I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:

3/4 cup flour
1 tablespoon rosemary
1 tablespoon thyme
2 tablespoons paprika
1 teaspoon cayenne
a goodly amount of salt.

Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin and
packing the flour mix underneath. In the end they were thickly coated and
dry on the outside.

I placed these legs in the hot baking dish for 15 minutes on 400F then
flipped them with a stainless spatula. they were crispy on the downside, and
smelled wonderful.

I reduced the temp to 375 and baked them for another 25 minutes.

They turned out really nice, the coating crispy in places and chewy in
others, KFC style but not as salty. The cayenne was a really nice addition.

We ate them with fresh cole slaw and skillet-fried potatoes with onions.

Did U make this in yer E - Z Bake Oven, cyberLAME...???

Lol...


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking


"cybercat" > wrote in message
...
> I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
> ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>
> 3/4 cup flour
> 1 tablespoon rosemary
> 1 tablespoon thyme
> 2 tablespoons paprika
> 1 teaspoon cayenne
> a goodly amount of salt.
>
> Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin
and
> packing the flour mix underneath. In the end they were thickly coated and
> dry on the outside.
>
> I placed these legs in the hot baking dish for 15 minutes on 400F then
> flipped them with a stainless spatula. they were crispy on the downside,
and
> smelled wonderful.
>
> I reduced the temp to 375 and baked them for another 25 minutes.
>
> They turned out really nice, the coating crispy in places and chewy in
> others, KFC style but not as salty. The cayenne was a really nice
addition.
>
> We ate them with fresh cole slaw and skillet-fried potatoes with onions.
>
>

cybercat wrote:
> I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
> ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>
> 3/4 cup flour
> 1 tablespoon rosemary
> 1 tablespoon thyme
> 2 tablespoons paprika
> 1 teaspoon cayenne
> a goodly amount of salt.
>
> Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin and
> packing the flour mix underneath. In the end they were thickly coated and
> dry on the outside.
>
> I placed these legs in the hot baking dish for 15 minutes on 400F then
> flipped them with a stainless spatula. they were crispy on the downside, and
> smelled wonderful.
>
> I reduced the temp to 375 and baked them for another 25 minutes.
>
> They turned out really nice, the coating crispy in places and chewy in
> others, KFC style but not as salty. The cayenne was a really nice addition.
>
> We ate them with fresh cole slaw and skillet-fried potatoes with onions.
>
>
Sounds like a nice simple idea and well worth trying. Thanks

--
John Kane, Kingston ON Canada

On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:

> I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
> ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>
> 3/4 cup flour
> 1 tablespoon rosemary
> 1 tablespoon thyme
> 2 tablespoons paprika
> 1 teaspoon cayenne
> a goodly amount of salt.
>
> Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin and
> packing the flour mix underneath.

Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.

What happened to the stuff under the skin?

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:
>
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>
> > I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
> > ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
> >
> > 3/4 cup flour
> > 1 tablespoon rosemary
> > 1 tablespoon thyme
> > 2 tablespoons paprika
> > 1 teaspoon cayenne
> > a goodly amount of salt.
> >
> > Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin and
> > packing the flour mix underneath.
>
> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>
> What happened to the stuff under the skin?

Never assume how other people live. This reminds me
of an Ann Landers column from many years ago in which
an anxious reader related her story about getting
together with some other housewives, and they were
talking about cleaning the bathroom and what a chore
it was to clean the toilet, when she discoverd that
one of the more challenging parts of that job (to
some of her friends) was cleaning the inside of the
toilet tank. She'd never heard of anybody doing that,
and she was writing to Ann to find out whether it was
normal to clean the inside of the tank. As I recall,
Ann had never heard of that either.

"Mark Thorson" > wrote in message
...
> Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>>
>> > I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in
>> > a
>> > ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>> >
>> > 3/4 cup flour
>> > 1 tablespoon rosemary
>> > 1 tablespoon thyme
>> > 2 tablespoons paprika
>> > 1 teaspoon cayenne
>> > a goodly amount of salt.
>> >
>> > Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the
>> > skin and
>> > packing the flour mix underneath.
>>
>> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>>
>> What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>
> Never assume how other people live. This reminds me
> of an Ann Landers column from many years ago in which
> an anxious reader related her story about getting
> together with some other housewives, and they were
> talking about cleaning the bathroom and what a chore
> it was to clean the toilet, when she discoverd that
> one of the more challenging parts of that job (to
> some of her friends) was cleaning the inside of the
> toilet tank. She'd never heard of anybody doing that,
> and she was writing to Ann to find out whether it was
> normal to clean the inside of the tank. As I recall,
> Ann had never heard of that either.

