Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Janet wrote:
> The exhaust fan in my kitchen died recently. > > Unfortunately, everything in our kitchen has to fit into custom cabinetry > installed by the previous owners, so that when something goes it is a > nightmare to replace. The hood over the cooktop is one of those decorative > wooden things with tiles around the edge. After extensive research, and > talking to a lot of appliance salespeople whose general response was a > shrug, I seem to have located a unit that I can have installed without > tearing out the hood or the existing ductwork, which runs up to and then > through the ceiling to the outside. > > Now, I do a lot of cooking that produces heavy-duty steam, smoke, and smell. > (The cooktop has a grill in the middle, I do a lot of things in a wok, I > cook Indian food, I make giant pots of stock that simmer for a day, and so > forth.) The old unit--a Thermador squirrel cage thing, circa 1980--was > grossly inadequate, and led to the accumulation of greasy dust on various > surfaces in the kitchen. In addition, the ceiling in my kitchen is high, and > the kitchen is not closed off from the rest of the house, which is a big old > house with high ceilings. My dream fan was always one of things that is > mounted outside the house, but I discovered that it would require larger > ductwork, which would be a big job involving going into the ceiling, so > that's out. > > The unit I've found moves about 400+ cubic feet per minute. This seems to be > the most powerful unit that can use 3 1/2x10 ductwork, which has a capacity > equal to 6" round, according to the appliance people. I'm wondering if > anyone here can offer an opinion, based on their experience, as to whether > this fan is going to be adequate to my needs. (It is over a 36" electric > cooktop--unfortunately, I would SO love to have gas--so BTUs are not a big > concern.) > > You didn't mention this but the first thing to do is see if it can be repaired. Especially if it is a installation like you described where it is difficult to remove the unit. Either the motor or switch has failed or it could even be a wiring problem. Our range hood quit a few weeks ago and when I disassembled it I found that a wire had been nicked when it was stripped at the factory and it broke off from the switch terminal. I repaired the wire and the hood is working. If you absolutely can't get exact replacement parts or ones that can be modified to fit then you start looking for a replacement unit. I think 400 CFM is undersized for the sort of cooking you describe. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 16 May 2008 10:46:23 -0400, George >
wrote: >I think 400 CFM is undersized for the sort of cooking you describe. Absolutely! She needs twice as much. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smile first |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> George wrote: > > >I think 400 CFM is undersized for the sort of cooking you describe. > > Absolutely! �She needs twice as much. 400 CFM is already over kill... 800 CFM is a tremendously powerful exhaust fan for cooking, most commercial installations are not nearly so powerful. My little Echo leaf blower is rated at 365 CFM and would literally blow you away. My range hood is plenty powerful at 250 CFM, I have it exhausted to the outdoors, I never run it on High and rarely run it on Medium, Low is plenty for most cooking. If I ran this on High I'd suck all the heat/AC out of my house before I could fry a burger. http://products.howstuffworks.com/ke...013-review.htm --- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 17 May 2008 11:29:25 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon >
wrote: >sf wrote: >> George wrote: >> >> >I think 400 CFM is undersized for the sort of cooking you describe. >> >> Absolutely! ?She needs twice as much. > >400 CFM is already over kill... 800 CFM is a tremendously powerful >exhaust fan for cooking, most commercial installations are not nearly >so powerful. My little Echo leaf blower is rated at 365 CFM and would >literally blow you away. > >My range hood is plenty powerful at 250 CFM, I have it exhausted to >the outdoors, I never run it on High and rarely run it on Medium, Low >is plenty for most cooking. If I ran this on High I'd suck all the >heat/AC out of my house before I could fry a burger. >http://products.howstuffworks.com/ke...013-review.htm > Mine is a vent-a-hood, and their cfm is lower than actual performance level: Equivalent CFM*: A 600 CFM Magic Lung® blower is capable of handling professional style cooking equipment with 900 CFM requirements (as specified by the range manufacturer.) I have a 48 inch cooktop. My unit has two exhaust fans (with an option of a third one), one is only one speed (low), the other is two speeds (high, low). I have an indoor bbq, so this exhaust works well for that purpose. It is also a godsend when hubby cooks steaks in the cast iron pan (better for searing, less heat up time). As far as changing the temperature in the entire house, or even the kitchen... I've never noticed that. It does a good job of clearing odor and moisture from the kitchen air though. BTW to Janet: The only duct work we needed to do when converting over from the older than dirt Newtone to the new Vent-a-Hood was to install a coupling that converts a rectangular duct to round. -- See return address to reply by email remove the smile first |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kitchen exhaust fan experience | General Cooking | |||
Kitchen exhaust fan experience | General Cooking | |||
Kitchen exhaust fan experience | General Cooking | |||
Kitchen exhaust fan experience | General Cooking | |||
exhaust fan-how necessary? | General Cooking |