On Mon 26 May 2008 03:53:06p, BOB told us...

> "Wayne Boatwright" wrote ...
>>
>> Thanks, BOB. :-) For some reason this one really got to me.
>>
> Y W. He'd had too much to drink, or too much to smoke.
>
> Or, maybe you just need a drink?
>
> BOB
>
>

Heh, maybe all three! :-)


--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Monday, 05(V)/26(XXVI)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Today is: Memorial Day
-------------------------------------------
All men think all men mortal, but
themselves. - Edward Young
-------------------------------------------

sf wrote:
> I've never seen Wayne so uncivil to a total nutcase (he usually gives
> the benefit of the doubt) - but truth be told, nobody cares what you
> think. Continue your current level of foaming at the mouth blather
> and you'll earn your way into a lot of kill files by Tuesday.
>
You're waiting until Tuesday?!! Damn, I've been gone all weekend and the
first thing I did was k/f this imbecile. (laughing)

Jill

On Mon 26 May 2008 04:26:23p, jmcquown told us...

> sf wrote:
>> I've never seen Wayne so uncivil to a total nutcase (he usually gives
>> the benefit of the doubt) - but truth be told, nobody cares what you
>> think. Continue your current level of foaming at the mouth blather
>> and you'll earn your way into a lot of kill files by Tuesday.
>>
> You're waiting until Tuesday?!! Damn, I've been gone all weekend and the
> first thing I did was k/f this imbecile. (laughing)
>
> Jill
>
>

That's probably the first thing I should have done. :-)


--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Monday, 05(V)/26(XXVI)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Today is: Memorial Day
-------------------------------------------
Drive C: Error, (A)bort (R)etry
(I)gnore (K)ick (S)cream
-------------------------------------------

Kathleen > wrote in
:

> sandi wrote:

>> I'll cook up the brats.
>>
>
> Hey, leave my kids out of this!

I was talking about MY brats! ;-)

"cybercat" > wrote in
om:

>
> "sandi" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Christine Dabney > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 May 2008 05:38:06 GMT, "Dave Bugg"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>><Chair pulled up to enjoy the entertainment> Someone pass the
>>>>popcorn, please.
>>>
>>> You gonna fix us bbq for this shindig??? I think we all
>>> deserve to have some good bbq for this.....
>>>
>>> Christine
>>
>> I'll cook up the brats.
>>
>
> CALL SOCIAL SERVICES!!

Too late.

--
They ** were ** good.

;-)

DK > wrote:

> admin-email:

You have to admire web-hosting company that uses gmail for their
email.

-sw

Sqwertz wrote:
> DK > wrote:
>
>> admin-email:
>
> You have to admire web-hosting company that uses gmail for their
> email.
>
> -sw

We do?
I don't even know what a web-hosting company is? I certainly had NO
intention of clicking on any link of his..
'splain Lucy?

On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:19:17 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> wrote:

>Michael <- ashamed

Are you better now?

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Mon, 26 May 2008 18:54:04 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:

>The brother of ~patches~?
>
>BOB
>
hey! Patches was *not* that bad.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Mon, 26 May 2008 18:13:47 -0400, Goomba >
wrote:

> BOB wrote:
>
>> Not trying to start another war here '-) (or am I?)
>>
>> BUT...add just a little Miracle Whip, no, not enough to actually taste.
>> Just a dollop or two. It adds an interesting taste that those hard-line
>> "Miracle-Whip-Haters" just lick their lips and ask..."What's that great tang
>> in here?" Never once had anyone guess what it was. They never, ever
>> believe me when I tell them.
>>
>> BOB
>>
>Sorry, I wouldn't have it in the house to test the theory. Miracle Whip
>is just too sweet for my tastes. What would I do with the rest of the
>jar? No need to answer that.

I'm not a miracle whip hater, nor am I commercial mayo lover. I'm
neutral about both.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Mon, 26 May 2008 17:57:48 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:

>Haven't had this much fun since the ~patches~ implosion.

You're a very cruel person. Really. Given the situation, what would
you have done?

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

Goomba > wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
>> DK > wrote:
>>
>>> admin-email:
>>
>> You have to admire web-hosting company that uses gmail for their
>> email.
>
> We do?
> I don't even know what a web-hosting company is? I certainly had NO
> intention of clicking on any link of his..
> 'splain Lucy?