I've cleaned the inside of my tank at some of the places I've lived.
Sometimes it gets really mucky in there. Sometimes not. Not sure what
causes it.

Julie Bove wrote:

> I've cleaned the inside of my tank at some of the places I've lived.
> Sometimes it gets really mucky in there. Sometimes not. Not sure what
> causes it.

It is probably mostly particles of dirt from your water supply. Municipal water
is pretty clean, but there is still some stuff that gets through. I get water
from my well and the soil here is sandy loam, so there is a brownish sediment
that builds up rather quickly. Ever month or so I stir it up and give a few
flushes to purge it from the tank.

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:01:43 -0800, Mark Thorson wrote:

> Never assume how other people live. This reminds me
> of an Ann Landers column from many years ago in which
> an anxious reader related her story about getting
> together with some other housewives, and they were
> talking about cleaning the bathroom and what a chore
> it was to clean the toilet, when she discoverd that
> one of the more challenging parts of that job (to
> some of her friends) was cleaning the inside of the
> toilet tank. She'd never heard of anybody doing that,
> and she was writing to Ann to find out whether it was
> normal to clean the inside of the tank. As I recall,
> Ann had never heard of that either.

There is a scum that builds up in there, especially if that
toilet doesn't get used often. Bacteria in the air get in there
and breed, and can get slimey. Many toilet tanks have green
stains inside the porcelain tanks from mildew and such.

I still don't see that this has to do with chicken legs ;-)

-sw

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>
>> I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
>> ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>>
>> 3/4 cup flour
>> 1 tablespoon rosemary
>> 1 tablespoon thyme
>> 2 tablespoons paprika
>> 1 teaspoon cayenne
>> a goodly amount of salt.
>>
>> Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin
>> and
>> packing the flour mix underneath.
>
> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>
> What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>

It added to the nice, crispy, chewy breading. I think the key is to use more
flour mix than I have in the past, and to make sure the pieces are dry on
the outside before you put them in the oil. They were more "oven-fried"
than baked. Had I baked them at a lower initial temp, it would have been
like glue.

cybercat wrote:

> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
> >
> >> I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in
a
> >> ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
> >>
> >> 3/4 cup flour
> >> 1 tablespoon rosemary
> >> 1 tablespoon thyme
> >> 2 tablespoons paprika
> >> 1 teaspoon cayenne
> >> a goodly amount of salt.
> >>
> >> Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the
skin
> >> and
> >> packing the flour mix underneath.
> >
> > Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
> >
> > What happened to the stuff under the skin?
> >
>
> It added to the nice, crispy, chewy breading. I think the key is to use
more
> flour mix than I have in the past, and to make sure the pieces are dry on
> the outside before you put them in the oil. They were more "oven-fried"
> than baked. Had I baked them at a lower initial temp, it would have been
> like glue.


A backpedal lame...

--
Best
Greg

Sqwertz wrote:

> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>
> > I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
> > ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
> >
> > 3/4 cup flour
> > 1 tablespoon rosemary
> > 1 tablespoon thyme
> > 2 tablespoons paprika
> > 1 teaspoon cayenne
> > a goodly amount of salt.
> >
> > Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin
and
> > packing the flour mix underneath.
>
> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>
> What happened to the stuff under the skin?


Oh, Steve, that was just the part of the "experiment" that *failed*...don't
you know nothing, as they say...???

Anyways, why go to all this trouble for the scrawny amount of meat that's on
a chicken leg...the mind *boogles*...!!!


--
Bbest
Greg

"Gregory Morrow" wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote:
> > cyberthud wrote:
>
> > > Washed six, even pulling back the foreskin
> > > packing the flour mix underneath.
>
> > Flour under the skin? �That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>
> > What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>
> Oh, Steve, that was just the part of the "experiment"
> that *failed*...don't you know nothing, as they say...???
>
> Anyways, why go to all this trouble for the scrawny amount
> of meat that's on a chicken leg...the mind *boogles*...!!!

You ain't seen cyberthud's skinny widdle tiddies and
her mammoth thighs.

