"sandi" > wrote in message
...
> "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in
>
> s.com:
>
>> On May 29, 1:05 pm, "Ms P" > wrote:
>>> "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in
>>> message
>>>
>>>
>>> oups.com... Yes, yes...another usenet idiot.
>>>
>>> You cannot chase me away...THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO !!!
>>>
>>> There are no rules, there is no one in charge. The ONLY hope
>>> of you idiots have is to be very, very nice to people like
>>> me...Otherwise, you should expect to be spammed into
>>> obliteration.
>>>
>>> Country Lamb Casserole
>>>
>>> Tomato
>>> Onion
>>> Carrot
>>> Potato
>>> Celery
>>> Parsnip
>>> Turnip
>>> Garlic
>>> Herbs - Parsley, basil, chili
>>>
>>> Fish stock ingreadients for 5Ltr are -
>>>
>>> 75g Butter
>>> 250g Onion finley sliced
>>> 2 Bayleaf
>>> 8 Peppercorns
>>> 20g Parsley
>>> Juice of 1 lemon
>>> 2kg Fish bones
>>> 5Ltr Cold water
>>>
>>> Ms P
>>
>> I like you Ms P,
>>
>> Dumb...but nice.
>>
>> Still not sure the point you are trying to make...
>
> <snip>
>
> You're serious!?
>
> --
> Oh my.

I give him another week and he'll figure it out. <cackle>

Ms P

cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:

> than be censored in that way.

Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
private server, hence no censoring can be done.

> Assholes.

Everyone has one.

cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:

> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with someone you are
> supposed to take it to email.

RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.

"Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
e...
> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:
>
>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with someone you are
>> supposed to take it to email.
>



What?
> RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.

"Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
e...
> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:
>
>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with someone you are
>> supposed to take it to email.
>
> RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.

Just read your headers. You're the controlling, no-life asswipe who wrote
the TOS of this asinine server.

Well, good for you. Happily, there are much better alternatives. Even free
alternatives.

"Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
e...
> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>
>> than be censored in that way.
>
> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>

It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not your
juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.

You'd much more likely be happy in moderated groups. People who attempt to
control Usenet usually do not end up happy.

Trust me on that.

On May 29, 2:31*pm, "Ms P" > wrote:
> "sandi" > wrote in message
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in
>
> > s.com:
>
> >> On May 29, 1:05 pm, "Ms P" > wrote:
> >>> "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in
> >>> message
>
>
> >>> oups.com... Yes, yes...another usenet idiot.
>
> >>> You cannot chase me away...THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO !!!
>
> >>> There are no rules, there is no one in charge. The ONLY hope
> >>> of you idiots have is to be very, very nice to people like
> >>> me...Otherwise, you should expect to be spammed into
> >>> obliteration.
>
> >>> Country Lamb Casserole
>
> >>> Tomato
> >>> Onion
> >>> Carrot
> >>> Potato
> >>> Celery
> >>> Parsnip
> >>> Turnip
> >>> Garlic
> >>> Herbs - Parsley, basil, chili
>
> >>> Fish stock ingreadients for 5Ltr are -
>
> >>> 75g Butter
> >>> 250g Onion finley sliced
> >>> 2 Bayleaf
> >>> 8 Peppercorns
> >>> 20g Parsley
> >>> Juice of 1 lemon
> >>> 2kg Fish bones
> >>> 5Ltr Cold water
>
> >>> Ms P
>
> >> I like you Ms P,
>
> >> Dumb...but nice.
>
> >> Still not sure the point you are trying to make...
>
> > <snip>
>
> > You're serious!?
>
> > --
> > Oh my.
>
> I give him another week and he'll figure it out. *<cackle>
>
> Ms P- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

In another week ???...I would give you another 10 years and you will
still NOT have a clue!!

You will never find all of my "mistakes" because YOU are just not good
enough to find them all...!!!

Dumb bitch !!

