What's with all these "on location" eps they've been making lately? And
why the hell did she drag all that equipment ( but no fridge) to the
parking lot of a DRIVE IN RESTAURANT? I can only guess she was barred
from entering the
kitchen where the real cooking was happening.

"Sweet potato chili fries" made without sweet potatoes. Thank GAWD.
SLop took a bag of Oreida fries and redundantly seasoned them, then put
them on the grill, one fry at a time instead of just dumping them and
spreading them out.

SLop claimed that Rudy's was selling walnut burgers twenty years ago
when she was in college spending al her time there and when she invented
AVOCADO hamburgers. Yeah, right.

SLop made a walnut burger (did it contain walnuts? I don't recall seieng
her dump them into th blender) patty looked more like a lump that was
about to fall apart and started to place it on the grill when we
suddenly cut to a shot of MV's hands gingerly placing a perfectly-formed
patty on the grill, followed by a quick return to SLop. Heh.

SLop tried to make mini-corn dogs out of cocktail sausages.Alas, no hand
jobs this time. I was very disappointed when SLop nibbled on that corn
dog in lieu of deep-throating it. Very disappointed.

Did you know C’lleen had never had avocado on a hamburger before she met
Sandy? Now you know. Again.


Dad joined me at this point after seeing the classic cars in the lot
behind SLop. SLop blathered about how some people like thir sauce hot
and some like it sweet, so by combining the two, everyone would be
happy. Huh? As SLop mulched the bottled pickeled peppers, Dad commented
on how he expected to see some fingers in those mulched peppers. Heh.
BTW, I think you can buy that relish at the store under the name
"Chow-Chow".

SLop boiled down some root beer and added some sugar. Really?

As darkness approached (did it take her that long to film this ep?),
SLop babbled something about how she lurves how it looks like a city of
lights when they turn them on. Thankfully, she did not mention France.

We laughed out loud about SLop giving out mini squeeze-bottles of
ketchup because everyone argues over ketchup. SLop gushed about these
cool snap apart place settings she found online somewhere [1], but holy
crap, they cost $12 for a set of four! How the hell is that going to
save one money?

[1]: http://www.thisnext.com/item/1CAAB6F...lastic-ware-by

--
WARNING!!!
Use of these recipes may be hazardous to your health, food budget,
standing in your community and liver function. Use at your own risk!!
We assume no liability from any illness or injury sustained while eating
the "food" or being exposed to crapass tablescapes. And no, we're not
sure where she grew up either. The Cordon Bleu disavows any knowlege of
Miss Lee.

In article >,
Ubiquitous > wrote:

> What's with all these "on location" eps they've been making lately? And
> why the hell did she drag all that equipment ( but no fridge) to the
> parking lot of a DRIVE IN RESTAURANT? I can only guess she was barred
> from entering the
> kitchen where the real cooking was happening.

Here's the scary thing: We now get Hi-Def FoodTV, and this was the
first time the DVR lit up with a "NEW" episode of SLop. So we got to
see this in HIGH DEFINITION. WIDE SCREEN!
>
> "Sweet potato chili fries" made without sweet potatoes. Thank GAWD.
> SLop took a bag of Oreida fries and redundantly seasoned them, then put
> them on the grill, one fry at a time instead of just dumping them and
> spreading them out.
>
> SLop claimed that Rudy's was selling walnut burgers twenty years ago
> when she was in college spending al her time there and when she invented
> AVOCADO hamburgers. Yeah, right.

Yeah, that old classic, walnut burgers. Huh?
>
> SLop made a walnut burger (did it contain walnuts? I don't recall seieng
> her dump them into th blender) patty looked more like a lump that was
> about to fall apart and started to place it on the grill when we
> suddenly cut to a shot of MV's hands gingerly placing a perfectly-formed
> patty on the grill, followed by a quick return to SLop. Heh.
>
> SLop tried to make mini-corn dogs out of cocktail sausages.Alas, no hand
> jobs this time. I was very disappointed when SLop nibbled on that corn
> dog in lieu of deep-throating it. Very disappointed.