A web hosting company provides web space for users to place their
pages. They are supposed to be "server gurus" that maintain 99.999%
availability since people rely on them to keep their web pages
available 100% of the time. Most of them also provide mail hosting.

In which case, they should be using their own servers and domain
for mail and not relying on a third party. It's very unprofessional
to use third-party servers when you run your own supposedly reliable
servers.

-sw

On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:09:28 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> wrote:

>Ohhhh... I had forgotten. Wonder what patches is up to these days?

I hope she's ok. Do you remember the circumstance or do you just
remember the smell of blood? I liked her and I think any other normal
poster would have gone ballistic too, given that situation. I think
RFC was absolutely horrible to her.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On May 26, 9:03*am, maxine in ri > wrote:
> On May 26, 8:47 am, Bobo Bonobo® > wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 25, 11:01 pm, "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > I have read through a fair bit of the past two weeks of posts to this
> > > group now. I understand now why you people are so scared of new
> > > members...You people are idiots.
>
> > I don't think anyone is scared, and newbies are treated well as long
> > as they don't come in trying to sell something.
>
> > > You are actually scared that someone like me, a Proffesional Chef,
> > > will come along and show you up for what you are...
>
> > > What sort of person would actually state on a public COOKING chat
> > > site, that they use POWDERED onion ??? Or for that matter, packet
> > > anything ??? LOL.
>
> > I agree there. *Here you'll find all kinds of crappy ingredients.
>
> > > You people are a bunch of wannabes...You wannabe a Chef, but alas you
> > > arn't even a Cook's fart!!
>
> > Very few of us aspire to be chefs.
>
> > > I am speachless...One of you clowns actually bragged about putting
> > > some butter on some beans...I bet my left testicle that they were
> > > canned or frozen beans!!
>
> > Better "butter" than the "butter or margarine" that folks leave in the
> > pirated recipes that they post.
>
> > > Wannabes...bloody wannabes !
>
> > > LOL
>
> > Welcome. *You have the potential of being disliked by more folks that
> > I am.
> > Try to be balanced though. *There are many posts that deserve praise,
> > as well as those that deserve ridicule.
>
> > --Bryan
>
> Aw, Bryan, not that many people dislike you. *Only the ones who've
> KF'd you<g>
>
> maxine in ri, so innofensive that only the google-kf'ers don't see
> me<g>
> wheak

Thing is, folks who approve of hydrogenated oils, and to a lesser
extent Velveeta, condensed "cream of" soups, Durkee or French's
onions, etc. as ingredients, heck, I don't blame them for disliking
me. I'm mean to them, and insult them, and it's not even accompanied
by cool music.

--Bryan

sf wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 17:57:48 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>
>> Haven't had this much fun since the ~patches~ implosion.
>
> You're a very cruel person. Really. Given the situation, what would
> you have done?
>
Which situation are you speaking of?
Patches over-reaction and spiral downward into paranoia or Bob making a
joke about it?

On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:21:19 -0700 (PDT), "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb"
> fired up random neurons and synapses to
opine:

>On May 26, 2:53*pm, Mark Thorson > wrote:
>
>>
>> Scared? *We're not scared. *We just don't like spammers
>> who look upon our newsgroup as a source of free advertising
>> for commercial web sites. *People such as yourself are like
>> people who litter in national parks or urinate while swimming
>> in public swimming pools.
>
>You ARE a bunch of gutless, chicken shit, yellow bellied, cowards !!!
>
>You ARE scared...So ****ing SCARED that you go into complete PANIC
>everytime someone new comes along !!
>
>Listen to yourselves..."We just don't like spammers who...." etc, etc.
>You gutless, chicken shit, yellow bellied cowards are trying to make
>excuses and expect REAL people like me to accept that.
>
>You people are nothing but wannabe idiots. I don't care how many
>excuses you make...You will not win me back until you apologise...(for
>you un-educated, ignorant Yanks it is not apologize).
>
>Gutter mouthed wannabes !

Bwahahahahaaaa!!! <wiping my eyes and pounding the desk> OMG, this
bozo is hilarious! Haven't been this entertained by a poster in ages!
--

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd...hee, hee <hic!> ow! my sides hurt!