We people that actually KNOW what is going on, put "mistakes" in so
that when Dumb Arse Idiots like you, try and thieve our work...we can
simply point to the "mistakes" which then PROVES you stole OUR
Copyright...And then the Court takes ALL YOUR money and gives it to
US !!!

http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/
http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/

Fried spam - http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/
Grilled spam - http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/

cybercat wrote:

>
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
> news
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>>> news >>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Default User" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> sittingduck wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Default User wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >> What would it take to get you to go away?
>>>>>>> >> Just curious...
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Your killfile?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A server that doesn't propagate google posts would do it...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Doesn't seem like anything I'd want or need.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you want to read postings from google then use google.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pure nonsense. I want to read USENET posts. GG posts are usenet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The other thing is, that server has ridiculous terms of service. I
>>>>> would
>>>>> rather not post at all than be censored in that way. Assholes.
>>>>
>>>> What do you wish to do that they do not allow?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with someone you are
>>> supposed to take it to email.
>>
>> I glanced over them. They probably read like everybodys else's, if one
>> actually studies all of them.
>
> No, they don't read like "everyone else's" They read like those of a control
> freak who's assholish enough to feel comfortable saying that all people
> posting through Google Groups are not worth reading.

The GG part is, of course, why I'm using that server.

> Nothing but middle school exclusionary bullshit.
>
>>Anyway, I'm not going to worry about it.
>
> How surprising.

Of course it's not surprising, Google hugger.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

On May 29, 3:32*pm, "cybercat" > wrote:

" Usenet is all about free speech...." - unquote

You have got to be kidding !!!!!

What ****ing free speech, trollop?

I can walk down the street with http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/
printed on a T-shirt and you, the man across the street, the whore you
live with and everyone else just has to live with it !!!! Right ?

Here...I only have to mention http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/ and
YOU ****ing low life slut scum bags start screaming blue ****ing
murder!!!!!! RIGHT ???

Where is the free speech SLUT ?

The ONLY speech "allowed" here is what YOU low life scum of the earth
sluts and NAZI ****s DICTATE !!!

You maggot !

http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/
http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/

Sven Svensson wrote:

> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:
>
>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with someone you are
>> supposed to take it to email.
>
> RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.

Sven, if you're part of usenet3all, thank you for the Google-free feed
and best wishes with it. See sig.

--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

cybercat wrote:

>
> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
> e...
>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>>
>>> than be censored in that way.
>>
>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>
> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not your

Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
a branch of government.

> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.

So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

Blinky the Shark wrote:

> Sven Svensson wrote:
>
>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:
>>
>>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with someone you are
>>> supposed to take it to email.
>>
>> RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.
>
> Sven, if you're part of usenet3all, thank you for the Google-free feed

Uh...or usenet4all, too.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

"Blinky the Shark" > wrote

> cybercat wrote:

>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>> your
>
> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
> a branch of government.

Free speech is a government thing. Not censorship. Newspaper editors
censor copy all the time.

nancy

"Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in

s.com:

> On May 29, 2:31*pm, "Ms P" > wrote:
>> "sandi" > wrote in message
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> > "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in
>>
>> >roup
>> > s.com:
>>
>> >> On May 29, 1:05 pm, "Ms P" > wrote:
>> >>> "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote
>> >>> in message
>>
>>
>> >>>egr
>> >>> oups.com... Yes, yes...another usenet idiot.
>>
>> >>> You cannot chase me away...THERE IS NOTHING YOU CAN DO
>> >>> !!!
>>
>> >>> There are no rules, there is no one in charge. The ONLY
>> >>> hope of you idiots have is to be very, very nice to
>> >>> people like me...Otherwise, you should expect to be
>> >>> spammed into obliteration.
>>
>> >>> Country Lamb Casserole
>>
>> >>> Tomato
>> >>> Onion
>> >>> Carrot
>> >>> Potato
>> >>> Celery
>> >>> Parsnip
>> >>> Turnip
>> >>> Garlic
>> >>> Herbs - Parsley, basil, chili
>>
>> >>> Fish stock ingreadients for 5Ltr are -
>>
>> >>> 75g Butter
>> >>> 250g Onion finley sliced
>> >>> 2 Bayleaf
>> >>> 8 Peppercorns
>> >>> 20g Parsley
>> >>> Juice of 1 lemon
>> >>> 2kg Fish bones
>> >>> 5Ltr Cold water
>>
>> >>> Ms P
>>
>> >> I like you Ms P,
>>
>> >> Dumb...but nice.
>>
>> >> Still not sure the point you are trying to make...
>>
>> > <snip>
>>
>> > You're serious!?
>>
>> > --
>> > Oh my.
>>
>> I give him another week and he'll figure it out. *<cackle>
>>
>> Ms P- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> In another week ???...I would give you another 10 years and
> you will still NOT have a clue!!
>
> You will never find all of my "mistakes" because YOU are just
> not good enough to find them all...!!!
>
> Dumb bitch !!
>
> We people that actually KNOW what is going on, put "mistakes"
> in so that when Dumb Arse Idiots like you, try and thieve our
> work...we can simply point to the "mistakes" which then PROVES
> you stole OUR Copyright...And then the Court takes ALL YOUR
> money and gives it to US !!!