I liked when she rolled it in flour to make the corn meal slop stick,
and then stuck it in the bowl and the corn meal retreated from the
weiner.
>
> Did you know C’lleen had never had avocado on a hamburger before she met
> Sandy? Now you know. Again.

And she's never eaten a burger without avocado since. In 20 years. She
must just be a JOY at fast food restaurants and bbqs.
>
>
> Dad joined me at this point after seeing the classic cars in the lot

The cars were the best part!

> behind SLop. SLop blathered about how some people like thir sauce hot
> and some like it sweet, so by combining the two, everyone would be
> happy. Huh? As SLop mulched the bottled pickeled peppers, Dad commented
> on how he expected to see some fingers in those mulched peppers. Heh.
> BTW, I think you can buy that relish at the store under the name
> "Chow-Chow".
>
> SLop boiled down some root beer and added some sugar. Really?
>
> As darkness approached (did it take her that long to film this ep?),

I'd bet she was there for 3 days.

> SLop babbled something about how she lurves how it looks like a city of
> lights when they turn them on. Thankfully, she did not mention France.
>
> We laughed out loud about SLop giving out mini squeeze-bottles of
> ketchup because everyone argues over ketchup. SLop gushed about these

and yet in other eps she's constantly finding ways to not give the kids
ketchup, like by giving them chili sauce or something.

> cool snap apart place settings she found online somewhere [1], but holy
> crap, they cost $12 for a set of four! How the hell is that going to
> save one money?
>
> [1]: http://www.thisnext.com/item/1CAAB6F...lastic-ware-by

Maybe if, like Sandy, your friends are imaginary?

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.
http://www.disneysub.com/board/noshat.jpg

"Ubiquitous" > wrote in message
...
> What's with all these "on location" eps they've been making lately? And
> why the hell did she drag all that equipment ( but no fridge) to the
> parking lot of a DRIVE IN RESTAURANT? I can only guess she was barred
> from entering the
> kitchen where the real cooking was happening.

But did her sweater match her blender? That's what is important on that
show.
Someone needs to tell that woman to buy a better bra.

Ubiquitous wrote:
> What's with all these "on location" eps they've been making lately?
> And why the hell did she drag all that equipment ( but no fridge) to
> the parking lot of a DRIVE IN RESTAURANT? I can only guess she was
> barred from entering the
> kitchen where the real cooking was happening.
>
(snipped the abundance of TV cross-posteddrivel which proves you don't care
about cooking but love TV "celebs")
Who cares?

jmcquown wrote:
> (snipped the abundance of TV cross-posteddrivel which proves you don't
> care about cooking but love TV "celebs")
> Who cares?

Simply spoke: You knew it was a snake when you picked it up.

If the subject line includes "Semi-Homemade," "Sandra Lee," "SLop," etc,
don't read it. Then who cares wont matter.

wrote:
> Ubiquitous > wrote:

>> What's with all these "on location" eps they've been making lately? And
>> why the hell did she drag all that equipment ( but no fridge) to the
>> parking lot of a DRIVE IN RESTAURANT? I can only guess she was barred
>> from entering the
>> kitchen where the real cooking was happening.
>
>Here's the scary thing: We now get Hi-Def FoodTV, and this was the
>first time the DVR lit up with a "NEW" episode of SLop. So we got to
>see this in HIGH DEFINITION. WIDE SCREEN!

My condolences.
Does the "vasoline effect" work on HD TV?

>> "Sweet potato chili fries" made without sweet potatoes. Thank GAWD.
>> SLop took a bag of Oreida fries and redundantly seasoned them, then put
>> them on the grill, one fry at a time instead of just dumping them and
>> spreading them out.
>>
>> SLop claimed that Rudy's was selling walnut burgers twenty years ago
>> when she was in college spending al her time there and when she invented
>> AVOCADO hamburgers. Yeah, right.
>
>Yeah, that old classic, walnut burgers. Huh?

Ha! I am incredulous that people were even eating vegetarian burgers that
long ago.

