Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri 14 Mar 2008 06:59:34a, Melba's Jammin' told us...
<non-hash recipe snipped> >> Yes, one could do that, but that's not hash. :-) > > Honest to Alex, Wayne! Do you think we could be twins separated at > birth? LOL! It seems that I make the same comments as you do. I do it > with your posts more than anyone else's, I think. Too funny. Great > minds thinking alike and all. > LOL! Yes m'am! I've thought that, too. -- Wayne Boatwright ------------------------------------------- Friday, 03(III)/14(XIV)/08(MMVIII) ------------------------------------------- Countdown till Memorial Day 10wks 2dys 13hrs 45mins ------------------------------------------- If your face were a tree, it would be different. ------------------------------------------- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > > Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to slice > them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly brown in hot > canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions and then pour > over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an omelette or a > frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the eggs are much > tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the eggs. > -- > JL We call that a Spanish omelet in my house. Way awesome. -Tracy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tracy wrote:
> > > Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > >> >> Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to >> slice them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly brown >> in hot canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions and then >> pour over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an omelette or a >> frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the eggs are much >> tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the eggs. >> -- >> JL > > We call that a Spanish omelet in my house. Way awesome. > > -Tracy Tortilla Esponola, I believe is the proper name? Made with lots of olive oil, potatoes and eggs. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > >> Goomba38 wrote: >> >>> Michael "Dog3" wrote: >>> >>>> Hmmm... taters, onions, ketchup... yep. I can't think of anything >>>> else except the usual s&p. I'm trying to remember if Steven's >>>> stepmom used a binder in it or not. I don't think so. >>>> >>>> Michael >>>> >>> >>> Damn! NOW you tell me!! I forgot to put Salt and Pepper in!!!! >>> Grrrrrrr. >> >> >> *chuckle* im surprised no body mentioned small dice of potato. >> > She did. " taters, onions, ketchup..." > > Jill "Tater's" is not "small dice of 'tater's' i struggled with hash for years before i actually read a recipe and decided to follow the advice of a "small dice" of potatoes. I used to have a similar problem with "hash browns" every time i made them they came out a grey, soggy mess. Till i was watching Jeff Smith (the frugal gourmet) and he shredded the potatoes, and squeezed the water out of them, then they fry up nice and white and get crisp and golden on the outside, light and fluffy on the inside. I like to keep pre boiled potatoes on hand but the few times i have tried to make hash with cooked potatoes they tend to turn into a paste. Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to slice them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly brown in hot canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions and then pour over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an omelette or a frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the eggs are much tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the eggs. -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> jmcquown wrote: >> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >> >>> Goomba38 wrote: >>> >>>> Michael "Dog3" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hmmm... taters, onions, ketchup... yep. I can't think of anything >>>>> else except the usual s&p. I'm trying to remember if Steven's >>>>> stepmom used a binder in it or not. I don't think so. >>>>> >>>>> Michael >>>>> >>>> >>>> Damn! NOW you tell me!! I forgot to put Salt and Pepper in!!!! >>>> Grrrrrrr. >>> >>> >>> *chuckle* im surprised no body mentioned small dice of potato. >>> >> She did. " taters, onions, ketchup..." >> >> Jill > > "Tater's" is not "small dice of 'tater's' i struggled with hash for > years before i actually read a recipe and decided to follow the advice > of a "small dice" of potatoes. > > I used to have a similar problem with "hash browns" every time i made > them they came out a grey, soggy mess. Till i was watching Jeff Smith > (the frugal gourmet) and he shredded the potatoes, and squeezed the > water out of them, then they fry up nice and white and get crisp and > golden on the outside, light and fluffy on the inside. > > I like to keep pre boiled potatoes on hand but the few times i have > tried to make hash with cooked potatoes they tend to turn into a > paste. > Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to > slice them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly > brown in hot canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions > and then pour over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an > omelette or a frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the > eggs are much tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the > eggs. -- > JL Our favorite is a "farmhouse hash." Chop some bacon and fry until crispy. Remove from pan and leave a little bacon grease behind. Slice or chop your pre-boiled potatoes and brown them in the pan. Add green onions and perhaps chunked red bell peppers if you like. Scramble some eggs in a separate pan. Add the scrambled eggs and bacon to the potatoes and serve. It's Sunday night supper around here. Janet |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > > >>Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> >> >>>In article >, >>> Goomba38 > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>lol, no, I must not have gotten that memo. >>>>Now this batch will come out of the oven and I'll wonder if *that* is >>>>the missing ingredient.... <sigh> >>> >>> >>>Oven? What's it doing in the oven? Melt some butter in a skillet, dump >>>in the mixture, brown it, flip it, brown it, eat it. Oven? I think >>>you'd better come over and sit by me, Hon. >> >>One can also take a small loaf pan and butter it, line the inside with >>thinly sliced raw potatoes as for potatoes anna, sprinkling with salt >>and pepper and grated cheese as one forms a potato lining for the pan, >>which is then filled with several thin layers of very lean ground meats >>seasoned appropriately and separated into layers by several other layers >>of the thinly sliced potatoes, cover with a final layer of thin sliced >>potatoes and if desired a bit of wine poured over all before is is set >>to