BWAHA HA HAHA HA HA HA!
--

2 weeks!

"Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in

ups.com:

> What ****ing free speech, trollop?
> The ONLY speech "allowed" here is what YOU low life scum of
> the earth sluts and NAZI ****s DICTATE !!!
>
> You maggot !

is Shelly off his meds again?
--
Last night while sitting in my chair
I pinged a host that wasn't there
It wasn't there again today
The host resolved to NSA.

Blinky the Shark > wrote in
news
> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>
>> Sven Svensson wrote:
>>
>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:
>>>
>>>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with
>>>> someone you are supposed to take it to email.
>>>
>>> RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.
>>
>> Sven, if you're part of usenet3all, thank you for the
>> Google-free feed
>
> Uh...or usenet4all, too.

oh, Blinky... do you know how to KF GG in xNews? how about
Pan (since i just got a new laptop & i'm putting a real OS on
it
BTW, i tried to upgrade the xNews on this box, but my xNews
files are on my D drive, & the download is on C... i tried
McAffee anti-virus on C a couple years ago & it fubared the
drive. i've been to lazy to wipe the drive & reinstall
Winbloze.

lee
--
Last night while sitting in my chair
I pinged a host that wasn't there
It wasn't there again today
The host resolved to NSA.

enigma wrote:
> "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > wrote in
>
> ups.com:
>
>> What ****ing free speech, trollop?
>> The ONLY speech "allowed" here is what YOU low life scum of
>> the earth sluts and NAZI ****s DICTATE !!!
>>
>> You maggot !
>
> is Shelly off his meds again?

LOL it does sound rather like him I fear we have a nutter far worse then
our Shelly.

What this loonie doesn't realise is we can use our killfiles and not see him
at all, unless someone responds. Might be good if we all did

On Wed, 28 May 2008 20:33:06 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>blake murphy wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 May 2008 19:14:54 -0700 (PDT), "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb"
>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> A person comes along and finds this "newsgroup". They then open a web
>>> site and install some forum script and a newsgroup reader and feed
>>> YOUR comments directly into their brand new forum. They now have a
>>> brand new web site forum fully stocked up with real life
>>> content...Content that MILLIONS of people are looking for. They then
>>> put some PPC ads up or even affilate ads and bingo...They use the
>>> FREE high quality FREE content that YOU give unkowingly FREE to
>>> them...and they "get rich quick" as they say!
>>>
>>> I don't think you would understand the maths behind it, so let me
>>> just give you the final figure. The yearly readership of just this
>>> "RFC" newsgroup from Forum feeds would be at least 100,000,000 (one
>>> hundred million). That would be generating in the order of around 5
>>> Billion U.S dollars per year...at an educated guess!
>>>
>>
>> ...and a hundred million people have read us point out the many ways
>> in which you're an idiot. it's truly awesome.
>
>psssssssssst, blake, what is 'forum script? errrr and affiliate ads and
>bingo????
>

beats me. but if the kook is talking about it, surely it can't be
good.

your pal,
blake

Nancy Young wrote:

>
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>
>> cybercat wrote:
>
>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>> your
>>
>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>> a branch of government.
>
> Free speech is a government thing. Not censorship. Newspaper editors
> censor copy all the time.

That's not censorship. It's editing, certainly. But a newspaper can't
censor.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

enigma wrote:

> Blinky the Shark > wrote in
> news >
>> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>>
>>> Sven Svensson wrote:
>>>
>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:
>>>>
>>>>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with someone you
>>>>> are supposed to take it to email.
>>>>
>>>> RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.
>>>
>>> Sven, if you're part of usenet3all, thank you for the Google-free feed
>>
>> Uh...or usenet4all, too.
>
> oh, Blinky... do you know how to KF GG in xNews? how about
> Pan (since i just got a new laptop & i'm putting a real OS on it

Of course I do, and I do so in both readers as well as others. Follow the
UIP link in my sig, and select Xnews/Pan/whatever from the menu.

