Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Anthony Ferrante > wrote: > http://www.cookware.com/LEIFHEIT-240...er-QI1037.html > > I really do love potatoes. I just hate peeling them. > > Anthony That's similar to the one I use, though mine is all metal. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anthony Ferrante wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:01:05 -0400, Goomba38 > > wrote: > >> Anthony Ferrante wrote: >> >>> I saw a rather inexpensive item that you add water to and about two >>> pounds of potatoes and it says it will clean them in about 4 >>> minutes. Sounds good, but I wonder: >>> http://tinyurl.com/2ky7tk >>> I've also seen the table-top apple peelers that also say they will >>> peel potatoes. Be nice if it works: >>> http://www.amazon.com/Back-Basics-Ap.../dp/B0000DE2SS >>> Anyone try any of these? If so, your thoughts? >>> Anthony >> >> What's with you and junk? > > I wish I knew. You cannot imagine (or maybe you can) how much money I > have spent on crap that I end up throwing away. I love gadgets and > despite the fact that I am usually disappointed with them, I still > look for them. I'm just going to go out and get a hand peeler with a > wider blade area. > Well don't throw the stuff away! Give it to the Salvation Army or some thrift shop where someone else who likes junk can buy it, cheap ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anthony Ferrante wrote:
> I can honestly say I am embarrassed answering your question, and > please remember, I said I am lazy. > > I usually peel maybe 4-5 big ones at a time. What would that be, maybe > 1 or 2 pounds?? > > Anthony .. oh geeez....grow a set of balls and just take the 2 minutes to peel them like a man.... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> What's your goal, Anthony? How's your budget? Try Simply Potatoes -- > I've used their hash brown shreds with fine success; they make several > different 'cuts' and combinations. I kinda liked Bob Evans' mashed > potatoes, too. I didn't look to see what they put in them but they were > creamy and tasty (read buttery-tasting and salty). Someone here > suggested refrigerated potato sides when I was looking for something to > accompany the meat loaf I was making for my friend a couple weeks ago. > Not the worst thing I've ever eaten. How odd. I looked at those for the first time yesterday while picking up some milk. They are kept in the dairy case for some reason? I looked at the package of red potato wedges, that had instructions on how to roast or pan fry them. They felt slightly soft in the package even before cooking. I noticed that second ingredient was sugar. I didn't even read further. I'm sure it helps them brown up nicely but...do I want or need that? I used to be amazed by the selection of prepped and ready to cook potatoes available in the grocers in The Netherlands years ago. I don't recall them having any sugar in them? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet Baraclough wrote:
>> oh geeez....grow a set of balls and just take the 2 minutes to peel them >> like a man.... > > Peel his balls? > > Janet LOL, oops.. no. The potatoes. Leave the little tater tots alone and maybe they'll grow up to be big spuds one day ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> > What exactly do you hate so much about peeling potatoes? The time it > takes? Maybe you need a different peeler. I use a U-shape peeler that > I got at the State Fair about four or five years ago. It works a treat > and I'll bet I can peel a large potato in less than 10 seconds. Is that one of those "Swiss" peelers? They seem to be only available at fairs and flea markets. It is my very, very favorite peeler. When I lost my only one in an RV wreck, I despaired of ever finding another peeler that worked as well. I tried every U-shaped and wishbone shaped peeler I could find and none compared. One day, while wandering through a flea market, I found a fellow selling them. I bought two. I have a spare, though I'll probably never need it. -- Janet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Anthony Ferrante wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:23:52 -0400, "Nancy Young" > > wrote: > > > > >"Anthony Ferrante" > wrote > > > >> Anyone try any of these? If so, your thoughts? > > > >Work on your technique. Get a nice Y peeler, with the nice black > >handle, and just run it down the potato from pole to pole. Easy and > >fast. Forget gizmos, didn't you learn from the pasta thing? > > > >nancy > > > That's what I intend to do. I am sure it will be much more comfortable > in my hand. > > Anthony If you want a pasta gadget that actually works as advertised, look for the VillaWare "Beebo" Cavatelli maker. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Anthony Ferrante > wrote: > I have been doing that. However, I was looking for a better way since > when standing at the sink, peeling, my back really hurts. And because > of the mess, I prefer to do it in there. What I currently have is > something similar to this, but mine has a all-metal body and is cheap > and very basic: C'mon, Anthony, get a grip. You want someone to eat the potatoes for you, too? If standing at the sink hurts your back, either peel faster so you're not standing so long or SIT DOWN. Sit on a chair, put a pan between your knees, peel those suckers and cut any eyes and bruises out and then go to the sink and wash them. Don't worry about how dirty they might get when you're peeling them. Rinse them and go about your cooking. You like gadgets? You wanna buy my julienne peeler? I'll give you a deal on it. I got it at Tuesday Morning. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:14:42 -0500, Janet Wilder