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/904/thighs7bj.jpg

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
...
>
> Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>>
>> > I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in
>> > a
>> > ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>> >
>> > 3/4 cup flour
>> > 1 tablespoon rosemary
>> > 1 tablespoon thyme
>> > 2 tablespoons paprika
>> > 1 teaspoon cayenne
>> > a goodly amount of salt.
>> >
>> > Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the
>> > skin
> and
>> > packing the flour mix underneath.
>>
>> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>>
>> What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>
>
> Oh, Steve, that was just the part of the "experiment" that
> *failed*...don't
> you know nothing, as they say...???
>
> Anyways, why go to all this trouble for the scrawny amount of meat that's
> on
> a chicken leg...the mind *boogles*...!!!
>
>
> --
> Bbest
> Greg
>
The mind "boogles"???
Wasn't that a word game we used to play?

Maybe you should just go away until you learn to play nice and maybe spell a
little better.

I happen to like chicken legs, and think they are well worth the trouble.

DP

"John Kane" > wrote
> Sounds like a nice simple idea and well worth trying. Thanks
>

Welcome. I just tried one out cold, and it was good that way
too. I think getting as much of the flour mixture on as possible
made all the difference in the flavor and texture. Heating the
oil first in the baking pan aided the browning and crisping, too.
The reason I put so little oil in is because I knew once I got
it started, the chicken was going to produce enough fat of its
own to finish up the crisping.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:01:43 -0800, Mark Thorson >
wrote:

>Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>>
>> > I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil in a
>> > ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>> >
>> > 3/4 cup flour
>> > 1 tablespoon rosemary
>> > 1 tablespoon thyme
>> > 2 tablespoons paprika
>> > 1 teaspoon cayenne
>> > a goodly amount of salt.
>> >
>> > Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the skin and
>> > packing the flour mix underneath.
>>
>> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>>
>> What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>
>Never assume how other people live. This reminds me
>of an Ann Landers column from many years ago in which
>an anxious reader related her story about getting
>together with some other housewives, and they were
>talking about cleaning the bathroom and what a chore
>it was to clean the toilet, when she discoverd that
>one of the more challenging parts of that job (to
>some of her friends) was cleaning the inside of the
>toilet tank. She'd never heard of anybody doing that,
>and she was writing to Ann to find out whether it was
>normal to clean the inside of the tank. As I recall,
>Ann had never heard of that either.

yeah, but as i recall ann ironed her handkerchiefs. or, more likely,
had her maid do so. or maybe it was abby.

your pal,
blake

Sqwertz wrote:
>
> There is a scum that builds up in there, especially if that
> toilet doesn't get used often. Bacteria in the air get in there
> and breed, and can get slimey. Many toilet tanks have green
> stains inside the porcelain tanks from mildew and such.
>
> I still don't see that this has to do with chicken legs ;-)

Well if those chickens go into the tank for a wee swim, they couldn't leave
their legs behind...............

I'll get my coat.................

"Ophelia" > ha scritto nel messaggio
...
> Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>> There is a scum that builds up in there, especially if that
>> toilet doesn't get used often. Bacteria in the air get in there
>> and breed, and can get slimey. Many toilet tanks have green
>> stains inside the porcelain tanks from mildew and such.
>>
>> I still don't see that this has to do with chicken legs ;-)
>
> Well if those chickens go into the tank for a wee swim, they couldn't
> leave their legs behind...............
>
> I'll get my coat.................

Snort!

Dale P wrote:
> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>> I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive
>>>> oil in a
>>>> ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
>>>>
>>>> 3/4 cup flour
>>>> 1 tablespoon rosemary
>>>> 1 tablespoon thyme
>>>> 2 tablespoons paprika
>>>> 1 teaspoon cayenne
>>>> a goodly amount of salt.
>>>>
>>>> Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the
>>>> skin
>> and
>>>> packing the flour mix underneath.
>>>
>>> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>>>
>>> What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>>
>>
>> Oh, Steve, that was just the part of the "experiment" that
>> *failed*...don't
>> you know nothing, as they say...???
>>
>> Anyways, why go to all this trouble for the scrawny amount of meat
>> that's on
>> a chicken leg...the mind *boogles*...!!!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bbest
>> Greg
>>
> The mind "boogles"???
> Wasn't that a word game we used to play?
>
> Maybe you should just go away until you learn to play nice and maybe
> spell a little better.
>
> I happen to like chicken legs, and think they are well worth the
> trouble.

*applause*

Gregory Morrow wrote:
> Sheldon wrote:

This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying. Have you seen
your phychiatrists lately?

You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.