> BTW, i tried to upgrade the xNews on this box, but my xNews
> files are on my D drive, & the download is on C... i tried

Drives, schmives. You only need to take the exe file out of the
distribution zip, and replace your current xnews.exe with it. Read this:

http://blinkynet.net/comp/xnewsrels.html


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

Janet Baraclough wrote:

> The message
> >
> from "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" > contains these words:
>
>
>> There are no rules, there is no one in charge.
>
> Well, that's an improvement in your internet education since you
> arrived here
>
> The ONLY hope of you
>> idiots have is to be very, very nice to people like me...Otherwise,
>> you should expect to be spammed into obliteration.
>
> Oops, forgot to tell you; you can't force your spamtrash onto
> newsreader screens. One click and my newsreader automatically
> obliterates every post you send.

He doesn't know anything about newsreaders because he's on the internet!


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

blake murphy wrote:

> On Wed, 28 May 2008 20:33:06 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>blake murphy wrote:
>>> On Tue, 27 May 2008 19:14:54 -0700 (PDT), "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb"
>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A person comes along and finds this "newsgroup". They then open a web
>>>> site and install some forum script and a newsgroup reader and feed
>>>> YOUR comments directly into their brand new forum. They now have a
>>>> brand new web site forum fully stocked up with real life
>>>> content...Content that MILLIONS of people are looking for. They then
>>>> put some PPC ads up or even affilate ads and bingo...They use the
>>>> FREE high quality FREE content that YOU give unkowingly FREE to
>>>> them...and they "get rich quick" as they say!
>>>>
>>>> I don't think you would understand the maths behind it, so let me
>>>> just give you the final figure. The yearly readership of just this
>>>> "RFC" newsgroup from Forum feeds would be at least 100,000,000 (one
>>>> hundred million). That would be generating in the order of around 5
>>>> Billion U.S dollars per year...at an educated guess!
>>>>
>>>
>>> ...and a hundred million people have read us point out the many ways
>>> in which you're an idiot. it's truly awesome.
>>
>>psssssssssst, blake, what is 'forum script? errrr and affiliate ads and
>>bingo????
>>
>
> beats me. but if the kook is talking about it, surely it can't be
> good.

Well, he's right that people steal Usenet groups and slap them into web
gateways to make money. Similarly, people mug little old ladies. That
doesn't make either the right thing to do.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

"enigma" > wrote in message
. ..
> Blinky the Shark > wrote in
> news >
>> Blinky the Shark wrote:
>>
>>> Sven Svensson wrote:
>>>
>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 02:29:
>>>>
>>>>> Have you read the terms of service? If you disagree with
>>>>> someone you are supposed to take it to email.
>>>>
>>>> RFC:s rule internet. Live with it or leave.
>>>
>>> Sven, if you're part of usenet3all, thank you for the
>>> Google-free feed
>>
>> Uh...or usenet4all, too.
>
> oh, Blinky... do you know how to KF GG in xNews? how about
> Pan (since i just got a new laptop & i'm putting a real OS on
> it
> BTW, i tried to upgrade the xNews on this box, but my xNews
> files are on my D drive, & the download is on C... i tried
> McAffee anti-virus on C a couple years ago & it fubared the
> drive. i've been to lazy to wipe the drive & reinstall
> Winbloze.
>

What are you, 12?

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>
>> cybercat wrote:
>
>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>> your
>>
>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>> a branch of government.
>
> Free speech is a government thing. Not censorship. Newspaper editors
> censor copy all the time.
>

Get a load of this.
http://www.rfc1855.net/#chapter-3-1-3

"Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
news
> cybercat wrote:
>
>>
>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
>> e...
>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>>>
>>>> than be censored in that way.
>>>
>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>>
>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>> your
>
> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
> a branch of government.
>
>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.
>
> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
>

You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts via
Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid. Period.

"Blinky the Shark" > wrote

> Nancy Young wrote:
>
>>
>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>>
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>>> your
>>>
>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>>> a branch of government.
>>
>> Free speech is a government thing. Not censorship. Newspaper editors
>> censor copy all the time.
>
> That's not censorship. It's editing, certainly. But a newspaper can't
> censor.

Sure they can, they decide what they prefer not to print. You don't
like that example, Warren Jeffs and his pals certainly censor what their
people can read. There are lots of examples.

nancy

Nancy Young wrote:

>
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>
>> Nancy Young wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>>>
>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>>>> your
>>>>
>>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>>>> a branch of government.
>>>
>>> Free speech is a government thing. Not censorship. Newspaper editors
>>> censor copy all the time.
>>
>> That's not censorship. It's editing, certainly. But a newspaper can't
>> censor.
>
> Sure they can, they decide what they prefer not to print. You don't

And that's not inherently censorship.

> like that example, Warren Jeffs and his pals certainly censor what their
> people can read. There are lots of examples.

Governments censor.

I don't know or care who Warren Jeffs is, but unless he's editing under
the authority of government, he's not censoring.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

cybercat wrote:

>
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
> news
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
>>> e...
>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>>>>
>>>>> than be censored in that way.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
>>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>>>
>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>> your
>>
>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>> a branch of government.
>>
>>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.
>>
>> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
>
> You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts via

No, I do not define spam that way. Not even close.

> Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid.
> Period.

I suppose you don't have any locks on your doors. I do. I will choose
who I wish interaction with, online and offline.

The *right* to association is not a demand for association.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

Blinky the Shark wrote:
> blake murphy wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 28 May 2008 20:33:06 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> blake murphy wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 27 May 2008 19:14:54 -0700 (PDT), "Kiss-The-CooK.110mb"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> A person comes along and finds this "newsgroup". They then open a
>>>>> web site and install some forum script and a newsgroup reader and
>>>>> feed YOUR comments directly into their brand new forum. They now
>>>>> have a brand new web site forum fully stocked up with real life
>>>>> content...Content that MILLIONS of people are looking for. They
>>>>> then put some PPC ads up or even affilate ads and bingo...They
>>>>> use the FREE high quality FREE content that YOU give unkowingly
>>>>> FREE to them...and they "get rich quick" as they say!
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you would understand the maths behind it, so let me
>>>>> just give you the final figure. The yearly readership of just this
>>>>> "RFC" newsgroup from Forum feeds would be at least 100,000,000
>>>>> (one hundred million). That would be generating in the order of
>>>>> around 5 Billion U.S dollars per year...at an educated guess!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...and a hundred million people have read us point out the many
>>>> ways in which you're an idiot. it's truly awesome.
>>>
>>> psssssssssst, blake, what is 'forum script? errrr and affiliate
>>> ads and bingo????
>>>
>>
>> beats me. but if the kook is talking about it, surely it can't be
>> good.
>
> Well, he's right that people steal Usenet groups and slap them into
> web gateways to make money. Similarly, people mug little old ladies.
> That doesn't make either the right thing to do.

Well, I think he's pretty much shown that he's a mugger...... a deranged
mugger.

--
Dave www.davebbq.com

What is best in life? "To crush your enemies, see them driven before
you, and to hear the lamentation of the women." -- Conan

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
. ..
>
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>
>> Nancy Young wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>>>
>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>>>> your
>>>>
>>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>>>> a branch of government.
>>>
>>> Free speech is a government thing. Not censorship. Newspaper editors
>>> censor copy all the time.
>>
>> That's not censorship. It's editing, certainly. But a newspaper can't
>> censor.
>
> Sure they can, they decide what they prefer not to print. You don't
> like that example, Warren Jeffs and his pals certainly censor what their
> people can read. There are lots of examples.
>

My point was, in a venue where free communication is rather the point
(Usenet) an nntp that tells you that you can have your posting privileges
revoked for disagreeing in Usenet is not very useful.

"Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
news
> cybercat wrote:
>
>>
>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>> news
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
>>>> e...
>>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>>>>>
>>>>>> than be censored in that way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
>>>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>>>>
>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>>> your
>>>
>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>>> a branch of government.
>>>
>>>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.
>>>
>>> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
>>
>> You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts via
>
> No, I do not define spam that way. Not even close.
>
>> Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid.
>> Period.
>
> I suppose you don't have any locks on your doors. I do. I will choose
> who I wish interaction with, online and offline.
>
> The *right* to association is not a demand for association.
>
>

The assumption underlying your killfiling ALL people posting from Google
Groups is what?

Hmmm? What is the reason you do not want to read ANY posts from Google
Groups, Oh Blinking One?

