hook handy. Lou |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:57:06 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: > ><sf> wrote in message ... >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:26:57 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> wrote: >> >>> >>>To me, 1-1/2 teasp for 4 cups isn't necessarily a slow rise; it is a >>>standard for pizza dough in a bread machine rise, and if anyone has done >>>dough in a bread machine, it pumps-up fast. >> >> ah. No bread machine here. I tough it out. >> > > >I don't tough it out; I've got tools up the whazoo to help me out. >I never was strong enough to knead bread even in my 'younger' years. > >Happy kneading :-)) <snork> I don't knead either. That's what a food processor is for. ![]() -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<sf> wrote in message ...
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:57:06 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > >> >><sf> wrote in message ... >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:26:57 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>To me, 1-1/2 teasp for 4 cups isn't necessarily a slow rise; it is a >>>>standard for pizza dough in a bread machine rise, and if anyone has done >>>>dough in a bread machine, it pumps-up fast. >>> >>> ah. No bread machine here. I tough it out. >>> >> >> >>I don't tough it out; I've got tools up the whazoo to help me out. >>I never was strong enough to knead bread even in my 'younger' years. >> >>Happy kneading :-)) > > <snork> I don't knead either. That's what a food processor is for. > > ![]() I used to use my food processor to knead bread, but since I got a big KA mixer, I now use that. AFAICT the bread comes out the same, but it seems to me that the KA is easier to clean -- fewer parts to go in dishwasher and they can go on either dw shelf. I don't have a bread machine and don't particularly want one. I've got too much one-use kitchen stuff already -- I don't want to give up what has become precious counter and storage space for another large item. Anny |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:20:28 -0600, "Anny Middon"
> wrote: >I used to use my food processor to knead bread, but since I got a big KA >mixer, I now use that. AFAICT the bread comes out the same, but it seems to >me that the KA is easier to clean -- fewer parts to go in dishwasher and >they can go on either dw shelf. <sob> No KA either. Someday, my hints may not fall on deaf ears. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:59:23 -0800, sf wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:20:28 -0600, "Anny Middon" > wrote: > >>I used to use my food processor to knead bread, but since I got a big KA >>mixer, I now use that. AFAICT the bread comes out the same, but it seems to >>me that the KA is easier to clean -- fewer parts to go in dishwasher and >>they can go on either dw shelf. > ><sob> No KA either. Someday, my hints may not fall on deaf ears. Do what I did. Buy your own. ![]() Christine |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Anny Middon" > wrote in message ... > <sf> wrote in message ... >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:57:06 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> wrote: >> >>> >>><sf> wrote in message ... >>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:26:57 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>To me, 1-1/2 teasp for 4 cups isn't necessarily a slow rise; it is a >>>>>standard for pizza dough in a bread machine rise, and if anyone has >>>>>done >>>>>dough in a bread machine, it pumps-up fast. >>>> >>>> ah. No bread machine here. I tough it out. >>>> >>> >>> >>>I don't tough it out; I've got tools up the whazoo to help me out. >>>I never was strong enough to knead bread even in my 'younger' years. >>> >>>Happy kneading :-)) >> >> <snork> I don't knead either. That's what a food processor is for. >> >> ![]() > > I used to use my food processor to knead bread, but since I got a big KA > mixer, I now use that. AFAICT the bread comes out the same, but it seems > to me that the KA is easier to clean -- fewer parts to go in dishwasher > and they can go on either dw shelf. > > I don't have a bread machine and don't particularly want one. I've got > too much one-use kitchen stuff already -- I don't want to give up what has > become precious counter and storage space for another large item. > > Anny > I now have an Electrolux mixer. I still keep and use all the rest, FP, KA mixer, Bread machine. Except I don't use the KA anymore for bread; just keep it for use with the attachments I own. I have a Vita-Mix which they tout as making bread - I even tried it, but it's not a good idea. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Christine Dabney > wrote in
: > Do what I did. Buy your own. ![]() > I can't justify buying a KA mixer for myself. I don't bake enough. And the attachments for it are a joke AFAIK. I don't bake bread often and I rarely bake pie, cakes, cookies or bars...Only around special occasions do I bake. The odd birthday cake or pie and Xmas goodies is mostly what I'd need one for and dragging it out every 3 or 4 months seems not justifible to me. Plus I enjoy doing it mostly by hand, I get along with the FP and hand mixer nicely. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan It'll be a sunny day in August, when the Moon will shine that night- Elbonian Folklore |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:01:07 -0700, Christine Dabney
> wrote: >On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:59:23 -0800, sf wrote: > >>On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:20:28 -0600, "Anny Middon" > wrote: >> >>>I used to use my food processor to knead bread, but since I got a big KA >>>mixer, I now use that. AFAICT the bread comes out the same, but it seems to >>>me that the KA is easier to clean -- fewer parts to go in dishwasher and >>>they can go on either dw shelf. >> >><sob> No KA either. Someday, my hints may not fall on deaf ears. > >Do what I did. Buy your own. ![]() > Speak for yourself! I have two kids who can do it for me - just to say "Thanks, Mom. Without you and all your support, I wouldn't have this great job." ![]() sf Feeling a good guilt trip coming on... if they don't get the hint for my birthday, there's always Mother's Day. LOL! -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:32:39 GMT, hahabogus > wrote:
> I get along with the FP and hand mixer nicely. That's been me too. No real reason to buy one. Sure it would be nice to have that paddle or dough hook every so often, but I don't make a years worth of sausage so hand stuffing is fine by me. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: >I now have an Electrolux mixer. LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door to door salesman? http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, sf says...
