.... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
old, but I'll say this:

1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...
2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
something)
3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Monday is a lousy way to spend one seventh of your life.

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:04:58 +0200, ChattyCathy
> wrote:

>... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
>old, but I'll say this:
>
>1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
>FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...
>2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
>something)
>3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>IMHO she gives Nigella some competition

On #3....not *this* guy. I used to watch Rachael Ray but after a
while that over-perkiness got to me like fingernails on a blackboard.
Now, if I see her, even on a commercial, I flip the channel. To
something else. *Anything* else.

I will however admit to watching Giada DeLaurentis ("Everyday
Italian") occasionally even if I'm not interested in the food she's
cooking.... :-)

Best -- Terry

ChattyCathy wrote:
> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
> old, but I'll say this:
>
> 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a
> carton, FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the
> show... 2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
> something)
> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>
She's a tad... bubbly And the portions! My god, was that a single plate
or a serving platter?!

She did a salad sort of thing the other day with prawns the size of small
lobster tails. After dishing up two plates piled high with the greens and
each with four huge prawns she said it was the first course, she'd be right
back to show how to prepare the rest of the meal. Who eats like that?!!

Jill

ChattyCathy wrote:

> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition

<snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit to a
chocolate truffle.

My Evoo is just dee-lish.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

Dave Bugg wrote:
> ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>
> <snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit
> to a chocolate truffle.
>
> My Evoo is just dee-lish.
>
Hey, she actually said "extra virgin olive oil" the other day. Could have
knocked me over with a feather!

Jill

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:04:58 +0200, ChattyCathy
> wrote:

>... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
>old, but I'll say this:
>
>1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
>FFS!),

They wouldn't be *30 minute* meals w/o convenience foods. Personally,
I'm not above using stock in a box on occasion.

>but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...

me too

>2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
>something)

That doesn't bother me - the majority of TV cooks talk nonstop, so
she's just one of many. It's the constant giggling that gets to me.

>3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>IMHO she gives Nigella some competition

I'm bedazzled by diamonds and can't take my eyes off them. It's
fascinating to watch TV cooks make messy things and still manage to
keep their jewelry sparkling clean! Sometimes I think they are hired
for that skill alone.


--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:49:51 GMT, "Dave Bugg" >
wrote:

>ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>
><snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit to a
>chocolate truffle.
>
>My Evoo is just dee-lish.

Frankly, I can't stand Nigella.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

ChattyCathy wrote:

> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
> old, but I'll say this:
>
> 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
> FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...
> 2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
> something)
> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>

Trust me, she offers Nigella no competition. Nigella is better looking and
is infinitely sexier than Rachel. Nigella's voice and words turn me on.
Rachel's voice is and incessant jabber is annoying.

Dave Bugg wrote:
> ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>
> <snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit to a
> chocolate truffle.
>
> My Evoo is just dee-lish.
>
Dave, you must have missed the 'winky face'. LOL!

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

Monday is a lousy way to spend one seventh of your life.

On Mar 22, 1:13*pm, Dave Smith > wrote:
> Trust me, she offers Nigella no competition. *Nigella is better looking and
> is infinitely sexier than *Rachel. *Nigella's voice and words turn me on.
> Rachel's voice is and incessant jabber is annoying.

Well, if you're into bobbleheads...

Dave Smith wrote:
> ChattyCathy wrote:
>
>> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
>> old, but I'll say this:
>>
>> 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a
>> carton, FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the
>> show...
>> 2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
>> something)
>> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>>
>
> Trust me, she offers Nigella no competition. Nigella is better
> looking and is infinitely sexier than Rachel. Nigella's voice and
> words turn me on. Rachel's voice is and incessant jabber is annoying.

Yup. She's like the scold that won't go away.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

ChattyCathy wrote:
> Dave Bugg wrote:
>> ChattyCathy wrote:
>>
>>> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>>> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>>
>> <snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit
>> to a chocolate truffle.
>>
>> My Evoo is just dee-lish.
>>
> Dave, you must have missed the 'winky face'. LOL!

I saw it ; I'm sorry I meant to make it sound like I was supporting your
commentary. Sometimes I'm just an oxen when it comes to rhetorical humor.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
...
> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months old,
> but I'll say this:
>
> 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
> FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...

