Goto www.watkinsonline.com check out what they have to offer.
Associate ID # 376827 you will need The ID# when checking out.

In article
>,
Ron B > wrote:

> Goto [advertised URL] check out what they have to offer.
> Associate ID # 376827 you will need The ID# when checking out.

No thanks, I don't buy from spammers. I wonder what Watkins would have
to say if they knew you were spamming. Thanks for the ID number --
makes it easier to report you.

Miche

--
Electricians do it in three phases

On Feb 7, 12:43*am, Miche > wrote:
> In article
> >,
> *Ron B > wrote:
>
> > Goto [advertised URL] check out what they have to offer.
> > Associate ID # 376827 you will need The ID# when checking out.
>
> No thanks, I don't buy from spammers. *I wonder what Watkins would have
> to say if they knew you were spamming. *Thanks for the ID number --
> makes it easier to report you.
>
> Miche
>
> --
> Electricians do it in three phases

Miche

No thanks, I don't buy from spammers.

Sorry you think that I am a Spammer. But you can think what you want.
In my post I did not ask anyone to buy anything. Just go to the web
site and have a look. If you want to buy that is up to you.

Watkins Web site is Where you can go and order if you want Top Quality
Spices, Flavorings, and Vanilla along with other products. They also
have receipes that may be of interest to this Usenet Group.

PS IF I WAS TRYING TO SPAM THIS GROUP DO YOU REALLY THINK I WOULD HAVE
INCLUDED MY ID NUMBER?????

PSS one message, one group, group specific, no not spam

Again sorry you feel my post was spam

Ron B > wrote in news:1001f86b-ee7c-4da6-9b47-
:

> Sorry you think that I am a Spammer. But you can think what you want.
> In my post I did not ask anyone to buy anything. Just go to the web
> site and have a look. If you want to buy that is up to you.
>

This proves you're a spammer. We actively don't buy from businesses that
spam. How stupid do you think we are? How little business ethics does
Spamkins have?

--

The house of the burning beet-Alan

It'll be a sunny day in August, when the Moon will shine that night-
Elbonian Folklore

On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:03:24 -0800 (PST), Ron B >
wrote:

>Again sorry you feel my post was spam

Join us as a regular poster, contribute to the conversations.... use
your Watkins url as a sig line and there will be no more problem if
you aren't continually pushing your product in conversations. If
you've noticed we do have people here who sell products, but their
product is mentioned in their sig line - it's not the bulk of their
conversation.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first

Ron B wrote:

> Sorry you think that I am a Spammer.

You are.

> But you can think what you want.

Oh, we do.

> In my post I did not ask anyone to buy anything.

Spammers are liars, but we knew that ahead of time.

> Just go to the web site and have a look.

Or not.

> If you want to buy that is up to you.

What I did do was file a complaint with Watkins, including the full
message with your ID number there. We'll see if they do anything.





Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

Default User wrote:

> Ron B wrote:
>
> > Sorry you think that I am a Spammer.
>
> You are.
>
> > But you can think what you want.
>
> Oh, we do.
>
> > In my post I did not ask anyone to buy anything.
>
> Spammers are liars, but we knew that ahead of time.
>
> > Just go to the web site and have a look.
>
> Or not.
>
> > If you want to buy that is up to you.
>
> What I did do was file a complaint with Watkins, including the full
> message with your ID number there. We'll see if they do anything.

Response today:

Thank you for contacting Watkins Incorporated. We appreciate your
bringing this to our attention. We do have rules about spamming and
will take it up with our Associate. Please let me know if this
continues to be a problem.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

One time on Usenet, Ron B > said:
> On Feb 7, 12:43=A0am, Miche > wrote:
> > In article
> > >,
> > =A0Ron B > wrote:
> >
> > > Goto [advertised URL] check out what they have to offer.
> > > Associate ID #XXXXX you will need The ID# when checking out.
> >
> > No thanks, I don't buy from spammers. =A0I wonder what Watkins would have
> > to say if they knew you were spamming. =A0Thanks for the ID number --
> > makes it easier to report you.

> Sorry you think that I am a Spammer. But you can think what you want.
> In my post I did not ask anyone to buy anything. Just go to the web
> site and have a look. If you want to buy that is up to you.

<snip>

> PS IF I WAS TRYING TO SPAM THIS GROUP DO YOU REALLY THINK I WOULD HAVE
> INCLUDED MY ID NUMBER?????

Yes. That was rather the point, wasn't it? If you really weren't
a spammer, you would have posted the link *without* your ID number.
You posted it to drum up business in a commercial free forum. Aka,
"spam". Thus you are a spammer. Aka "asshole"...