"cybercat" > wrote

> "Nancy Young" > wrote

>> Sure they can, they decide what they prefer not to print. You don't
>> like that example, Warren Jeffs and his pals certainly censor what their
>> people can read. There are lots of examples.
>>
>
> My point was, in a venue where free communication is rather the point
> (Usenet) an nntp that tells you that you can have your posting privileges
> revoked for disagreeing in Usenet is not very useful.

I wasn't disagreeing with you. I was debating the meaning of the
word censor.

nancy

cybercat wrote:

>
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
> news
>> cybercat wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>>> news >>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
>>>>> e...
>>>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> than be censored in that way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
>>>>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>>>> your
>>>>
>>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>>>> a branch of government.
>>>>
>>>>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.
>>>>
>>>> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
>>>
>>> You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts via
>>
>> No, I do not define spam that way. Not even close.
>>
>>> Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid.
>>> Period.
>>
>> I suppose you don't have any locks on your doors. I do. I will choose
>> who I wish interaction with, online and offline.
>>
>> The *right* to association is not a demand for association.
>>
>>
>
> The assumption underlying your killfiling ALL people posting from Google
> Groups is what?

"The worthwhile Gropers are few enough to be insignificant to me in the
scope of the lame-brains and spammers; and because I dislike the
watering-down of Usenet via web gateways, of which GG is the largest
offender, I choose not to cooperate by reading articles from its users."

Clear enough? Of course, you don't *get* it; but it should be clear
enough.

> Hmmm? What is the reason you do not want to read ANY posts from Google
> Groups, Oh Blinking One?

I've never been bashful about explaining my reasons. Hell, I created a
whole web site about the issue, and the link is never further away than
my sig. So why do I have to reinvent the wheel for you here? You know
how to read websites, right? So no more hand-holding. Follow the link
if you wish to become educated. Blinky out -- on this topic, as far as
repeating everything that's there, for you.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

"Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
news
> cybercat wrote:
>
>>
>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>> news
>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>>>> news >>>>> cybercat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
>>>>>> e...
>>>>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> than be censored in that way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is a
>>>>>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech,
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> your
>>>>>
>>>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>>>>> a branch of government.
>>>>>
>>>>>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
>>>>
>>>> You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts via
>>>
>>> No, I do not define spam that way. Not even close.
>>>
>>>> Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid.
>>>> Period.
>>>
>>> I suppose you don't have any locks on your doors. I do. I will choose
>>> who I wish interaction with, online and offline.
>>>
>>> The *right* to association is not a demand for association.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The assumption underlying your killfiling ALL people posting from Google
>> Groups is what?
>
> "The worthwhile Gropers are few enough to be insignificant to me in the
> scope of the lame-brains and spammers; and because I dislike the
> watering-down of Usenet via web gateways, of which GG is the largest
> offender, I choose not to cooperate by reading articles from its users."
>
> Clear enough? Of course, you don't *get* it; but it should be clear
> enough.
>
>> Hmmm? What is the reason you do not want to read ANY posts from Google
>> Groups, Oh Blinking One?
>
> I've never been bashful about explaining my reasons. Hell, I created a
> whole web site about the issue, and the link is never further away than
> my sig. So why do I have to reinvent the wheel for you here? You know
> how to read websites, right? So no more hand-holding. Follow the link
> if you wish to become educated. Blinky out -- on this topic, as far as
> repeating everything that's there, for you.
>
>

I know the reason, and so do you. You give new meaning to the
characterization
of sharks as prehistoric creatures.

The "watering down of Usenet," as though Usenet is some precious pool
instead
of the cesspool it has always been.

What a steaming crock of horseshit. You're an assbackwards elitist, yet
another
person trying to elevate himself by denigrating others according to your
prejudices.
Blecch.

You suck, Blinky. It would be bad enough without your being so damned
pleased
with your suckyass self.

Ick, ick, ick.

Nancy Young wrote:


> "cybercat" > wrote
>
>> "Nancy Young" > wrote
>
>>> Sure they can, they decide what they prefer not to print. You don't
>>> like that example, Warren Jeffs and his pals certainly censor what
>>> their people can read. There are lots of examples.
>>>
>>>
>> My point was, in a venue where free communication is rather the point
>> (Usenet) an nntp that tells you that you can have your posting
>> privileges revoked for disagreeing in Usenet is not very useful.
>
> I wasn't disagreeing with you. I was debating the meaning of the word
> censor.

People are sloppy. Analogous to what you're talking about are the people
who, if I said, "I don't like people from South Dakota", would call me
"racist" when that's not a racial statment. It's easy to cry "censorship"
and "racism"; but it's only *meaninful* if you know what the two *are*.


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project --> http://improve-usenet.org
Found 5/08: a free GG-blocking news *feed* --> http://usenet4all.se

cybercat wrote:

> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
> news
> > cybercat wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
> >> news > >>> cybercat wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
> >>>> news > >>>>> cybercat wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
> >>>>>> e...
> >>>>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> than be censored in that way.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is
a
> >>>>>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech,
> >>>>>> not
> >>>>>> your
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
> >>>>> a branch of government.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to Usenet.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
> >>>>
> >>>> You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts
via
> >>>
> >>> No, I do not define spam that way. Not even close.
> >>>
> >>>> Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid.
> >>>> Period.
> >>>
> >>> I suppose you don't have any locks on your doors. I do. I will
choose
> >>> who I wish interaction with, online and offline.
> >>>
> >>> The *right* to association is not a demand for association.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> The assumption underlying your killfiling ALL people posting from
Google
> >> Groups is what?
> >
> > "The worthwhile Gropers are few enough to be insignificant to me in the
> > scope of the lame-brains and spammers; and because I dislike the
> > watering-down of Usenet via web gateways, of which GG is the largest
> > offender, I choose not to cooperate by reading articles from its users."
> >
> > Clear enough? Of course, you don't *get* it; but it should be clear
> > enough.
> >
> >> Hmmm? What is the reason you do not want to read ANY posts from Google
> >> Groups, Oh Blinking One?
> >
> > I've never been bashful about explaining my reasons. Hell, I created a
> > whole web site about the issue, and the link is never further away than
> > my sig. So why do I have to reinvent the wheel for you here? You know
> > how to read websites, right? So no more hand-holding. Follow the link
> > if you wish to become educated. Blinky out -- on this topic, as far as
> > repeating everything that's there, for you.
> >
> >
>
> I know the reason, and so do you. You give new meaning to the
> characterization
> of sharks as prehistoric creatures.
>
> The "watering down of Usenet," as though Usenet is some precious pool
> instead
> of the cesspool it has always been.
>
> What a steaming crock of horseshit. You're an assbackwards elitist, yet
> another
> person trying to elevate himself by denigrating others according to your
> prejudices.
> Blecch.
>
> You suck, Blinky. It would be bad enough without your being so damned
> pleased
> with your suckyass self.
>
> Ick, ick, ick.


I wonder how much more time - if any - Blinky (or anyone) will be willing to
waste on you after your above bi - polar l'il diatribe...

It's no wonder blake and Ophelia are just about your only comrades here...

"Birds of a feather" and such - like...but do carry on, I've not had so much
fun since seeing Mothra Hughes' and Sheryl Rosen's melt downs.

:-)

--
Best
Greg

" I find Greg Morrow lowbrow, witless, and obnoxious. For him to claim that
we are some
kind of comedy team turns my stomach."
- "cybercat" to me on rec.food.cooking

"Blinky the Shark" > wrote

> Nancy Young wrote:

>> I wasn't disagreeing with you. I was debating the meaning of the word
>> censor.
>
> People are sloppy. Analogous to what you're talking about are the people
> who, if I said, "I don't like people from South Dakota", would call me
> "racist" when that's not a racial statment. It's easy to cry "censorship"
> and "racism"; but it's only *meaninful* if you know what the two *are*.

I'm not agreeing that only government can censor. Religions have
certainly been known to practice censorship to their followers. Just
for giggles I googled censorship, they mention corporate censorship
and other media censorship.

The right to freedom of speech, that's another matter.

nancy

"Kiss-The-CooK.110mb" wrote:


> Here...I only have to mention http://www.kiss-the-cook.110mb.com/ and
> YOU ****ing low life slut scum bags start screaming blue ****ing
> murder!!!!!! RIGHT ???

> Where is the free speech SLUT ?

> The ONLY speech "allowed" here is what YOU low life scum of the earth
> sluts and NAZI ****s DICTATE !!!

> You maggot !



Q: What is Aussie-talk for an ear of corn?
A: Corn on the yob.

"Gregory Morrow" > wrote in message
...
>
> cybercat wrote:
>
>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>> news
>> > cybercat wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>> >> news >> >>> cybercat wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote in message
>> >>>> news >> >>>>> cybercat wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> "Sven Svensson" > wrote in message
>> >>>>>> e...
>> >>>>>>> cybercat wrote , at 2008-05-29 00:13:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> than be censored in that way.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Sorry but that service is not run by a government or equal. It is
> a
>> >>>>>>> private server, hence no censoring can be done.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech,
>> >>>>>> not
>> >>>>>> your
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>> >>>>> a branch of government.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> juvenile opinions on what should or should not be posted to
>> >>>>>> Usenet.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> So, for the record, you favor spam. It's "free speech", after all.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You define "spam" as anything you don't want to see. Like all posts
> via
>> >>>
>> >>> No, I do not define spam that way. Not even close.
>> >>>
>> >>>> Google Groups. It's asinine, exclusionist, juvenile, and stooooopid.
>> >>>> Period.
>> >>>
>> >>> I suppose you don't have any locks on your doors. I do. I will
> choose
>> >>> who I wish interaction with, online and offline.
>> >>>
>> >>> The *right* to association is not a demand for association.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> The assumption underlying your killfiling ALL people posting from
> Google
>> >> Groups is what?
>> >
>> > "The worthwhile Gropers are few enough to be insignificant to me in the
>> > scope of the lame-brains and spammers; and because I dislike the
>> > watering-down of Usenet via web gateways, of which GG is the largest
>> > offender, I choose not to cooperate by reading articles from its
>> > users."
>> >
>> > Clear enough? Of course, you don't *get* it; but it should be clear
>> > enough.
>> >
>> >> Hmmm? What is the reason you do not want to read ANY posts from Google
>> >> Groups, Oh Blinking One?
>> >
>> > I've never been bashful about explaining my reasons. Hell, I created a
>> > whole web site about the issue, and the link is never further away than
>> > my sig. So why do I have to reinvent the wheel for you here? You know
>> > how to read websites, right? So no more hand-holding. Follow the link
>> > if you wish to become educated. Blinky out -- on this topic, as far as
>> > repeating everything that's there, for you.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I know the reason, and so do you. You give new meaning to the
>> characterization
>> of sharks as prehistoric creatures.
>>
>> The "watering down of Usenet," as though Usenet is some precious pool
>> instead
>> of the cesspool it has always been.
>>
>> What a steaming crock of horseshit. You're an assbackwards elitist, yet
>> another
>> person trying to elevate himself by denigrating others according to your
>> prejudices.
>> Blecch.
>>
>> You suck, Blinky. It would be bad enough without your being so damned
>> pleased
>> with your suckyass self.
>>
>> Ick, ick, ick.
>
>
> I wonder how much more time - if any - Blinky (or anyone) will be willing
> to
> waste on you after your above bi - polar l'il diatribe...
>
> It's no wonder blake and Ophelia are just about your only comrades here...
>
> "Birds of a feather" and such - like...but do carry on, I've not had so
> much
> fun since seeing Mothra Hughes' and Sheryl Rosen's melt downs.
>
> :-)
>

This is Usenet, not a social club, you fetid waste of air. I read, I post, I
really don't get that emotionally involved.

I also *drive* which is something else that is apparently beyond you.

Here's a clue for you, gasbag: calling a steaming crock of shit a steaming
crock of shit does not amount to a "meltdown." "Blinky knows damned
well his whole Google Groups fetish is juvenile. He's just airing stupid
prejudices like a status seeking high-school kid. Unnbecoming as hell
in a man of any age, but particularly of his age.

Perfectly nice, interesting, intelligent people post via Google Groups
all the time. To suggest that using Usenet only for Usenet access is
some sort of ****ing feather-in-one's-cap is just stupid.

It annoys me to see otherwise intelligent people deposit turds like this
on the screen.

Speaking of which:

*flush*~ ~ ~

oops, there goes another middle-aged Queen

lalalala LA.

Nancy Young skrev:
> "Blinky the Shark" > wrote
>
>> cybercat wrote:
>
>>> It's a private, censoring server. Usenet is all about free speech, not
>>> your
>> Censorship is a governmental thing. A private news server is not
>> a branch of government.
>
> Newspaper editors
> censor copy all the time.

No. Since you have other channels to publish your work.

> nancy
>