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > > >I now have an Electrolux mixer. > > LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door > to door salesman? > > http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG > > I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan > from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? > > http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 > > I like that one a lot! Found it for $459: |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, sf says...
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > > >I now have an Electrolux mixer. > > LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door > to door salesman? > > http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG > > I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan > from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? > > http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 > > I like that one a lot. Found it a bit cheaper at $459: http://www.appliancehut.com/productdetails.asp?id=311 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:35:49 -0500, T >
wrote: >In article >, sf says... >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> wrote: >> >> >I now have an Electrolux mixer. >> >> LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door >> to door salesman? >> >> http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG >> >> I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan >> from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? >> >> http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 >> >> > >I like that one a lot. Found it a bit cheaper at $459: > >http://www.appliancehut.com/productdetails.asp?id=311 ![]() -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() <sf> wrote in message ... > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > >>I now have an Electrolux mixer. > > LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door > to door salesman? > > http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG > > I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan > from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? > > http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 > Here is a not-too-good video, but it certainly shows it in action. No audio throughout, but self-explanatory. http://www.everythingkitchens.com/electroluxvideo.html I wouldn't recommend it for someone not too interested in bread or the other things it will do -- although I bought it just for breadmaking. Big wise -- it's a monster. It'll eat you alive! One has to be prepared for a beast like this. (There are a couple of other posters here that have one.) I'm only new to it. But I'd buy it over again a thousand times. BTW, I had a good buying experience recently buying a distiller from Kodiak. Actually I bought the same distiller I had bought in 1975, which I no longer owned and wanted to start distilling again. (Just water, please!) Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "T" > wrote in message . .. > In article >, sf says... >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> wrote: >> >> >I now have an Electrolux mixer. >> >> LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door >> to door salesman? >> >> http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG >> >> I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan >> from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? >> >> http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 >> >> > > I like that one a lot! Found it for $459: $459 is a good price, but only if you bought it! I bought the 600w, although some say that 450 is as good, but the 600w is newer Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "T" > wrote in message . .. > In article >, sf says... >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> wrote: >> >> >I now have an Electrolux mixer. >> >> LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door >> to door salesman? >> >> http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG >> >> I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan >> from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? >> >> http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 >> >> > > I like that one a lot. Found it a bit cheaper at $459: > > http://www.appliancehut.com/productdetails.asp?id=311 Be sure and check their ratings or whatever it is to see if it is a reliable source. Make sure you have their address, an email, someone answers the phone, etc. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() <sf> wrote in message ... > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:35:49 -0500, T > > wrote: > >>In article >, sf says... >>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >>> wrote: >>> >>> >I now have an Electrolux mixer. >>> >>> LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door >>> to door salesman? >>> >>> http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG >>> >>> I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan >>> from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? >>> >>> http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 >>> >>> >> >>I like that one a lot. Found it a bit cheaper at $459: >> >>http://www.appliancehut.com/productdetails.asp?id=311 > > ![]() > I measured the footprint of both the KA mixer and the Electrolux. My KA mixer is the 5qt that you does not raise up backwards - it scoots up to lower and raise. you know what I mean. Basically the foot prints are KA 11 x 14 deep Electrolux 9-1/2 x 15 deep They are both heavy, but I feel the Electrolux is more clumsy to maneuver -- Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:58:47 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: >Basically the foot prints are >KA 11 x 14 deep >Electrolux 9-1/2 x 15 deep > >They are both heavy, but I feel the Electrolux is more clumsy to maneuver -- Thanks, Dee. It's all a consideration. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:50:29 -0500, "Dee.Dee" >
