Not hard to do, when you have the facts.

http://www.basicinstructions.net/

On Sun 25 May 2008 10:50:22p, Mark Thorson told us...

> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>
> http://www.basicinstructions.net/
>

I like that!

--
Wayne Boatwright
-------------------------------------------
Sunday, 05(V)/25(XXV)/08(MMVIII)
-------------------------------------------
Countdown till Memorial Day
1hrs
-------------------------------------------
'I think so, Brain, but if we didn't
have ears we'd look like weasels.'
-------------------------------------------

Mark Thorson wrote:
> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>
> http://www.basicinstructions.net/

too bad it wasn't a funnier site.

One of the better admonitions I've heard is a song by "The Old Dogs"
(Waylon Jennings, Bobby Bare, Jerry Reed and..someone else?) doing
"Still Gonna Die"
Here is a Youtube clip that uses the music-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyQcx7ibdEE

On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:50:22 -0700, Mark Thorson >
wrote:

>Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>
>http://www.basicinstructions.net/

What do you know about facts? Where is your apology to Landers?!

On Mon, 26 May 2008 02:46:11 -0400, Goomba >
wrote:

>Mark Thorson wrote:
>> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>>
>> http://www.basicinstructions.net/
>
> too bad it wasn't a funnier site.
>
>One of the better admonitions I've heard is a song by "The Old Dogs"
>(Waylon Jennings, Bobby Bare, Jerry Reed and..someone else?) doing
>"Still Gonna Die"
>Here is a Youtube clip that uses the music-
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyQcx7ibdEE


Where is your apology to Landers?!

Mark A.Meggs wrote:
> On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:50:22 -0700, Mark Thorson >
> wrote:
>
>> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>>
>> http://www.basicinstructions.net/
>
> What do you know about facts? Where is your apology to Landers?!

Oh goodie. Now you've become a crazed stalker, huh?

Mark A.Meggs wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 02:46:11 -0400, Goomba >
> wrote:
>
>> Mark Thorson wrote:
>>> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>>>
>>> http://www.basicinstructions.net/
>> too bad it wasn't a funnier site.
>>
>> One of the better admonitions I've heard is a song by "The Old Dogs"
>> (Waylon Jennings, Bobby Bare, Jerry Reed and..someone else?) doing
>> "Still Gonna Die"
>> Here is a Youtube clip that uses the music-
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyQcx7ibdEE
>
>
> Where is your apology to Landers?!

<yawn>
you're coming across like a crackpot. You know that, don't you?

On Mon, 26 May 2008 09:38:14 -0400, Goomba >
wrote:

>Mark A.Meggs wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 May 2008 02:46:11 -0400, Goomba >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mark Thorson wrote:
>>>> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.basicinstructions.net/
>>> too bad it wasn't a funnier site.
>>>
>>> One of the better admonitions I've heard is a song by "The Old Dogs"
>>> (Waylon Jennings, Bobby Bare, Jerry Reed and..someone else?) doing
>>> "Still Gonna Die"
>>> Here is a Youtube clip that uses the music-
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iyQcx7ibdEE
>>
>>
>> Where is your apology to Landers?!
>
><yawn>
>you're coming across like a crackpot. You know that, don't you?

"LOL Who told you you were allergic to folic acid?
I once had a patient tell me they were allergic to potassium. How
people
get these ideas, I dunno?"

Who's the crackpot? You were wrong!! You owe an apology!!

- Mark

On Mon, 26 May 2008 09:36:49 -0400, Goomba >
wrote:

>Mark A.Meggs wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 May 2008 22:50:22 -0700, Mark Thorson >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>>>
>>> http://www.basicinstructions.net/
>>
>> What do you know about facts? Where is your apology to Landers?!
>
>Oh goodie. Now you've become a crazed stalker, huh?

"LOL Who told you you were allergic to folic acid?
I once had a patient tell me they were allergic to potassium. How
people
get these ideas, I dunno?"

You were wrong!! You owe an apology!!

- Mark

Mark A.Meggs wrote:

> "LOL Who told you you were allergic to folic acid?
> I once had a patient tell me they were allergic to potassium. How
> people
> get these ideas, I dunno?"
>
> Who's the crackpot? You were wrong!! You owe an apology!!
>
> - Mark

Do you think a SYNTHETIC product is the same as a naturally occuring one
which the body requires and gets from foods?

And why are you so rabid about this?

Mark Thorson wrote:
> Not hard to do, when you have the facts.
>
> http://www.basicinstructions.net/


Very nice. I always thought the main rule was
"If it tastes good, don't eat it."

gloria p

On Mon, 26 May 2008 12:18:30 -0400, Goomba >
wrote:

>Mark A.Meggs wrote:
>
>> "LOL Who told you you were allergic to folic acid?
>> I once had a patient tell me they were allergic to potassium. How
>> people
>> get these ideas, I dunno?"
>>
>> Who's the crackpot? You were wrong!! You owe an apology!!
>>
>> - Mark
>
>Do you think a SYNTHETIC product is the same as a naturally occuring one
>which the body requires and gets from foods?
>
>And why are you so rabid about this?

The OP didn't specify "natural" or "synthetic". Chemically, there is
no difference.

You were wrong! Why can'y you simply admit it!!

- Mark

Mark A.Meggs wrote:

>> Do you think a SYNTHETIC product is the same as a naturally occuring one
>> which the body requires and gets from foods?
>>
>> And why are you so rabid about this?
>
> The OP didn't specify "natural" or "synthetic". Chemically, there is
> no difference.
>
> You were wrong! Why can'y you simply admit it!!
>
> - Mark

No, but your citations ALL specified SYNTHETIC. And yes, there most
certainly can be a difference.

Why are you so rabid about this?

On Mon, 26 May 2008 13:39:24 -0400, Goomba >
wrote:

>Mark A.Meggs wrote:
>
>>> Do you think a SYNTHETIC product is the same as a naturally occuring one
>>> which the body requires and gets from foods?
>>>
>>> And why are you so rabid about this?
>>
>> The OP didn't specify "natural" or "synthetic". Chemically, there is
>> no difference.
>>
>> You were wrong! Why can'y you simply admit it!!
>>
>> - Mark
>
>No, but your citations ALL specified SYNTHETIC. And yes, there most
>certainly can be a difference.
>
>Why are you so rabid about this?

"Rabid"?

I'm demanding that youi apologize for your response to Landers. You
were wrong. Why can't you admit it.

- Mark

Mark A.Meggs wrote:

> "Rabid"?
>
> I'm demanding that youi apologize for your response to Landers. You
> were wrong. Why can't you admit it.
>
> - Mark

Because I think YOU are wrong. And a nutjob.
Who the hell are you to demand ANYTHING, anyway?
Why are you taking this so rabidly personal?

"Mark A.Meggs" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 May 2008 13:39:24 -0400, Goomba >
> wrote:
>
> >Mark A.Meggs wrote:
> >
> >>> Do you think a SYNTHETIC product is the same as a naturally occuring one
> >>> which the body requires and gets from foods?
> >>>
> >>> And why are you so rabid about this?
> >>
> >> The OP didn't specify "natural" or "synthetic". Chemically, there is
> >> no difference.
> >>
> >> You were wrong! Why can'y you simply admit it!!
> >>
> >> - Mark
> >
> >No, but your citations ALL specified SYNTHETIC. And yes, there most
> >certainly can be a difference.
> >
> >Why are you so rabid about this?
>
> "Rabid"?
>
> I'm demanding that youi apologize for your response to Landers. You
> were wrong. Why can't you admit it.

Because it's so much more amusing to watch
you rant and rave? :-)