"Some weasel took the cork out of my lunch!"

-- W.C. Fields

Bobo Bonobo® wrote:

> Thing is, folks who approve of hydrogenated oils, and to a lesser
> extent Velveeta, condensed "cream of" soups, Durkee or French's
> onions, etc. as ingredients, heck, I don't blame them for disliking
> me. I'm mean to them, and insult them, and it's not even accompanied
> by cool music.
>
> --Bryan

Yet you never seem to change anyone's opinion or use of them.
Must frustrate you horribly to be so impotent, huh?

Perhaps it would be mentally healthier for you to just let it
go...breath in...breath out....
We all make our own choices in life and trade offs in what is important
to us.

Sqwertz > wrote:

>A web hosting company provides web space for users to place their
>pages. They are supposed to be "server gurus" that maintain 99.999%
>availability since people rely on them to keep their web pages
>available 100% of the time. Most of them also provide mail hosting.

>In which case, they should be using their own servers and domain
>for mail and not relying on a third party. It's very unprofessional
>to use third-party servers when you run your own supposedly reliable
>servers.

This makes no sense. Mail administration is a lot of work.
If you only have a few users it makes sense not to do it
even if you run servers for other things, and even if you
have all the necessary skills. A lot of orgainzations
these days wait until they are 20 or 30 people before they
even think about standalone email administration. They just
use yahoo or gmail until then. Their man-hours are better spent
on other, money-making efforts than running email.

Steve

Michael "Dog3" wrote:

> I don't remember a lot about it. IIRC her downfall have to do with a
> pizza pic she accused someone of stealing? IIRC she posted a lot of pics
> and her oven was spotless. I might be thinking of someone else.
>
> Michael

Well *that's* a positive thing, I say!
I can recall some pictures people have posted of food yet the oven and
kitchen were so cluttered and filthy looking that it was hard to get
past that to even see the food!

I know a woman who always brings cookies to meetings and events. Most of
the guys there will eat anything, y'know? Well, I've been to her house
before and it is DISGUSTING! She's a pack rat type slob, incontinent
animals leaving their accidents all over (to include in her bed!) and
smelling the place up (and newspaper doggy drip cloths all over the
place, ugh!) dirt, dust, filthy kitchen, yada yada yada. I won't touch
those cookies. I sometimes wonder if I should warn folks....?

"Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in news:1e9be145-
:

> Maybe you missed it...everyone else says it is not a "group", ****wit.

Not me. It's a newsgroup. There, its been said.

> It is not "asshole", you ignorant, yank in-bred fool of an idiot...It
> is arse hole...Like what you are below... an arse hole!

You say tomahto I say **** you.

Thanks for your input. Do come again when the mood strikes you.

*plonk*

(Bet you don't know what that means but I don't care)

On Mon, 26 May 2008 18:17:49 -0400, Goomba >
fired up random neurons and synapses to opine:

> BOB wrote:
>
>> HEY! I apologiZed. Well, sort of. I really am sorry I told "it" to suck
>> an egg, and not what I almost typed. '-)
>
>Was it a hundred year egg (or whatever those things are called?) or
>(shiver) balout?
>
>>> Usenet Means Never Having to Say You're Sorry
>>
>> I thought that rule # 125 of usenet was "Never, ever apologiZe on usenet."
>> Or am I remembering something else. I'll check with the cabal.
>>
>> BOB
>> tinc
>
>If one is in the cabal, one can spell apologize any old way they'd like.
>*That* person wasn't in the cabal, hence was confused about the spelling.
>
>Goomba (member of the cabal solely on account of time in grade here)

Does this mean I outrank you? <blink!>

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
--
"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "meatloaf" with "cox"

Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:

>> If one is in the cabal, one can spell apologize any old way they'd like.
>> *That* person wasn't in the cabal, hence was confused about the spelling.
>>
>> Goomba (member of the cabal solely on account of time in grade here)
>
> Does this mean I outrank you? <blink!>

Absofreakinlutely.

On Mon 26 May 2008 05:19:17p, Michael "Dog3" told us...