>> Did you know C’lleen had never had avocado on a hamburger before she met
>> Sandy? Now you know. Again.
>
>And she's never eaten a burger without avocado since. In 20 years. She
>must just be a JOY at fast food restaurants and bbqs.

"Can you believe my best friend in college invented the AVOCADO BACON
CHEESENURGER?!?!?!"

>> Dad joined me at this point after seeing the classic cars in the lot
>
>The cars were the best part!

Probably the most edible part, too.

>> SLop babbled something about how she lurves how it looks like a city of
>> lights when they turn them on. Thankfully, she did not mention France.
>>
>> We laughed out loud about SLop giving out mini squeeze-bottles of
>> ketchup because everyone argues over ketchup. SLop gushed about these
>
>and yet in other eps she's constantly finding ways to not give the kids
>ketchup, like by giving them chili sauce or something.

Or making alternative things, made from ketchup.

>> cool snap apart place settings she found online somewhere [1], but holy
>> crap, they cost $12 for a set of four! How the hell is that going to
>> save one money?
>>
>> [1]: http://www.thisnext.com/item/1CAAB6F...lastic-ware-by
>
>Maybe if, like Sandy, your friends are imaginary?

Heh.

What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?

wrote:
> What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?

More to the point, what is it about you that wants to inflict violence
on someone you have never met?

Don

In article >,
Don > wrote:

> wrote:
> > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
>
> More to the point, what is it about you that wants to inflict violence
> on someone you have never met?
>
> Don

Common sense?

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:49:00 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

>What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?

The meth you're on?


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:22:01 -0700, Anim8rFSK >
wrote:

>In article >,
> Don > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>> > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
>>
>> More to the point, what is it about you that wants to inflict violence
>> on someone you have never met?
>>
>> Don
>
>Common sense?

Tell it to the judge.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

In article >, sf <.> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:22:01 -0700, Anim8rFSK >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> > Don > wrote:
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
> >>
> >> More to the point, what is it about you that wants to inflict violence
> >> on someone you have never met?
> >>
> >> Don
> >
> >Common sense?
>
> Tell it to the judge.

He only *wants* to hit her. Wanting to hit Sandra Lee is a completely
reasonable reaction. NOT wanting to hit Sandra Lee means you have
problems.

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.

On Jun 27, 1:16*am, sf <.> wrote:

> Tell it to the judge.

Well, whether you like it or not, I and others will continue to bash
her. Get over yourself. And my meth addiction is MY BUSINESS, ya
hear?

On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 5:04:07 -0400, Ubiquitous >
wrote:
>
>"Can you believe my best friend in college invented the AVOCADO BACON
>CHEESENURGER?!?!?!"
>

your ideas about cheesenurgers are intriguing to me and i wish to
subscribe to your newsletter.

your pal,
homer

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:10:56 -0700, Anim8rFSK >
wrote:

>In article >, sf <.> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 20:22:01 -0700, Anim8rFSK >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article >,
>> > Don > wrote:
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
>> >>
>> >> More to the point, what is it about you that wants to inflict violence
>> >> on someone you have never met?
>> >>
>> >> Don
>> >
>> >Common sense?
>>
>> Tell it to the judge.
>
>He only *wants* to hit her. Wanting to hit Sandra Lee is a completely
>reasonable reaction. NOT wanting to hit Sandra Lee means you have
>problems.

hmm. is that what 'i'd hit that' means?

your pal,
blake

wrote:

> What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?

You TV only get the one channel?




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Jun 27, 12:08*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> wrote:
> > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
>
> You TV only get the one channel?
>
> Brian

Quiet, Fandra.

wrote:

> On Jun 27, 12:08*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
> >
> > You TV only get the one channel?

> Quiet

Seriously. It the show bothers you, why do you watch it? I saw a grand
total of one, decided it wasn't for me, then never turned it on again.

You somehow unable to do that? Or do you think your pathetic whining is
somehow entertaining?