She doesn't cook. She assembles. She can't cook.

> 2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
> something)

Her voice is grating and irritating. I simply never could watch her show
more than just a few minutes. That chesire cat grin and the insipid Betty
Rubble giggle are unbearabl. She reminds me of somebody who has smoked a
lot of pot. They get that wide SEG and they can't stop giggling.

> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) - IMHO
> she gives Nigella some competition

Not even. In fact I get quite the opposte affect if you know what I mean.
I'd sooner have an IRS audit than a date with her.

Paul

ChattyCathy wrote:
> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
> old, but I'll say this:
>

when asked of anthony bourdain, other than trans fat, what else should be
banned from new york kitchens?

rachel ray

On Mar 22, 2:04špm, ChattyCathy > wrote:
> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
> old, but I'll say this:
>
> 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
> FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...
> 2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
> something)
> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy
>
> Monday is a lousy way to spend one seventh of your life.

íÎÅ ÎÕÖÎÁ ÄÅ×ÕÛËÁ ÌÉÚÁÔØ É ÐÏÐÁÌÉÓØ. ñ ÈÏÞÕ ÍÕÄÁË.

Dave Bugg wrote:
>
> My Evoo is just dee-lish.

When I finally saw RR after reading all the descriptions,
I was surprised she pronounces it EE VEE OH OH and not
as I imagined it the more sultry ee-vous.

sf wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:49:51 GMT, "Dave Bugg" >
> wrote:
>
>> ChattyCathy wrote:
>>
>>> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>>> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>>
>> <snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit
>> to a chocolate truffle.
>>
>> My Evoo is just dee-lish.
>
> Frankly, I can't stand Nigella.

Nor can I. If she wasn't the daughter of a former member of our government
and famous, I doubt if we would have heard of her.

Pure Gastro porn!

Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> "Paul M. Cook" > dropped this
> news:2LfFj.1194$VK4.60@trnddc08: in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>> Not even. In fact I get quite the opposte affect if you know what I
>> mean. I'd sooner have an IRS audit than a date with her.
>>
>> Paul
>
> ROFLMAO... Oh GAWD that is funny. Now, what would you prefer to
> Sandra Lee?
>
> Michael
>
A colonoscopy?

Jill

Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> Paula Deen cracks me up on the jewels. She's got that enormous rock the
> hubster gave her and she will vigorously dive into meatloaf with, laughing
> all the while. HOW to they keep the jewels clean? Maybe they have fakes
> made and just toss 'em after taping the show.
>
> Michael

What is it about fat women who like to wear multiple rings on ugly fat
sausage fingers? Drives me batty because not only is it so unattractive
(nothing like calling attention to your fat hands) but wearing them
while preparing food is just gross. At least with the money she's
pulling in now she can buy herself better rings than many I see.

Just one of my pet peeves.

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 12:27:24 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> wrote:

>Paula Deen cracks me up on the jewels. She's got that enormous rock the
>hubster gave her and she will vigorously dive into meatloaf with, laughing
>all the while. HOW to they keep the jewels clean? Maybe they have fakes
>made and just toss 'em after taping the show.

I've made a career of watching TV cooks jewelry and can tell you she's
an expert at this. I never see her fingers go into in messy food past
the first bendy part when she's sporting her rocks. What she does
with her fingertips takes me my arm (often up to the elbow)!

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:04:58 +0200, ChattyCathy
> wrote:

>... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
>old, but I'll say this:
>
>1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
>FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...
>2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
>something)
>3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
>IMHO she gives Nigella some competition

i've also seen about five minutes of her show, and she didn't do a
thing for me. and you're right, she is on the chatty, er, gabby side.

your pal,
blake

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:03:04 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:

>sf wrote:

>> Frankly, I can't stand Nigella.
>
>Nor can I. If she wasn't the daughter of a former member of our government
>and famous, I doubt if we would have heard of her.
>
>Pure Gastro porn!

And this is a bad thing because ... ?

On Mar 22, 3:04�pm, ChattyCathy > wrote:
> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months
> old, but I'll say this:
>
> 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
> FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...
> 2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
> something)
> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition

Were you serious with 3? In what way does RR compete with Nigella?