> wrote: >Melba's Jammin' wrote: > >> >> What exactly do you hate so much about peeling potatoes? The time it >> takes? Maybe you need a different peeler. I use a U-shape peeler that >> I got at the State Fair about four or five years ago. It works a treat >> and I'll bet I can peel a large potato in less than 10 seconds. > >Is that one of those "Swiss" peelers? They seem to be only available at >fairs and flea markets. It is my very, very favorite peeler. When I lost >my only one in an RV wreck, I despaired of ever finding another peeler >that worked as well. I tried every U-shaped and wishbone shaped peeler I >could find and none compared. > >One day, while wandering through a flea market, I found a fellow selling >them. I bought two. I have a spare, though I'll probably never need it. Howdy, You might want to try one of these: http://preview.tinyurl.com/2k8o2n That one is made by Kyocera, though there are other fine manufacturers. These have a ceramic blade and are a pleasure to use. All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Anthony Ferrante > wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:40:32 -0500, Melba's Jammin' > > wrote: > >> I saw a rather inexpensive item that you add water to and about two > >> pounds of potatoes and it says it will clean them in about 4 minutes. > >> Sounds good, but I wonder: > > > >> Anthony > > > >They're as good as the Pasta Express. > > Ouch! I knew that was going to be mentioned ![]() You leave yourself open like that, Anthony, you gotta expect it. :-) -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:43:07 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon
> wrote: >He always thought all the local groceries hired him to >unload the delivery trucks and haul the cases into the basement >because he was smart... Henry never realized that they sought out his >services because he cost less than a forklift. 'and it's best that they did... Just the image of a forklift heading for the basement gives me the shivers... -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Anthony Ferrante > wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 09:23:52 -0400, "Nancy Young" > > wrote: > > > > >"Anthony Ferrante" > wrote > > > >> Anyone try any of these? If so, your thoughts? > > > >Work on your technique. Get a nice Y peeler, with the nice black > >handle, and just run it down the potato from pole to pole. Easy and > >fast. Forget gizmos, didn't you learn from the pasta thing? > > > >nancy > > > That's what I intend to do. I am sure it will be much more comfortable > in my hand. > > Anthony Maybe you need a palm peeler: http://tinyurl.com/2yntny Might want to check into the corn zipper while you're on that page, too. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:45:23 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon
> wrote: >the volume increases by the square of the diameter. Well, no... The volume varies with the cube of the diameter. The surface area varies with the square of the diameter. (and that's why peeling the larger spud saves time) All the best, -- Kenneth If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Anthony Ferrante > wrote: > I know sitting would be easier than standing, but being lazy I am > always looking for an easy out. It usually does not happen. I am just > going to bite the bullet and buy a Y-shaped peeler and sit and do what > I have been dreading. But, I can always do it near the computer as I > read all my groups. > > Anthony Anthony, just peel the damn potatoes, be done with them, and THEN read your groups. If you try to do both at the same time, you'll give neither the attention it deserves and you'll have potato starch all over your keyboard and then you'll be looking for a miracle cleaner to get your keyboard clean. I can see a pattern here. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 5:00�pm, Sqwertz > wrote:
> Sheldon <Sheldon >> wrote: > > I think they're too big for single serving/baked. �But they'd be great > > for any other use; fries, roasted, soups, stews, salads, etc. �So far > > I roasted four, quartered with skins on, oiled and salted. �I baked > > four, ate two a half at a time (I like cold baked), two became tater > > salad. �I used two diced into a potato fritata with ten eggs, sliced > > in quarters was plenty for four meals. �Those are the last three.. > > They're very good quality potatoes, I shoulda bought two bags. �I > > don't get up to Sam's often, it's about thirty miles one way and in a > > out of the way direction where there's nothing else I need. > > For some reason I thought you said CostCo. �The CostCo bags are > 30lbs each. �So when you said "you should have bought 2 bags", I was > scratching my head. > > -sw There's no CostCo around here. At first I thought those were 10 lb bags but upon further inspection I realized I had a 15 lb bag. Sometimes I can buy a five pound bag of potatoes and they can set around for weeks and begin to sprout before I use them. But these monsters were so good I only have those three left, so I shoulda got a second bag. The thing is with those mega stores there's no way to know what they have until you get there and look about. Those spuds were great but just as often I'll come home with something totally awful, like a few months back I came upon a pecan chocolate bobka that looked fabulous so I bought two, and they were huge, like 3 pounds each, I figured to freeze most. When I got home that was the first thing I tried, it was disgusting, wasn't really bobka because it was not a yeast leavened product, I think it was mostly outta space chems, had no flavor at all other than sickly sweet. The critters in my yard got it all... the deer shunned it, the huge flocks of starlings pecked at it for two days, and I'm talking clouds of starlings well over a thousand strong, I'm always amazed at what critters find their way here even in winter. The Canada geese are already perfoming fly overs so I know it's spring. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 9:30�pm, Kenneth > wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 14:43:07 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon > > > wrote: > >He always thought all the local groceries hired him to > >unload the delivery trucks and haul the cases into the basement > >because he was smart... Henry never realized that they sought out his > >services because he cost less than a forklift. > > 'and it's best that they did... > > Just the image of a forklift heading for the basement gives > me the shivers... That's called a figure of speech, Henry coulda been a bull dozer, a steam shovel, or a 20 yard dump truck. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Janet Wilder > wrote: > Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > > > > What exactly do you hate so much about peeling potatoes? The time it > > takes? Maybe you need a different peeler. I use a U-shape peeler that > > I got at the State Fair about four or five years ago. It works a treat > > and I'll bet I can peel a large potato in less than 10 seconds. > > Is that one of those "Swiss" peelers? They seem to be only available at > fairs and flea markets. It is my very, very favorite peeler. When I lost > my only one in an RV wreck, I despaired of ever finding another peeler > that worked as well. I tried every U-shaped and wishbone shaped peeler I > could find and none compared. STAR brand, Made in Switzerland. I just checked. :-) -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Melba's Jammin' > wrote:
> (Victor Sack) wrote: > > > A conventional peeler, held like a knife, is way more comfortable and > > faster to use. > > Do you peel towards yourself or away? The former, of course. Did you take a gander at the two video links I posted? Takes just a few minutes. > My "conventional" peeler works > best peeling away from me. Feh. A peeler does not work - you work it. Only a child - especially of the male persuasion - or someone who is particularly clumsy in the kitchen would peel away from himself, as if sharperning or whittling a stick. I do not know how clumsy you are, but you are very young for a grandmother, a mere child. As a much older grandmother I can tell you so! Also, a proper conventional peeler, the swivel type, whether "right-" or "left-handed", would make it impossible to peel away from yourself, unless you are reasonably ambidextrous and willing to use your "alternative" hand. > My U-shaped peeler is not the most comfortable to use but it is most > efficient so it doesn't matter. When peeling round objects, like potatoes, it is impossible for a U-shaped peeler to be more efficient than a properly used conventional one. With a conventional peeler, peeling and rotating the object is one motion, with your thumb helping to both guide the blade and rotate the object. You could peel a potato in one continuous motion, with the whole of the peel in one strip, if you wanted. With a U-shaped peeler, the thumb is needed to hold the peeler and the motions are separate, short and virtually unrelated. Look at the videos; they are self-explanatory. Bubba Vic |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kenneth wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:14:42 -0500, Janet Wilder > > wrote: > >> Melba's Jammin' wrote: >> >>> What exactly do you hate so much about peeling potatoes? The time it >>> takes? Maybe you need a different peeler. I use a U-shape peeler that >>> I got at the State Fair about four or five years ago. It works a treat >>> and I'll bet I can