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Jun 29, 1:35*am, "Default User" > wrote:
> wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 12:08*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> > > wrote:
> > > > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
>
> > > You TV only get the one channel?
> > Quiet
>
> Seriously. It the show bothers you, why do you watch it? I saw a grand
> total of one, decided it wasn't for me, then never turned it on again.
>
> You somehow unable to do that? Or do you think your pathetic whining is
> somehow entertaining?
>
> Brian

It's certainly more entertaining than your pathetic self-
righteousness. You don't watch her? Fine. But you fully realize
that people post here mainly to snark about her - you know this, so
IMO, it's pretty dumb for you to come here and jump on people because
they like to snark on Sandra Lee. You don't like it? Don't read the
posts here. Apply your own "logic" to this group, PLEASE.

On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:45:28 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

>On Jun 29, 1:35*am, "Default User" > wrote:
>> wrote:
>> > On Jun 27, 12:08*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
>>
>> > > You TV only get the one channel?
>> > Quiet
>>
>> Seriously. It the show bothers you, why do you watch it? I saw a grand
>> total of one, decided it wasn't for me, then never turned it on again.
>>
>> You somehow unable to do that? Or do you think your pathetic whining is
>> somehow entertaining?
>>
>> Brian
>
>It's certainly more entertaining than your pathetic self-
>righteousness. You don't watch her? Fine. But you fully realize
>that people post here mainly to snark about her - you know this, so
>IMO, it's pretty dumb for you to come here and jump on people because
>they like to snark on Sandra Lee. You don't like it? Don't read the
>posts here. Apply your own "logic" to this group, PLEASE.

Stop xposting and you won't have to endure people telling you to shut
up already. Ubiquitous has been killfiled by most of the posters
people who have that capability, and you're next. Bottom line: go
back to where you came from and snark there.


--
I never worry about diets. The only carrots that interest me are the number of carats in a diamond.

Mae West

wrote:

> On Jun 29, 1:35*am, "Default User" > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > On Jun 27, 12:08*pm, "Default User" >
> > > wrote:
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
> >
> > > > You TV only get the one channel?
> > > Quiet
> >
> > Seriously. It the show bothers you, why do you watch it? I saw a
> > grand total of one, decided it wasn't for me, then never turned it
> > on again.

> It's certainly more entertaining than your pathetic self-
> righteousness. You don't watch her? Fine.

More than fine. It's smart.

> But you fully realize
> that people post here mainly to snark about her

People post in rec.arts.tv and rec.food.cooking mainly to snark about
her? I think I'd have to dispute that.

> - you know this, so
> IMO, it's pretty dumb for you to come here

Come where? I didn't "go" anywhere. I saw your dumbass post in two of
the groups I read. Also (hint) I don't need your permission for
anything.

> and jump on people because
> they like to snark on Sandra Lee. You don't like it? Don't read the
> posts here.

I should skip the posts in two heavily trafficked groups? Because of
you? I think not.

> Apply your own "logic" to this group, PLEASE.

Which group is that?




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

In article >, sf <.> wrote:

> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 06:45:28 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
>
> >On Jun 29, 1:35*am, "Default User" > wrote:
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Jun 27, 12:08*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > What is it about this woman that makes me want to hit her?
> >>
> >> > > You TV only get the one channel?
> >> > Quiet
> >>
> >> Seriously. It the show bothers you, why do you watch it? I saw a grand
> >> total of one, decided it wasn't for me, then never turned it on again.
> >>
> >> You somehow unable to do that? Or do you think your pathetic whining is
> >> somehow entertaining?
> >>
> >> Brian
> >
> >It's certainly more entertaining than your pathetic self-
> >righteousness. You don't watch her? Fine. But you fully realize
> >that people post here mainly to snark about her - you know this, so
> >IMO, it's pretty dumb for you to come here and jump on people because
> >they like to snark on Sandra Lee. You don't like it? Don't read the
> >posts here. Apply your own "logic" to this group, PLEASE.
>
> Stop xposting and you won't have to endure people telling you to shut
> up already. Ubiquitous has been killfiled by most of the posters
> people who have that capability, and you're next. Bottom line: go
> back to where you came from and snark there.