Sheldon wrote:

"Gregory Morrow" wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote:
> > cyberthud wrote:
>
> > > Washed six, even pulling back the foreskin
> > > packing the flour mix underneath.
>
> > Flour under the skin? ?That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>
> > What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>
> Oh, Steve, that was just the part of the "experiment"
> that *failed*...don't you know nothing, as they say...???
>
> Anyways, why go to all this trouble for the scrawny amount
> of meat that's on a chicken leg...the mind *boogles*...!!!

You ain't seen cyberthud's skinny widdle tiddies and
her mammoth thighs.

http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/904/thighs7bj.jpg

------------------------

GM:

<chuckle/>

And it sounds like cyberPREPUCE could do with a good mohel, that way she
could forgoe that ICKY flour under the chikky foreskin mishegos...


--
Best
Greg

Dale Peon aka "Pee - On" escribe:
..
> "Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 12:33:32 -0500, cybercat wrote:
> >>
> >> > I preheated the oven to 400 F, put just a thin coating of olive oil
in
> >> > a
> >> > ceramic baking dish, them mixed up:
> >> >
> >> > 3/4 cup flour
> >> > 1 tablespoon rosemary
> >> > 1 tablespoon thyme
> >> > 2 tablespoons paprika
> >> > 1 teaspoon cayenne
> >> > a goodly amount of salt.
> >> >
> >> > Washed six chicken legs and coated them well, even pulling back the
> >> > skin
> > and
> >> > packing the flour mix underneath.
> >>
> >> Flour under the skin? That sounds like a recipe for glue.
> >>
> >> What happened to the stuff under the skin?
> >
> >
> > Oh, Steve, that was just the part of the "experiment" that
> > *failed*...don't
> > you know nothing, as they say...???
> >
> > Anyways, why go to all this trouble for the scrawny amount of meat
that's
> > on
> > a chicken leg...the mind *boogles*...!!!
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bbest
> > Greg
> >
> The mind "boogles"???
> Wasn't that a word game we used to play?
>
> Maybe you should just go away until you learn to play nice and maybe spell
a
> little better.
>
> I happen to like chicken legs, and think they are well worth the trouble.
>
> DP


You are just a DUMB CLUCK noob...and the cyberchickenshit's idiotic receipt
above does *nothing* except to "foul" the poor hapless "fowl", so to speak.


--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:

>Gregory Morrow wrote:
>> Sheldon wrote:
>
>This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying. Have you seen
>your phychiatrists lately?
>
>You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
>

it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.

your pal,
blake

blake murphy wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>
>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> Sheldon wrote:
>>
>> This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying. Have
>> you seen your phychiatrists lately?
>>
>> You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
>>
>
> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.

Heh

blake murphy wrote:

> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>
> >Gregory Morrow wrote:
> >> Sheldon wrote:
> >
> >This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying. Have you
seen
> >your phychiatrists lately?
> >
> >You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
> >
>
> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.
>


You are a *dirty* bird, blake...!!!

;-p

Anyways, I like to indulge the cybertwot in a bit of verbal bandiage now and
then, I *know* it makes it her day, lol...in fact she *couldn't* live
without me.


--
Best
Greg

Gregory Morrow wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>
>>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>> Sheldon wrote:
>>>
>>> This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying. Have
>>> you seen your phychiatrists lately?
>>>
>>> You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
>>>
>>
>> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.
>>
>
>
> You are a *dirty* bird, blake...!!!
>
> ;-p
>
> Anyways, I like to indulge the cybertwot in a bit of verbal bandiage
> now and then, I *know* it makes it her day, lol...in fact she
> *couldn't* live without me.

What on earth is 'bandiage'? Perhaps you meant 'badinage' or are you
strapping your sore wrist with it.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>> blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>>> Sheldon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying. Have
>>>> you seen your phychiatrists lately?
>>>>
>>>> You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.
>>>
>>
>>
>> You are a *dirty* bird, blake...!!!
>>
>> ;-p
>>
>> Anyways, I like to indulge the cybertwot in a bit of verbal bandiage
>> now and then, I *know* it makes it her day, lol...in fact she
>> *couldn't* live without me.
>
> What on earth is 'bandiage'? Perhaps you meant 'badinage' or are you
> strapping your sore wrist with it.

*snicker*

O' Feel Up proffers:

> Gregory Morrow wrote:
> > blake murphy wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
> >>>> Sheldon wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying. Have
> >>> you seen your phychiatrists lately?
> >>>
> >>> You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
> >>>
> >>
> >> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.
> >>
> >
> >
> > You are a *dirty* bird, blake...!!!
> >
> > ;-p
> >
> > Anyways, I like to indulge the cybertwot in a bit of verbal bandiage
> > now and then, I *know* it makes it her day, lol...in fact she
> > *couldn't* live without me.
>
> What on earth is 'bandiage'? Perhaps you meant 'badinage' or are you
> strapping your sore wrist with it.


Oh, look, Dame O' Feel Up proffers a spelling lame...in fact this is prolly
your most *substantial* contri ever to this froup.

<chuckle>


--
Best
Greg

Gregory Morrow wrote:
> O' Feel Up proffers:
>
>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>>>> Sheldon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying.
>>>>> Have you seen your phychiatrists lately?
>>>>>
>>>>> You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You are a *dirty* bird, blake...!!!
>>>
>>> ;-p
>>>
>>> Anyways, I like to indulge the cybertwot in a bit of verbal bandiage
>>> now and then, I *know* it makes it her day, lol...in fact she
>>> *couldn't* live without me.
>>
>> What on earth is 'bandiage'? Perhaps you meant 'badinage' or are
>> you strapping your sore wrist with it.
>
>
> Oh, look, Dame O' Feel Up proffers a spelling lame...in fact this is
> prolly your most *substantial* contri ever to this froup.

Well, I corrected your spelling mistake I can understand you being
embarrassed)))

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>> O' Feel Up proffers:
>>
>>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>>>>> Sheldon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying.
>>>>>> Have you seen your phychiatrists lately?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their arse-banditry.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You are a *dirty* bird, blake...!!!
>>>>
>>>> ;-p
>>>>
>>>> Anyways, I like to indulge the cybertwot in a bit of verbal bandiage
>>>> now and then, I *know* it makes it her day, lol...in fact she
>>>> *couldn't* live without me.
>>>
>>> What on earth is 'bandiage'? Perhaps you meant 'badinage' or are
>>> you strapping your sore wrist with it.
>>
>>
>> Oh, look, Dame O' Feel Up proffers a spelling lame...in fact this is
>> prolly your most *substantial* contri ever to this froup.
>
> Well, I corrected your spelling mistake I can understand you being
> embarrassed)))

I really love it when Greggie critiques *our* contributions to rfc.

Sheldon wrote:

> "Gregory Morrow" wrote:
> > Sqwertz wrote:
> > > cyberthud wrote:
>
> > > > Washed six, even pulling back the foreskin
> > > > packing the flour mix underneath.
>
> > > Flour under the skin? �That sounds like a recipe for glue.
>
> > > What happened to the stuff under the skin?
>
> > Oh, Steve, that was just the part of the "experiment"
> > that *failed*...don't you know nothing, as they say...???
>
> > Anyways, why go to all this trouble for the scrawny amount
> > of meat that's on a chicken leg...the mind *boogles*...!!!
>
> You ain't seen cyberthud's skinny widdle tiddies and
> her mammoth thighs.
>
> http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/904/thighs7bj.jpg


Didja know that the cyperSTINK eats cheep canned mackerel on crackers
in bed...her poor husband sez the smell is *so* rank it's like
sleeping with a seal.

;-p


--
Best
Greg

cybercat wrote:
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>> O' Feel Up proffers:
>>>
>>>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 22:33:13 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>>>>>> Sheldon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This obsession you two have on cybercat is becoming worrying.
>>>>>>> Have you seen your phychiatrists lately?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are really showing yourselves up and it is embarrassing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> it's a vain attempt to distract attention from their
>>>>>> arse-banditry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You are a *dirty* bird, blake...!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> ;-p
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, I like to indulge the cybertwot in a bit of verbal
>>>>> bandiage now and then, I *know* it makes it her day, lol...in
>>>>> fact she *couldn't* live without me.
>>>>
>>>> What on earth is 'bandiage'? Perhaps you meant 'badinage' or are
>>>> you strapping your sore wrist with it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, look, Dame O' Feel Up proffers a spelling lame...in fact this is
>>> prolly your most *substantial* contri ever to this froup.
>>
>> Well, I corrected your spelling mistake I can understand you
>> being embarrassed)))
>
> I really love it when Greggie critiques *our* contributions to rfc.

<G>

On Mon, 3 Mar 2008 15:13:07 -0500, "cybercat" >
wrote:

>
>"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh, look, Dame O' Feel Up proffers a spelling lame...in fact this is
>>> prolly your most *substantial* contri ever to this froup.
>>
>> Well, I corrected your spelling mistake I can understand you being
>> embarrassed)))
>
>I really love it when Greggie critiques *our* contributions to rfc.

<snort>

your pal,
blake