> Wayne Boatwright >
> 6.120: in
> rec.food.cooking
>
>>
>> Thanks, BOB. :-) For some reason this one really got to me.
>
> I noticed And here I thought I was the one that was being a complete
> asshole for the past month or so. Gawd I've been terrible and taking it
> out on everyone ;(
>
> Michael <- ashamed

We all have our moments. You were okay.



--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Monday, 05(V)/26(XXVI)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Today is: Memorial Day
-------------------------------------------
'Sometimes I wake up grumpy; Other
times I let her sleep'
-------------------------------------------

On Mon 26 May 2008 05:47:42p, sf told us...

> On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:09:28 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> > wrote:
>
>>Ohhhh... I had forgotten. Wonder what patches is up to these days?
>
> I hope she's ok. Do you remember the circumstance or do you just
> remember the smell of blood? I liked her and I think any other normal
> poster would have gone ballistic too, given that situation. I think
> RFC was absolutely horrible to her.
>

I liked here, too, and I tried to be sympathetic, but she wouldn't have it.
I thought she had a lot to offer. I, too, hope she's ok.

--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Monday, 05(V)/26(XXVI)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Today is: Memorial Day
-------------------------------------------
A book is never finished; it's
abandoned. --Gene Fowler
-------------------------------------------

Steve Pope > wrote:

> Sqwertz > wrote:
>
>>A web hosting company provides web space for users to place their
>>pages. They are supposed to be "server gurus" that maintain 99.999%
>>availability since people rely on them to keep their web pages
>>available 100% of the time. Most of them also provide mail hosting.
>
>>In which case, they should be using their own servers and domain
>>for mail and not relying on a third party. It's very unprofessional
>>to use third-party servers when you run your own supposedly reliable
>>servers.
>
> This makes no sense. Mail administration is a lot of work.

Not as hard as web hosting.

> If you only have a few users it makes sense not to do it
> even if you run servers for other things, and even if you
> have all the necessary skills. A lot of orgainzations
> these days wait until they are 20 or 30 people before they
> even think about standalone email administration. They just
> use yahoo or gmail until then. Their man-hours are better spent
> on other, money-making efforts than running email.

As the very least, a web hosting company - or *any* tech company of
any size (3 or more people), should be using their own domain for
email, whether they physically host it or not. Not gmail, or yahoo,
or hotmail. Maintaining a mail server is not as hard as you make it
seem. I've done it for companies of 5-80 people by spending only a
couple hours a week on it once it was set up and running (Unix,
using sendmail and MMDF, not Exhange).

A professional company does not use yahoo, gmail, or hotmail email
addresses. Especially a web-hosting company. There's really never
any argument about it, except for your attempt.

-sw

On Mon 26 May 2008 06:25:45p, kilikini told us...

> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Mon 26 May 2008 04:26:23p, jmcquown told us...
>>
>>> sf wrote:
>>>> I've never seen Wayne so uncivil to a total nutcase (he usually
>>>> gives the benefit of the doubt) - but truth be told, nobody cares
>>>> what you think. Continue your current level of foaming at the
>>>> mouth blather and you'll earn your way into a lot of kill files by
>>>> Tuesday.
>>>>
>>> You're waiting until Tuesday?!! Damn, I've been gone all weekend
>>> and the first thing I did was k/f this imbecile. (laughing)
>>>
>>> Jill
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That's probably the first thing I should have done. :-)
>
> Nah, this whole thing has been extremely entertaining. You did us a
> service, Wayne. Thanks!
>
> kili

Well, you're welcome, I guess. But I'm not usually so nasty and vitriolic.


--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Monday, 05(V)/26(XXVI)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Today is: Memorial Day
-------------------------------------------
Procrastination: The art of keeping up
with yesterday.
-------------------------------------------

On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:51:06 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> wrote:

>I don't remember a lot about it. IIRC her downfall have to do with a
>pizza pic she accused someone of stealing?

Whoever it was *did* steal her original picture.

>IIRC she posted a lot of pics
>and her oven was spotless. I might be thinking of someone else.

I don't remember oven pictures by patches.