Why would you KF Ubi? His SLop postings are great!

--
Star Trek 09:

No Shat, No Show.

On Jun 29, 1:41*pm, "Default User" > wrote:

> Which group is that?

Your group? Why, I believe it is alt.soapbox.asswipe

If you don't like what is posted here, ignore it.

wrote:

> On Jun 29, 1:41*pm, "Default User" > wrote:

> If you don't like what is posted here, ignore it.

Typical dumbass Google Groper. No idea how usenet works in the
slightest. Unfortunately, you're able to find the keyboard.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Jun 30, 12:03*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> wrote:
> > On Jun 29, 1:41*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> > If you don't like what is posted here, ignore it.
>
> Typical dumbass Google Groper. No idea how usenet works in the
> slightest. Unfortunately, you're able to find the keyboard.

For all your posing, you are nothing but a troll. Besides, you are a
Google Groper yourself, as well as a bit of a pussy.

On Jun 30, 12:03*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> Typical dumbass Google Groper. No idea how usenet works in the
> slightest. Unfortunately, you're able to find the keyboard.
>
> Brian

Awwww him wittle feewings is hurt....it's typical to resort to name-
calling when you are losing an argument. I am through
arguing....unlike you, I realize I'm no better than you, and I won't
sink to your level. buh-bye
=============================

Back OT - SANDY SUCKS and so does her food....I wish I could pull away
from the TV, but like most of you fellow shrikes, I am addicted.

wrote:

> On Jun 30, 12:03*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> > wrote:
> > > On Jun 29, 1:41*pm, "Default User" >
> > > wrote: If you don't like what is posted here, ignore it.
> >
> > Typical dumbass Google Groper. No idea how usenet works in the
> > slightest. Unfortunately, you're able to find the keyboard.
>
> For all your posing, you are nothing but a troll.

I like to think that I'm other things besides a troll. Don't get me
wrong, trolling is very important. It's just not everything.

> Besides, you are a Google Groper yourself

Dumbshit. I post through news.individual.net with XanaNews as my
newsreader. Anyone with the brains to be able to read the message
headers could have told that. Of course, a stupid Google Groper like
you can't even tell what groups he posts to, let alone what anyone else
is doing.

You have the knowledgable people in three newsgroups laughing at your
incompetence. Those that even see you. Many people these days block all
posts from Google Groups and/or ones with gmail addresses. So you're
kind of a double-whammy of suckitude.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

On Jun 30, 2:56*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> wrote:
> > On Jun 30, 12:03*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Jun 29, 1:41*pm, "Default User" >
> > > > wrote: *If you don't like what is posted here, ignore it.
>
> > > Typical dumbass Google Groper. No idea how usenet works in the
> > > slightest. Unfortunately, you're able to find the keyboard.
>
> > For all your posing, you are nothing but a troll.
>
> I like to think that I'm other things besides a troll. Don't get me
> wrong, trolling is very important. It's just not everything.
>
> > *Besides, you are a Google Groper yourself
>
> Dumbshit. I post through news.individual.net with XanaNews as my
> newsreader. Anyone with the brains to be able to read the message
> headers could have told that. Of course, a stupid Google Groper like
> you can't even tell what groups he posts to, let alone what anyone else
> is doing.

Take a chill pill already. Your name-calling and computer snobiness
is BEYOND girly.....do you need a Mydol?

> You have the knowledgable people in three newsgroups laughing at your
> incompetence. Those that even see you. Many people these days block all
> posts from Google Groups and/or ones with gmail addresses. So you're
> kind of a double-whammy of suckitude.

Wow. Are they as charming and hospitable as you? I can only imagine.

> Brian
> If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
> won't shut up.
> -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

HAHAHAHA! Thanks for the laughs, kid. I can't even get angry with
you. Don't think I've ever met anyone whose siggy line was more
appropriate - for themselves.