cook in the oven for about 20 minutes in a hot oven, covering the top >>with foil if it browns to fast. >> >>Un - mould sprinkle with cheese and brown under the broiler for a few >>minutes or serve from the loaf pan. >>-- >>JL > > > > But that's not hash, Joseph. Hash is put together in about 5 minutes > and on the table in 15. :-) What you've got going is something else > entirely. '-) Well d'uh! its a variation on a Tuscan lamb or pork dish, where an entire leg, shoulder or other large cut of lamb or pork is wrapped in a covering of thinly sliced & seasoned potatoes and baked. The French do a similar dish "ala boulangiere" but the potatoes are added after the meat is 3/4 cooked. -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > > In article >, > > Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > > > > > >>Melba's Jammin' wrote: > >> > >> > >>>In article >, > >>> Goomba38 > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>lol, no, I must not have gotten that memo. > >>>>Now this batch will come out of the oven and I'll wonder if *that* is > >>>>the missing ingredient.... <sigh> > >>> > >>> > >>>Oven? What's it doing in the oven? Melt some butter in a skillet, dump > >>>in the mixture, brown it, flip it, brown it, eat it. Oven? I think > >>>you'd better come over and sit by me, Hon. > >> > >>One can also take a small loaf pan and butter it, line the inside with > >>thinly sliced raw potatoes as for potatoes anna, sprinkling with salt > >>and pepper and grated cheese as one forms a potato lining for the pan, > >>which is then filled with several thin layers of very lean ground meats > >>seasoned appropriately and separated into layers by several other layers > >>of the thinly sliced potatoes, cover with a final layer of thin sliced > >>potatoes and if desired a bit of wine poured over all before is is set > >>to cook in the oven for about 20 minutes in a hot oven, covering the top > >>with foil if it browns to fast. > >> > >>Un - mould sprinkle with cheese and brown under the broiler for a few > >>minutes or serve from the loaf pan. > >>-- > >>JL > > But that's not hash, Joseph. Hash is put together in about 5 minutes > > and on the table in 15. :-) What you've got going is something else > > entirely. '-) > > Well d'uh! its a variation on a Tuscan lamb or pork dish, where an > entire leg, shoulder or other large cut of lamb or pork is wrapped in a > covering of thinly sliced & seasoned potatoes and baked. The French do > a similar dish "ala boulangiere" but the potatoes are added after the > meat is 3/4 cooked. > -- > JL Shouldn't have put it in a thread about hash, then. It deserves its own thread and its own discussion. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > >>>>> >>>>> Oven? What's it doing in the oven? Melt some butter in a >>>>> skillet, dump in the mixture, brown it, flip it, brown it, eat >>>>> it. Oven? I think you'd better come over and sit by me, Hon. >>>> >>>> One can also take a small loaf pan and butter it, line the inside >>>> with thinly sliced raw potatoes as for potatoes anna, sprinkling >>>> with salt and pepper and grated cheese as one forms a potato >>>> lining for the pan, which is then filled with several thin layers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> JL > >>> But that's not hash, Joseph. Hash is put together in about 5 >>> minutes and on the table in 15. :-) What you've got going is >>> something else entirely. '-) >> >> Well d'uh! its a variation on a Tuscan lamb or pork dish, where an >> entire leg, shoulder or other large cut of lamb or pork is wrapped >> in a covering of thinly sliced & seasoned potatoes and baked. The >> French do a similar dish "ala boulangiere" but the potatoes are >> added after the meat is 3/4 cooked. >> -- >> JL > > > Shouldn't have put it in a thread about hash, then. It deserves its > own thread and its own discussion. > Absotively! Sounds tasty enough but it's not "beef hash" ![]() Jill <--contemplating corned beef hash if we have enough left over next week |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> In article >, > Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > > >>Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> >> >>>In article >, >>> Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Melba's Jammin' wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>In article >, >>>>>Goomba38 > wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>lol, no, I must not have gotten that memo. >>>>>>Now this batch will come out of the oven and I'll wonder if *that* is >>>>>>the missing ingredient.... <sigh> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Oven? What's it doing in the oven? Melt some butter in a skillet, dump >>>>>in the mixture, brown it, flip it, brown it, eat it. Oven? I think >>>>>you'd better come over and sit by me, Hon. >>>> >>>>One can also take a small loaf pan and butter it, line the inside with >>>>thinly sliced raw potatoes as for potatoes anna, sprinkling with salt >>>>and pepper and grated cheese as one forms a potato lining for the pan, >>>>which is then filled with several thin layers of very lean ground meats >>>>seasoned appropriately and separated into layers by several other layers >>>>of the thinly sliced potatoes, cover with a final layer of thin sliced >>>>potatoes and if desired a bit of wine poured over all before is is set >>>>to cook in the oven for about 20 minutes in a hot oven, covering the top >>>>with foil if it browns to fast. >>>> >>>>Un - mould sprinkle with cheese and brown under the broiler for a few >>>>minutes or serve from the loaf pan. >>>>-- >>>>JL > > >>>But that's not hash, Joseph. Hash is put together in about 5 minutes >>>and on the table in 15. :-) What you've got going is something else >>>entirely. '-) >> >>Well d'uh! its a variation on a Tuscan lamb or pork dish, where an >>entire leg, shoulder or other large cut of lamb or pork is wrapped in a >>covering of thinly sliced & seasoned potatoes and baked. The French do >>a similar dish "ala boulangiere" but the potatoes are added after the >>meat is 3/4 cooked. >>-- >>JL > > > > Shouldn't have put it in a thread about hash, then. It deserves its own > thread and its own discussion. Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try to suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any way inappropriate as much as i am curious as to why it should matter so much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my comments as in any way inappropriately placed but that you felt the need to express such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a criticism of my description of a dish with similar ingredients and baked rather than fried? My comments are as correct and appropriately placed as the subject itself. Variations on a theme. About food in a cooking group. One almost expects anal pernicketiness in ridged interpretation of "recipes" and "ingredients" in a "food group" but i did think any strict observance of some convenient literary or editorial "style" was of less concern than the subject matter. I am not a professional writer or teacher of English and have misplaced my style manual. Such a type or style of criticism "shouldn't have put it in a..." made humorously always evades me, criticism as a joke, i don't get the joke, so if the above was meant as a kind of humorous reference than just ignore this, but remember, i had my "sense of humour" surgically removed so any such reference is likely to be taken literally by me. Now...to mention my sense of loss at the passing of Bill Buckley and his inimitable literary and rhetorical style, that would be inappropriate here ![]() -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 4:30*pm, Joseph Littleshoes > wrote:
> > Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try to > suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any way > inappropriate *as much as i am curious as to why it should matter so > much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my comments as in > any way inappropriately placed but that you felt the need to express > such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a criticism of my description > of a dish with similar ingredients and baked rather than fried? Are you really this dense, not to mention pompous? All she is gently and humorously suggesting is that the dishes you and the other poster describe might be good and tasty but they don't meet the ordinary definition of "hash". Like many other dishes, this one is defined not just by its ingredients but by its mode of cooking. > .... i don't get the joke, More than you know..... -aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > In article >, > > Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > > > > > >>Melba's Jammin' wrote: > >> > >> > >>>In article >, > >>> Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Melba's Jammin' wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>In article >, > >>>>>Goomba38 > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>lol, no, I must not have gotten that memo. > >>>>>>Now this batch will come out of the oven and I'll wonder if *that* is > >>>>>>the missing ingredient.... <sigh> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Oven? What's it doing in the oven? Melt some butter in a skillet, dump > >>>>>in the mixture, brown it, flip it, brown it, eat it. Oven? I think > >>>>>you'd better come over and sit by me, Hon. > >>>> > >>>>One can also take a small loaf pan and butter it, line the inside with > >>>>thinly sliced raw potatoes as for potatoes anna, sprinkling with salt > >>>>and pepper and grated cheese as one forms a potato lining for the pan, > >>>>which is then filled with several thin layers of very lean ground meats > >>>>seasoned appropriately and separated into layers by several other layers > >>>>of the thinly sliced potatoes, cover with a final layer of thin sliced > >>>>potatoes and if desired a bit of wine poured over all before is is set > >>>>to cook in the oven for about 20 minutes in a hot oven, covering the top > >>>>with foil if it browns to fast. > >>>> > >>>>Un - mould sprinkle with cheese and brown under the broiler for a few > >>>>minutes or serve from the loaf pan. > >>>>-- > >>>>JL > > > > > >>>But that's not hash, Joseph. Hash is put together in about 5 minutes > >>>and on the table in 15. :-) What you've got going is something else > >>>entirely. '-) > >> > >>Well d'uh! its a variation on a Tuscan lamb or pork dish, where an > >>entire leg, shoulder or other large cut of lamb or pork is wrapped in a > >>covering of thinly sliced & seasoned potatoes and baked. The French do > >>a similar dish "ala boulangiere" but the potatoes are added after the > >>meat is 3/4 cooked. > >>-- > >>JL > > > > > > > > Shouldn't have put it in a thread about hash, then. It deserves its own > > thread and its own discussion. > > Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try to > suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any way > inappropriate as much as i am curious as to why it should matter so > much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my comments as in > any way inappropriately placed but that you felt the need to express > such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a criticism of my description > of a dish with similar ingredients and baked rather than fried? > > My comments are as correct and appropriately placed as the subject > itself. Variations on a theme. About food in a cooking group. One > almost expects anal pernicketiness in ridged interpretation of "recipes" > and "ingredients" in a "food group" but i did think any strict > observance of some convenient literary or editorial "style" was of less > concern than the subject matter. I am not a professional writer or > teacher of English and have misplaced my style manual. > > Such a type or style of criticism "shouldn't have put it in a..." made > humorously always evades me, criticism as a joke, i don't get the joke, > so if the above was meant as a kind of humorous reference than just > ignore this, but remember, i had my "sense of humour" surgically removed > so any such reference is likely to be taken literally by me. > > Now...to mention my sense of loss at the passing of Bill Buckley and his > inimitable literary and rhetorical style, that would be inappropriate here ![]() > -- > JL Please accept my apology. I intended no offense. Peace. -Barb Schaller -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >> >>Now...to mention my sense of loss at the passing of Bill Buckley and his >>inimitable literary and rhetorical style, that would be inappropriate here ![]() >>-- >>JL > > > > Please accept my apology. I intended no offense. > Peace. > -Barb Schaller Oh its all my fault, if boli were here i would blame him but....as a person without a sense of humour i really should not inflict my over intellectualized, pompous & pretentious examples of it on others, it was just a slow day and your note caught my eye, no offence was taken and i hope none, inadvertently given, by my own miserable prose ![]() -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
aem wrote:
> On Mar 14, 4:30�pm, Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > >>Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try to >>suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any way >>inappropriate �as much as i am curious as to why it should matter so >>much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my comments as in >>any way inappropriately placed but that you felt the need to express >>such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a criticism of my description >>of a dish with similar ingredients and baked rather than fried? > > > Are you really this dense, not to mention pompous? You hadn't noticed? > All she is gently > and humorously suggesting is that the dishes you and the other poster > describe might be good and tasty but they don't meet the ordinary > definition of "hash". Like many other dishes, this one is defined not > just by its ingredients but by its mode of cooking. Yeah but the mere fact of doing that seems a bit odd to me. Like what does it matter that i was tweaking the subject, changing its flow somewhat? its a very tasty dish and there have been several threads on it here comparing the French "a la boulangiere" and the Italian "Tuscano" versions of potato wrapped meat dishes. Were talking meat and potatoes here, and other than when talking to Royalty, changing the subject in a conversation is usually acceptable, especially when any change is just a variation on a theme. So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being inappropriate. > > >> .... i don't get the joke, > > > More than you know..... -aem It goes to a theory of humour that maintains "all humour is based on suffering" that's why i had mine surgically removed ![]() -- JL > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tracy wrote:
> > > Joseph Littleshoes wrote: > >> >> Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to >> slice them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly brown >> in hot canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions and then >> pour over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an omelette or a >> frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the eggs are much >> tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the eggs. >> -- >> JL > > > We call that a Spanish omelet in my house. Way awesome. > > -Tracy I saw it demonstrated on a japanese cooking show, they were making the worlds largest omelette and it was primarily composed of potatoes and eggs. This seemed to intrigue me for some reason, something instinctual about it just grabbed me and i rather soon made an potatoe omelette. It was SO delicious, so much better than eggs with potatoes on the side that i experimented with the basic ingredients till i devised a formula of outstanding and exceptional excellence and value to myself ![]() A quick stir fry of eggs and potatoes and one has a delightfully delicious and filling dish. Of course this "quick stir fry" is dependent on individual knowledge and technique but in essence is a simple thing, easily mastered. -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joseph Littleshoes wrote:
> aem wrote: > >> On Mar 14, 4:30�pm, Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: >> >>> Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try to >>> suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any way >>> inappropriate �as much as i am curious as to why it should matter so >>> much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my comments >>> as in any way inappropriately placed but that you felt the need to >>> express such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a criticism of my >>> description of a dish with similar ingredients and baked rather >>> than fried? >> >> >> Are you really this dense, not to mention pompous? > > You hadn't noticed? > >> All she is gently >> and humorously suggesting is that the dishes you and the other poster >> describe might be good and tasty but they don't meet the ordinary >> definition of "hash". Like many other dishes, this one is defined >> not just by its ingredients but by its mode of cooking. > > Yeah but the mere fact of doing that seems a bit odd to me. Like what > does it matter that i was tweaking the subject, changing its flow > somewhat? its a very tasty dish and there have been several threads on > it here comparing the French "a la boulangiere" and the Italian > "Tuscano" versions of potato wrapped meat dishes. > > Were talking meat and potatoes here, and other than when talking to > Royalty, changing the subject in a conversation is usually > acceptable, especially when any change is just a variation on a theme. > > So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being > inappropriate. >> Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know this. This isn't "thread drift", your suggested recipe is a totally different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:11:58 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes
> wrote: >Tracy wrote: >> >> >> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >> >>> >>> Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to >>> slice them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly brown >>> in hot canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions and then >>> pour over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an omelette or a >>> frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the eggs are much >>> tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the eggs. >>> -- >>> JL >> >> >> We call that a Spanish omelet in my house. Way awesome. >> >> -Tracy > >I saw it demonstrated on a japanese cooking show, they were making the >worlds largest omelette and it was primarily composed of potatoes and eggs. > >This seemed to intrigue me for some reason, something instinctual about >it just grabbed me and i rather soon made an potatoe omelette. It was SO >delicious, so much better than eggs with potatoes on the side that i >experimented with the basic ingredients till i devised a formula of >outstanding and exceptional excellence and value to myself ![]() > >A quick stir fry of eggs and potatoes and one has a delightfully >delicious and filling dish. > >Of course this "quick stir fry" is dependent on individual knowledge and >technique but in essence is a simple thing, easily mastered. It's called Frittata at my house too, except I make it in the skillet. I also add browned hamburger, so it looks like a thick, lumpy, egg pancake when it's done. I eat it with chili sauce and a few dashes of Tabasco. Haven't made that in quite a while, maybe I'll do it this weekend. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smile first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... > Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >> aem wrote: >> >>> On Mar 14, 4:30?pm, Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: >>> >>>> Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try to >>>> suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any way >>>> inappropriate ?as much as i am curious as to why it should matter so >>>> much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my comments >>>> as in any way inappropriately placed but that you felt the need to >>>> express such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a criticism of my >>>> description of a dish with similar ingredients and baked rather >>>> than fried? >>> >>> >>> Are you really this dense, not to mention pompous? >> >> You hadn't noticed? >> >>> All she is gently >>> and humorously suggesting is that the dishes you and the other poster >>> describe might be good and tasty but they don't meet the ordinary >>> definition of "hash". Like many other dishes, this one is defined >>> not just by its ingredients but by its mode of cooking. >> >> Yeah but the mere fact of doing that seems a bit odd to me. Like what >> does it matter that i was tweaking the subject, changing its flow >> somewhat? its a very tasty dish and there have been several threads on >> it here comparing the French "a la boulangiere" and the Italian >> "Tuscano" versions of potato wrapped meat dishes. >> >> Were talking meat and potatoes here, and other than when talking to >> Royalty, changing the subject in a conversation is usually >> acceptable, especially when any change is just a variation on a theme. >> >> So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being >> inappropriate. >>> > Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know this. > This isn't "thread drift", your suggested recipe is a totally different animal > (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. > I agree with Jill. The dish you mentioned also has a Greek version, JL. Cheers, Michael Kuettner |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Kuettner" > wrote in
: > > "jmcquown" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag > ... >> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >>> aem wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 14, 4:30?pm, Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try >>>>> to suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any >>>>> way inappropriate ?as much as i am curious as to why it should >>>>> matter so much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my >>>>> comments as in any way inappropriately placed but that you felt >>>>> the need to express such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a >>>>> criticism of my description of a dish with similar ingredients and >>>>> baked rather than fried? >>>> >>>> >>>> Are you really this dense, not to mention pompous? >>> >>> You hadn't noticed? >>> >>>> All she is gently >>>> and humorously suggesting is that the dishes you and the other >>>> poster describe might be good and tasty but they don't meet the >>>> ordinary definition of "hash". Like many other dishes, this one is >>>> defined not just by its ingredients but by its mode of cooking. >>> >>> Yeah but the mere fact of doing that seems a bit odd to me. Like >>> what does it matter that i was tweaking the subject, changing its >>> flow somewhat? its a very tasty dish and there have been several >>> threads on it here comparing the French "a la boulangiere" and the >>> Italian "Tuscano" versions of potato wrapped meat dishes. >>> >>> Were talking meat and potatoes here, and other than when talking to >>> Royalty, changing the subject in a conversation is usually >>> acceptable, especially when any change is just a variation on a >>> theme. >>> >>> So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being >>> inappropriate. >>>> >> Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know >> this. This isn't "thread drift", your suggested recipe is a totally >> different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. >> > I agree with Jill. > The dish you mentioned also has a Greek version, JL. > > Cheers, > > Michael Kuettner > > > > So where can I get parts for my lawnmower? -- The house of the burning beet-Alan A man in line at the bank kept falling over...when he got to a teller he asked for his balance. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hahabogus" schrieb : > "Michael Kuettner" wrote : > >> >> "jmcquown" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag >> ... >>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >>>> aem wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mar 14, 4:30?pm, Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try >>>>>> to suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any >>>>>> way inappropriate ?as much as i am curious as to why it should >>>>>> matter so much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret my >>>>>> comments as in any way inappropriately placed but that you felt >>>>>> the need to express such a thought publicly, as i read it, as a >>>>>> criticism of my description of a dish with similar ingredients and >>>>>> baked rather than fried? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you really this dense, not to mention pompous? >>>> >>>> You hadn't noticed? >>>> >>>>> All she is gently >>>>> and humorously suggesting is that the dishes you and the other >>>>> poster describe might be good and tasty but they don't meet the >>>>> ordinary definition of "hash". Like many other dishes, this one is >>>>> defined not just by its ingredients but by its mode of cooking. >>>> >>>> Yeah but the mere fact of doing that seems a bit odd to me. Like >>>> what does it matter that i was tweaking the subject, changing its >>>> flow somewhat? its a very tasty dish and there have been several >>>> threads on it here comparing the French "a la boulangiere" and the >>>> Italian "Tuscano" versions of potato wrapped meat dishes. >>>> >>>> Were talking meat and potatoes here, and other than when talking to >>>> Royalty, changing the subject in a conversation is usually >>>> acceptable, especially when any change is just a variation on a >>>> theme. >>>> >>>> So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being >>>> inappropriate. >>>>> >>> Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know >>> this. This isn't "thread drift", your suggested recipe is a totally >>> different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. >>> >> I agree with Jill. >> The dish you mentioned also has a Greek version, JL. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Michael Kuettner >> >> >> >> > > So where can I get parts for my lawnmower? > Either from Rasenmäherreparaturservice at Landstrasse, Schaan. Or just cannibalize the lawn mower of your neighbour. HTH, Michael Kuettner |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "hahabogus" > wrote in message > > So where can I get parts for my lawnmower? > Perfectly on topic if you are mowing dandelion greens for a salad to accompany hash. I change my oil every 7000 miles. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hahabogus wrote:
> "Michael Kuettner" > wrote in > : > >> >> "jmcquown" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag >> ... >>> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >>>> aem wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mar 14, 4:30?pm, Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Its not so much that im surprised or amazed that anyone would try >>>>>> to suggest that not only what i write but where i write is in any >>>>>> way inappropriate ?as much as i am curious as to why it should >>>>>> matter so much to you "Melba" that you could not only interpret >>>>>> my comments as in any way inappropriately placed but that you >>>>>> felt the need to express such a thought publicly, as i read it, >>>>>> as a criticism of my description of a dish with similar >>>>>> ingredients and baked rather than fried? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Are you really this dense, not to mention pompous? >>>> >>>> You hadn't noticed? >>>> >>>>> All she is gently >>>>> and humorously suggesting is that the dishes you and the other >>>>> poster describe might be good and tasty but they don't meet the >>>>> ordinary definition of "hash". Like many other dishes, this one >>>>> is defined not just by its ingredients but by its mode of cooking. >>>> >>>> Yeah but the mere fact of doing that seems a bit odd to me. Like >>>> what does it matter that i was tweaking the subject, changing its >>>> flow somewhat? its a very tasty dish and there have been several >>>> threads on it here comparing the French "a la boulangiere" and the >>>> Italian "Tuscano" versions of potato wrapped meat dishes. >>>> >>>> Were talking meat and potatoes here, and other than when talking to >>>> Royalty, changing the subject in a conversation is usually >>>> acceptable, especially when any change is just a variation on a >>>> theme. >>>> >>>> So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being >>>> inappropriate. >>>>> >>> Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know >>> this. This isn't "thread drift", your suggested recipe is a totally >>> different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. >>> >> I agree with Jill. >> The dish you mentioned also has a Greek version, JL. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Michael Kuettner >> >> >> >> > > So where can I get parts for my lawnmower? LOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Edwin Pawlowski" > schrieb im Newsbeitrag . net... > > "hahabogus" > wrote in message >> >> So where can I get parts for my lawnmower? >> > > Perfectly on topic if you are mowing dandelion greens for a salad to accompany > hash. > > I change my oil every 7000 miles. That's a long distance for a salad oil ... How many miles does your vinaigrette last ? Cheers, Michael Kuettner |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> It's called Frittata at my house too, except I make it in the skillet. > I also add browned hamburger, so it looks like a thick, lumpy, egg > pancake when it's done. I eat it with chili sauce and a few dashes of > Tabasco. Haven't made that in quite a while, maybe I'll do it this > weekend. If I make it with potatoes we call it Spanish Omlette. If I make it with pasta, we call it Frittata ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:51:22 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>sf wrote: >> It's called Frittata at my house too, except I make it in the skillet. >> I also add browned hamburger, so it looks like a thick, lumpy, egg >> pancake when it's done. I eat it with chili sauce and a few dashes of >> Tabasco. Haven't made that in quite a while, maybe I'll do it this >> weekend. > >If I make it with potatoes we call it Spanish Omlette. If I make it with >pasta, we call it Frittata ![]() > Interesting. The only pasta with egg dish I've heard of was called "spaghetti pie" and it was baked. Can't say I like the solidified egg with pasta combo. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smile first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >> So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being >> inappropriate. >> >>> > Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know > this. Now your claiming to be a 'mind reader' as well as a style maven? Must be nice having that kind of omniscience, not only knowing what every body else knows, but knowing me better than i know my self. This isn't "thread drift", Yes it is. As well as my own epistolary creativity. your suggested recipe is a totally > different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. > D'uh! > Jill I disagree, go back and read "Goomba's" comment that i was commenting on, that was a comment on technique i merely expanded on. -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:51:22 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote: > > >>sf wrote: >> >>>It's called Frittata at my house too, except I make it in the skillet. >>>I also add browned hamburger, so it looks like a thick, lumpy, egg >>>pancake when it's done. I eat it with chili sauce and a few dashes of >>>Tabasco. Haven't made that in quite a while, maybe I'll do it this >>>weekend. >> >>If I make it with potatoes we call it Spanish Omlette. If I make it with >>pasta, we call it Frittata ![]() >> > > Interesting. The only pasta with egg dish I've heard of was called > "spaghetti pie" and it was baked. Can't say I like the solidified egg > with pasta combo. > I have a chinese onion pie recipe that is essentially a very onion quiche. Pasta carbonara anyone? -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() <sf> wrote in message ... > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 16:51:22 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote: > >>sf wrote: >>> It's called Frittata at my house too, except I make it in the skillet. >>> I also add browned hamburger, so it looks like a thick, lumpy, egg >>> pancake when it's done. I eat it with chili sauce and a few dashes of >>> Tabasco. Haven't made that in quite a while, maybe I'll do it this >>> weekend. >> >>If I make it with potatoes we call it Spanish Omlette. If I make it with >>pasta, we call it Frittata ![]() >> > Interesting. The only pasta with egg dish I've heard of was called > "spaghetti pie" and it was baked. Can't say I like the solidified egg > with pasta combo. I can't say it is a "solidified egg with pasta combo" My husband loves it ![]() i do try to add something moist, like tomatoes though ![]() some kind of sauce too ![]() I make it the same way I do Spanish Omletter though. I finish it off under the grill/broiler. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joseph Littleshoes" > wrote in message .. . > jmcquown wrote: >> Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >>> So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being >>> inappropriate. >>> >>>> >> Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know >> this. > > Now your claiming to be a 'mind reader' as well as a style maven? > > Must be nice having that kind of omniscience, not only knowing what every > body else knows, but knowing me better than i know my self. > > This isn't "thread drift", > > Yes it is. As well as my own epistolary creativity. > > your suggested recipe is a totally >> different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. >> > D'uh! > >> Jill > > I disagree, go back and read "Goomba's" comment that i was commenting on, > that was a comment on technique i merely expanded on. > -- You are giving this silly, self-important bitch wayyy too much unction here, Joseph. Life is short enough already. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message 6.121... > "jmcquown" > dropped this > : in rec.food.cooking > >> Melba's Jammin' wrote: >>> Shouldn't have put it in a thread about hash, then. It deserves its >>> own thread and its own discussion. >>> > >> Absotively! Sounds tasty enough but it's not "beef hash" ![]() >> >> Jill <--contemplating corned beef hash if we have enough left over >> next week > > I haven't thought that far ahead yet but there will be corned beef hash in > the house next week ![]() > Do you grind or chop yours? What do you do with the left over cabbage? I > make soup if there is a lot left over. > > Michael > I chop the meat with a handy dandy cleaver. There probably won't be any leftover cabbage. Mom and I are both cabbage fiends. I should have bought two while they were on sale. Got 2 nice big bunches of broccoli instead. I've got a pot of broccoli soup on the stove ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 23:11:58 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes > > wrote: > > >>Tracy wrote: >> >>> >>>Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to >>>>slice them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly brown >>>>in hot canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions and then >>>>pour over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an omelette or a >>>>frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the eggs are much >>>>tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the eggs. >>>>-- >>>>JL >>> >>> >>>We call that a Spanish omelet in my house. Way awesome. >>> >>>-Tracy >> >>I saw it demonstrated on a japanese cooking show, they were making the >>worlds largest omelette and it was primarily composed of potatoes and eggs. >> >>This seemed to intrigue me for some reason, something instinctual about >>it just grabbed me and i rather soon made an potatoe omelette. It was SO >>delicious, so much better than eggs with potatoes on the side that i >>experimented with the basic ingredients till i devised a formula of >>outstanding and exceptional excellence and value to myself ![]() >> >>A quick stir fry of eggs and potatoes and one has a delightfully >>delicious and filling dish. >> >>Of course this "quick stir fry" is dependent on individual knowledge and >>technique but in essence is a simple thing, easily mastered. > > > It's called Frittata at my house too, except I make it in the skillet. > I also add browned hamburger, so it looks like a thick, lumpy, egg > pancake when it's done. I eat it with chili sauce and a few dashes of > Tabasco. Haven't made that in quite a while, maybe I'll do it this > weekend. > I prefer a bit of left over shrimp or chicken but meat is a good inclusion to the dish, i have used various spicy sausages to good effect in such a recipe. Recently got a smoked ham, am looking forward to its leftovers for Denver omelettes ![]() -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:05:42 -0800, Joseph Littleshoes
> wrote: >Pasta carbonara anyone? I love carbonara, but it's not solidified egg either. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smile first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cybercat wrote:
> "Joseph Littleshoes" > wrote in message > .. . > >>jmcquown wrote: >> >>>Joseph Littleshoes wrote: >>> >>>>So you can see why i was a bit confused by an accusation of being >>>>inappropriate. >>>> >>>> >>>Should have been a separate subject, JL. You know this, we all know >>>this. >> >>Now your claiming to be a 'mind reader' as well as a style maven? >> >>Must be nice having that kind of omniscience, not only knowing what every >>body else knows, but knowing me better than i know my self. >> >>This isn't "thread drift", >> >>Yes it is. As well as my own epistolary creativity. >> >>your suggested recipe is a totally >> >>>different animal (lamb, even!). And not lamb hash. >>> >> >>D'uh! >> >> >>>Jill >> >>I disagree, go back and read "Goomba's" comment that i was commenting on, >>that was a comment on technique i merely expanded on. >>-- > > > You are giving this silly, self-important bitch wayyy too much unction here, > Joseph. Life is short enough already. > > Well....i've been called prick in my life but never a Bishopric indulging in Ex Cathedra unction ![]() Im not too sure any emotions i have about it are anything other than shallow and superficial and a moments passing amusement. -- JL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes > dropped this news:e54e5$47daca23 > : in rec.food.cooking > > >>Now one use for the pre boiled potatoes that i do like a lot is to slice >>them into medium sized chunks, quickly heat up and lightly brown in hot >>canoloa oil with garlic, s & p, & chopped green onions and then pour >>over them several beaten eggs. Served as either an omelette or a >>frittata, i find the potatoes incorporated into the eggs are much >>tastier than the potatoes served 'on the side' with the eggs. > > > While keeping the pre-boiled potatoes is a great idea, I don't think that > would work for me. I would forget about them and they would go to waste. I guess i do serve potatoes fairly often i usually boil a dozen or so new red or white potatoes and use them up over the course of a week. Often times just taking one or 2 out of the fridge and nuking it and then adding a bit of butter, very quick and tasty. But they often get warmed up for a side dish with whatever im serving at any particular meal, often times just cut in to chunks and tossed in butter & herbs and warmed up in the oven, toast and coffee and a couple of eggs and that's b'fast. > If I made eggs of some kind every morning it would be a different story but > eggs are not on the menu every day. I like potatoes pretty much any way I > can get them. I tend to make them on the side much more than incorporating > them into a dish. I don't know why. I make a curry 2 - 3 times a month, nothing special just a commercial Japanese curry mix called "golden curry" cause its the "elderly relatives" favourite curry but i usually put chunks of raw potatoes in the curry along with onions and carrots to simmer for 20 minutes or so .. > > Mine used to take forever to fry up and like you, the result was > unacceptable. I honestly can't tell you where I learned to squeeze the > water out of the potatoes. I may have picked it up here or maybe I just > used some common sense for a change ![]() It never occurred to me till i saw it done. But then it was in desperation at the awful 'hash' i was making that i finally turned to a cook book and tried to figure out what i was doing wrong. But that squeezing of the water is truly remarkable in the difference it makes, i find i can put the shredded raw potatoes in my old potato rice and give them a really good squeeze. But i rarely make hash browns, and not a lot of fried foods in general. My b'fast potatoes are pre cooked, re - heated in an iron skillet with butter and herbs and set in the oven to fully warm, that is, when i don't boil an egg butter a slice of toast and drink a cup of coffee all while doing my e mail and call it breakfast before i rush out of the house. -- JL > > Michael > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Goomba38 > wrote:
> Ok, I've got assorted leftovers of flank steak, rib eye and roast beef. > My mother used to collect her scraps in the freezer and make the best hash. > I've got onions, potatoes, ketchup and can grind up the leftover meat. > Anything else go in? Make cottage pie or hachis parmentier. You can refine it with some or all of the following: smoked bacon, raw egg, parsley, bread, stock or gravy, Port wine, Worcestershire sauce, nutmeg, allspice, rosemary, parsley. Victor |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joseph Littleshoes > wrote:
> My comments are as correct and appropriately placed as the subject > itself. Variations on a theme. Hey, Caligula, I do not think gigot à la boulangère is really any kind of variation on a hash theme, but it does bear discussion on its own terms. I think that the Escoffier recipe you seem to have in mind is a refined version of a simpler peasant dish which was brought to the baker's on Saturday and cooked in the still hot bread oven to be ready on Sunday. So, all the ingredients had to be there - and cooked - at the same time. I do not think the peasants congregated at the baker's in the middle of the night to add potatoes. A similar dish in this sense is the Alsatian baeckofe. Victor |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Victor Sack wrote:
> Joseph Littleshoes > wrote: > >> My comments are as correct and appropriately placed as the subject >> itself. Variations on a theme. > > Hey, Caligula, I do not think gigot à la boulangère is really any kind > of variation on a hash theme, but it does bear discussion on its own > terms. I think that the Escoffier recipe you seem to have in mind is > a refined version of a simpler peasant dish which was brought to the > baker's on Saturday and cooked in the still hot bread oven to be ready > on Sunday. So, all the ingredients had to be there - and cooked - at > the same time. I do not think the peasants congregated at the baker's > in the middle of the night to add potatoes. A similar dish in this > sense is the Alsatian baeckofe. Will you share your recipe please, Victor? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message . .. > > "Michael "Dog3"" > wrote in message > 6.121... >> "jmcquown" > dropped this >> : in rec.food.cooking >> >>> Melba's Jammin' wrote: >>>> Shouldn't have put it in a thread about hash, then. It deserves its >>>> own thread and its own discussion. >>>> >> >>> Absotively! Sounds tasty enough but it's not "beef hash" ![]() >>> >>> Jill <--contemplating corned beef hash if we have enough left over >>> next week >> >> I haven't thought that far ahead yet but there will be corned beef hash >> in >> the house next week ![]() >> Do you grind or chop yours? What do you do with the left over cabbage? I >> make soup if there is a lot left over. >> >> Michael >> > I chop the meat with a handy dandy cleaver. There probably won't be any > leftover cabbage. Mom and I are both cabbage fiends. I should have > bought two while they were on sale. Got 2 nice big bunches of broccoli > instead. I've got a pot of broccoli soup on the stove ![]() > > Jill And dammitall, I can't find their cleaver! I know they had one; a nice hefty one Dad picked up in Thailand. A chef's knife will have to do if I go the corned beef hash route. We'll see ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia > wrote:
> Will you share your recipe please, Victor? Sure, but it is not "my" recipe. It is from _The Real Meat Cookbook_ by Frances Bissell. Victor Gigot Boulangère Serves 4-6 1 leg of lamb, weighing 4-5 lb/1.8-2.3 kg 2-3 cloves of garlic 4 lb/1.8 kg maincrop potatoes, peeled and sliced quite thinly 1 tsp dried rubbed thyme 2 bay leaves, crushed fine 1/2 tsp salt good pinch of freshly ground black pepper 1 onion, peeled and finely chopped up to 4 oz/110 g butter Peel and slice the garlic, then cut it into 'nails'. Insert these into the leg of lamb, all over, in slashes made in the in the fat with a sharp knife, between the muscles and around the bone. Preheat the oven to 200°C/400°F, gas mark 6. Mix the herbs, seasoning and onions together. Butter an ovenproof dish and lay half the potatoes in it. Sprinkle on half the seasoning then the rest of the potatoes in a layer, topped with the remaining seasoning. Dot with half the rest of the butter. Pour on enough warm water to just cover the potatoes and put them in the oven for 1 - 1 1/2 hours. Mix the rest of the butter with a good pinch each of salt and pepper and smear this over the leg of lamb. Remove the cooked potatoes from the oven and place the lamb on top. Return it to the oven and cook it for 15-18 minutes per lb/455 g, depending on how well cooked you like the meat. Switch off the oven, open the door and let the meat relax for 5-10 minutes before carving and serving. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wonderful
![]() "Victor Sack" > wrote in message .. . > Ophelia > wrote: > >> Will you share your recipe please, Victor? > > Sure, but it is not "my" recipe. It is from _The Real Meat Cookbook_ by > Frances Bissell. > > Victor > > Gigot Boulangère > Serves 4-6 > > 1 leg of lamb, weighing 4-5 lb/1.8-2.3 kg > 2-3 cloves of garlic > 4 lb/1.8 kg maincrop potatoes, peeled and sliced quite thinly > 1 tsp dried rubbed thyme > 2 bay leaves, crushed fine > 1/2 tsp salt > good pinch of freshly ground black pepper > 1 onion, peeled and finely chopped > up to 4 oz/110 g butter > > Peel and slice the garlic, then cut it into 'nails'. Insert these into > the leg of lamb, all over, in slashes made in the in the fat with a > sharp knife, between the muscles and around the bone. > > Preheat the oven to 200°C/400°F, gas mark 6. Mix the herbs, seasoning > and onions together. Butter an ovenproof dish and lay half the potatoes > in it. Sprinkle on half the seasoning then the rest of the potatoes in > a layer, topped with the remaining seasoning. Dot with half the rest of > the butter. Pour on enough warm water to just cover the potatoes and > put them in the oven for 1 - 1 1/2 hours. > > Mix the rest of the butter with a good pinch each of salt and pepper and > smear this over the leg of lamb. Remove the cooked potatoes from the > oven and place the lamb on top. Return it to the oven and cook it for > 15-18 minutes per lb/455 g, depending on how well cooked you like the > meat. > > Switch off the oven, open the door and let the meat relax for 5-10 > minutes before carving and serving. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ham hash | General Cooking | |||
Making hash... | General Cooking | |||
HASH BROWNS | General Cooking | |||
Hash Browns | General Cooking | |||
BBQ Hash!!!!!! | General Cooking |