--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote

> On Mon 26 May 2008 05:19:17p, Michael "Dog3" told us...
>
>> Wayne Boatwright >

>> rec.food.cooking
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, BOB. :-) For some reason this one really got to me.
>>
>> I noticed And here I thought I was the one that was being a complete
>> asshole for the past month or so. Gawd I've been terrible and taking it
>> out on everyone ;(
>>
>> Michael <- ashamed
>
> We all have our moments. You were okay.

I can't *imagine* what I missed! Whatever it was, I bet it
wasn't nearly as bad a Michael thinks.

nancy

Thanks everyone... :-)

Only a few more messages posted and this will be the most popular
topic for May !! Am I good or what?

For those that have not already book marked my site the URL is -
http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/

Actually, if you set it as your home page, you can keep up to date.
Don't forget that next months 3 recipes will be posted to the site
soon...So remember to book mark the site so that you don't miss out!

Thanks again for all the support.

Kindest Regards
KTC

On Mon, 26 May 2008 20:50:35 -0400, Goomba >
wrote:

>sf wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 May 2008 17:57:48 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>>
>>> Haven't had this much fun since the ~patches~ implosion.
>>
>> You're a very cruel person. Really. Given the situation, what would
>> you have done?
>>
>Which situation are you speaking of?
>Patches over-reaction and spiral downward into paranoia

Someone stole her picture. FACT! The picture in question was
denigrated to the hilt by Sheldon with several "me too" posts and
subsequently praised by rfc in general after it was stolen several
months later by (I don't remember who). The gang up included a fake
t-shirt with the OP picture on it. How would you have handled the
situation?

> or Bob making a joke about it?

I was replying to BOB's reply about the "~patches~ implosion". I
wonder what he or you would have done, given the same set of
circumstances? She was *very* nice up to that point.

It is still hard to believe how horribly normally nice posters acted.
It was an absolute feeding frenzy! *I* think they should be ashamed
about the way they acted.


--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Mon 26 May 2008 07:03:29p, kilikini told us...

> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> On Mon 26 May 2008 06:25:45p, kilikini told us...
>>
>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>>> On Mon 26 May 2008 04:26:23p, jmcquown told us...
>>>>
>>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>>> I've never seen Wayne so uncivil to a total nutcase (he usually
>>>>>> gives the benefit of the doubt) - but truth be told, nobody cares
>>>>>> what you think. Continue your current level of foaming at the
>>>>>> mouth blather and you'll earn your way into a lot of kill files by
>>>>>> Tuesday.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're waiting until Tuesday?!! Damn, I've been gone all weekend
>>>>> and the first thing I did was k/f this imbecile. (laughing)
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's probably the first thing I should have done. :-)
>>>
>>> Nah, this whole thing has been extremely entertaining. You did us a
>>> service, Wayne. Thanks!
>>>
>>> kili
>>
>> Well, you're welcome, I guess. But I'm not usually so nasty and
>> vitriolic.
>
> You're not at all! That was part of the fun of it. LOL.
>
> kili
>
>

Thanks for saying so, Kili!

--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Monday, 05(V)/26(XXVI)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Today is: Memorial Day
-------------------------------------------
I parked my hard disk and now I can't
find it!
-------------------------------------------

sf wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 18:54:04 -0400, " BOB" > wrote:
>
>> The brother of ~patches~?
>>
>> BOB
>>
> hey! Patches was *not* that bad.

But... but... but... we *stole* her pizza!!!

sf wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2008 00:51:06 GMT, "Michael \"Dog3\""
> > wrote:
>
>> I don't remember a lot about it. IIRC her downfall have to do with a
>> pizza pic she accused someone of stealing?
>
> Whoever it was *did* steal her original picture.

Yeah, they did. But wasn't it done as a joke and she blew it all out of
proportion? That was my take on it.

>> IIRC she posted a lot of pics
>> and her oven was spotless. I might be thinking of someone else.
>
> I don't remember oven pictures by patches.

Nor do I recall oven pictures by Patches? I was thinking of many other
pictures I've seen in various newsgroups and such.