Your obsession with my posts are so endearing. I'll do more in the
future so you can have something to do, 'kay?

wrote:

> On Jun 30, 2:56*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
> > wrote:

> > > *Besides, you are a Google Groper yourself
> >
> > Dumbshit. I post through news.individual.net with XanaNews as my
> > newsreader. Anyone with the brains to be able to read the message
> > headers could have told that. Of course, a stupid Google Groper like
> > you can't even tell what groups he posts to, let alone what anyone
> > else is doing.
>
> Take a chill pill already. Your name-calling and computer snobiness
> is BEYOND girly.....do you need a Mydol?

Ah, now you realize that you made a fool of yourself in front of
everyone, and now want to brush it aside. Good with luck with that.

> > You have the knowledgable people in three newsgroups laughing at
> > your incompetence. Those that even see you. Many people these days
> > block all posts from Google Groups and/or ones with gmail
> > addresses. So you're kind of a double-whammy of suckitude.
>
> Wow. Are they as charming and hospitable as you? I can only imagine.

Towards you? Pity and laughter, I'd imagine.


> I can't even get angry with you.

I don't believe you. You right now have that sinking feeling you're a
joke that you don't really understand, even though everyone else does.
You're trying desperately to deflect in any way you can.

> Your obsession with my posts are so endearing.

You shouldn't gotten into something that you can't handle.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

wrote:
> On Jun 30, 12:03 pm, "Default User" > wrote:
>> wrote:
>>> On Jun 29, 1:41 pm, "Default User" > wrote:
>>> If you don't like what is posted here, ignore it.
>> Typical dumbass Google Groper. No idea how usenet works in the
>> slightest. Unfortunately, you're able to find the keyboard.
>
> For all your posing, you are nothing but a troll. Besides, you are a
> Google Groper yourself, as well as a bit of a pussy.

Brian is no troll, and is very knowledgeable about usenet. I'd shut up
and listen if I were you.

--
Don't blame it on the hormones...no wait...blame it on the hormones...

On Jul 1, 9:09*am, ravenlynne > wrote:
>
> Brian is no troll, and is very knowledgeable about usenet. *I'd shut up
> and listen if I were you.

Listen to what? I'm going to post what I please. You can't stop me.
Too bad if you disapprove.

On Jun 30, 3:27*pm, "Default User" > wrote:

> I don't believe you. You right now have that sinking feeling you're a
> joke that you don't really understand, even though everyone else does.
> You're trying desperately to deflect in any way you can.

Deflect how? You have no idea what you're talking about; you're just
here to harass act superior. I don't need you to believe me. So
continue with your name-calling; that's your way of deflecting.

wrote:
> On Jul 1, 9:09 am, ravenlynne > wrote:
>> Brian is no troll, and is very knowledgeable about usenet. I'd shut up
>> and listen if I were you.
>
> Listen to what? I'm going to post what I please. You can't stop me.
> Too bad if you disapprove.

Why are you acting like such a child? "i'll do what I want and no one
can stop me? I don't care about ettiquette...nanny nanny boo boo."

--
Don't blame it on the hormones...no wait...blame it on the hormones...

jeremy wrote:
> wrote:
>> On Jul 1, 9:09 am, ravenlynne > wrote:
>>> Brian is no troll, and is very knowledgeable about usenet. I'd shut up
>>> and listen if I were you.
>>
>> Listen to what? I'm going to post what I please. You can't stop me.
>> Too bad if you disapprove.
>
> I hate it when school is out. I can **** on your mother after sweating
> her up a bit but I do not because it would be impolite of me to make her
> life any worse than trying to explain away your behavior.
>
> The easy thing is for you to join the rest of the feral humans in the
> killfile.
>
> JJ

<dies>

--
Don't blame it on the hormones...no wait...blame it on the hormones...

wrote:

> On Jun 30, 3:27*pm, "Default User" > wrote:
>
> > I don't believe you. You right now have that sinking feeling you're
> > a joke that you don't really understand, even though everyone else
> > does. You're trying desperately to deflect in any way you can.
>
> Deflect how? You have no idea what you're talking about; you're just
> here to harass act superior.

That's not the ONLY reason. Just a fun side venture, puncturing
self-important jerkwads like you.




Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)