peel a large potato in less than 10 seconds. >> Is that one of those "Swiss" peelers? They seem to be only available at >> fairs and flea markets. It is my very, very favorite peeler. When I lost >> my only one in an RV wreck, I despaired of ever finding another peeler >> that worked as well. I tried every U-shaped and wishbone shaped peeler I >> could find and none compared. >> >> One day, while wandering through a flea market, I found a fellow selling >> them. I bought two. I have a spare, though I'll probably never need it. > > Howdy, > > You might want to try one of these: > > http://preview.tinyurl.com/2k8o2n > > That one is made by Kyocera, though there are other fine > manufacturers. These have a ceramic blade and are a pleasure > to use. > > All the best, Thanks, but I'll stick with my Swiss peeler. -- Janet Wilder Bad spelling. Bad punctuation Good Friends. Good Life |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
(Victor Sack) wrote: > Melba's Jammin' > wrote: > > > (Victor Sack) wrote: > > > > > A conventional peeler, held like a knife, is way more comfortable and > > > faster to use. > > > > Do you peel towards yourself or away? > > The former, of course. Did you take a gander at the two video links I > posted? Takes just a few minutes. Sort of. > > > My "conventional" peeler works best peeling away from me. > Feh. A peeler does not work - you work it. Only a child - especially > of the male persuasion - or someone who is particularly clumsy in the > kitchen would peel away from himself, as if sharperning or whittling a > stick. I do not know how clumsy you are, but you are very young for a > grandmother, a mere child. As a much older grandmother I can tell you > so! Also, a proper conventional peeler, the swivel type, whether > "right-" or "left-handed", would make it impossible to peel away from > yourself, unless you are reasonably ambidextrous and willing to use your > "alternative" hand. Once again, you're full of crap, Bubba Vic. '-) > > > My U-shaped peeler is not the most comfortable to use but it is most > > efficient so it doesn't matter. > > When peeling round objects, like potatoes, it is impossible for a > U-shaped peeler to be more efficient than a properly used conventional > one. With a conventional peeler, peeling and rotating the object is one > motion, with your thumb helping to both guide the blade and rotate the > object. You could peel a potato in one continuous motion, with the > whole of the peel in one strip, if you wanted. My life would be complete. > With a U-shaped peeler, > the thumb is needed to hold the peeler and the motions are separate, > short and virtually unrelated. Look at the videos; they are > self-explanatory. My connection isn't fast enough for a smooth viewing unless I do something else for 5 minutes while the whole downloads. I watched some of it. Where she was peeling with a knife and with an Oxo-looking peeler, towards herself on both counts. > > Bubba Vic -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
>, Nancy2 > wrote: > On Mar 18, 12:58*pm, George > wrote: > > Anthony Ferrante wrote: > > > There are few things in life I hate more than peeling potatoes and I > > > was reminded of that fact when I began peeling them for my gig's > > > dinner. Through Google, I was able to see a few gadgets that claim to > > > be able to peel potatoes and I was wondering if they really work? > > > > > I saw a rather inexpensive item that you add water to and about two > > > pounds of potatoes and it says it will clean them in about 4 minutes. > > > Sounds good, but I wonder: > > > > >http://tinyurl.com/2ky7tk > > > > > I've also seen the table-top apple peelers that also say they will > > > peel potatoes. Be nice if it works: > > > > >http://www.amazon.com/Back-Basics-Ap.../dp/B0000DE2SS > > > > > Anyone try any of these? If so, your thoughts? > > > > > Anthony > > > > I can't remember the last time I peeled a potato. Thats where all of the > > vitamins and fiber are and even if it wasn't I like the texture.- Hide > > quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > I absolutely cannot eat mashed potatoes with skin in them. Hardly > anything, to me, is more gross. ;-) Peeling potatoes to make skin-free mashed isn't necessary. You can get excellent skin-free mashed potatoes simply by running whole unpeeled boiled potatoes through a potato ricer. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"Pete C." > wrote: > If you want a pasta gadget that actually works as advertised, look for > the VillaWare "Beebo" Cavatelli maker. I want one!!! (What do you do with cavatelli?) Looks like it can be had for $30. -- -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ http://www.caringbridge.org/visit/amytaylor Pray for the abatement of her pain. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Melba's Jammin'" > wrote > "Pete C." > wrote: > >> If you want a pasta gadget that actually works as advertised, look for >> the VillaWare "Beebo" Cavatelli maker. > > I want one!!! (What do you do with cavatelli?) When I think of cavadell I think of broccoli! Cavatelli and broccoli is one of my favorites. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Melba's Jammin'" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > In article >, > "Pete C." > wrote: > >> If you want a pasta gadget that actually works as advertised, look for >> the VillaWare "Beebo" Cavatelli maker. > > I want one!!! (What do you do with cavatelli?) > Looks like it can be had for $30. > -- > -Barb, Mother Superior, HOSSSPoJ A cavatelli make is a butter knife! I swear it. There is a dish of cavatelli, mussels and white beans that ought by rights to be the national dish of Italy. Cavatelli are orecchitte shaped differently! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 18, 9:04*am, Anthony Ferrante >
wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:40:32 -0500, Melba's Jammin' > > > > > wrote: > >In article >, > > Anthony Ferrante > wrote: > > >> There are few things in life I hate more than peeling potatoes and I > >> was reminded of that fact when I began peeling them for my gig's > >> dinner. Through Google, I was able to see a few gadgets that claim to > >> be able to peel potatoes and I was wondering if they really work? > > >> I saw a rather inexpensive item that you add water to and about two > >> pounds of potatoes and it says it will clean them in about 4 minutes. > >> Sounds good, but I wonder: > > >> Anthony > > >They're as good as the Pasta Express. > > Ouch! I knew that was going to be mentioned ![]() > > >Get a copper wire ChoreBoy scrubber and scrub the little skin off the > >little suckers. > > I have been doing that. However, I was looking for a better way since > when standing at the sink, peeling, my back really hurts. And because > of the mess, I prefer to do it in there. * Then lay out some newspaper on the kitchen table, half fill a rather large pot with salted water. Take a bowl or plastic dishpan to the table with you and SIT DOWN at the kitchen table and peel the spuds that way. Peel over the plastic container, drop the peeled potatoes into the salted water to keep them from discoloring. Newspaper protects the kitchen table surface from errant peelings. You just have to fold everything up in the newspaper and away into the trash it goes. The best way to peel potatoes is with a peeler and a little wrist action. If you can't stand and do it, find a way to sit and do it. Unless you have more money and space than you know what to do with. Why waste money on junk that may or may not work? You know the peeler works. What is the big deal about peeling potatoes? I can peel 5 lbs in 10 minutes. Just put on some music or call a friend while you're doing it, so you won't have to deal with the tedium of it, if that's the problem. When it's time to scrub the toilets or other unpleasant household chores that have to be done, i usually call someone to chat with. The work gets done before I know it and i've had a nice chat with a friend. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Thorson wrote:
> I didn't read this whole thread. Did anybody mention > these: > > http://www.Tatermitts.com/ > > They got a horrible review he > > http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/0...-tatermit.html Holy Cow Batman! Who peels potatoes under a wide open water faucet? How offensive is that!? And how hard is it to peel a potato in the first place? Where *do* they get those klutzy rejects who on any given infomercial "struggle" to perform those common every days tasks we all seem to manage to do albeit without the POS gimmick being marketed? There is a sucker born every day... <sigh> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anthony Ferrante wrote:
> > There are few things in life I hate more than peeling potatoes and I > was reminded of that fact when I began peeling them for my gig's > dinner. Through Google, I was able to see a few gadgets that claim to > be able to peel potatoes and I was wondering if they really work? I didn't read this whole thread. Did anybody mention these: http://www.Tatermitts.com/ They got a horrible review he http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/0...-tatermit.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Melba's Jammin' wrote: > > In article >, > "Pete C." > wrote: > > > If you want a pasta gadget that actually works as advertised, look for > > the VillaWare "Beebo" Cavatelli maker. > > I want one!!! (What do you do with cavatelli?) > Looks like it can be had for $30. The price tag on my box indicates it was $24.99 at Home Goods (Marshall's). It's just another pasta, so you can use it most any way. I think the traditional way to form them is with a spoon and a little grooved board, the gadget works similarly using a couple wiper blades to roll a piece of dough around a grooved surface. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Speaking of food processors, potato slicing gadgets | General Cooking | |||
Dawn Wells Potato Peeling Video | General Cooking | |||
I tried that potato peeling method | General Cooking | |||
Potato Peeler gadgets | General Cooking | |||
Kitchen Gadgets | Marketplace |