Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food..._rich_and.html
or http://tinyurl.com/ypzgwr At least it is still a pound package. Tracy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tracy" > wrote > http://tinyurl.com/ypzgwr > > > At least it is still a pound package. Their half pounds had the little sticks, I liked them. They were rather handy. I can't say they were time saving except maybe they would be used up rather than having to rewrap and save. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tracy wrote:
> http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food..._rich_and.html > > or > > > http://tinyurl.com/ypzgwr > > > At least it is still a pound package. I may be missing something, but what's the big deal? Sounds like a good idea to me. I hate having to re-wrap a messy portion of butter from which I have taken a measure. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Bugg" > wrote > I may be missing something, but what's the big deal? Sounds like a good > idea to me. I hate having to re-wrap a messy portion of butter from which > I have taken a measure. The most important thing is those little sticks of butter are so darned cute!! Also, my store is having Land O Lakes butter $2 a pound this week, maybe they're getting rid of the inventory of 1/4 pound sticks. Okay with me. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another imbecile thread... how many does that make today... don't any
of yoose ****-offs own a friggin' butter dish. Now yoose pinheads are implying I gotta toss out my full 1/4lb stick Pyrex butter dish that's served well for nigh on fifty years and resort to storing mini sticks in finger cots. And here I thought this is a cooking group... WAS a cooking group. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldon wrote:
> Another imbecile thread... how many does that make today... don't any > of yoose ****-offs own a friggin' butter dish. Now yoose pinheads are > implying I gotta toss out my full 1/4lb stick Pyrex butter dish that's > served well for nigh on fifty years and resort to storing mini sticks > in finger cots. ROTFLOL!! Finger cot storage vessels :-) -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote > On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:40:40 -0500, Nancy Young wrote: >> Also, my store is having Land O Lakes butter $2 a pound >> this week, maybe they're getting rid of the inventory of >> 1/4 pound sticks. Okay with me. > > I just bought 4lbs of butter at Costco for $1.53/lb. I think I'm > making croque monsieurs for dinner... You like the Costco butter? I remember you had questions. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:30:24 -0500, Tracy wrote: > >> http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food..._rich_and.html > > Since butter is an odor sponge, and gets pretty messy wrapping it > back up when you only use a little at a time, I don't see that > the problem is. > > Why did you even post this? It seems like a non-issue. > > =sw Just thought it was kind of funny..."Changing demographics and time-starved U.S. consumers have prompted Land O'Lakes to offer a new stick configuration." I mean - really - new stick configuration?? When are they going really listen to consumers. I was most surprised that they are still selling it by the pound. -Tracy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Bugg" wrote:
> Sheldon wrote: > > Another imbecile thread... how many does that make today... don't any > > of yoose ****-offs own a friggin' butter dish. �Now yoose pinheads are > > implying I gotta toss out my full 1/4lb stick Pyrex butter dish that's > > served well for nigh on fifty years and resort to storing mini sticks > > in finger cots. > > ROTFLOL!! �Finger cot storage vessels :-) It is funny, but also very sad. I don't understand all those mentioning rewrapping... why... I never rewraped stick butter in my life, put a stick in the glass dish and cover with the domed glass lid. Any questions... that's what I thought. Makes me really suspicious if any of those rewappers actually cook, I truly suspect they eat out or do take out. Come to think of it none of them have stick butter in their fridge --- all liars--- can't bullshit me about cooking, anyone claims to rewrap stick butter reuses condoms and launders tampons. Liars! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldon wrote:
> > Makes me really suspicious if any of those rewappers actually cook, I > truly suspect they eat out or do take out. Come to think of it none > of them have stick butter in their fridge --- all liars--- can't > bullshit me about cooking, anyone claims to rewrap stick butter reuses > condoms and launders tampons. The reuseable ones aren't called tampons. http://www.divacup.com/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Tracy > wrote:
> http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food..._rich_and.html > > or > > > http://tinyurl.com/ypzgwr > > > At least it is still a pound package. All that unnecessary packaging. Miche -- Electricians do it in three phases |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 1>,
"Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote: > "Dave Bugg" > dropped this > news:uY%zj.3544$4D2.2852@trndny06: in rec.food.cooking > > > Tracy wrote: > >> http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food...amy_rich_and.h > >> tml > >> > >> or > >> > >> > >> http://tinyurl.com/ypzgwr > >> > >> > >> At least it is still a pound package. > > > > I may be missing something, but what's the big deal? Sounds like a > > good idea to me. I hate having to re-wrap a messy portion of butter > > from which I have taken a measure. > > It's a non issue here as well. Sometimes I'll make clarified butter out > of the bits and pieces if I accumulate enough. Total non-issue in New Zealand, as butter is available in 500g "metric pound" or 250g "metric half-pound" blocks. If you want any amount less than that you have to cut if off the block and either use it or put it on a dish. None of this farting about with "sticks". Miche -- Electricians do it in three phases |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sheldon" > wrote in message It is funny, but also very sad. I don't understand all those mentioning rewrapping... why... I never rewraped stick butter in my life, put a stick in the glass dish and cover with the domed glass lid. Any questions... that's what I thought. ********************** Using the same butter dish with cover for years now. Only time I ever re-wrap is when I take a part of a stick to keep in the fridge at work as I don't use all that much there. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Sqwertz > wrote: > On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:36:44 -0500, Nancy Young wrote: > > > "Sqwertz" > wrote > > > >> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:40:40 -0500, Nancy Young wrote: > > > >>> Also, my store is having Land O Lakes butter $2 a pound > >>> this week, maybe they're getting rid of the inventory of > >>> 1/4 pound sticks. Okay with me. > >> > >> I just bought 4lbs of butter at Costco for $1.53/lb. I think I'm > >> making croque monsieurs for dinner... > > > > You like the Costco butter? I remember you had questions. > > Good memory. I've had trouble using it for candy-making - > getting it up to toffee temps. I've had three successive failed > attempts using that butter, but this christmas I bought store > brand butter (HEB brand), and I made 3 or 4 batches without > incident. > > Other than that, Costco butter has served me well for all other > uses. Huh. I wonder if it's had water added to it. Some butter does, and I regard it as a nasty trick. Miche -- Electricians do it in three phases |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young wrote:
> > "Dave Bugg" > wrote > >> I may be missing something, but what's the big deal? Sounds like a good >> idea to me. I hate having to re-wrap a messy portion of butter from which >> I have taken a measure. > > The most important thing is those little sticks of butter are > so darned cute!! > > Also, my store is having Land O Lakes butter $2 a pound > this week, maybe they're getting rid of the inventory of > 1/4 pound sticks. Okay with me. Hey, back in the day didn't butter come in sticks longer than today's little 3.25" stubbies? Seems like maybe they were half-pound sticks -- same cross section but twice as long. I used marge for many years; when I came back to butter it seems like this change had happened. Or am I misremembering? Or is this a regional thing? In the middle there, I did move to the other end of the country. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:16:43 -0800, Blinky the Shark
> wrote: > >Hey, back in the day didn't butter come in sticks longer than today's >little 3.25" stubbies? Seems like maybe they were half-pound sticks -- >same cross section but twice as long. I used marge for many years; when I >came back to butter it seems like this change had happened. Or am I >misremembering? Or is this a regional thing? In the middle there, I did >move to the other end of the country. Butter used to come in two half pound "slabs". Think the shape of two undivided quarter pound sticks in today's shape. I still have a butter dish for them (intact). I don't buy brand name butter anymore, so I'd like to know if everyone is getting rid of the tablespoon marks on the wrapper - or is that limited to store brands? -- See return address to reply by email remove the smile first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:16:43 -0800, Blinky the Shark > > wrote: >> >>Hey, back in the day didn't butter come in sticks longer than today's >>little 3.25" stubbies? Seems like maybe they were half-pound sticks -- >>same cross section but twice as long. I used marge for many years; when I >>came back to butter it seems like this change had happened. Or am I >>misremembering? Or is this a regional thing? In the middle there, I did >>move to the other end of the country. > > Butter used to come in two half pound "slabs". Think the shape of two > undivided quarter pound sticks in today's shape. I still have a > butter dish for them (intact). I sure don't remember those. > I don't buy brand name butter anymore, so I'd like to know if everyone > is getting rid of the tablespoon marks on the wrapper - or is that > limited to store brands? Store brand here. Marked in TSPs and 1/4, 1/3 and 1/2-cup portions. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:16:43 -0800, Blinky the Shark > > wrote: >> >>Hey, back in the day didn't butter come in sticks longer than today's >>little 3.25" stubbies? Seems like maybe they were half-pound sticks -- >>same cross section but twice as long. I used marge for many years; when I >>came back to butter it seems like this change had happened. Or am I >>misremembering? Or is this a regional thing? In the middle there, I did >>move to the other end of the country. > > Butter used to come in two half pound "slabs". Think the shape of two > undivided quarter pound sticks in today's shape. I still have a > butter dish for them (intact). I was right, according to wiki (which I quote below). It's regional. I spent about the first half of my life in Michigan: "The dominant shape east of the Rocky Mountains is the Elgin, or Eastern-pack shape. This shape was originally developed by the Elgin Butter Tub Company, founded in 1882 in Elgin, Illinois and Rock Falls, Illinois. The sticks are 4.75" long and 1.25" wide, and are usually sold in somewhat cubical boxes stacked 2x2." Then I moved to California; "West of the Rocky Mountains, butter printers standardized on a different shape that is now referred to as the Western-Pack shape. These butter sticks are 3.125" long and 1.5" wide and are typically sold packed side-by-side in a rectangular container." So I grew up with thinner, longer ones (by 1 5/8 inches), albeit they weren't as long as I thought I remembered them. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:03:53 -0800, Blinky the Shark
> wrote: >sf wrote: > >> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:16:43 -0800, Blinky the Shark >> > wrote: >>> >>>Hey, back in the day didn't butter come in sticks longer than today's >>>little 3.25" stubbies? Seems like maybe they were half-pound sticks -- >>>same cross section but twice as long. I used marge for many years; when I >>>came back to butter it seems like this change had happened. Or am I >>>misremembering? Or is this a regional thing? In the middle there, I did >>>move to the other end of the country. >> >> Butter used to come in two half pound "slabs". Think the shape of two >> undivided quarter pound sticks in today's shape. I still have a >> butter dish for them (intact). > >I was right, according to wiki (which I quote below). > >It's regional. > >I spent about the first half of my life in Michigan: > >"The dominant shape east of the Rocky Mountains is the Elgin, or >Eastern-pack shape. This shape was originally developed by the Elgin >Butter Tub Company, founded in 1882 in Elgin, Illinois and Rock Falls, >Illinois. The sticks are 4.75" long and 1.25" wide, and are usually sold >in somewhat cubical boxes stacked 2x2." > >Then I moved to California; > >"West of the Rocky Mountains, butter printers standardized on a different >shape that is now referred to as the Western-Pack shape. These butter >sticks are 3.125" long and 1.5" wide and are typically sold packed >side-by-side in a rectangular container." > >So I grew up with thinner, longer ones (by 1 5/8 inches), albeit they >weren't as long as I thought I remembered them. Blinky, I was brought up in Michigan too (so, you're a freshwater shark?)... but my mom used margarine back in those days, so I have no point of reference. I've seen skinny sticks of butter, but it was here in California and I thought they were trying to mimic European butter (what do I know?). -- See return address to reply by email remove the smile first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blinky the THIEF wrote:
> sf wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:16:43 -0800, Blinky the Shark > > > wrote: > > >>Hey, back in the day didn't butter come in sticks longer than today's > >>little 3.25" stubbies? �Seems like maybe they were half-pound sticks -- > >>same cross section but twice as long. �I used marge for many years; when I > >>came back to butter it seems like this change had happened. �Or am I > >>misremembering? �Or is this a regional thing? �In the middle there, I did > >>move to the other end of the country. > > > Butter used to come in two half pound "slabs". �Think the shape of two > > undivided quarter pound sticks in today's shape. �I still have a > > butter dish for them (intact). > > I was right, according to wiki (which I quote below). > > It's regional. > > I spent about the first half of my life in Michigan: > > "The dominant shape east of the Rocky Mountains is the Elgin, or > Eastern-pack shape. This shape was originally developed by the Elgin > Butter Tub Company, founded in 1882 in Elgin, Illinois and Rock Falls, > Illinois. The sticks are 4.75" long and 1.25" wide, and are usually sold > in somewhat cubical boxes stacked 2x2." > > Then I moved to California; > > "West of the Rocky Mountains, butter printers standardized on a different > shape that is now referred to as the Western-Pack shape. These butter > sticks are 3.125" long and 1.5" wide and are typically sold packed > side-by-side in a rectangular container." > > So I grew up with thinner, longer ones (by 1 5/8 inches), albeit they > weren't as long as I thought I remembered them. When you post information that you gleaned off the net it's honest to include attributions. You stole all that from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butter Blinky the THIEF |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldon wrote:
> Blinky the THIEF wrote: >> sf wrote: >>> On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:16:43 -0800, Blinky the Shark >>> > wrote: >> >>>> Hey, back in the day didn't butter come in sticks longer than >>>> today's little 3.25" stubbies? ?Seems like maybe they were >>>> half-pound sticks -- same cross section but twice as long. ?I used >>>> marge for many years; when I came back to butter it seems like >>>> this change had happened. ?Or am I misremembering? ?Or is this a >>>> regional thing? ?In the middle there, I did move to the other end >>>> of the country. >> >>> Butter used to come in two half pound "slabs". ?Think the shape of >>> two undivided quarter pound sticks in today's shape. ?I still have a >>> butter dish for them (intact). >> >> I was right, according to wiki (which I quote below). >> >> It's regional. >> >> I spent about the first half of my life in Michigan: >> >> "The dominant shape east of the Rocky Mountains is the Elgin, or >> Eastern-pack shape. This shape was originally developed by the Elgin >> Butter Tub Company, founded in 1882 in Elgin, Illinois and Rock >> Falls, Illinois. The sticks are 4.75" long and 1.25" wide, and are >> usually sold in somewhat cubical boxes stacked 2x2." >> >> Then I moved to California; >> >> "West of the Rocky Mountains, butter printers standardized on a >> different shape that is now referred to as the Western-Pack shape. >> These butter sticks are 3.125" long and 1.5" wide and are typically >> sold packed side-by-side in a rectangular container." >> >> So I grew up with thinner, longer ones (by 1 5/8 inches), albeit they >> weren't as long as I thought I remembered them. > > When you post information that you gleaned off the net it's honest to > include attributions. > > You stole all that from: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butter > > Blinky the THIEF Shellie the blind. Read ALL of his post! ">> I was right, according to wiki (which I quote below)." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote:
> "Sheldon" wrote: > > It is funny, but also very sad. �I don't understand all those > mentioning rewrapping... why... I never rewraped stick butter in my > life, put a stick in the glass dish and cover with the domed glass > lid. �Any questions... that's what I thought. > > ********************** > Using the same butter dish with cover for years now. �Only time I ever > re-wrap is when I take a part of a stick to keep in the fridge at work as I > don't use all that much there. I place the butter along with the parchment wrapping into my butter dish; stays neater: http://i26.tinypic.com/ih2muh.jpg We had a real kitchen in our lunch room at work; large double sink, two stoves, two fridges, two microwaves, and all the typical kitchen tools... we also had some very large stainless steel pots that were custom made at our sheet metal/welding shop, used for holiday meals. There were about forty in our department. Some of us chipped in to a slush fund for keeping our kitchen supplied with condiments, we didn't use a lot of butter so we bought whipped butter in tubs Amazingly there were very few disputes about using other people's stuff. We had a good system for keeping things neat, anyone's left overs found in the fridge after 3PM on Friday got shit canned. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote > "Nancy Young" > dropped this >> Also, my store is having Land O Lakes butter $2 a pound >> this week, maybe they're getting rid of the inventory of >> 1/4 pound sticks. Okay with me. > > So how much butter you gonna buy? At least five pounds ... maybe more later in the week if I wind up there. What really holds me back is that those pounds of butter take up a lot of freezer room after a while. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldon wrote:
> Liars! Shellie, have you been missing your meds again? This cry of LIAR seems to come out of the mouths of total weirdos on a regular basis. Normal people don't seem to do it all all!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 5:30�pm, Tracy > wrote:
> http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food...reamy_rich_and.... > > or > > http://tinyurl.com/ypzgwr > > At least it is still a pound package. Yeah but that extra packaging will increase the cost per pound, I betcha! With more wrapping there will also be a bit more waste, always some small quantity of butter stays with the wrapping and few people make the effort to scrape the last bits off the wrapping paper... now instead of four grams you'll waste eight grams... with all the tons of butter sold grams count... butter companys don't care that you have more waste so long as you pay for it, so if they can increase each individual consumer's waste even a little bit it all adds up, they increase their profits substantially I don't see any convenience whatsoever, in fact it's twice the work; twice as many sticks to handle and unwrap... may as well go all the way and buy those individually wrapped pats like they serve at restaurants. I think this is a marketing ploy to increse butter consumption... most folks tend not to leave that last pat worth of butter from a 1/4 lb stick but will instead unconciously use it all by slathering a little extra on their bread or dump it into their recipe.. is there such a thing as too much butter in baked goods. So now with twice as many sticks there is twice the opportunity presented to use up those ends by taking extra... folks will become fatter while butter company wallets get fatter too. Butter companys are no different from other businesses, everything they do is to increase their bottom line, Land O' Lakes is not doing this for the good of the consumer... they are emptying consumer's wallets while increasing their increasing bottoms and waists. Think about all the reasons why commercial kitchens buy ingredients in the *largest* sizes... resturant kitchens don't use sticks, they use five pound blocks. In ethnic neighborhoods where people do a lot of cooking/baking they mostly buy butter in one pound blocks, costs substantially less than sticks and there is less waste. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Bugg wrote:
> > > At least it is still a pound package. > > I may be missing something, but what's the big deal? Sounds like a good idea > to me. I hate having to re-wrap a messy portion of butter from which I have > taken a measure. Who would have thought that people were too stupid to figure out how to cut a stick of butter in half. Maybe it would have been cheaper for them to just change the package and provide written instructions. FWIW. most butter here is sold in one pound blocks. Some of the better quality butters are also sold in half pound blocks. Not surprisingly, they are half as big as the one pound blocks. Very few brands are sold in sticks. In the grocery store where I usually shop they have 5 or 6 brands of butter, some of which sell salted and unsalted. Two of them also sell half pound sizes. Only one (premium) brand comes in boxes of sticks, both salted and unsalted. , |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
... > Dave Bugg wrote: > >> >> > At least it is still a pound package. >> >> I may be missing something, but what's the big deal? Sounds >> like a good idea >> to me. I hate having to re-wrap a messy portion of butter >> from which I have >> taken a measure. > > > FWIW. most butter here is sold in one pound blocks. Some of > the better quality > butters are also sold in half pound blocks. Not surprisingly, > they are half as > big as the one pound blocks. Very few brands are sold in > sticks. In the grocery > store where I usually shop they have 5 or 6 brands of butter, > some of which > sell salted and unsalted. Two of them also sell half pound > sizes. Only one > (premium) brand comes in boxes of sticks, both salted and > unsalted. A small request :-) Could people who use the word "here" check that it is apparent where it is? I only found out that Dave Smith was talking about Canada when I saw his address as I began to compose this response. I could have asked for details of the message too, I suppose, but that's extra work too. -- Jim Silverton Potomac, Maryland |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"PinocchiOphelia" wrote:
> Sheldon wrote: > > Liars! > > Shellie, have you been missing your meds again? > > This cry of LIAR seems to come out of the mouths of total weirdos on a > regular basis. > > Normal people don't seem to do it all all!! Ever notice how it's the most offensive prevaricators who need to comment as though defending themselves. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldon wrote:
> "PinocchiOphelia" wrote: >> Sheldon wrote: >>> Liars! >> >> Shellie, have you been missing your meds again? >> >> This cry of LIAR seems to come out of the mouths of total weirdos on >> a regular basis. >> >> Normal people don't seem to do it all all!! > > Ever notice how it's the most offensive prevaricators who need to > comment as though defending themselves. LOLOL what's up fercocktah Shellie.... don't you like being shown up to be wrong ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"PinoicchiOfailure" wrote:
> Sheldon wrote: > > "PinocchiOfailure" wrote: > >> Sheldon wrote: > >>> Liars! > > >> Shellie, have you been missing your meds again? > > >> This cry of LIAR seems to come out of the mouths of total weirdos on > >> a regular basis. > > >> Normal people don't seem to do it all all!! > > > Ever notice how it's the most offensive prevaricators who need to > > comment as though defending themselves. > > LOLOL what's up fercocktah Shellie.... don't you like being shown up to be > wrong ![]() Wrong, me... NEVER! Ofailure! Ahahahaha. . . . SHELDON |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldon wrote:
> "PinoicchiOfailure" wrote: >> Sheldon wrote: >>> "PinocchiOfailure" wrote: >>>> Sheldon wrote: >>>>> Liars! >> >>>> Shellie, have you been missing your meds again? >> >>>> This cry of LIAR seems to come out of the mouths of total weirdos >>>> on a regular basis. >> >>>> Normal people don't seem to do it all all!! >> >>> Ever notice how it's the most offensive prevaricators who need to >>> comment as though defending themselves. >> >> LOLOL what's up fercocktah Shellie.... don't you like being shown up >> to be wrong ![]() > > Wrong, me... NEVER! > > Ofailure! > > Ahahahaha. . . . > > > SHELDON You wish old man ![]() afraid you are a busted flush <G> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 6, 7:08*pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:36:44 -0500, Nancy Young wrote: > > "Sqwertz" > wrote > > >> On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 19:40:40 -0500, Nancy Young wrote: > > >>> Also, my store is having Land O Lakes butter $2 a pound > >>> this week, maybe they're getting rid of the inventory of > >>> 1/4 pound sticks. *Okay with me. > > >> I just bought 4lbs of butter at Costco for $1.53/lb. *I think I'm > >> making croque monsieurs for dinner... > > > You like the Costco butter? *I remember you had questions. > > Good memory. *I've had trouble using it for candy-making - > getting it up to toffee temps. *I've had three successive failed > attempts using that butter, but this christmas I bought store > brand butter (HEB brand), and I made 3 or 4 batches without > incident. > > Other than that, Costco butter has served me well for all other > uses. > > -sw You should be using unsalted... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ofailure" wrote:
> Sheldon wrote: > > "PinoicchiOfailure" �wrote: > >> Sheldon wrote: > >>> "PinocchiOfailure" wrote: > >>>> Sheldon wrote: > >>>>> Liars! > > >>>> Shellie, have you been missing your meds again? > > >>>> This cry of LIAR seems to come out of the mouths of total weirdos > >>>> on a regular basis. > > >>>> Normal people don't seem to do it all all!! > > >>> Ever notice how it's the most offensive prevaricators who need to > >>> comment as though defending themselves. > > >> LOLOL what's up fercocktah Shellie.... don't you like being shown up > >> to be wrong ![]() > > > Wrong, me... NEVER! > > > Ofailure! > > > Ahahahaha. . . . > > > SHELDON > > I hate to prick your balloon but..........I am > afraid you are a busted flush <G> Hmm, you must be dyslexic... I think that should read "I hate to bust your balloon but I'm araid... youre a big prick". <G> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Silverton wrote:
> > > > > FWIW. most butter here is sold in one pound blocks. Some of > > the better quality > > butters are also sold in half pound blocks. Not surprisingly, > > they are half as > > big as the one pound blocks. Very few brands are sold in > > sticks. In the grocery > > store where I usually shop they have 5 or 6 brands of butter, > > some of which > > sell salted and unsalted. Two of them also sell half pound > > sizes. Only one > > (premium) brand comes in boxes of sticks, both salted and > > unsalted. > > A small request :-) Could people who use the word "here" check > that it is apparent where it is? I only found out that Dave > Smith was talking about Canada when I saw his address as I began > to compose this response. I could have asked for details of the > message too, I suppose, but that's extra work too. Aside from the fact that, like a lot of people here, I am on the RFC map, have frequently said that I live in the Niagara Peninsula, and my address has that identifying .ca, I am not sure that it really mattes where I live. The fact remains that around here ( Niagara Peninsula of southern Ontario, Canada) the vast majority of butter is sold in grocery stores is 1 lb. blocks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:59:56 -0500:
??>>> FWIW. most butter here is sold in one pound blocks. Some ??>>> of the better quality butters are also sold in half pound ??>>> blocks. Not surprisingly, they are half as big as the one ??>>> pound blocks. Very few brands are sold in sticks. In the ??>>> grocery store where I usually shop they have 5 or 6 ??>>> brands of butter, some of which sell salted and unsalted. ??>>> Two of them also sell half pound sizes. Only ??>>> one (premium) brand comes in boxes of sticks, both ??>>> salted and unsalted. ??>> ??>> A small request :-) Could people who use the word "here" ??>> check that it is apparent where it is? I only found out ??>> that Dave Smith was talking about Canada when I saw his ??>> address as I began to compose this response. I could have ??>> asked for details of the message too, I suppose, but ??>> that's extra work too. D>Aside from the fact that, like a lot of people here, I am on D>the RFCmap, have frequently said that I live in the Niagara D>Peninsula, and myaddress has that identifying .ca, I am not D>sure that it really matteswhere I live. The fact remains that D>around here ( Niagara Peninsula ofsouthern Ontario, Canada) D>the vast majority of butter is sold in grocerystores is 1 lb. D>blocks. .. I was just interested in where butter was sold in 1 lb blocks: a reasonable request, I thought. I certainly don't think I am so famous that everyone knows where I live nor that my address will appear with the post :-) James Silverton Potomac, Maryland E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote > Who would have thought that people were too stupid to figure out how to > cut a > stick of butter in half. Maybe it would have been cheaper for them to just > change the package and provide written instructions. Just because some company decided to sell their butter cut into smaller pieces doesn't mean they were being inundated with people asking how they could cut their butter in half. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Silverton wrote:
> > > D>Aside from the fact that, like a lot of people here, I am on > D>the RFCmap, have frequently said that I live in the Niagara > D>Peninsula, and myaddress has that identifying .ca, I am not > D>sure that it really matteswhere I live. The fact remains that > D>around here ( Niagara Peninsula ofsouthern Ontario, Canada) > D>the vast majority of butter is sold in grocerystores is 1 lb. > D>blocks. > > . > > I was just interested in where butter was sold in 1 lb blocks: a > reasonable request, I thought. I certainly don't think I am so > famous that everyone knows where I live nor that my address will > appear with the post :-) > > James Silverton > Potomac, Maryland But you are famous. We all know that you live in Potomac Maryland :-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
... > James Silverton wrote: > >> >> >> D>Aside from the fact that, like a lot of people here, I am >> on >> D>the RFCmap, have frequently said that I live in the Niagara >> D>Peninsula, and myaddress has that identifying .ca, I am >> not >> D>sure that it really matteswhere I live. The fact remains >> that >> D>around here ( Niagara Peninsula ofsouthern Ontario, Canada) >> D>the vast majority of butter is sold in grocerystores is 1 >> lb. >> D>blocks. >> >> . >> >> I was just interested in where butter was sold in 1 lb >> blocks: a >> reasonable request, I thought. I certainly don't think I am >> so >> famous that everyone knows where I live nor that my address >> will >> appear with the post :-) >> >> James Silverton >> Potomac, Maryland > > But you are famous. We all know that you live in Potomac > Maryland :-) > I'd never claim fame in r.f.cooking nor is it one of my life's great ambitions :-). You only know I post from Potomac because I include it in my signature. My real address gives none of that information, only my carrier. -- Jim Silverton Potomac, Maryland |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> Sheldon wrote: >> "PinocchiOphelia" wrote: >>> Sheldon wrote: >>>> Liars! >>> >>> Shellie, have you been missing your meds again? >>> >>> This cry of LIAR seems to come out of the mouths of total weirdos on >>> a regular basis. >>> >>> Normal people don't seem to do it all all!! >> >> Ever notice how it's the most offensive prevaricators who need to >> comment as though defending themselves. > > LOLOL what's up fercocktah Shellie.... don't you like being shown up to be > wrong ![]() Uh...ferkakdeh? (I'm not positive, myself.) -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article <SWjAj.214$Ls6.110@trnddc01>,
"James Silverton" > wrote: > Dave wrote on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:59:56 -0500: [attributions lost previously] > ??>> A small request :-) Could people who use the word "here" > ??>> check that it is apparent where it is? I only found out > ??>> that Dave Smith was talking about Canada when I saw his > ??>> address as I began to compose this response. I could have > ??>> asked for details of the message too, I suppose, but > ??>> that's extra work too. > > D>Aside from the fact that, like a lot of people here, I am on > D>the RFCmap, have frequently said that I live in the Niagara > D>Peninsula, and myaddress has that identifying .ca, I am not > D>sure that it really matteswhere I live. The fact remains that > D>around here ( Niagara Peninsula ofsouthern Ontario, Canada) > D>the vast majority of butter is sold in grocerystores is 1 lb. > D>blocks. > > . > > > I was just interested in where butter was sold in 1 lb blocks: a > reasonable request, I thought. I certainly don't think I am so > famous that everyone knows where I live nor that my address will > appear with the post :-) Butter is sold in "metric pound" (500g) and "metric half-pound" (250g) blocks in New Zealand. Miche -- Electricians do it in three phases |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Butter vs. Peanut Butter | General Cooking | |||
How to Cook With Butter and Butter Varieties | General Cooking | |||
Substituting artificial butter for real butter or shortening | General Cooking | |||
Apple Butter-Peanut Butter Cookies | Recipes (moderated) | |||
What is the product of Butter Ghee and White Butter? Friends,pls help me clarify them,thank you! | General Cooking |