Kiss-The-CooK.110mb wrote:
> Thanks everyone... :-)
>
> Only a few more messages posted and this will be the most popular
> topic for May !! Am I good or what?
>
> For those that have not already book marked my site the URL is -
>
> Actually, if you set it as your home page, you can keep up to date.
> Don't forget that next months 3 recipes will be posted to the site
> soon...So remember to book mark the site so that you don't miss out!
>
> Thanks again for all the support.
>
> Kindest Regards
> KTC

LOL LOL LOL.... as If!

sf wrote:

>> Which situation are you speaking of?
>> Patches over-reaction and spiral downward into paranoia
>
> Someone stole her picture. FACT! The picture in question was
> denigrated to the hilt by Sheldon with several "me too" posts and
> subsequently praised by rfc in general after it was stolen several
> months later by (I don't remember who). The gang up included a fake
> t-shirt with the OP picture on it. How would you have handled the
> situation?
>
I think someone was pulling her leg or playing a joke and she couldn't
laugh at the absurdity of it. Her over-reaction (IMO) is what caused the
problems to escalate.

On Mon, 26 May 2008 22:01:42 -0400, "Nancy Young" >
wrote:

>
>"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote
>
>> On Mon 26 May 2008 05:19:17p, Michael "Dog3" told us...
>>
>>> Wayne Boatwright >
>
>>> rec.food.cooking
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, BOB. :-) For some reason this one really got to me.
>>>
>>> I noticed And here I thought I was the one that was being a complete
>>> asshole for the past month or so. Gawd I've been terrible and taking it
>>> out on everyone ;(
>>>
>>> Michael <- ashamed
>>
>> We all have our moments. You were okay.
>
>I can't *imagine* what I missed! Whatever it was, I bet it
>wasn't nearly as bad a Michael thinks.
>

It was much worse.


--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Tue, 27 May 2008 01:17:59 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

>On Mon 26 May 2008 05:19:17p, Michael "Dog3" told us...
>
>> Wayne Boatwright >
>> 6.120: in
>> rec.food.cooking
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, BOB. :-) For some reason this one really got to me.
>>
>> I noticed And here I thought I was the one that was being a complete
>> asshole for the past month or so. Gawd I've been terrible and taking it
>> out on everyone ;(
>>
>> Michael <- ashamed
>
>We all have our moments. You were okay.

Again, you're being too nice!

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On Mon 26 May 2008 07:34:28p, sf told us...

> On Tue, 27 May 2008 01:17:59 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> > wrote:
>
>>On Mon 26 May 2008 05:19:17p, Michael "Dog3" told us...
>>
>>> Wayne Boatwright >
>>> 6.120: in
>>> rec.food.cooking
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, BOB. :-) For some reason this one really got to me.
>>>
>>> I noticed And here I thought I was the one that was being a
complete
>>> asshole for the past month or so. Gawd I've been terrible and taking
it
>>> out on everyone ;(
>>>
>>> Michael <- ashamed
>>
>>We all have our moments. You were okay.
>
> Again, you're being too nice!
>

Well, maybe I missed something. Michael didn't take anything out on me.

--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Monday, 05(V)/26(XXVI)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Today is: Memorial Day
-------------------------------------------
Potential is finite.
-------------------------------------------

On Mon, 26 May 2008 19:05:43 -0700 (PDT), "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb"
> wrote:

>Only a few more messages posted and this will be the most popular
>topic for May !! Am I good or what?

Excellent troll. One of the best.

Please don't consider the OT comments as real contributions to your OP
troll though. RFC has gotten lazy about changing subject headers
lately and I don't think you're going to change the trend.

--
See return address to reply by email
remove the smile first

On May 27, 12:31*pm, Goomba > wrote:
> Kiss-The-CooK.110mb wrote:
> > Thanks everyone... :-)
>
> > Only a few more messages posted and this will be the most popular
> > topic for May !! Am I good or what?
>
> > For those that have not already book marked my site the URL is -
>
> > Actually, if you set it as your home page, you can keep up to date.
> > Don't forget that next months 3 recipes will be posted to the site
> > soon...So remember to book mark the site so that you don't miss out!
>
> > Thanks again for all the support.
>
> > Kindest Regards
> > KTC
>
> LOL LOL LOL.... as If!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

What do you mean..." as if! " ?

It's TRUE...Every month I will be putting up 3 easy to make recipes
that you (yes even you) can cook at home...There is no "as if" about
it, there will be 3 new easy to make recipes each month...!!

http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/ Don't forget to book mark!

KTC