|
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Goomba38 wrote:
> Felice wrote: >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> ... >>> Felice <Felice >> wrote: >>> >>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> Actually, I'm surprised she didn't go postal all tell us all to go >>>>> **** ourselves by now. So she at least deserves a kudos for that :-) >>>> Oooh! And you deserve a kudos yourself for knowing that it's singular! >>> What's singular? Kudos? >>> >>> -sw >> >> Yes, but you seem to have known that. Instinctively? Most people use it >> as a plural and so kudo has come about as a back-formation. >> >> Felice >> Professional wordster > > And that doesn't even touch on how many people spell it incorrectly as > "cudos" Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Blinky the Shark" > wrote > Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. nancy |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
In article >, "Nancy Young" > wrote:
> >"Blinky the Shark" > wrote > >> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. > >I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have >an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. Does your problem extend to "his"? ;-) Cheers, Phred. -- LID |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Phred" > wrote > In article >, "Nancy Young" > > wrote: >> >>"Blinky the Shark" > wrote >> >>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >> >>I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have >>an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. > > Does your problem extend to "his"? ;-) (laugh) No, nothing's his. nancy |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Nancy Young" > wrote in
: > (laugh) No, nothing's his. > > nancy > Ahh! A married woman. What's his is yours and what is yours is yours. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan A man in line at the bank kept falling over...when he got to a teller he asked for his balance. |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Blinky the Shark wrote:
> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. > <raises hand up to be counted> LOL |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Nancy Young wrote:
> "Phred" > wrote > >> In article >, "Nancy Young" >> > wrote: >>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >>> >>>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have >>> an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >> Does your problem extend to "his"? ;-) > > (laugh) No, nothing's his. > > nancy > > ....and that's the way we LIKE it!! His is mine Ours is mine Mine is mine :) |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Goomba38 > wrote in
: >> >> (laugh) No, nothing's his. >> >> nancy >> >> > ...and that's the way we LIKE it!! > His is mine > Ours is mine > Mine is mine :) > Zsa Zsa Gabor, when asked about her many marriages, used to say "I'm an excellent housekeeper. Every time I get a divorce, I keep the house." -- Peter Lucas Brisbane Australia Mary had a little lamb it ran into a pylon. 10,000 volts went up its arse and turned its wool to nylon. |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message ynet.net... > Goomba38 wrote: > >> Blinky the Shark wrote: >> >>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >>> >> <raises hand up to be counted> LOL > > I don't know why this is so misunderstood. > > These other possessive pronouns that are the pronoun with an added "s" > don't need apostrophes, either: > > ours > yours > hers > theirs > > I hope you aren't confused by *those*, too. See, the possessive "its" is > not even an exception -- it follows the *norm*: its, yours, hers, ours. > > And "it's" is simply a contraction for "it is", so needs the apostrope of > contraction: "It is going to rain." "It's going to rain." That's no > different than the contractions "didn't" and "weren't" and "can't" -- the > apostrophe replaces what was left out of the contraction. Would you write > "dont" and "werent" and "cant"? Of course not. So use "it's" just the > same way. Neither "its" nor "it's" are exceptions to anything. > > A bloodthirsty shark giving English lessions. How sexy is that? *fanning myself* |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Blinky the Shark" > wrote > Nancy Young wrote: >> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have >> an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. > > Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? > > hers > theirs > yours > ours > > No. > > "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? nancy |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Nancy Young wrote:
> > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote > >> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. > > I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have > an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? hers theirs yours ours No. "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Blinky the Shark" > wrote > Nancy Young wrote: > >> >> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >> >>> Nancy Young wrote: >> >>>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't >>>> have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >>> >>> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >>> >>> hers >>> theirs >>> yours >>> ours >>> >>> No. >>> >>> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. >> >> Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? > > Uh. Of course not. But thanks for playing. Okay, I'm talking about when you'd say its hat. Its foot. That's when I want that apostrophe in there. nancy |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Goomba38 wrote:
> Blinky the Shark wrote: > >> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >> > <raises hand up to be counted> LOL I don't know why this is so misunderstood. These other possessive pronouns that are the pronoun with an added "s" don't need apostrophes, either: ours yours hers theirs I hope you aren't confused by *those*, too. See, the possessive "its" is not even an exception -- it follows the *norm*: its, yours, hers, ours. And "it's" is simply a contraction for "it is", so needs the apostrope of contraction: "It is going to rain." "It's going to rain." That's no different than the contractions "didn't" and "weren't" and "can't" -- the apostrophe replaces what was left out of the contraction. Would you write "dont" and "werent" and "cant"? Of course not. So use "it's" just the same way. Neither "its" nor "it's" are exceptions to anything. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message ynet.net... > cybercat wrote: > >> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message >> ynet.net... >>> Goomba38 wrote: >>> >>>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >>>>> >>>> <raises hand up to be counted> LOL >>> >>> I don't know why this is so misunderstood. >>> >>> These other possessive pronouns that are the pronoun with an added "s" >>> don't need apostrophes, either: >>> >>> ours >>> yours >>> hers >>> theirs >>> >>> I hope you aren't confused by *those*, too. See, the possessive "its" >>> is not even an exception -- it follows the *norm*: its, yours, hers, >>> ours. >>> >>> And "it's" is simply a contraction for "it is", so needs the apostrope >>> of contraction: "It is going to rain." "It's going to rain." That's >>> no different than the contractions "didn't" and "weren't" and "can't" -- >>> the apostrophe replaces what was left out of the contraction. Would you >>> write "dont" and "werent" and "cant"? Of course not. So use "it's" >>> just the same way. Neither "its" nor "it's" are exceptions to anything. >>> >> A bloodthirsty shark giving English lessions. How sexy is that? *fanning >> myself* > > :) > You sexy, bloodthirsty devil you. |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
cybercat wrote:
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message > ynet.net... >> Goomba38 wrote: >> >>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>> >>>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >>>> >>> <raises hand up to be counted> LOL >> >> I don't know why this is so misunderstood. >> >> These other possessive pronouns that are the pronoun with an added "s" >> don't need apostrophes, either: >> >> ours >> yours >> hers >> theirs >> >> I hope you aren't confused by *those*, too. See, the possessive "its" >> is not even an exception -- it follows the *norm*: its, yours, hers, >> ours. >> >> And "it's" is simply a contraction for "it is", so needs the apostrope >> of contraction: "It is going to rain." "It's going to rain." That's >> no different than the contractions "didn't" and "weren't" and "can't" -- >> the apostrophe replaces what was left out of the contraction. Would you >> write "dont" and "werent" and "cant"? Of course not. So use "it's" >> just the same way. Neither "its" nor "it's" are exceptions to anything. >> > A bloodthirsty shark giving English lessions. How sexy is that? *fanning > myself* :) -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Blinky the Shark" > wrote > Nancy Young wrote: > > >> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >> >>> Nancy Young wrote: >>> >>> >>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >>>> >>>>> Nancy Young wrote: >>>> >>>>>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't >>>>>> have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >>>>> >>>>> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >>>>> >>>>> hers >>>>> theirs >>>>> yours >>>>> ours >>>>> >>>>> No. >>>>> >>>>> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. >>>> >>>> Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? >>> >>> Uh. Of course not. But thanks for playing. >> >> Okay, I'm talking about when you'd say its hat. Its foot. That's when I >> want that apostrophe in there. > > Well, if you want to do it correctly, stop wanting that. :) That's > exactly what I was illustrating with the list I showed -- that adding an > "s" to a pronoun doesn't mean you have to insert an "apostrophe". It's no > more necessary there than when you add an "s" to make a plural. Lions and > tigers and bears identify a group of animals; "lion's and tiger's and > bear's" doesn't. We must stamp out this knee-jerk obsession for inserting > apostrophes as if they are somehow needed to warn the reader that there is > an "s" coming. Esses are not dangerous; the reader does not need to be > warned that he's about to see one. :) I don't always want to add the apostrophe, I am *not* the cause of the apostrophe shortage. You will have to blame someone else for that. I'm only talking about when I would say Nancy's car. The woman's scarf. It's feet. My right pinky wants to put that apostrophe only in cases like that. I'm not the person who thinks ' means Watch out, here comes an s. nancy |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Nancy Young wrote:
> > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote > >> Nancy Young wrote: > >>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't >>> have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >> >> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >> >> hers >> theirs >> yours >> ours >> >> No. >> >> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. > > Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? Uh. Of course not. But thanks for playing. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Nancy Young wrote:
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote > >> Nancy Young wrote: >> >> >>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >>> >>>> Nancy Young wrote: >>> >>>>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't >>>>> have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >>>> >>>> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >>>> >>>> hers >>>> theirs >>>> yours >>>> ours >>>> >>>> No. >>>> >>>> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. >>> >>> Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? >> >> Uh. Of course not. But thanks for playing. > > Okay, I'm talking about when you'd say its hat. Its foot. That's when I > want that apostrophe in there. Well, if you want to do it correctly, stop wanting that. :) That's exactly what I was illustrating with the list I showed -- that adding an "s" to a pronoun doesn't mean you have to insert an "apostrophe". It's no more necessary there than when you add an "s" to make a plural. Lions and tigers and bears identify a group of animals; "lion's and tiger's and bear's" doesn't. We must stamp out this knee-jerk obsession for inserting apostrophes as if they are somehow needed to warn the reader that there is an "s" coming. Esses are not dangerous; the reader does not need to be warned that he's about to see one. :) -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
cybercat wrote:
> > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message > ynet.net... >> cybercat wrote: >> >>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message >>> ynet.net... >>>> Goomba38 wrote: >>>> >>>>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >>>>>> >>>>> <raises hand up to be counted> LOL >>>> >>>> I don't know why this is so misunderstood. >>>> >>>> These other possessive pronouns that are the pronoun with an added "s" >>>> don't need apostrophes, either: >>>> >>>> ours >>>> yours >>>> hers >>>> theirs >>>> >>>> I hope you aren't confused by *those*, too. See, the possessive "its" >>>> is not even an exception -- it follows the *norm*: its, yours, hers, >>>> ours. >>>> >>>> And "it's" is simply a contraction for "it is", so needs the apostrope >>>> of contraction: "It is going to rain." "It's going to rain." That's >>>> no different than the contractions "didn't" and "weren't" and "can't" >>>> -- the apostrophe replaces what was left out of the contraction. >>>> Would you write "dont" and "werent" and "cant"? Of course not. So >>>> use "it's" just the same way. Neither "its" nor "it's" are exceptions >>>> to anything. >>>> >>> A bloodthirsty shark giving English lessions. How sexy is that? >>> *fanning myself* >> >> :) >> >> > You sexy, bloodthirsty devil you. Keep that up and my participle won't be dangling any more. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Nancy Young wrote:
> > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote > >> Nancy Young wrote: >> >> >>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >>> >>>> Nancy Young wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >>>>> >>>>>> Nancy Young wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't >>>>>>> have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >>>>>> >>>>>> hers >>>>>> theirs >>>>>> yours >>>>>> ours >>>>>> >>>>>> No. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. >>>>> >>>>> Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? >>>> >>>> Uh. Of course not. But thanks for playing. >>> >>> Okay, I'm talking about when you'd say its hat. Its foot. That's when >>> I want that apostrophe in there. >> >> Well, if you want to do it correctly, stop wanting that. :) That's >> exactly what I was illustrating with the list I showed -- that adding an >> "s" to a pronoun doesn't mean you have to insert an "apostrophe". It's >> no more necessary there than when you add an "s" to make a plural. >> Lions and tigers and bears identify a group of animals; "lion's and >> tiger's and bear's" doesn't. We must stamp out this knee-jerk obsession >> for inserting apostrophes as if they are somehow needed to warn the >> reader that there is an "s" coming. Esses are not dangerous; the reader >> does not need to be warned that he's about to see one. :) > > I don't always want to add the apostrophe, I am *not* the cause of the > apostrophe shortage. You will have to blame someone else for that. I blame it on linguistic warming. > I'm only talking about when I would say Nancy's car. The woman's scarf. Correct and correct, of course. > It's feet. My right pinky wants to put that apostrophe only in cases > like that. Off with its head! It's the only fix. -- Blinky Killing all posts from Google Groups The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org Blinky: http://blinkynet.net |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Nancy Young" > wrote in
: > > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote > >> Nancy Young wrote: > >>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't >>> have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >> >> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >> >> hers >> theirs >> yours >> ours >> >> No. >> >> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. > > Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? > > nancy > > > The hats that are hers' rock...There I said it. Disclaimer: Never actually having seen Julie or you, I have no clue to her hat style. And their appeal to me or others. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan A man in line at the bank kept falling over...when he got to a teller he asked for his balance. |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
In article >,
"Nancy Young" > wrote: > Okay, I'm talking about when you'd say its hat. Its foot. > That's when I want that apostrophe in there. > > nancy Possessive pronouns don't take apostrophes. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Nancy Young wrote:
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote > >> Nancy Young wrote: > >>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have >>> an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >> >> hers >> theirs >> yours >> ours >> >> No. >> >> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. > > Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? > > nancy > > The hats belong to her. They are hers. She found the rock. It is hers, not his. gloria p |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Nancy Young wrote:
> > I'm talking about when you'd say its hat. Its foot. > That's when I want that apostrophe in there. > Nope. The only time you'd put an apostrophe in "it's" is when it means it is. Its is a word already meaning "belonging to it" just like his, hers, ours, theirs. gloria p |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
hahabogus wrote:
> > The hats that are hers' rock...There I said it. > Yabbut you said it incorrectly. NO APOSTROPHE NEEDED. The hats that are hers (not his) rock. gloria p |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Puester > wrote in news:stZEj.58984$cQ1.58614
@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net: > The hats that are hers (not his) rock. > Don't be silly...I don't have hats...I'm a manly man. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan A man in line at the bank kept falling over...when he got to a teller he asked for his balance. |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
Puester > wrote in
: > Nancy Young wrote: >> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >> >>> Nancy Young wrote: >> >>>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't >>>> have an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >>> Do these *other* possessive pronouns have an apostrophe? >>> >>> hers >>> theirs >>> yours >>> ours >>> >>> No. >>> >>> "Its" isn't even an exception; it illustrates the *norm*. >> >> Do you say hers hats? Hers rock? >> >> nancy >> >> > > > The hats belong to her. They are hers. > She found the rock. It is hers, not his. > > gloria p > He found the rock. it is hiss, not hers...cried the snake. hers, hers ...a snake with a lisp. -- The house of the burning beet-Alan A man in line at the bank kept falling over...when he got to a teller he asked for his balance. |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
"Nancy Young" schrieb : > > "Blinky the Shark" > wrote <snip> >> >> Well, if you want to do it correctly, stop wanting that. :) That's >> exactly what I was illustrating with the list I showed -- that adding an >> "s" to a pronoun doesn't mean you have to insert an "apostrophe". It's no >> more necessary there than when you add an "s" to make a plural. Lions and >> tigers and bears identify a group of animals; "lion's and tiger's and >> bear's" doesn't. We must stamp out this knee-jerk obsession for inserting >> apostrophes as if they are somehow needed to warn the reader that there is >> an "s" coming. Esses are not dangerous; the reader does not need to be >> warned that he's about to see one. :) > > I don't always want to add the apostrophe, I am *not* the cause > of the apostrophe shortage. You will have to blame someone else > for that. > > I'm only talking about when I would say Nancy's car. The woman's scarf. > It's feet. My right pinky wants to put that apostrophe only in cases like > that. > Easy solution : Amputate the right pinky ! > I'm not the person who thinks ' means Watch out, here comes an s. > After reading this thread, I feel the urge to write "Blinky the 'Shark". Cheers, Michael Kuettner |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:51:11 -0400, "cybercat" >
wrote: > >"Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message kynet.net... >> Goomba38 wrote: >> >>> Blinky the Shark wrote: >>> >>>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >>>> >>> <raises hand up to be counted> LOL >> >> I don't know why this is so misunderstood. >> >> These other possessive pronouns that are the pronoun with an added "s" >> don't need apostrophes, either: >> >> ours >> yours >> hers >> theirs >> >> I hope you aren't confused by *those*, too. See, the possessive "its" is >> not even an exception -- it follows the *norm*: its, yours, hers, ours. >> >> And "it's" is simply a contraction for "it is", so needs the apostrope of >> contraction: "It is going to rain." "It's going to rain." That's no >> different than the contractions "didn't" and "weren't" and "can't" -- the >> apostrophe replaces what was left out of the contraction. Would you write >> "dont" and "werent" and "cant"? Of course not. So use "it's" just the >> same way. Neither "its" nor "it's" are exceptions to anything. >> >> > >A bloodthirsty shark giving English lessions. How sexy is that? *fanning >myself* > first they sweet-talk you and then they eat you. a man could learn something from that. your pal, blake |
How about we give Julie another start? (was Sub for lard?)
On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 15:15:45 -0400, Goomba38 >
wrote: >Nancy Young wrote: >> "Phred" > wrote >> >>> In article >, "Nancy Young" >>> > wrote: >>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote >>>> >>>>> Hell, most people can't even spell "its" and it's" correctly. >>>> I have its it's issues. I can't get it that the possessive doesn't have >>>> an apostrophe. Why???? Heh. >>> Does your problem extend to "his"? ;-) >> >> (laugh) No, nothing's his. >> >> nancy >> >> >...and that's the way we LIKE it!! >His is mine >Ours is mine >Mine is mine :) i suppose in your case, not even his golf clubs are safe. your pal, blake |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter