Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To make duck stock, is it basically the same as chicken stock? And then
a demi-glace is stock reduced by half? Just need to make sure I don't screw this up... :-) -- 'Tis Herself |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Herself wrote:
> To make duck stock, is it basically the same as chicken stock? And then > a demi-glace is stock reduced by half? Duck stock will be more fatty than chicken stock and typically less gelatinous. Demi-glace is not just reduced stock. There's a limit to how much a bird stock can be reduced because the longer it cooks, the more flavor is lost. That's why beef and veal stocks are long-cooked and bird stocks aren't. Same for seafood stocks. Short cooking times. There is not true poultry demi-glace because it can't endure the lengthy cooking necessary. The best you'll do is to make a proper roux-thickened stock (skimmed as needed or use a pure starch like corn or potato, with some seasoning as for Espagnole sauce), add an equal volume of plain stock to it and reduce it to the original volume. That's closer to a real demi-glace and it should be reasonably rich. Pastorio |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Herself wrote:
> >To make duck stock, is it basically the same as chicken stock? Essentially the same recipe/procedure... plenty of info available on the net, he http://www.meilleurduchef.com/cgi/md...ce/fond_canard _ill.html >And then a demi-glace is stock reduced by half? Preparing a true demi glace is a bit more involved than a simple reduction... but there is no reason one couldn't reduce any stock to intensify flavor and to conserve storage space. Duck stock is best produced with uncooked parts, then chilled and defatted... duck fat is excellent for many recipes, wonderful as a spread on bread instead of butter. ---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =--- ---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =--- Sheldon ```````````` "Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation." |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PENMART01 > wrote:
> Herself wrote: > > > >To make duck stock, is it basically the same as chicken stock? > > Essentially the same recipe/procedure... plenty of info available on the net, > he > http://www.meilleurduchef.com/cgi/md...ce/fond_canard > _ill.html That's the site I was looking at :-). > Duck stock is best produced with uncooked parts, then > chilled and defatted... duck fat is excellent for many recipes, wonderful as a > spread on bread instead of butter. Hmmm...I have the cooked bones from the duck, plus the raw backbone and wings from trimming it. Should they all be roasted together? No, that's silly...roast the raw, add the cooked just to bring out a little flava, then do. Sound right? -- 'Tis Herself |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I think most CIA instructors would agree with Bob, I have had
wonderful success over the years making duck Dimi (except for the one time I did it overnight and my temp was too high and the water boiled off and I almost burnt down my house...). Short version: Roast the bones (even if already cooked) at 500 for approx 40 mines until VERY brown. in a stock pot: brown celery, carrots, onion (or leek), garlic, pepper corns after all are nicely colored, add 1.5 teaspoons - table spoon of tomato paste. Deglaze with about 1/4 cup of wine and cook until almost dry. Add bouquet garni (thyme, bay, etc) toss in the bones, cover with COLD water and bring up to a simmer slowly. Often I do not care to make a perfectly clear stock and just let it boil away. After about 6 hours you have something that is pretty much duck stock. I strain the bones and veggies, and return the stock to heat and reduce it to like 1.5 cups of liquid. That is pretty much duck dimi and its very rich and tasty. As little as a spoonful finishes sauces very nicely. You can also reconstitute it into lighter stock rather easily. If you are just making stock, omit the tomato paste and wine.... Good luck! -N "Herself" > wrote in message ... > To make duck stock, is it basically the same as chicken stock? And then > a demi-glace is stock reduced by half? > > Just need to make sure I don't screw this up... :-) > -- > 'Tis Herself |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Nick" <npdweb@nick-dawson.[removeme]com> wrote:
> Roast the bones (even if already cooked) at 500 for approx 40 mines until > VERY brown. I still have some raw bits (backbone, wings)...should I toss those in to roast as well? > If you are just making stock, omit the tomato paste and wine.... Would it be horrendous if I left out the tomato paste? We're a tomato-free household (yeah, I know...kills me sometimes). -- 'Tis Herself |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick wrote:
> While I think most CIA instructors would agree with Bob, Demi-glace is a classic technical term. It has a very specific culinary meaning. It's a "half-glaze" or not fully concentrated combination of an Espagnole sauce and additional stock. A true demi is made one way. What you describe below is a simple reduction. Not a bad thing, just not a demi-glace. It may well taste good, may well be thick and may well please you. But it isn't demi-glace. It's like saying you made a wonderful creamed corn by cooking green beans in a creamy sauce base. What you describe below is a classic roasted poultry stock with one flaw - no meat. It's an attempt to make a fonds brun (brown stock) with duck bones alone. The bones will provide some flavor, but the greatest percentage of the flavor and body will come from the meat. Cooking it for 6 hours will diminish the finished flavor. Typical poultry stock is cooked for 3 hours or less because it doesn't get better with long cooking. Pastorio > I have had > wonderful success over the years making duck Dimi (except for the one time I > did it overnight and my temp was too high and the water boiled off and I > almost burnt down my house...). > Short version: > Roast the bones (even if already cooked) at 500 for approx 40 mines until > VERY brown. > in a stock pot: brown celery, carrots, onion (or leek), garlic, pepper corns > after all are nicely colored, add 1.5 teaspoons - table spoon of tomato > paste. > Deglaze with about 1/4 cup of wine and cook until almost dry. > Add bouquet garni (thyme, bay, etc) > toss in the bones, cover with COLD water and bring up to a simmer slowly. > Often I do not care to make a perfectly clear stock and just let it boil > away. > After about 6 hours you have something that is pretty much duck stock. I > strain the bones and veggies, and return the stock to heat and reduce it to > like 1.5 cups of liquid. That is pretty much duck dimi and its very rich and > tasty. As little as a spoonful finishes sauces very nicely. You can also > reconstitute it into lighter stock rather easily. > > If you are just making stock, omit the tomato paste and wine.... > > Good luck! > -N > > > > "Herself" > wrote in message > ... > >>To make duck stock, is it basically the same as chicken stock? And then >>a demi-glace is stock reduced by half? >> >>Just need to make sure I don't screw this up... :-) >>-- >>'Tis Herself > > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PENMART01 > wrote:
> See above. Yes, you can mix in the roasted frame but then it won't taste much > like duck stock. I lived most of my life on Lung Guyland, where fresh LI > Duckling is plentiful and cheap... I always deboned the ducks, cooked the meat > on it's own (usually grilled) and made stock from the raw frames. There's not > much solid meat on duck anyway, more than 2/3 is frame and fat. I would get > 3-4 ducks to feed six so it would be a shame not to make stock from all that > carcass. I use the skimmed fat fro all sorts of things, especially great as > shortening for rustic breads and pie crusts. Hmmm...okay, I think I get it now. I had a college roommate from Ronkonkoma. I just like saying the name of that town. :-) We've saved all the fat (in the freezer right now), and the duck bits are in there too. So I just need to get my act together. Thanks. -- 'Tis Herself |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Herself wrote:
> I had a college roommate from Ronkonkoma. I just like saying the name > of that town. :-) That's just because you don't know anyone from Sheboygan. nancy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young > wrote:
> Herself wrote: > > > I had a college roommate from Ronkonkoma. I just like saying the name > > of that town. :-) > > That's just because you don't know anyone from Sheboygan. Hmmm....or Okeefenokee swamp. -- 'Tis Herself |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Herself" > wrote in message ... > "Nick" <npdweb@nick-dawson.[removeme]com> wrote: > > > Roast the bones (even if already cooked) at 500 for approx 40 mines until > > VERY brown. > > I still have some raw bits (backbone, wings)...should I toss those in to > roast as well? Yeah, toss those in too > > If you are just making stock, omit the tomato paste and wine.... > > Would it be horrendous if I left out the tomato paste? We're a > tomato-free household (yeah, I know...kills me sometimes). I don't see why not... the paste adds a little richness, etc but I've left it out plenty of times. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Peking Duck (Beijing Duck, Peking Roast Duck, ±±¾© | General Cooking | |||
duck duck dinner success! | General Cooking | |||
Q. re duck stock | General Cooking | |||
vegas trip: gumbo, gumbo, sushi, ribs, duck, duck, duck, crabcake, and the conundrum of kobe beef sliders | General Cooking | |||
Chicken stock and stock pots | Cooking Equipment |