wrote: >Here is a not-too-good video, but it certainly shows it in action. No audio >throughout, but self-explanatory. >http://www.everythingkitchens.com/electroluxvideo.html > >I wouldn't recommend it for someone not too interested in bread or the other >things it will do -- although I bought it just for breadmaking. > >Big wise -- it's a monster. It'll eat you alive! One has to be prepared >for a beast like this. Thanks for that video.... wow, it is an intimidating monster! It would be kinda like buying a draft horse to pull a Radio Flyer wagon for me. It has a lot of parts and some of them are full of other parts. Not so sure I want to contend with that either. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "T" > wrote in message . .. > In article >, > says... >> >> <sf> wrote in message ... >> > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:04:38 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> > wrote: >> > >> >>I now have an Electrolux mixer. >> > >> > LOL - I thought Electrolux was a vacuum! Did you buy it from a door >> > to door salesman? >> > >> > http://www.appliancist.com/electrolux-assistent.JPG >> > >> > I like the looks of this Electrolux "mixer", maybe I'll switch my plan >> > from KA to that. How big is it (in inches, not quarts)? >> > >> > http://kodiakhealth.com/catalog/prod...oducts_id/2009 >> > >> >> >> >> Here is a not-too-good video, but it certainly shows it in action. No >> audio >> throughout, but self-explanatory. >> http://www.everythingkitchens.com/electroluxvideo.html >> >> I wouldn't recommend it for someone not too interested in bread or the >> other >> things it will do -- although I bought it just for breadmaking. >> >> Big wise -- it's a monster. It'll eat you alive! One has to be prepared >> for a beast like this. >> (There are a couple of other posters here that have one.) I'm only new >> to >> it. But I'd buy it over again a thousand times. >> >> BTW, I had a good buying experience recently buying a distiller from >> Kodiak. >> Actually I bought the same distiller I had bought in 1975, which I no >> longer >> owned and wanted to start distilling again. (Just water, please!) >> >> Dee Dee >> >> >> >> >> > > It slices, it dices, it does just about everything. Probably costs about > $8,000 when you get all the attachments but you'll never want for > anything else. > > I just want something that can handle batters and doughs. KA Mixer does a lot of the same extras things, which you do pay maybe $100 +/- for each attachment. I'm not sure about the prices on the Electrolux attachments -- they list them on line. I think they are in line with the rest of the machine; none of which I wanted, but didn't seem too exhorbitant to me; just too unwieldy to use. I bought the Electrolux for only batters and doughs myself. As I said, you have to be 'ready' for it. Most people only want the KitchenAid and do praise it. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, sf says...
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:50:29 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > > wrote: > > >Here is a not-too-good video, but it certainly shows it in action. No audio > >throughout, but self-explanatory. > >http://www.everythingkitchens.com/electroluxvideo.html > > > >I wouldn't recommend it for someone not too interested in bread or the other > >things it will do -- although I bought it just for breadmaking. > > > >Big wise -- it's a monster. It'll eat you alive! One has to be prepared > >for a beast like this. > > Thanks for that video.... wow, it is an intimidating monster! It > would be kinda like buying a draft horse to pull a Radio Flyer wagon > for me. It has a lot of parts and some of them are full of other > parts. Not so sure I want to contend with that either. > > Are you kidding me? I'm just anal enough that I'd have a special cabinet with drawers etc. for all the small parts. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:34:33 -0500, T >
wrote: >In article >, sf says... >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:50:29 -0500, "Dee.Dee" > >> wrote: >> >> >Here is a not-too-good video, but it certainly shows it in action. No audio >> >throughout, but self-explanatory. >> >http://www.everythingkitchens.com/electroluxvideo.html >> > >> >I wouldn't recommend it for someone not too interested in bread or the other >> >things it will do -- although I bought it just for breadmaking. >> > >> >Big wise -- it's a monster. It'll eat you alive! One has to be prepared >> >for a beast like this. >> >> Thanks for that video.... wow, it is an intimidating monster! It >> would be kinda like buying a draft horse to pull a Radio Flyer wagon >> for me. It has a lot of parts and some of them are full of other >> parts. Not so sure I want to contend with that either. >> >> > >Are you kidding me? I'm just anal enough that I'd have a special cabinet >with drawers etc. for all the small parts. My kitchen is stuffed as it is. We just stacked the w/d so we could add a pantry cabinet that relieves some of the burden from the kitchen. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smiley face first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hahabogus wrote:
> Christine Dabney > wrote in > : > >> Do what I did. Buy your own. ![]() >> > > I can't justify buying a KA mixer for myself. I don't bake enough. And the > attachments for it are a joke AFAIK. I *love* the grain-grinder attachment I have. I use it a few times a week. Bread made with freshly-ground grain is a joy. I would like the food grinder and the ice-cream attachment, and and and... Serene |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The weather is against me! | General Cooking | |||
Do you eat less in hot weather? | General Cooking | |||
The weather was . . . . . | General Cooking | |||
smoking in frigid weather | Barbecue | |||
OT weather | Barbecue |