"Steve Grant" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 10:03:04 -0000, "Ophelia" > wrote:
>
>>sf wrote:
>
>>> Frankly, I can't stand Nigella.
>>
>>Nor can I. If she wasn't the daughter of a former member of our
>>government
>>and famous, I doubt if we would have heard of her.
>>
>>Pure Gastro porn!
>
> And this is a bad thing because ... ?

Heh dirty boy

Ophelia wrote:
> sf wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:49:51 GMT, "Dave Bugg" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChattyCathy wrote:
>>>
>>>> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s)
>>>> - IMHO she gives Nigella some competition
>>>
>>> <snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit
>>> to a chocolate truffle.
>>>
>>> My Evoo is just dee-lish.
>>
>> Frankly, I can't stand Nigella.
>
> Nor can I. If she wasn't the daughter of a former member of our
> government and famous, I doubt if we would have heard of her.
>
> Pure Gastro porn!

I'm sure that women aren't her target audience anyway :-)

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

Michael "Dog3" wrote:
> "Paul M. Cook" > dropped this
> news:2LfFj.1194$VK4.60@trnddc08: in rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>> Not even. In fact I get quite the opposte affect if you know what I
>> mean. I'd sooner have an IRS audit than a date with her.
>>
>> Paul
>
> ROFLMAO... Oh GAWD that is funny. Now, what would you prefer to
> Sandra Lee?

Cyanide.

--
Dave
www.davebbq.com

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:15:42 -0500, The Cook >
wrote:

>How about the prep for a colonoscopy?

Oh, man... if you don't know, either you're lucky or you haven't
turned 50 yet (which is when most MDs tell you to do one).

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:33:40 -0400, "jmcquown" >
wrote:

>Michael "Dog3" wrote:
>> "Paul M. Cook" > dropped this
>> news:2LfFj.1194$VK4.60@trnddc08: in rec.food.cooking
>>
>>>
>>> Not even. In fact I get quite the opposte affect if you know what I
>>> mean. I'd sooner have an IRS audit than a date with her.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>
>> ROFLMAO... Oh GAWD that is funny. Now, what would you prefer to
>> Sandra Lee?
>>
>> Michael
>>
>A colonoscopy?
>
>Jill

How about the prep for a colonoscopy?
--
Susan N.

"Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral,
48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy."
Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974)

ChattyCathy > wrote in news:%LcFj.851$wn3.777
@fe115.usenetserver.com:

> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) -
> IMHO she gives Nigella some competition

Eeyeew...she has the voice of fishwife (an expression of course, as
individual fishwives may have lovely voices) and the mannerisms of a drill
sergeant (Eat this! go there! ooh and ah...NOW, sojer!). She grates on my
nerves.

Nigella, on the other hand, is soothing and earthmotherish, with promises
of intimate meals (which she always has with a gaggle of hangers-on in my
protracted absence) and much much more...much much more...

"Dave Bugg" > wrote in
news:zpdFj.1431$vD1.902@trndny09:

> <snork> Comparing 'The Joker' to Nigella is like comparing fly vomit
> to a chocolate truffle.

Heavens forfend! Bugg and I agree on something! Quick, duck! The
universe is about to come to an end...

"Dave Bugg" > wrote in news:EexFj.1138$Xl2.652
@trndny01:

> I'm sure that women aren't her target audience anyway :-)

Now, now...some might be, but they're the competition...

"ChattyCathy" > wrote in message
...
> ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4 months old,
> but I'll say this:
>
> 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a carton,
> FFS!), but I fancied some of the cookware she had on the show...
> 2. The woman never stops talking (and coming from me, that's quite
> something)
> 3. I can understand why a lot of the guys 'tune in' to her show(s) - IMHO
> she gives Nigella some competition
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy
>
> Monday is a lousy way to spend one seventh of your life.

I'm still waiting on the Playboy Special Edition on the "Girls of Food
Network". I believe that is the only way they can increase their ratings.
Tushman's gastro-entertainment programming has gotten a bit too corn-pone,
too much Garbage in/Garbage out. I don't want to see the old, dry PBS
documentaries make a come back but his programming is a violation of the
Pure Food and Drug Act; ...Dinner Impossible, Down home with the Neeleys,
Simply Delicioso, Drive ins-....-Dives, this new one about an Air Force
Vet/DJ, Oh, don't forget Bobbie and Jamie! His D-list keeps getting bigger
and the A-list keeps shrinking. WTH is he thinking???

"Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote in
6.121:

> Bleh... I can't stand her. I'd like her show if they would stuff a dish
> towel in her mouth.

I must say though that I have drooled over her yellow gas stove, a Chambers
1950.

sf wrote:

> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 21:04:58 +0200, ChattyCathy
> > wrote:
>
> > ... on one of our local TV channels. Of course, the show was 4
> > months old, but I'll say this:
> >
> > 1. Her cooking was, well, not impressive (chicken stock out of a
> > carton, FFS!),
>
> They wouldn't be *30 minute* meals w/o convenience foods. Personally,
> I'm not above using stock in a box on occasion.

Man I get tired of the RR bashing. The show is designed to get the
people who are buying takeout or using frozen premade stuff to start
thinking about preparing their own.

The show's not for me, so I don't watch it. It's really as simple as
that.





Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

"Michael \"Dog3\"" > wrote in
6.121:

> She's a cook and claims to be a cook. She's know
> chef and the first to admit it.

Same with Nigella.

"Gunner" > wrote in
:

> I'm still waiting on the Playboy Special Edition on the "Girls of
> Food Network". I believe that is the only way they can increase their
> ratings. Tushman's gastro-entertainment programming has gotten a bit
> too corn-pone, too much Garbage in/Garbage out.

We have different programming in Canada that keeps the network sane. I
rather enjoy Michael Smith, Georges Laurier, Christine Cushing, Anna Olson
and Laura Calder not to mention the graduates of the ITHQ in Montréal,
Caroline McCann-Bizjak and Ricardo Larrivée. Our programs are less built
around a gimmick (you know the kind, Bam! Eevoo, that sort of schtick) and
more around the qualifications of the host.

http://www.foodtv.ca/ontv/hostsatoz.aspx

What I really find irritating, on top of Rachael Ray, are those restaurant
fix-it shows and the Iron Chef franchise.

Dave Bugg wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:

>> Nor can I. If she wasn't the daughter of a former member of our
>> government and famous, I doubt if we would have heard of her.
>>
>> Pure Gastro porn!
>
> I'm sure that women aren't her target audience anyway :-)
>
I disagree. Have you ever noticed a Cosmopolitan magazine or Glamour
Magazine? They always have sexy women on the covers and inside. Women
like to see sexy women too- perhaps we like to or want to identify with
them and they make us feel sexier too?

Default User wrote:

> Man I get tired of the RR bashing. The show is designed to get the
> people who are buying takeout or using frozen premade stuff to start
> thinking about preparing their own.

I think she also does a good job "educating" novice cooks on how to
multitask. How to plan out the meal prep so as to reach the end point
all together. How to work on something else while that big pot of water
is being brought to a boil.... some people just don't seem to be able to
do more than one dish at a time. She shows them how they can!

Goomba38 wrote:
>
> Default User wrote:
>
> > Man I get tired of the RR bashing. The show is designed to get the
> > people who are buying takeout or using frozen premade stuff to start
> > thinking about preparing their own.
>
> I think she also does a good job "educating" novice cooks on how to
> multitask. How to plan out the meal prep so as to reach the end point
> all together. How to work on something else while that big pot of water
> is being brought to a boil.... some people just don't seem to be able to
> do more than one dish at a time. She shows them how they can!

Culinary kindergarten...

Pete C. wrote:
> Goomba38 wrote:
>>
>> Default User wrote:
>>
>>> Man I get tired of the RR bashing. The show is designed to get the
>>> people who are buying takeout or using frozen premade stuff to start
>>> thinking about preparing their own.
>>
>> I think she also does a good job "educating" novice cooks on how to
>> multitask. How to plan out the meal prep so as to reach the end point
>> all together. How to work on something else while that big pot of
>> water is being brought to a boil.... some people just don't seem to
>> be able to do more than one dish at a time. She shows them how they
>> can!
>
> Culinary kindergarten...
>
Some people *need* that. I don't know anyone who sprung from the womb with
a whisk in their hand

Jill