--
Jani in WA

One time on Usenet, "Default User" > said:
> Default User wrote:

<snip>

> > What I did do was file a complaint with Watkins, including the full
> > message with your ID number there. We'll see if they do anything.
>
> Response today:
>
> Thank you for contacting Watkins Incorporated. We appreciate your
> bringing this to our attention. We do have rules about spamming and
> will take it up with our Associate. Please let me know if this
> continues to be a problem.

Good for you!

--
Jani in WA

In article
>,
Ron B > wrote:

> Sorry you think that I am a Spammer.

Unsolicited (as in unasked-for) sales posts are what spam is.

Miche

--
Electricians do it in three phases

One time on Usenet, Miche > said:
> In article
> >,
> Ron B > wrote:
>
> > Sorry you think that I am a Spammer.
>
> Unsolicited (as in unasked-for) sales posts are what spam is.

Disingenuous spammers are the worst -- give me a post and run any
day...

--
Jani in WA

Miche > wrote:
> *Ron B > wrote:
>
> > Goto [advertised URL] check out what they have to offer.
> > Associate ID # [complaint number here] you will need The ID# when checking out.
>
> No thanks, I don't buy from spammers.

You do however quote their contact data. Trim those posts!

Setting aside what associate to go through (I'm not one and tend
to go through ones at home shows so I don't have any to recommend)
I have been happy the times I've used their products. Different stuff
than Penzy's, similar good quality.

Little Malice wrote:

> One time on Usenet, "Default User" > said:
> > Default User wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > What I did do was file a complaint with Watkins, including the
> > > full message with your ID number there. We'll see if they do
> > > anything.
> >
> > Response today:
> >
> > Thank you for contacting Watkins Incorporated. We appreciate your
> > bringing this to our attention. We do have rules about spamming and
> > will take it up with our Associate. Please let me know if this
> > continues to be a problem.
>
> Good for you!

I hate spammers, but I really hate spammers that lie about spamming and
get all huffy about it. That motivates me to extra effort.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

"Ron B" > wrote in message

> Sorry you think that I am a Spammer.

> PSS one message, one group, group specific, no not spam

> Again sorry you feel my post was spam


It is not what we think it is what we KNOW. That one message was a
commercial message designed to enrich you at the expense of us. This is a
non-commercial newsgroup and it specifically prohibits commercial
advertising.

Reputable retailers buy advertising in venues that solicit it, such as
magazines, TV, radio etc. You don't see Sear, Proctor & Gamble, LL Bean,
etc hawking their wares here. Nor should you.

Sorry, but we consider people that try to get a free ride here as scum.
Learn about newsgroups and save yourself a lot of hassle. If you were a
regular contributor here we'd get to know you and your products and maybe
buy from you. As it is, you are an intruder looking for a freebee.

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in
. net:

>
> "Ron B" > wrote in message
>
>> Sorry you think that I am a Spammer.
>
>> PSS one message, one group, group specific, no not spam
>
>> Again sorry you feel my post was spam
>
>
> It is not what we think it is what we KNOW. That one message was a
> commercial message designed to enrich you at the expense of us. This
> is a non-commercial newsgroup and it specifically prohibits commercial
> advertising.
>
> Reputable retailers buy advertising in venues that solicit it, such as
> magazines, TV, radio etc. You don't see Sear, Proctor & Gamble, LL
> Bean, etc hawking their wares here. Nor should you.
>
> Sorry, but we consider people that try to get a free ride here as
> scum. Learn about newsgroups and save yourself a lot of hassle. If you
> were a regular contributor here we'd get to know you and your products
> and maybe buy from you. As it is, you are an intruder looking for a
> freebee.
>
>
>

I feel a Watkins bycott coming on unless they fire this yahoo. And maybe
even longer as they seem to not be reputabe in their business practices.

--

The house of the burning beet-Alan

It'll be a sunny day in August, when the Moon will shine that night-
Elbonian Folklore

In article >,
(Little Malice) wrote:

> One time on Usenet, "Default User" > said:
> > Default User wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > > What I did do was file a complaint with Watkins, including the full
> > > message with your ID number there. We'll see if they do anything.
> >
> > Response today:
> >
> > Thank you for contacting Watkins Incorporated. We appreciate your
> > bringing this to our attention. We do have rules about spamming and
> > will take it up with our Associate. Please let me know if this
> > continues to be a problem.
>
> Good for you!

Yes, thanks from me also.

I almost feel sorry for truckerron, though. Almost. He wasn't
obnoxious or pushy, and he took the time to reply to the charge of being
a spammer. A dedicated spammer responds to nothing but orders. Still,
some spammers are funny. "What do you mean I'm a spammer? I couldn't
be a spammer, I did it because I NEEDED MONEY!".

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA

One time on Usenet, Doug Freyburger > said:
> Miche > wrote:
> > =A0Ron B > wrote:
> >
> > > Goto [advertised URL] check out what they have to offer.
> > > Associate ID # [complaint number here] you will need The ID# when checki=
> ng out.
> >
> > No thanks, I don't buy from spammers.
>
> You do however quote their contact data. Trim those posts!
>
> Setting aside what associate to go through (I'm not one and tend
> to go through ones at home shows so I don't have any to recommend)
> I have been happy the times I've used their products. Different stuff
> than Penzy's, similar good quality.

My mother used to buy their stuff from a lady at work. We liked
it. She screwed up their butterscotch pudding base though -- the
milk was shown as two additions and she skipped one. It was like
eating sweet rubber...

--
Jani in WA

wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:03:24 -0800 (PST), Ron B
> > wrote:
>
>>Again sorry you feel my post was spam
>
> Join us as a regular poster, contribute to the conversations....
> use your Watkins url as a sig line and there will be no more
> problem if you aren't continually pushing your product in
> conversations. If you've noticed we do have people here who
> sell products, but their product is mentioned in their sig line
> - it's not the bulk of their conversation.

Another Google Gropes spammer that a proper gg filter (as versus a
gmail filter) would catch, as it did here.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

On 9 Feb 2008 18:59:57 GMT, Blinky the Shark >
wrote:

> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:03:24 -0800 (PST), Ron B
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>Again sorry you feel my post was spam
>>
>> Join us as a regular poster, contribute to the conversations....
>> use your Watkins url as a sig line and there will be no more
>> problem if you aren't continually pushing your product in
>> conversations. If you've noticed we do have people here who
>> sell products, but their product is mentioned in their sig line
>> - it's not the bulk of their conversation.
>
>Another Google Gropes spammer that a proper gg filter (as versus a
>gmail filter) would catch, as it did here.

Believe it or not, Blinky.... I don't care as much as you do.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first

wrote:

> On 9 Feb 2008 18:59:57 GMT, Blinky the Shark >
> wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:03:24 -0800 (PST), Ron B
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>Again sorry you feel my post was spam
>>>
>>> Join us as a regular poster, contribute to the conversations....
>>> use your Watkins url as a sig line and there will be no more
>>> problem if you aren't continually pushing your product in
>>> conversations. If you've noticed we do have people here who
>>> sell products, but their product is mentioned in their sig line
>>> - it's not the bulk of their conversation.
>>
>>Another Google Gropes spammer that a proper gg filter (as versus a
>>gmail filter) would catch, as it did here.
>
> Believe it or not, Blinky.... I don't care as much as you do.

Well, you keep complaining about spam.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Blinky: http://blinkynet.net

On 10 Feb 2008 00:17:35 GMT, Blinky the Shark >
wrote:

> wrote:
>
>> On 9 Feb 2008 18:59:57 GMT, Blinky the Shark >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:03:24 -0800 (PST), Ron B
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Again sorry you feel my post was spam
>>>>
>>>> Join us as a regular poster, contribute to the conversations....
>>>> use your Watkins url as a sig line and there will be no more
>>>> problem if you aren't continually pushing your product in
>>>> conversations. If you've noticed we do have people here who
>>>> sell products, but their product is mentioned in their sig line
>>>> - it's not the bulk of their conversation.
>>>
>>>Another Google Gropes spammer that a proper gg filter (as versus a
>>>gmail filter) would catch, as it did here.
>>
>> Believe it or not, Blinky.... I don't care as much as you do.
>
>Well, you keep complaining about spam.

You're right, I do complain about Spam ™. LOL

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:32:22 -0600, wrote:

>On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 07:03:24 -0800 (PST), Ron B >
>wrote:
>
>>On Feb 7, 12:43*am, Miche > wrote:
>>> In article
>>> >,
>>> *Ron B > wrote:
>>
>>PSS one message, one group, group specific, no not spam
>>
>>Again sorry you feel my post was spam
>
>Hey BITCH.

It takes one to know one.

>You spammed the group. PERIOD !!!!

Who appointed you deputy sheriff?

>You're out of a job. I hope you starve and lose your home, you
>worthless piece of shit.

OIC, you just escaped from the mental institution.
>
>You're a ****ing asshole.
>GO **** OFF and DIE !!!

Ahhhh, my exact thoughts about you. How kind of you to post them.
>
>By the way, since I know Watkins employees are SPAMMERS, I will be
>sure to NEVER buy anything from Watkins.

Like you would have anyway.

>
>YOU LOSE. **** YOU !!!!!
>
>GOODBYE GET LOST **** OFF
>
>PLONK
>-------------------
Why don't you plonk yourself for a change? It's probably the only
action you'll get all year.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smiley face first